endourology

Endourology
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在泌尿外科实践中,放置双J支架的常规程序旨在促进上泌尿系统的引流。尽管其临时性和及时清除的必要性,由于各种原因,这些支架中约有12%保留在患者体内,持续时间较长。遗忘的输尿管支架可导致并发症,增加患者的发病率和死亡率。本报告讨论了双J支架由于长期使用而钙化的情况,需要在联合手术中移除。
    In urological practice, the routine procedure of placing a double J stent aims to facilitate drainage of the upper urinary system. Despite its temporary nature and the necessity for timely removal, approximately 12% of these stents are retained in patients for extended durations due to various reasons. Forgotten ureteral stents can lead to complications that increase the morbidity and mortality of patients. This report discusses a case of the double J stent that became calcified due to prolonged use and needed to be removed in a combined procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:良性前列腺增生(BPH)是影响全球老年男性的常见泌尿系统疾病。在BPH可用的治疗方案中,经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)是侵入性干预的金标准.为了降低与TURP相关的不可忽视的发病率,射精丢失率,住院治疗,失血和插管时间已经开发了几种激光技术,例如前列腺的Thulium激光摘除术(ThuLEP)。为了研究ThuLEP作为良性前列腺增生(BPH)治疗选择的疗效,我们在MoriggiaPelascini医院(Como,意大利)2015年1月至2018年9月。
    方法:我们纳入了265例患者,这些患者在特定的医院在确定的日期之间接受了ThuLEP。各种参数的数据,包括后空隙残留物体积,尿流率峰值(Qmax),排尿症状的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS),IPSS生活质量(QoL)评分,勃起功能障碍的国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)评分,在基线和随访时收集。
    结果:分析显示排尿效率显着提高,尿流,泌尿症状,生活质量,和勃起功能后ThuLEP。此外,某些基线特征,比如后空隙残留物,尿流率峰值,年龄,前列腺体积,和阿司匹林的使用,被发现影响治疗结果。
    结论:尽管研究有局限性,这些发现有助于了解ThuLEP在治疗BPH方面的有效性,并有助于为患者护理做出明智的临床决策.建议进行具有较长随访期的前瞻性研究以验证和扩展这些结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common urological condition affecting aging men worldwide. Among the treatment options available for BPH, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold-standard invasive intervention. To reduce the TURP-related non-negligible morbidity, loss-of-ejaculation rate, hospitalization, blood loss and catheterization time several laser techniques have been developed, such as the Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuLEP). To investigate the efficacy outcomes of the ThuLEP as a treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) we performed a retrospective observational study at Moriggia Pelascini Hospital (Como, Italy) between January 2015 and September 2018.
    METHODS: We included 265 patients who underwent ThuLEP at a specific hospital between defined dates. Data on various parameters, including post-void residue volume, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) for urinary symptoms, IPSS Quality of Life (QoL) score, and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score for erectile dysfunction, were collected at baseline and follow-up.
