Background: Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) often require Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission during the disease trajectory, but aggressive medical treatment has not resulted in increased quality of life for patients or caregivers. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes relevant data thematically exploring the current state of serious illness communication in the ICU with identification of barriers and potential strategies to improve performance. We provide a conceptual model underscoring the importance of providing comprehensible disease and prognosis knowledge, eliciting patient values and aligning these values with available goals of care options through a series of discussions. Achieving effective serious illness communication supports the delivery of goal concordant care (care aligned with the patient\'s stated values) and improved quality of life. Results: General barriers to effective serious illness communication include lack of outpatient serious illness communication discussions; formalized provider training, literacy and culturally appropriate patient-directed serious illness communication tools; and unoptimized electronic health records. ESLD-specific barriers to effective serious illness communication include stigma, discussing the uncertainty of prognosis and provider discomfort with serious illness communication. Evidence-based strategies to address general barriers include using the Ask-Tell-Ask communication framework; clinician training to discuss patients\' goals and expectations; PREPARE for Your Care literacy and culturally appropriate written and online tools for patients, caregivers, and clinicians; and standardization of documentation in the electronic health record. Evidence-based strategies to address ESLD-specific barriers include practicing with empathy; using the \"Best-Case, Worst Case\" prognostic framework; and developing interdisciplinary solutions in the ICU. Conclusion: Improving clinician training, providing patients and caregivers easy-to-understand communication tools, standardizing EHR documentation, and improving interdisciplinary communication, including palliative care, may increase goal concordant care and quality of life for critically ill patients with ESLD.

BACKGROUND: The challenge of transplant waiting-lists is to provide organs for all candidates while maintaining efficiency and equity.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the probability of being transplanted or of waiting-list dropout in Italy.
METHODS: Data from 12,749 adult patients waitlisted for primary liver-transplantation from January 2012 to December 2022 were collected from the National Transplant-Registry.The cohort was divided into Eras:1 (2012-2014);2 (2015-2018);and 3 (2019-2022).
RESULTS: The one-year probability of undergoing transplant increased (67.6 % in Era 1vs73.8 % in Era 3,p < 0001) with a complementary 46 % decrease in waiting-list failures. Patients with hepatocellular-carcinoma were transplanted more often than cirrhotics[at model for end-stage liver-disease (MELD)-15:HR = 1.28,95 %CI:1.21-1.35;at MELD-25:HR = 1.04,95 %CI:0.92-1.19) and those with other indications (at MELD-15:HR = 1.27,95 %CI:1.11-1.46) across all eras. Candidates with Hepatitis-B-virus (HBV)related disease had a greater probability of transplant than those with Hepatitis-C virus-related (HR = 1.13,95 %CI:1.07-1.20), alcohol-related (HR = 1.13,95 %CI:1.05-1.21), and metabolic-related (HR = 1.18,95 %CI:1.09-1.28)disease. Waiting-list failures increased by 27 % every 5 MELD-points and by 14 % for every 5-year increase in recipient-age and decreased by 10 % with each 10-cm increase in stature. Blood-group O patients showed the highest probability of waiting-list failure (HR = 1.28,95 %CI:1.15-1.43).
CONCLUSIONS: Liver-transplantation waiting-list success-rates have significantly improved in Italy, with patients with hepatocellular-carcinoma and/or HBV-related diseases being favored. High MELD-score, old-age, short-stature, and blood-group O were significant risk-factors for waiting-list failure. Efforts to improve organ-allocation and prioritization-policies are underway.

Sarcopenia, characterized by the loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, is a significant complication in patients with cirrhosis. This condition not only exacerbates the overall morbidity and mortality associated with liver disease but also complicates patient management, increasing the risk of hospitalization, infections, and hepatic encephalopathy. Despite its clinical significance, sarcopenia in cirrhotic patients remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. This review aims to summarize current knowledge on the pathophysiology of sarcopenia in cirrhosis, including mechanisms such as altered metabolism, hormonal imbalances, and inflammation. Additionally, we explore diagnostic challenges and discuss emerging therapeutic strategies, including nutritional support, exercise, and pharmacological interventions. By highlighting the gaps in existing research and proposing directions for future studies, this review seeks to improve the management and outcomes of cirrhotic patients affected by sarcopenia.

