end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)

终末期肾病 ( ESKD )
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病是一种以高血糖为特征的代谢紊乱。近年来,由于发病率和患病率的增加,T2DM已成为世界性的健康问题。糖尿病肾病(DKD)是糖尿病的毁灭性后果之一,尤其是由于2型糖尿病,DKD的主要临床表现是肾功能减弱和进行性蛋白尿。DKD影响约1/3的糖尿病患者,T2DM是终末期肾病(ESKD)的主要病因。一些研究已经观察到维生素D缺乏与II型糖尿病的进展和病因之间的关联。新兴的实验证据表明,T2DM与各种肾脏疾病有关。最近的证据还表明,足细胞中VDR(维生素D受体)信号的改变导致DKD。本综述旨在探讨维生素D代谢及其与T2DM的相关性。此外,我们讨论了维生素D和VDR在糖尿病肾病中的潜在作用。
    Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder characterized by high blood sugar levels. In recent years, T2DM has become a worldwide health issue due to an increase in incidence and prevalence. Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the devastating consequences of diabetes, especially owing to T2DM and the key clinical manifestation of DKD is weakened renal function and progressive proteinuria. DKD affects approximately 1/3rd of patients with diabetes mellitus, and T2DM is the predominant cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Several lines of studies have observed the association between vitamin D deficiency and the progression and etiology of type II diabetes mellitus. Emerging experimental evidence has shown that T2DM is associated with various kinds of kidney diseases. Recent evidence has also shown that an alteration in VDR (vitamin D receptor) signaling in podocytes leads to DKD. The present review aims to examine vitamin D metabolism and its correlation with T2DM. Furthermore, we discuss the potential role of vitamin D and VDR in diabetic kidney disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:包皮免疫坏死性肾小球肾炎(PING)通常与抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体(ANCA)的存在有关,但相当多的患者没有这些抗体。在Berden对PING的分类中,ANCA否定的意义尚不清楚。
    方法:对所有1998年1月至2018年12月诊断为特发性PING的组织病理学诊断患者进行回顾性分析,而不考虑ANCA状态,并在肾脏门诊随访12个月以上。所有活检均按Berden分类重新分类。比较ANCA阳性和ANCA阴性患者的临床病理特征和肾脏结局。
    结果:在134名患者中,66例(49.5%)为ANCA阴性。平均年龄为34.76±13.3岁。与ANCA阳性患者相比,ANCA阴性患者的肾病性蛋白尿患病率明显更高(74.23%vs57.9%,P=0.036),肾外表现较少(P<0.05))。在组织学上,局灶性和新月形类占主导地位,全球硬化性肾小球数量较少(2.7%对5.07%,P=0.02)和更多的系膜增殖(22.7%对4.41%,P=0.002)在ANCA阴性组中,而硬化在ANCA阳性组中占主导地位(P=0.05)。在ANCA阴性患者中,更多的患者实现了完全和部分康复(42.4%vs20.5%,P<0.05)具有更好的肾脏生存率(27.27%vs16.17%,对数秩检验:P=0.03)和较低的患者死亡率(13.63%vs30.8%,对数秩检验:P=0.04),2年。
    结论:我们的研究证实了我们队列中ANCA阴性的高患病率,该组表现为孤立的肾脏受累,肾脏和患者的生存率更高。ANCA阳性组显示出明显更多的硬化类患者,较低的2年肾生存率,与ANCA阴性组相比,2年死亡率更高。然而,在ANCA阴性组中,对治疗的完全和部分缓解均显著较好.要点•这项研究表明,巴基斯坦人口中PING病例中ANCA消极性的患病率很高,因为这项研究中几乎一半的患者没有这些抗体。•这种消极情绪在亚洲人群中更为普遍,但在Berden对PING的分类中,其意义尚不清楚。•与ANCA阳性组相比,ANCA阴性组表现出不那么严重的表型和更好的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Pauci-immune necrotizing glomerulonephritis (PING) is commonly associated with the presence of antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs) but a significant number of patients do not have these antibodies. The significance of ANCA-negativity in the context of Berden\'s classification of PING is not known.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients with histopathological diagnosis of idiopathic PING irrespective of ANCA status diagnosed between January 1998 to December 2018 and followed up at renal clinic for > 12 months. All biopsies were reclassified by Berden\'s classification. Clinicopathological characteristics and renal outcomes of ANCA-positive and ANCA-negative patients were compared.