    RESULTS: The analysis revealed significant improvements in voiding efficiency, urinary flow, urinary symptoms, quality of life, and erectile function following ThuLEP. Furthermore, certain baseline characteristics, such as post-void residue, peak urinary flow rate, age, prostate volume, and aspirin usage, were found to influence treatment outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite the study\'s limitations, these findings contribute to understanding ThuLEP\'s effectiveness in managing BPH and can aid in making informed clinical decisions for patient care. Prospective studies with longer follow-up periods are recommended to validate and extend these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自二十多年前推出以来,手术激光已用于泌尿系结石的碎石术,膀胱肿瘤切除术,膀胱颈切口,前列腺摘除术.对安全使用钬激光器的担忧导致了潜在的过度和过于谨慎的剧院法规。我们旨在评估在腔内使用激光的单个部位的先入为主的印象和实践模式。
    我们设计了一个由三部分组成的在线问卷,可以使用智能设备或计算机进行访问。这项调查已分发给我们单一地点所有参与激光手术的手术室工作人员,包括外科手术,护理,和不同资历的麻醉人员。它询问了有关钬激光安全性的问题,提供了有关激光器安全使用的已发表文献的最新摘要,并最终为参与者提供了进一步的选择,以更改先前遇到的几个问题的答案。
    共有54名剧院工作人员完成了调查,包括17名手术室护士(31.5%),10名泌尿科顾问(18.5%),8名泌尿外科注册师(14.8%),7家麻醉药注册商(13%),4名麻醉顾问(7.4%)。大约51.9%的参与者认为目前的激光安全协议是足够的,38.9%的人发现他们过度。在阅读了最近发布的有关激光安全的信息后,22.2%的人认为目前的激光安全措施是足够的(减少57%),77.8%的人认为它们是过度的(增加100%)。大约74.1%的参与者发现激光安全护目镜会损害他们的视力,79.6%的参与者会选择不佩戴。
    严格的激光安全指南反映了在手术室使用钬激光的风险被高估。应重新评估激光安全法规,以符合当前研究和设备固有的潜在危险。在这样做的时候,更有效地分配工作人员可以使更多的人获得激光手术,从而减少患者发病率和医院等待时间。
    UNASSIGNED: Since its introduction over two decades ago, the surgical laser has served in the lithotripsy of urinary calculi, resection of bladder tumours, bladder neck incisions, and prostate enucleation. Concerns regarding the safe use of holmium lasers have resulted in potentially excessive and overly precautious theatre regulations. We aimed to evaluate the preconceived impressions and practice patterns at a single site surrounding laser use in endourology.
    UNASSIGNED: We designed a three-part online questionnaire that could be accessed using a smart device or computer. This survey was distributed to all theatre staff involved in laser surgery at our single site, including surgical, nursing, and anaesthetic staff of varying seniority. It asked questions regarding holmium laser safety, provided an up-to-date summary of published literature surrounding the safe use of lasers, and finally gave participants further option to alter the answers to several previously encountered questions.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 54 theatre staff completed the survey, including 17 theatre nurses (31.5%), 10 urology consultants (18.5%), 8 urology registrars (14.8%), 7 anaesthetic registrars (13%), 4 anaesthetic consultants (7.4%). About 51.9% of participants believed that current laser safety protocols were adequate, with 38.9% finding them excessive. After reading recently published information on laser safety, 22.2% thought current laser safety measures were adequate (57% decrease) and 77.8% found them to be excessive (100% increase). About 74.1% of participants found that laser safety goggles impair their vision and that 79.6% would choose not to wear them if they were optional.
    UNASSIGNED: Strict laser safety guidelines reflect an overestimated risk associated with using holmium laser in operating theatres. Laser safety regulations should be re-evaluated to align with current research and potential hazards inherent to the device. In doing so, a more effective distribution of staff could enable greater access to laser surgery, thereby reducing patient morbidity and hospital wait times.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:创新扩散理论解释了思想或产品如何随着时间的推移在特定人群或社会系统中获得动力并扩散(或传播)。该理论分析了新思想传播的主要影响者,包括创新本身,沟通渠道,时间,和社会制度。
    方法:当前的研究回顾了已发表的医学文献,以确定人工智能(AI)在腔内科学中的研究和应用,并利用E.M.Rogers的创新扩散理论来分析在腔内科学护理中采用AI的主要影响因素。获得的见解被分类并优先考虑到与AI应用程序相关的行动项目或“提示”,以促进最有价值的内在创新的适当传播。