BACKGROUND: Data to guide dialysis decision-making for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the processes, predictors, and outcomes of renal replacement therapy (RRT) initiation for transplant-ineligible patients with cirrhosis at a single liver transplantation center.
METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study of a retrospective cohort of 372 transplant-ineligible inpatients with cirrhosis with acute kidney injury (AKI) due to hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-AKI) or acute tubular necrosis (ATN) between 2008 and 2015. We performed survival analyses to evaluate 6-month survival and renal recovery and examined end-of-life care outcomes. We used a consensus-driven medical record review to characterize processes leading to RRT initiation.
RESULTS: We identified 266 (71.5%) patients who received RRT and 106 (28.5%) who did not receive RRT (non-RRT). Median survival was 12.5 days (RRT) vs. 2.0 days (non-RRT) (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.28-0.46); 6-month survival was 15% (RRT) vs. 0% (non-RRT). RRT patients were more likely to die in the intensive care unit (88% vs. 32%, p < 0.001). HRS-AKI patients were more likely to be RRT dependent at 6 months than ATN patients (86% vs. 27%, p = 0.007). The most common reasons for RRT initiation were unclear etiology of AKI on presentation (32%) and belief of likely reversibility of ATN (82%).
CONCLUSIONS: Most transplant-ineligible patients who were initiated on RRT experienced very short-term mortality and received intensive end-of-life care. However, approximately 1 in 6 were alive at 6 months. Our findings underscore the critical need for structured clinical processes to support high-quality serious illness communication and RRT decision-making for this population.

BACKGROUND: Chronic liver disease (CLD) in children, often leads to cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease (ESLD). CLD poses significant challenges in management and prognosis. Assessing body composition, including sarcopenia, is increasingly recognized as important in understanding outcomes in this population.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study, involving children aged 2 to 18 years with ESLD awaiting liver transplantation. Socio-demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and body composition was assessed using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA). Sarcopenia was defined using age-specific cut-off points for appendicular skeletal muscle mass (aSMM) and fat-free mass (FFM).
RESULTS: The study included 57 children (42.1% girls, 57.9% boys; median age: 10.9 years) with liver cirrhosis. Of them 11 (19.3%) died during the study. The mean duration of living with end-stage liver disease prior to participation was 5.43 years [IQR: 3.32, 8.39]. The most common etiology was biliary atresia (24.6%), followed by cryptogenic (22.8%). Deceased children exhibited significantly higher sarcopenia prevalence, lower basal metabolic rate and growth scores compared to survivors (P < 0.05), (771.0 vs. 934.0, P = 0.166) (65.0 vs. 80.5, P = 0.005). Total body and limb-specified lean mass were lower in deceased children, although not statistically significant. Similarly, total mineral (90% normal) and bone mineral content were lower in deceased children, with a significant difference observed only in water-to-FFM percentage (72.5 vs. 73.1, P = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high prevalence of sarcopenia among children with ESLD and its association with adverse outcomes, including mortality. Bioimpedance analysis emerges as a promising, non-invasive method for assessing body composition in pediatric ESLD, warranting further investigation and integration into clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) slows disease progression among patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), yet not all patients receive this standard-of-care medication. Our study aims to identify reasons why PBC patients did not receive the recommended UDCA treatment.
METHODS: Using medical record data collected by the Fibrotic Liver Disease (FOLD) Consortium for 2006-2016, we identified PBC patients from a single site with no UDCA therapy record. Two independent reviewers used a structured data collection instrument to systematically confirm and record the reasons for the lack of treatment.
RESULTS: Among 494 PBC patients (11% men and 13.2% Black patients) with a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 35 (7%) had never received UDCA (16% men and 24% Black patients). Of these, 18 (51%) had laboratory indications of PBC but were not formally diagnosed. Among the remaining 17 patients with recognized PBC, six were never offered UDCA, seven declined treatment, and four remained untreated despite being offered treatment. We did not find a statistically significant association between the lack of PBC diagnosis and treatment and patients\' age (p = 0.139), gender (p = 0.222), race (p = 0.081), or insurance coverage (p = 0.456), perhaps due to our small sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors influencing the lack of evaluation and treatment in PBC patients were identified at the provider and patient levels. The most common reasons included financial barriers, loss to follow-up, severe decompensated disease at diagnosis, and lack of referral to specialists for further evaluation. Future interventions targeting modifiable provider and patient barriers may improve rates and timeliness of PBC diagnosis and treatment.

The prevalence and mortality related to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) continue to rise globally. Liver transplant (LT) recipients continue to be older and have inherently more comorbidities. Among these, cardiac disease is one of the three main causes of morbidity and mortality after LT. Several reasons exist including the high prevalence of associated risk factors, which can also be attributed to the rise in the proportion of patients undergoing LT for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Additionally, as people age, the prevalence of now treatable cardiac conditions, including coronary artery disease (CAD), cardiomyopathies, significant valvular heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, and arrhythmias rises, making the need to treat these conditions critical to optimize outcomes. There is an emerging body of literature regarding CAD screening in patients with ESLD, however, there is a paucity of strong evidence to support the guidance regarding the management of cardiac conditions in the pre-LT and perioperative settings. This has resulted in significant variations in assessment strategies and clinical management of cardiac disease in LT candidates between transplant centres, which impacts LT candidacy based on a transplant centre\'s risk tolerance and comfort level for caring for patients with concomitant cardiac disease. Performing a comprehensive assessment and understanding the potential approaches to the management of ESLD patients with cardiac conditions may increase the acceptance of patients, who appear too complex, but rather require extra evaluation and may be reasonable candidates for LT. The unique physiology of ESLD can profoundly influence preoperative assessment, perioperative management, and outcomes associated with underlying cardiac pathology, and requires a thoughtful multidisciplinary approach. The strategies proposed in this manuscript attempt to review the latest expert experience and opinions and provide guidance to practicing clinicians who assess and treat patients being considered for LT. These topics also highlight the gaps that exist in the comprehensive care of LT patients and the need for future investigations in this field.

