end-stage liver disease

终末期肝病
  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    End-stage liver disease is a life-threatening clinical syndrome combined with a state of immune dysfunction. In this constellation patients are prone to bacterial, fungal and viral infections associated with markedly increased morbidity and mortality rates. Bacterial infections are the most prevalent kind of infection in patients with end-stage liver disease accounting for nearly 30%. The evolving rates of multidrug resistant organisms present enormous challenges in treatment strategies. Therefore, the urgent needs for prevention, early detection strategies and widespread treatment options are a necessity to handle the rising incidence of infection complications in end-stage liver disease.
    UNASSIGNED: Die Leberzirrhose im Endstadium ist ein lebensbedrohliches klinisches Syndrom, das mit Funktionsstörungen des Immunsystems einhergeht. In dieser Lage neigen Patienten zu Infektionen mit bakteriellen, pilzlichen und viralen Erregern, assoziiert mit einer deutlich erhöhten Morbidität und Mortalität. Am häufigsten sind bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose im Endstadium bakterielle Infektionen; sie machen einen Anteil von fast 30 % aus. Die wachsende Verbreitung multiresistenter Erreger stellt hinsichtlich der Behandlungsstrategien eine enorme Herausforderung dar. Daher besteht ein dringender Bedarf an Präventionsmaßnahmen, Früherkennungsstrategien und breit verfügbaren Therapieoptionen. All diese Ansätze sind erforderlich, wenn die steigende Inzidenz infektionsassoziierter Komplikationen bei Leberzirrhose im Endstadium bewältigt werden soll.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管终末期肝病(ESLD)患者肺动脉高压(PH)的诊断和治疗策略取得了进展,通过右心导管插入术(RHC)确定的ESLD患者的血流动力学模式对临床结局的影响尚不清楚.
    这项单中心回顾性队列研究确定了2018年8月至2023年6月接受RHC的诊断为ESLD的患者。人口统计学和临床数据,包括合并症,经胸超声心动图,和RHC的发现,已获得。我们感兴趣的结果是全因死亡率和RHC后一年内接受原位肝移植(OLT)的机会。采用对数秩检验的Kaplan-Meier生成存活曲线。
    我们确定了415名具有RHC结果的ESLD患者。中位年龄(IQR)为59岁(52-66),62%为男性。白种人占43%,其次是非洲裔美国人(30%)。高达89%的人被诊断为门静脉高压症。MELD-Na评分中位数为30(19-36)。ESLD的病因主要来自酒精使用(55%)。根据RHC结果将患者分类为毛细血管前PH(19%),毛细管后PH(28%),和非PH(53%)组。总的来说,RHC后一年死亡率为22%,与血流动力学组无关,死亡率无显著差异。然而,与其他组相比,毛细血管前PH组接受OLT的可能性较小(P<0.001).
    我们观察到血流动力学组的全因死亡率无差异。然而,与其他组相比,毛细血管前PH组不太可能接受OLT。需要进一步的调查以确定在临床实践中应如何解决这一问题。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite advances in the diagnosis and therapeutics strategies for pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), the impact of hemodynamic patterns among ESLD patients identified through right heart catheterization (RHC) on clinical outcomes remains poorly understood.