    结果:已发表的医学文献表明,AI仍然是一种基于研究的工具,在临床实践中并未广泛使用。已发表的研究提出了人工智能模型和算法来协助检测结石疾病(n=17),管理结果的预测(n=18),手术过程的优化(n=9),以及石病化学和成分的阐明(n=24)。促进适当采用内生人工智能的五个提示是:(1)制定/优先考虑培训计划,以建立有效使用的基础;(2)创建适当的数据基础设施以实施,包括其随着时间的推移的维护和演变;(3)提供AI透明度,以获得内在泌尿学利益相关者的信任;(4)在持续质量改进(CQI)计划-做-研究-法案(PDSA)周期的背景下采用创新,因为这些方法已经证明了改善护理质量的跟踪记录;(5)对AI目前可以/不能做的事情保持现实,并记录以建立共同理解的基础。
    结论:创新扩散理论提供了一个框架,用于分析在腔内护理中采用AI的影响因素。通过这项研究确定的五个技巧可用于促进最有价值的内在创新的适当传播。
    Introduction: Diffusion of Innovation Theory explains how ideas or products gain momentum and diffuse (or spread) through specific populations or social systems over time. The theory analyzes primary influencers of the spread of new ideas, including the innovation itself, communication channels, time, and social systems. Methods: The current study reviewed published medical literature to identify studies and applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in endourology and used E.M. Rogers\' Diffusion of Innovation Theory to analyze the primary influencers of the adoption of AI in endourological care. The insights gained were triaged and prioritized into AI application-related action items or \"tips\" for facilitating the appropriate diffusion of the most valuable endourological innovations. Results: Published medical literature indicates that AI is still a research-based tool in endourology and is not widely used in clinical practice. The published studies have presented AI models and algorithms to assist with stone disease detection (n = 17), the prediction of management outcomes (n = 18), the optimization of operative procedures (n = 9), and the elucidation of stone disease chemistry and composition (n = 24). Five tips for facilitating appropriate adoption of endourological AI are: (1) Develop/prioritize training programs to establish the foundation for effective use; (2) create appropriate data infrastructure for implementation, including its maintenance and evolution over time; (3) deliver AI transparency to gain the trust of endourology stakeholders; (4) adopt innovations in the context of continuous quality improvement Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles as these approaches have proven track records for improving care quality; and (5) be realistic about what AI can/cannot currently do and document to establish the basis for shared understanding. Conclusion: Diffusion of Innovation Theory provides a framework for analyzing the influencers of the adoption of AI in endourological care. The five tips identified through this research may be used to facilitate appropriate diffusion of the most valuable endourological innovations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估内镜下结石手术对儿童肾脏灌注和血流的影响。
    方法:接受经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的儿童,逆行肾内手术(RIRS),输尿管肾镜检查(URS),内镜联合肾内手术(ECIRS)纳入研究.术前1天进行肾多普勒超声检查(RDUS),术后第1天和第1个月。测量收缩期峰值速度(PSV)和舒张末期速度(EDV),电阻指数(RI)用(PSV-EDV)/PSV公式计算。比较手术前后以及同侧和对侧肾脏之间的RDUS参数。
    结果:共纳入45名中位年龄为8(2-17)岁的儿童(15名(33.3%)女孩,30名(66.7%)男孩)。13名儿童(28.9%)进行了PCNL,RIRS11(24.4%),URS12(26.7%),和ECIRS9(20%)。肾脏和节段性PSV无显著差异,术前肾脏的EDV和RI值,术后期间。在术前或术后期间,同侧和对侧肾脏的RDUS参数之间没有显着差异。术前未行DJ支架组术后第1个月的PSV和EDV值均明显高于有DJ支架组(分别为p=0.031,p=0.041)。然而,RI值相似。每个时期的平均RI低于阈值0.7。
    结论:RDUS参数在儿童中没有显着差异。在小儿结石疾病中可以安全地进行内窥镜手术。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of endoscopic stone surgeries on renal perfusion and blood flow in children.
    METHODS: Children who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), ureterorenoscopy (URS), endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) were included to the study. Renal Doppler ultrasonography (RDUS) was performed one day before the operation, and on the postoperative 1st day and 1st month. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) were measured, and resistive index (RI) was calculated with the (PSV-EDV)/PSV formula. RDUS parameters were compared before and after surgery and between ipsilateral and contralateral kidneys.