    RESULTS: Out of 134 patients, 66 (49.5%) were ANCA-negative. The mean age was 34.76 ± 13.3 years. Compared with the ANCA-positive patients, ANCA-negative patients had significantly greater prevalence of nephrotic-range proteinuria (74.23% Vs 57.9%, P = 0.036) with less extra-renal manifestations (P < 0.05)). On histology, focal and crescentic classes dominated with less number of globally sclerosed glomeruli (2.7% Vs 5.07%, P = 0.02) and more mesangial proliferation (22.7% Vs 4.41%, P = 0.002) in the ANCA-negative group, whereas sclerotic was predominant in the ANCA-positive group (P = 0.05). More patients achieved complete and partial recovery in ANCA-negative patients (42.4% Vs 20.5%, P < 0.05) with better renal survival (27.27% Vs 16.17%, log-rank test: P = 0.03) and less patient mortality (13.63% vs 30.8%, log-rank test: P = 0.04) at 2 years.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms high prevalence of ANCA negativity among our cohort and this group presents with isolated renal involvement with better renal and patient survival. The ANCA-positive group showed significantly more patients in the sclerotic class, lower 2-year renal survival, and higher 2-year mortality as compared to the ANCA-negative group. However, the complete and partial responses to treatment were significantly better in the ANCA-negative group. Key Points • This study shows a high prevalence of ANCA negativity in cases of PING in Pakistani population, as almost half of patients in this study did not have these antibodies. • This negativity is more prevalent in the Asian populations but its significance in the context of Berden\'s classification of PING is unknown. • ANCA-negative group exhibited less severe phenotype and better outcomes compared with ANCA-positive group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为终末期肾病(ESKD)患者实施高级护理计划(ACP),特别是在血液透析的背景下,提出了重大挑战。尽管现有的法律框架,在整个欧洲,提前护理计划实践的差异很明显。目前的观点引入了多学科模型,始于2019年。该模型包含一个由肾脏病学家组成的专业团队,一个心理学家,姑息治疗专家,和麻醉师/强化医生。通过这种合作方式,我们的目标是全面解决复杂的医疗问题,情感,和心理维度在预先护理计划中的应用。从这个角度来看,我们讨论我们模型的优势,它对欧洲肾脏病学的潜力,并倡导指南,以加强肾脏病学社区的预先护理计划实施。
    Implementing Advance Care Planning (ACP) for patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD), particularly in the context of hemodialysis, presents significant challenges. Despite existing legal frameworks, disparities in advance care planning practices are evident across Europe. The present perspective introduces a multidisciplinary model, initiated in 2019. This model incorporates a specialized team comprising a nephrologist, a psychologist, a palliative care specialist, and an anesthesiologist/intensivist. Through this collaborative approach, we aimed to comprehensively address the intricate medical, emotional, and psychological dimensions in advance care planning. In this point of view, we discuss the strengths of our model, its potential for European Nephrology, and advocate for guidelines to enhance advance care planning implementation within the nephrology community.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管缺乏临床试验数据,β-受体阻滞剂广泛用于透析患者。在透析人群中,与替代β受体阻滞剂相比,特定的β受体阻滞剂是否与改善的长期结局相关仍不确定。
    我们分析了一项国际队列研究的数据,该研究包括18个国家的10.125名维持性血液透析患者,这些患者在透析结果和实践模式研究(DOPPS)中新开了β受体阻滞剂的处方。比较了以下β受体阻滞剂:美托洛尔,阿替洛尔,比索洛尔和卡维地洛。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型来估计新处方的β受体阻滞剂与全因死亡率之间的关联。对有和没有心血管疾病病史的患者进行分层分析。
    队列中的平均(标准差)年龄为63(15)岁,57%的参与者为男性。最常用的β受体阻滞剂是美托洛尔(49%),其次是卡维地洛(29%),阿替洛尔(11%)和比索洛尔(11%)。与美托洛尔相比,阿替洛尔{校正风险比(HR)0.77[95%置信区间(CI)0.65-0.90]}与较低的死亡风险相关.与美托洛尔相比,比索洛尔[调整后HR0.99(95%CI0.82-1.20)]或卡维地洛[调整后HR0.95(95%CI0.82-1.09)]的死亡风险没有差异。这些结果在根据是否存在心血管疾病病史对患者进行分层时是一致的。
    在接受维持性血液透析的患者中,新开了β受体阻滞剂药物,与替代药物相比,阿替洛尔的死亡率风险最低.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite a lack of clinical trial data, β-blockers are widely prescribed to dialysis patients. Whether specific β-blocker agents are associated with improved long-term outcomes compared with alternative β-blocker agents in the dialysis population remains uncertain.