    UNASSIGNED: This single-center retrospective cohort study identified patients diagnosed with ESLD who underwent RHC from August 2018 to June 2023. Demographic and clinical data, including comorbidities, transthoracic echocardiography, and RHC findings, were obtained. Our outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and the chance of receiving orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) within a year after RHC. Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test was employed to generate survival curves.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 415 ESLD patients with the RHC results. The median (IQR) age was 59 years (52-66), and 62% were male. Caucasians accounted for 43%, followed by African Americans (30%). Up to 89% had a diagnosis of portal hypertension. Median MELD-Na score was 30 (19-36). The etiology of ESLD was mainly from alcohol use (55%). Patients were classified based on RHC results as pre-capillary PH (19%), post-capillary PH (28%), and non-PH (53%) groups. Overall, one-year mortality post-RHC was 22%, with no significant difference in mortality regardless of hemodynamic group. However, the pre-capillary PH group was less likely to receive OLT compared to other groups (P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: We observed no difference in all-cause mortality among hemodynamic groups. However, pre-capillary PH group were less likely to undergo OLT compared to others. Further investigations are necessary to determine how this should be addressed in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹水,肝硬化的严重并发症,显着影响患者的发病率和死亡率,尤其是黑人患者。已提出获得疾病优化护理作为这种差异的潜在驱动因素。在这项研究中,我们评估跨种族和族裔群体的TIPS利用率。
    方法:我们检查了连续D部分覆盖的20%美国医疗保险参保者的随机样本数据。我们需要在肝硬化诊断前连续门诊登记180天,所有患者在肝硬化诊断180天内有≥1次穿刺。时间零点是第一次穿刺的日期。我们评估了TIPS放置的可能性。进行分析以确定每个结果与种族/民族之间的独立关联。
    结果:5915例患者(平均年龄68.2,64.4%为男性)纳入分析。439名(7.4%)患者被确定为黑人,223(3.8%)为西班牙裔,和4942(83.6%)为白色。在多变量分析中与白人患者相比,黑人患者接受TIPS手术的可能性较小(风险比0.4;95%置信区间(CI)0.2-0.8),并且在医院外存活的天数较少(-100.5;95%CI-189.4--11.6)。种族和种族之间的无移植生存率或每年的平行数没有显着差异。
    结论:Black患者在控制常见患者和疾病特异性变量时,接受TIPS程序的可能性较小。获得最佳的专业服务可能是种族和族裔之间肝硬化患者结果差异的重要驱动因素。
    BACKGROUND: Ascites, a severe complication of cirrhosis, significantly impacts patient morbidity and mortality especially in Black patients. Access to disease optimizing care has been proposed as a potential driver of this disparity. In this study, we evaluate TIPS utilization across racial and ethnic groups.
    METHODS: We examined data from a 20% random sample of US Medicare enrollees with continuous Part D coverage. We required 180 days of continuous outpatient enrollment prior to cirrhosis diagnosis and all patients had ≥1 paracentesis within 180 days of their cirrhosis diagnosis. Time zero was the date of the first paracentesis. We assessed the likelihood of TIPS placement. Analyses were conducted to determine the independent associations between each outcome and race/ethnicity.
    RESULTS: 5915 patients (average age 68.2, 64.4% male) were included in the analysis. 439 (7.4%) patients were identified as Black, 223 (3.8%) as Hispanic, and 4942 (83.6%) as white. When compared to white patients in a multivariable analysis, Black patients were less likely to receive a TIPS procedure (hazard ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.8) and had less days alive outside of the hospital (-100.5; 95% CI -189.4 - -11.6). There were no significant differences in transplant-free survival or number of paracenteses per year between ethnic and racial groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Black patients are less likely to receive a TIPS procedure when controlling for common patient- and disease-specific variables. Access to optimal specialized services may be a significant driver for disparities in outcomes of patients with cirrhosis between racial and ethnic groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝脏再移植(reLT)历来相对于原发性肝移植(LT)的存活率较低。为了改善reLT后的结果,研究人员已经确定了预测reLT后总体存活(OS)和/或移植物存活(GS)的因素.本系统综述和随机效应荟萃分析旨在总结该文献,以阐明reLT后最强的独立预测因子。