    RESULTS: A total of 45 children with a median age was 8 (2-17) years were included (15 (33.3%) girls, 30 (66.7%) boys). PCNL was performed in 13 children (28.9%), RIRS 11 (24.4%), URS 12 (26.7%), and ECIRS 9 (20%). There was no significant difference in renal and segmental PSV, EDV and RI values of operated kidney in the preoperative, postoperative periods. There was no significant difference between RDUS parameters of the ipsilateral and contralateral kidneys in preoperative or postoperative periods. PSV and EDV values were significantly higher in the 1st postoperative month in the group without preoperative DJ stent than in the group with DJ stent (p = 0,031, p = 0,041, respectively). However, RI values were similar. The mean RI were below the threshold value of 0.7 in each period.
    CONCLUSIONS: RDUS parameters didn\'t show a significant difference in children. Endoscopic surgeries can be safely performed in pediatric stone disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾穹窿破裂(FR)是梗阻性尿路病变的独特并发症。这项研究旨在确定由于输尿管结石阻塞而出现肾绞痛的患者中FR的预测因素。
    获得伦理批准后,在2016年至2020年期间,我们审查了来自沙特阿拉伯3家国民警卫队医院的患者的电子记录,以确定出现肾绞痛并因梗阻性输尿管结石而被诊断为FR的患者(FR组).选择由于阻塞输尿管结石而没有FR而出现肾绞痛的连续患者作为对照组(非FR组)。患者按年龄组(<30、30-40、41-50和>50岁)分组,体重指数(BMI)等级,性别,合并症,肾积水等级,结石在输尿管中的位置,石头的大小(<3毫米,3-7毫米,且>7毫米),和石头以前的地位。比较了基线患者和结石特征,并进行回归分析以确定FR的预测因子.
    共确定了50例FR患者,选择50例无FR患者的对照组。基线患者和结石人口统计学特征(P=0.42),性别(P=0.275),BMI(P=0.672),合并症,肾积水分级(P=0.201),FR组和非FR组之间的结石位置(P=0.639)具有可比性。然而,两组间结石大小差异有统计学意义(P=0.014).在多变量分析中,研究发现,结石大小与FR发生率显著增加相关(比值比[OR]:6.5[1.235-34.434];P=0.027).此外,年龄在30~40岁之间的人群患FR的风险可能较低(OR:0.262[0.069~0.999];P=0.049).
    这项多中心研究表明,大小为3-7毫米的结石发生FR的机会增加了六倍,30至40岁的年龄组患FR的风险可能较低.
    UNASSIGNED: Renal forniceal rupture (FR) is a unique complication of obstructive uropathy. This study aimed to identify the predictors of FR among patients presenting with renal colic due to obstructing ureteral calculi.
    UNASSIGNED: After obtaining ethics approval, electronic records of patients from three National Guard hospitals in Saudi Arabia were reviewed between 2016 and 2020 to identify patients who presented with renal colic and were diagnosed with FR due to obstructive ureteric stones (FR group). An equivalent number of consecutive patients presenting with renal colic due to obstructing ureteric stones without FR was selected as a control group (non-FR group). Patients were grouped according to age group (<30, 30-40, 41-50, and >50 years), body mass index (BMI) class, gender, comorbidities, grade of hydronephrosis, location of the stone in the ureter, size of the stone (<3 mm, 3-7 mm, and >7 mm), and stone former status. Baseline patients\' and stone characteristics were compared, and a regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of FR.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 50 patients with FR were identified, and a control group of 50 patients without FR were selected. The baseline patients\' and stone demographic characteristics in terms of age (P = 0.42), gender (P = 0.275), BMI (P = 0.672), comorbidity, grade of hydronephrosis (P = 0.201), and stone location (P = 0.639) were comparable between the FR group and the non-FR group. However, the stone size was statistically significant between both groups (P = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, it was found that the stone size was associated with a significantly higher increase in the incidence of FR (odds ratio [OR]: 6.5 [1.235-34.434]; P = 0.027). Furthermore, the age group between 30 and 40 years was potentially at a lower risk for FR (OR: 0.262 [0.069-0.999]; P = 0.049).