    UNASSIGNED: We analyzed data from an international cohort study of 10 125 patients on maintenance hemodialysis across 18 countries that were newly prescribed a β-blocker medication within the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). The following β-blocker agents were compared: metoprolol, atenolol, bisoprolol and carvedilol. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between the newly prescribed β-blocker agent and all-cause mortality. Stratified analyses were performed on patients with and without a prior history of cardiovascular disease.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean (standard deviation) age in the cohort was 63 (15) years and 57% of participants were male. The most commonly prescribed β-blocker agent was metoprolol (49%), followed by carvedilol (29%), atenolol (11%) and bisoprolol (11%). Compared with metoprolol, atenolol {adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.90]} was associated with a lower mortality risk. There was no difference in mortality risk with bisoprolol [adjusted HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.82-1.20)] or carvedilol [adjusted HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.82-1.09)] compared with metoprolol. These results were consistent upon stratification of patients by presence or absence of a prior history of cardiovascular disease.
    UNASSIGNED: Among patients on maintenance hemodialysis who were newly prescribed β-blocker medications, atenolol was associated with the lowest mortality risk compared with alternative agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在终末期肾病(ESKD)患者中使用血液透析滤过(HDF)作为肾脏替代疗法(KRT)引发了关于其优于常规血液透析(HD)的争论。本研究旨在通过比较接受HDF的ESKD患者和接受HD的患者之间的死亡率和特定于原因的死亡来阐明这一争议。
    随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析。搜索是使用PubMed进行的,EMBASE,和CochraneCentral在2023年7月1日。
    接受常规KRT治疗的ESKD成年患者。
    对接受HDF的参与者进行研究。
    主要结果是全因死亡率,心血管(CV)死亡率,与感染有关的死亡,和肾脏移植。我们还评估了与恶性肿瘤相关的死亡终点,心肌梗塞,中风,心律失常,突然死亡。
    我们包括评估HDF与HD的RCT。交叉试验和具有重叠群体的研究被排除。两位作者根据预定义的搜索标准和质量评估独立地提取数据。使用Cochrane的RoB2工具评估偏倚风险。
    我们纳入了4,143名患者的5个随机对照试验,其中2078人(50.1%)接受了HDF,而2,065(49.8%)正在接受HD。总的来说,HDF与全因死亡率风险较低相关(风险比[RR],0.81;95%置信区间[CI],0.73-0.91;P<0.001;I2=7%)和较低的CV相关死亡风险(RR,0.75;95%CI,0.61-0.92;P=0.007;I2=0%)。感染相关死亡的发生率在治疗之间也有显著差异(RR,0.69;95%CI,0.50-0.95;P=0.02;I2=26%)。
    在个别研究中,HDF组实现了不同水平的对流量。
    与接受HD的人相比,接受HDF的患者全因死亡率降低,CV死亡率,和感染相关的死亡率。这些结果提供了令人信服的证据,支持将HDF用作接受KRT的ESKD患者的有益干预措施。
    注册于PROSPERO:CRD42023438362。
    UNASSIGNED: The use of hemodiafiltration (HDF) as a kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has sparked a debate regarding its advantages over conventional hemodialysis (HD). The present study aims to shed light on this controversy by comparing mortality rates and cause-specific deaths between ESKD patients receiving HDF and those undergoing HD.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central on July 1, 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: Adult patients with ESKD on regular KRT.