    在多变量Cox比例风险分析中进行了系统评价,以确定影响生存的手稿报告因素。排除具有重叠队列的论文。
    所有25项纳入研究均为回顾性研究,15例(60%)为单中心研究.移植前通气的患者(HR,3.11;95%CI,1.56-6.20;p=0.001)和高血清肌酐(HR,1.46;95%CI,1.15-1.87;p=0.002)在reLT后死亡风险最高。收件人年龄,终末期肝病评分模型,供体年龄,冷缺血时间>12小时也赋予了reLT后死亡的显着风险(所有p<0.05)。影响GS的因素包括供体年龄和再移植间隔(LT和reLT之间的时间;均p<0.05)。当再移植间隔≤7天时,OS明显高于8-30天(p=0.04)。
    由于论文使用非标准化的截止值对变量进行分组,因此荟萃分析变得复杂,这使得研究之间的比较变得困难。然而,它确实确定了7个变量,这些变量显着影响reLT后的生存率,这可能会刺激未来的研究来改善reLT后的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Liver retransplantation (reLT) has historically had inferior survival relative to primary liver transplant (LT). To improve outcomes after reLT, researchers have identified factors predicting overall (OS) and/or graft survival (GS) after reLT. This systematic review and random effects meta-analysis sought to summarize this literature to elucidate the strongest independent predictors of post-reLT.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review was conducted to identify manuscripts reporting factors affecting survival in multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Papers with overlapping cohorts were excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: All 25 included studies were retrospective, and 15 (60%) were single-center studies. Patients on pre-transplant ventilation (HR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.56-6.20; p = 0.001) and with high serum creatinine (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.15-1.87; p = 0.002) had the highest mortality risk after reLT. Recipient age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, donor age, and cold ischemia time >12 h also conferred a significant risk of post-reLT death (all p < 0.05). Factors affecting GS included donor age and retransplant interval (the time between LT and reLT; both p < 0.05). OS is significantly higher when the retransplant interval is ≤7 days relative to 8-30 days (p = 0.04).
    UNASSIGNED: The meta-analysis was complicated by papers utilizing non-standardized cut-off values to group variables, which made between-study comparisons difficult. However, it did identify 7 variables that significantly impact survival after reLT, which could stimulate future research into improving post-reLT outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:2型糖尿病(T2DM)对等待肝移植(LT)的终末期肝病(ESLD)患者的影响尚不明确。本研究的目的是评估LT等待列表注册患者中T2DM与临床结局之间的关系。我们假设T2DM的存在将与更差的临床结果相关。
    方法:在2010年1月1日至2017年1月1日期间登记接受LT的593例成人(18岁或以上)患者被纳入本回顾性分析。2型糖尿病对肝脏相关临床事件(LACE)的影响,生存,住院治疗,需要肾脏替代治疗,并在12个月内评估接受LT的可能性.LACE被定义为静脉曲张出血,肝性脑病,和腹水。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析来确定T2DM与临床结局之间的关联。
    结果:T2DM的基线患病率为32%(n=191),T2DM患者更容易发生食管静脉曲张(61%vs.47%,p=0.002)和静脉曲张出血病史(23%vs.16%,p=0.03)。2型糖尿病的存在与腹水的风险增加相关(HR1.91,95%CI1.11,3.28,p=0.019)。T2DM患者更有可能需要住院治疗(56%vs.49%,p=0.06),门脉高压相关并发症住院(22%vs.14%;p=0.026),住院期间需要肾脏替代治疗。T2DM患者接受LT的可能性较小(37%vs.45%;p=0.03)。关于MELD实验室,2型糖尿病患者在每次随访时胆红素均显著降低;然而,INR和肌酐无差异.
    结论:T2DM患者的临床结局风险增加。此风险未记录在MELD评分中,这可能会对他们接受LT的可能性产生负面影响。
    OBJECTIVE: Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) awaiting liver transplantation (LT) remains poorly defined. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between T2DM and clinical outcomes among patients with LT waitlist registrants. We hypothesize that the presence of T2DM will be associated with worse clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: 593 patients adult (age 18 years or older) who were registered for LT between 1/2010 and 1/2017 were included in this retrospective analysis. The impact of T2DM on liver-associated clinical events (LACE), survival, hospitalizations, need for renal replacement therapy, and likelihood of receiving LT were evaluated over a 12-month period. LACE was defined as variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to determine the association between T2DM and clinical outcomes.