    UNASSIGNED: This multicenter study showed that the stone size 3-7 mm had a six-fold increase in the chance of FR, and the age group between 30 and 40 years is potentially at a lower risk for FR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在体外表征和比较使用前输尿管支架(STENTS)的表面。
    方法:我们的体外实验包括六个未使用的STENTS模型:三个带侧孔的双尾纤(ImaJin和Stenostent[Coloplast©,法国],TriaSoft[BostonScientific©,美国]),两个没有侧孔的双尾纤(Vortek-TumorStent[Coloplast©,法国],尿路软-肿瘤支架[Bard-Angiomed©,德国])和一根单尾纤(J-Fil[Rocamed©,摩纳哥])。支架由聚氨酯制成,除了ImaJin(硅酮)。对于所有支架,在高分辨率扫描电子显微镜下对支架的四个部分进行了具体分析(HR-SEM,FEI-XL40[飞利浦©,法国]):表面核心,侧孔,输尿管环,和黑色标记表面。用来自三个不同支架的三个不同样品重复每个实验。STENTS分析包括多个缺陷搜索,定义为不规则>10μm。
    结果:所有支架均存在缺陷,没有明显差异。缺陷主要位于支架环上和侧孔上。对于无侧孔的支架(J-Fil,Urosoft)缺陷也有报道,在斜面切口以及远端环孔上。标记表面检查发现了Urosoft的缺陷和ImaJin和Stenostent的缺陷。与其他支架相比,Triasoft在标记表面上呈现更好的光滑度。在J-Fil和ImaJin的环路远端孔上报告了其他物质,但所有支架均呈现不规则的横截面aeras。
    结论:所有输尿管支架在使用前并不完全光滑。无论支架成分或形状如何,都会发现缺陷,并可能在结壳现象中发挥作用,与内心的不规则联系在一起,感染,和尿液成分。制造和材料都可能对支架外表面的光滑度产生影响。
    方法:
    OBJECTIVE: To characterize and compare in vitro the surfaces of ureteral stents (STENTS) before utilization.
    METHODS: Our in vitro experiment included six unused STENTS models: three double-pigtail with side orifices (ImaJin and Stenostent [Coloplast©,France], TriaSoft [BostonScientific©,USA]), two double-pigtail without side orifice (Vortek-TumorStent [Coloplast©,France], Urosoft-TumorStent [Bard-Angiomed©,Germany]) and one single-pigtail (J-Fil [Rocamed©,Monaco]). STENTS were made of polyurethane except for ImaJin (silicone). For all STENTS, four parts of the stent were specifically analyzed under high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM,FEI-XL40 [Philips©,France]): surface core, lateral orifice, ureteral loop, and black marking surface. Each experiment was repeated with three different samples from three different stents. STENTS analysis included multiple imperfection searches, defined as irregularities>10μm.
    RESULTS: All STENTS presented imperfections with no discernible differences. Imperfections were mainly located on the stent loop and on the lateral orifice. For STENTS without side orifice (J-Fil, Urosoft) imperfections were also reported, on the beveled cut as well as the distal loop orifice. Marking surfaces examinations found defects in the Urosoft and imperfections in the ImaJin and Stenostent. The Triasoft presented a better smoothness on marking surfaces compared to other STENTS. Additional matter was reported on the loop distal orifice for J-Fil and ImaJin but all STENTS presented irregular cross-sectional aeras.
    CONCLUSIONS: All ureteral stents are not perfectly smooth even before utilization. Imperfections were noticed regardless to stent composition or shape, and could play a role in the incrustation phenomenon, is association with inner irregularities, infection, and urine composition. Both manufacturing and material could have an impact on the stent external surface\'s smoothness.