End-stage liver disease is a life-threatening clinical syndrome combined with a state of immune dysfunction. In this constellation patients are prone to bacterial, fungal and viral infections associated with markedly increased morbidity and mortality rates. Bacterial infections are the most prevalent kind of infection in patients with end-stage liver disease accounting for nearly 30%. The evolving rates of multidrug resistant organisms present enormous challenges in treatment strategies. Therefore, the urgent needs for prevention, early detection strategies and widespread treatment options are a necessity to handle the rising incidence of infection complications in end-stage liver disease.
UNASSIGNED: Die Leberzirrhose im Endstadium ist ein lebensbedrohliches klinisches Syndrom, das mit Funktionsstörungen des Immunsystems einhergeht. In dieser Lage neigen Patienten zu Infektionen mit bakteriellen, pilzlichen und viralen Erregern, assoziiert mit einer deutlich erhöhten Morbidität und Mortalität. Am häufigsten sind bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose im Endstadium bakterielle Infektionen; sie machen einen Anteil von fast 30 % aus. Die wachsende Verbreitung multiresistenter Erreger stellt hinsichtlich der Behandlungsstrategien eine enorme Herausforderung dar. Daher besteht ein dringender Bedarf an Präventionsmaßnahmen, Früherkennungsstrategien und breit verfügbaren Therapieoptionen. All diese Ansätze sind erforderlich, wenn die steigende Inzidenz infektionsassoziierter Komplikationen bei Leberzirrhose im Endstadium bewältigt werden soll.

UNASSIGNED: Despite advances in the diagnosis and therapeutics strategies for pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD), the impact of hemodynamic patterns among ESLD patients identified through right heart catheterization (RHC) on clinical outcomes remains poorly understood.
UNASSIGNED: This single-center retrospective cohort study identified patients diagnosed with ESLD who underwent RHC from August 2018 to June 2023. Demographic and clinical data, including comorbidities, transthoracic echocardiography, and RHC findings, were obtained. Our outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and the chance of receiving orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) within a year after RHC. Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test was employed to generate survival curves.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 415 ESLD patients with the RHC results. The median (IQR) age was 59 years (52-66), and 62% were male. Caucasians accounted for 43%, followed by African Americans (30%). Up to 89% had a diagnosis of portal hypertension. Median MELD-Na score was 30 (19-36). The etiology of ESLD was mainly from alcohol use (55%). Patients were classified based on RHC results as pre-capillary PH (19%), post-capillary PH (28%), and non-PH (53%) groups. Overall, one-year mortality post-RHC was 22%, with no significant difference in mortality regardless of hemodynamic group. However, the pre-capillary PH group was less likely to receive OLT compared to other groups (P < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: We observed no difference in all-cause mortality among hemodynamic groups. However, pre-capillary PH group were less likely to undergo OLT compared to others. Further investigations are necessary to determine how this should be addressed in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Ascites, a severe complication of cirrhosis, significantly impacts patient morbidity and mortality especially in Black patients. Access to disease optimizing care has been proposed as a potential driver of this disparity. In this study, we evaluate TIPS utilization across racial and ethnic groups.
METHODS: We examined data from a 20% random sample of US Medicare enrollees with continuous Part D coverage. We required 180 days of continuous outpatient enrollment prior to cirrhosis diagnosis and all patients had ≥1 paracentesis within 180 days of their cirrhosis diagnosis. Time zero was the date of the first paracentesis. We assessed the likelihood of TIPS placement. Analyses were conducted to determine the independent associations between each outcome and race/ethnicity.
RESULTS: 5915 patients (average age 68.2, 64.4% male) were included in the analysis. 439 (7.4%) patients were identified as Black, 223 (3.8%) as Hispanic, and 4942 (83.6%) as white. When compared to white patients in a multivariable analysis, Black patients were less likely to receive a TIPS procedure (hazard ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.8) and had less days alive outside of the hospital (-100.5; 95% CI -189.4 - -11.6). There were no significant differences in transplant-free survival or number of paracenteses per year between ethnic and racial groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Black patients are less likely to receive a TIPS procedure when controlling for common patient- and disease-specific variables. Access to optimal specialized services may be a significant driver for disparities in outcomes of patients with cirrhosis between racial and ethnic groups.