    RESULTS: The baseline prevalence of T2DM was 32% (n = 191) and patients with T2DM were more likely to have esophageal varices (61% vs. 47%, p = 0.002) and history of variceal hemorrhage (23% vs. 16%, p = 0.03). The presence of T2DM was associated with increased risk of incident ascites (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.11, 3.28, p = 0.019). Patients with T2DM were more likely to require hospitalizations (56% vs. 49%, p = 0.06), hospitalized with portal hypertension-related complications (22% vs. 14%; p = 0.026), and require renal replacement therapy during their hospitalization. Patients with T2DM were less likely to receive a LT (37% vs. 45%; p = 0.03). Regarding MELD labs, patients with T2DM had significantly lower bilirubin at each follow-up; however, no differences in INR and creatinine were noted.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with T2DM are at increased risk of clinical outcomes. This risk is not captured in MELD score, which may potentially negatively affect their likelihood of receiving LT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于并非所有肝功能障碍患者都适合移植,并且移植物短缺,肝支持疗法已经引起了人们的兴趣。在这方面,体外白蛋白透析设备,如单程白蛋白透析(SPAD),普罗米修斯,和分子吸附剂回收系统(MARS)在补充标准药物治疗(SMT)方面具有重要价值。然而,这些设备的有效性和安全性经常受到质疑。目的:我们进行了系统评价,以总结MARS的疗效和安全性,SPAD,和普罗米修斯作为肝功能障碍的支持性治疗。
    PubMed,Medline,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,和GoogleScholar电子数据库被广泛搜索所有以英文发表的随机试验。此外,荟萃分析使用ReviewManager软件进行,和Cochrane的偏见风险工具嵌入在该软件用于偏见评估。
    包括总共653名患者在内的12项试验符合纳入条件。对这些试验数据的亚组分析显示,与SMT相比,MARS和Prometheus与胆红素的显着去除有关(MD=-5.14mg/dl;95%CI:-7.26--3.02;p<0.00001和MD=-8.11mg/dl;95%CI:-12.40--3.82;p=0.0002),但与SMT相比,胆汁酸和氨无关。此外,MARS在降低胆红素方面与普罗米修斯和SPAD一样有效(MD=2.98mg/dl;95%CI:-4.26-10.22;p=0.42和MD=0.67mg/dl;95%CI:-2.22-3.56;p=0.65),胆汁酸(MD=-17.06µmol/l;95%CI:-64.33-30.20;p=0.48,MD=16.21µmol/l;95%CI:-17.26-49.68;p=0.34),和氨(MD=26μmol/l;95%CI:-12.44-64.44;p=0.18)。此外,MARS在改善肝性脑病(HE)方面具有相当大的作用(RR=1.54;95%CI:1.15-2.05;p=0.004)。然而,与SMTRR相比,MARS和普罗米修斯均无死亡率获益(分别为0.86;95%CI:0.71-1.03;p=0.11,RR=0.87;95%CI:0.66-1.14;p=0.31).
    火星,SPAD,还有普罗米修斯,作为肝脏支持疗法,在减少白蛋白结合和水溶性物质方面同样有效。此外,MARS与他的进步有关。然而,所有治疗均未显著降低死亡率或不良事件.
    UNASSIGNED: Because not all liver dysfunction patients are suitable for transplantations and there is a shortage of grafts, liver support therapies have gained interest. In this regard, extracorporeal albumin dialysis devices such as single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD), Prometheus, and molecular adsorbent recycling system (MARS) have been valuable in supplementing standard medical therapy (SMT). However, the efficacy and safety of these devices is often questioned.Aim: We performed a systematic review to summarize the efficacy and safety of MARS, SPAD, and Prometheus as supportive treatments for liver dysfunction.