    METHODS:
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估在术前URS同意过程中使用视频-同意可能的有益效果。
    方法:前瞻性随机试验于2022年3月至2022年9月在意大利的两个三级医疗中心进行。患者被随机分为两组:A组(标准口头/书面知情同意书)和B组(视频支持的知情同意书)。我们调查了两种类型的知情同意对术前和术后用STAI问卷评估的患者焦虑水平的影响。此外,我们评估了知情同意对术后疼痛的影响,用VAS量表测量,以及住院期间求助次数作为次要结果。评估与整个过程相关的满意度,我们要求患者以1-10的等级对他们的经历进行评分,其中1表示“不满意”,10表示“完全满意”。\"
    结果:总体而言,每组166例患者以1:1随机分组。根据多元回归模型,视频辅助知情同意书显著增加了术后与术前STAI之间的差异,降低焦虑程度。视频辅助知情同意书可显著预测住院期间的援助电话数量。
    结论:输尿管镜检查的视频同意是提高患者满意度和对手术意识的有效工具。视频同意能够减少患者在术后期间与手术和援助电话相关的焦虑,从而产生一个有用的工具来管理一个更好的知情同意书。
    Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the possible benefits of using video consent in the preoperative ureteroscopy (URS) consent process. Material and Methods: Prospective randomized trials took place at two Italian tertiary-care centers from March 2022 to September 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (standard verbal/written informed consent) and Group B (informed consent supported by video). We investigated the impact of both types of informed consent on patient anxiety levels using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire both pre- and post-consent. In addition, using the Visual Analogue Scale, analysis of the effect of informed consent on postoperative pain and the number of calls for assistance during hospitalization as secondary outcomes was done. To assess the satisfaction level related to the whole process, patients were asked to rate their experience on a scale of 1-10, with 1 indicating \"not satisfied\" and 10 indicating \"completely satisfied.\" Results: Overall, 166 patients were randomized 1:1 in each group. The multivariable regression model demonstrated that video-assisted informed consent significantly increased the difference between post- and pre-consent STAI with a reduced level of anxiety. The video-assisted informed consent significantly predicted the number of assistance calls during hospitalization. Conclusions: Video consent for ureteroscopies is a valid tool to improve procedure awareness and satisfaction. Video consent is able to reduce procedure-related patient anxiety and postoperative assistance calls, thus proving to be useful in obtaining better-informed consent for endourological procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胃镜检查相关的肌肉骨骼损伤(ERI)是常见的胃肠道,肺,鼻部,泌尿外科内镜医师,影响医疗系统。本综述旨在比较ERI率,危险因素,以及不同内窥镜领域的人体工程学建议。使用PubMed和Cochrane图书馆对基于调查的文章进行了审查,并发表至2024年1月10日。人口统计,工作,包括46种出版物的ERI数据,涵盖10539名响应者。ERI发生率介于14%和97%之间,强调独立于专业的干预需要。脖子,回来,和肩膀是最常见的ERI位置,而性别,年龄,多年的经验,和手术量是最常见的风险因素。人体工程学建议建议集中在内窥镜设计变更上,尤其是在胃肠内窥镜检查中,为了增加舒适度,手术室设备的适应性,和工作流程/机构政策的变化。包含一个符合人体工程学的超时保证正确的设备定位,中和内窥镜医师的姿势,和程序之间的间接中断。应推广人体工程学训练,以提高认识和最佳实践,也使用新技术。未来的研究应集中于干预和比较研究,以评估预防措施和新设计的设备在多大程度上可以减少ERI发生率。
    Endoscopy-related musculoskeletal injuries (ERIs) are frequent among gastrointestinal, pulmonary, nasal, and urologic endoscopists, impacting the healthcare system. The present review aims to compare the ERI rates, risk factors, and ergonomic recommendations in the different endoscopic fields. A review was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library for articles based on surveys and published until 10 January 2024. Demographic, work, and ERI data from 46 publications were included, covering 10,539 responders. The ERI incidence ranged between 14% and 97%, highlighting the need of intervention independent of the specialties. The neck, back, and shoulder were the most frequent ERI locations, while gender, age, years of experience, and procedure volume the most common risk factors. Ergonomic recommendations suggest concentrating on endoscope design changes, especially in gastrointestinal endoscopy, to increase the comfort, adaptability of the equipment in the operating room, and workflow/institutional policy changes. The inclusion of an ergonomic timeout guarantees the correct equipment positioning, the neutralisation of the endoscopist\'s posture, and an indirect break between procedures. Ergonomic training to increase awareness and best practice should be promoted, also using new technologies. Future research should concentrate on intervention and comparative studies to evaluate to which extent prevention measures and newly designed equipment could reduce ERI incidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号