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar electronic databases were extensively searched for all randomized trials published in English. In addition, meta-analytic analyses were performed with Review Manager software, and Cochrane\'s risk of bias tool embedded in this software was used for bias assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: Twelve trials including a total of 653 patients were eligible for inclusion. Subgroup analyses of data from these trials revealed that MARS and Prometheus were associated with significant removal of bilirubin (MD = -5.14 mg/dl; 95% CI: -7.26 - -3.02; p < 0.00001 and MD = -8.11 mg/dl; 95% CI: -12.40 - -3.82; p = 0.0002, respectively) but not bile acids and ammonia when compared to SMT. Furthermore, MARS was as effective as Prometheus and SPAD in the reduction of bilirubin (MD = 2.98 mg/dl; 95% CI: -4.26 - 10.22; p = 0.42 and MD = 0.67 mg/dl; 95% CI: -2.22 - 3.56; p = 0.65), bile acids (MD = -17.06 µmol/l; 95% CI: -64.33 - 30.20; p = 0.48 and MD = 16.21 µmol/l; 95% CI: -17.26 - 49.68; p = 0.34), and ammonia (MD = 26 µmol/l; 95% CI: -12.44 - 64.44; p = 0.18). In addition, MARS had a considerable effect in improving hepatic encephalopathy (HE) (RR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.15-2.05; p = 0.004). However, neither MARS nor Prometheus had a mortality benefit compared to SMTRR (0.86; 95% CI: 0.71-1.03; p = 0.11 and RR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.66-1.14; p = 0.31, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: MARS, SPAD, and Prometheus, as liver support therapies, are equally effective in reducing albumin-bound and water-soluble substances. Moreover, MARS is associated with HE improvement. However, none of the therapies was associated with a significant reduction in mortality or adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全球慢性肝病(CLD)的负担正在增加,最终的治疗方法是肝移植。由于巴基斯坦是一个发展中国家,由于资源有限,肝移植不容易获得。这项研究旨在评估CLD患者的肝移植,并找到符合条件的肝移植候选人的频率。
    方法:对2022年6月至2022年12月的CLD患者进行了横断面观察性研究。总胆红素,血清肌酐全血细胞计数,血清电解质,和国际标准化比率(INR)。计算终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分,并确定符合条件的肝移植患者的频率。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第22版输入和分析数据(IBMCorp.,Armonk,NY,美国)。
    结果:在我们的研究中,149例患者入选,平均年龄46.81±15.7岁。男性占58.7%,女性占41.6%。肝硬化的平均病程为18.22±11.7个月。平均MELD评分为20.71±5.2。常见的肝硬化阶段为II期,II期分别为32.2%。15.4%的患者存在肝细胞癌(HCC)。有25.5%的患者符合肝移植条件。
    结论:在我们的研究中,我们发现大量CLD患者符合肝移植条件.
    BACKGROUND: The burden of chronic liver disease (CLD) is increasing globally and the ultimate treatment is a liver transplant. As Pakistan is a developing country, liver transplantation is not easily available due to limited resources. This study aims to assess the patients with CLD for liver transplantation and to find the frequency of eligible candidates for liver transplantation.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on patients with CLD from June 2022 to December 2022. Total bilirubin, serum creatinine complete blood count, serum electrolytes, and international normalised ratio (INR) were done. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was calculated and the frequency of eligible patients for liver transplant was determined. Data was entered and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
    RESULTS: In our study, 149 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 46.81±15.7 years. There were 58.7% male and 41.6% female patients. The mean duration of liver cirrhosis was 18.22±11.7 months. The mean MELD score was 20.71±5.2. The common liver cirrhosis stages were stage II and stage II was found in 32.2% of each. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was present in 15.4% of patients. There were 25.5% of patients eligible for liver transplants.
    CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we found that significant numbers of patients with CLD were eligible for liver transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    姑息治疗对于终末期肝病(ESLD)患者通常是次优的。腹水仍然是ESLD中最常见的并发症。尽管长期腹腔引流(LTAD)通常用于难治性恶性腹水,ESLD的标准治疗是医院引流(大体积穿刺(LVP)).正在进行的美国国立卫生与护理研究所(NIHR)资助的试验(REDUCe2研究)(ISRCTN269936824)将姑息性LTAD与ESLD中的LVP进行比较。这个35个地点的试验是在英国进行的,苏格兰和威尔士。
    了解医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对在ESLD中使用姑息性LTAD的看法和经验。
    在2019年8月至12月之间使用了一项电子调查,该调查包括七个带有固定定量选项的问题和三个探索性问题。该调查通过英国肝脏研究协会通讯以电子方式分发,并分发到英格兰东南部和伦敦东北部的相关医院部门。在初次邀请调查后的4周和8周发送了电子邮件提醒。
    有211名受访者(肝病专家(36.5%),专科护士(24.6%),胃肠病学家(16.6%),学员(17%)和其他人(5.2%))。所有受访者都可以使用LVP,86%的患者接受经颈静脉肝内门体分流术,67%到LTAD,10%到其他选项,如自动低流量腹水(ALFA)泵。调查的大多数受访者(68%)报告了他们使用LTAD的经验。几乎所有受访者(91%)都愿意在ESLD中考虑LTAD。然而,这方面的主要威慑因素是感知到的感染风险(90%),其次是社区的LTAD管理(57%)。有使用LTAD经验的患者中约有51%报告了患者的临床并发症(包括出血,感染和肾功能损害),41%的人报告了技术问题,35%的人报告了社区支持不足。
    由于ESLD,几乎所有的HCP都愿意在难治性腹水中考虑姑息性LTAD,但主要的威慑因素是感知到的感染风险和缺乏指导社区管理的公开数据。REDUCe2审判将澄清这些担忧是否真实,并提供关于角色的确凿证据,如果有的话,在这个脆弱的和正在研究的ELD队列中,姑息性LTAD。
    UNASSIGNED: Palliative care is often suboptimal for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Ascites remains the most common complication in ESLD. Though long-term abdominal drains (LTAD) are commonly used in refractory malignant ascites, the standard care for ESLD is hospital drainage (large volume paracentesis (LVP)). There is an ongoing National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) funded trial (REDUCe 2 Study) (ISRCTN269936824) comparing palliative LTAD to LVP in ESLD. This 35-site trial is being conducted in England, Scotland and Wales.
    UNASSIGNED: To understand the views and experience of healthcare professionals (HCP) on the use of palliative LTAD in ESLD.
    UNASSIGNED: An electronic survey comprised of seven questions with fixed quantitative options and three exploratory questions was used between August-December 2019. The survey was distributed electronically via the British Association for Study of Liver newsletter and to relevant hospital departments in Southeast England and Northeast London. An email reminder was sent at 4 and 8 weeks after the initial invitation to the survey.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 211 respondents (hepatologists (36.5%), specialist nurses (24.6%), gastroenterologists (16.6%), trainees (17%) and others (5.2%)). All respondents had access to LVP, 86% to a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure for patients, 67% to LTADs and 10% to other options, such as the automated low-flow ascites (ALFA) pump. The majority of respondents to the survey (68%) reported their experience of using LTAD. Almost all respondents (91%) were willing to consider LTAD in ESLD. However, the main deterrents of this were the perceived risk of infection (90%), followed by LTAD management in community (57%). Some 51% of those with prior experience of using LTAD reported clinical complications for patients (including bleeding, infection and renal impairment), 41% reported technical issues and 35% inadequate community support.
    UNASSIGNED: Almost all HCPs are willing to consider palliative LTAD in refractory ascites due to ESLD, but the main deterrents are the perceived infection risk and lack of published data to guide community management. The REDUCe 2 trial will clarify if these concerns are real and provide conclusive evidence on role, if any, of palliative LTADs in this vulnerable and under researched cohort with ESLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    活体肝移植(LDLT)是终末期肝病患者的有效治疗方法。进行这项研究是为了评估在乌兹别克斯坦共和国进行的最初一系列LDLT手术的结果,并证明在该国的条件下肝移植是可行的。
    在2021年10月至2023年12月之间,我们进行了40次LDLT。我们评估了近期和长期结果。
    肝动脉血栓形成1例(2.5%)。3例(7.5%)诊断为动脉吻合狭窄,并通过血管内球囊扩张成功治疗。3例患者(7.5%)出现脾动脉盗血综合征,并通过脾动脉血管内栓塞治疗。一名患者(2.5%)发生门静脉血栓形成。2例患者(5%)在移植后10个月发生门静脉狭窄,采用血管内球囊血管成形术治疗,产生良好的临床结果。在45%的病例中观察到胆道并发症,胆汁渗漏占这些问题的89%,胆道吻合狭窄占11%。住院死亡率为12.5%。
    我们对并发症的研究结果和分析与国际文献一致,在肝移植计划的实施阶段,结果被认为是可以接受的。因此,肝移植在乌兹别克斯坦共和国是可行的;然而,必须改进手术和治疗方法,以最大程度地减少术后早期和晚期并发症的发生。
    UNASSIGNED: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease. This study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of the initial series of LDLT procedures performed in the Republic of Uzbekistan and to demonstrate that liver transplantation is viable under the conditions in this country.
    UNASSIGNED: Between October 2021 and December 2023, we performed 40 LDLTs. We evaluated both immediate and long-term outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Thrombosis of the hepatic artery developed in one case (2.5%). Arterial anastomotic stenoses were diagnosed in three cases (7.5%) and were successfully treated with endovascular balloon vasodilation. Splenic artery steal syndrome arose in three patients (7.5%) and was managed with endovascular embolization of the splenic artery. One patient (2.5%) developed portal vein thrombosis. Portal vein stenosis occurred in two patients (5%) at 10 months posttransplantation and was addressed with endovascular balloon angioplasty, yielding good clinical outcomes. Biliary complications were observed in 45% of the cases, with bile leakages accounting for 89% of these issues and strictures of the biliary anastomoses for 11%. The in-hospital mortality rate was 12.5%.
    UNASSIGNED: Our research findings and analysis of complications align with the international literature, and the results are deemed acceptable during this implementation phase of the liver transplantation program. Accordingly, liver transplantation is feasible in the Republic of Uzbekistan; however, improvements in surgical and therapeutic methods are necessary to minimize the development of both early and late postoperative complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了研究大剂量静脉(IV)铁的肝脏效应,包括肝功能和纤维化程度,在肝硬化的大鼠模型中。
    方法:我们将25只Sprague-Dawley大鼠均匀分为5组:正常大鼠(对照组),肝硬化大鼠接受静脉生理盐水(肝硬化[LC]组),和肝硬化大鼠接受20、40或80mg/kg静脉铁羧基麦芽糖(LC-iron20,LC-iron40和LC-iron80组,分别)。在0、7、14、21和28天比较生化参数。评估肝纤维化和铁沉积的程度。还比较了炎症和氧化应激标志物。
    结果:LC-iron20,LC-iron40和LC-iron80组的28天血清丙氨酸转氨酶水平没有显着差异(对照组为69±7、1003±127、1064±309、919±346和820±195/IU,LC,LC-iron20、LC-iron40和LC-iron80基团,分别)。肝脏铁积累以剂量依赖性方式增加,但各组之间的肝纤维化程度相当。根据IV铁剂量,炎症和氧化应激标志物水平没有显着差异。
    结论:在我们的肝硬化大鼠模型中,以各种高剂量给予静脉铁似乎是安全的。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hepatic effects of high-dose intravenous (IV) iron, including those on liver function and the degree of fibrosis, in a rat model of cirrhosis.
    METHODS: We evenly allocated 25 Sprague-Dawley rats into five groups: normal rats (control group), cirrhotic rats receiving IV normal saline (liver cirrhosis [LC] group), and cirrhotic rats receiving 20, 40, or 80 mg/kg IV ferric carboxymaltose (LC-iron20, LC-iron40, and LC-iron80 group, respectively). Biochemical parameters were compared at 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The degrees of hepatic fibrosis and iron deposition were evaluated. Inflammatory and oxidative stress markers were also compared.
    RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the 28-day serum alanine aminotransferase levels among the LC-iron20, LC-iron40, and LC-iron80 groups (69 ± 7, 1003 ± 127, 1064 ± 309, 919 ± 346, and 820 ± 195 IU/L in the control, LC, LC-iron20, LC-iron40, and LC-iron80 groups, respectively). Hepatic iron accumulation increased in a dose-dependent manner, but the degree of hepatic fibrosis was comparable among the groups. The inflammatory and oxidative stress marker levels did not differ significantly according to the IV iron dose.
    CONCLUSIONS: Administration of IV iron at various high doses appears safe in our rat model of cirrhosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号