    UNASSIGNED: Studies with participants undergoing HDF.
    UNASSIGNED: Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, deaths related to infections, and kidney transplant. We also evaluated the endpoints for deaths related to malignancy, myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmias, and sudden death.
    UNASSIGNED: We included RCTs evaluating HDF versus HD. Crossover trials and studies with overlapping populations were excluded. Two authors independently extracted the data following predefined search criteria and quality assessment. The risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane\'s RoB2 tool.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 5 RCTs with 4,143 patients, of which 2,078 (50.1%) underwent HDF, whereas 2,065 (49.8%) were receiving HD. Overall, HDF was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.91; P < 0.001; I2 = 7%) and a lower risk of CV-related deaths (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92; P = 0.007; I2 = 0%). The incidence of infection-related deaths was also significantly different between therapies (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.95; P = 0.02; I2 = 26%).
    UNASSIGNED: In individual studies, the HDF groups achieved varying levels of convection volume.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with those undergoing HD, patients receiving HDF experienced a reduction in all-cause mortality, CV mortality, and infection-related mortality. These results provide compelling evidence supporting the use of HDF as a beneficial intervention in ESKD patients undergoing KRT.
    UNASSIGNED: Registered at PROSPERO: CRD42023438362.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    远程医疗已经成为医疗保健领域的变革性解决方案,特别是在解决与慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)和透析护理相关的复杂性和挑战方面。这篇社论探讨了远程医疗在彻底改变肾脏疾病的管理和治疗方面的潜力,强调其在减轻全球医疗保健系统面临的负担方面的作用。随着高质量的视听平台的出现,远程医疗促进了远程医疗保健的提供,使医疗保健专业人员能够从远处提供卓越的护理。这在CKD和终末期肾病(ESKD)患者的情况下尤其相关。需要持续的护理和监测是至关重要的。这篇社论强调了ESKD的发病率不断上升,受普遍风险因素的驱动,比如糖尿病,高血压,肥胖,以及不同人群在获得治疗方面的差异。远程医疗在CKD和透析护理中的整合为更多的人提供了一条途径,高效,和具有成本效益的医疗保健服务。它提供了许多好处,包括远程监控的便利性,增强患者依从性,降低医疗成本,提高患者满意度和生活质量。远程医疗促进了多学科的护理方法,允许及时干预和随访,这对接受透析的患者至关重要。此外,COVID-19大流行加速了远程医疗的采用,展示了在限制患者接触的情况下保持护理连续性的有效性。尽管潜力巨大,其远程医疗的实施面临着几个挑战,包括监管障碍,对医疗信息安全的担忧,以及虚拟平台是否足以捕获关键的健康指标。此外,远程医疗的财务影响及其长期可持续性仍然需要进一步调查。总之,远程医疗在加强CKD和透析患者的护理和管理方面具有重要的前景.它提供了克服地理障碍的重要解决方案,改善获得护理的机会,减轻医疗系统的压力。然而,与传统护理模式相比,需要进一步研究以充分了解其益处,并应对与实施相关的挑战。远程医疗在肾脏护理中的扩展标志着朝着更具包容性的方向迈出了一步,高效,以及以患者为中心的医疗保健未来。
    Telemedicine has emerged as a transformative solution in the realm of healthcare, particularly in addressing the complexities and challenges associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis care. This editorial explores the potential of telemedicine in revolutionizing the management and treatment of kidney diseases, highlighting its role in mitigating the burdens faced by healthcare systems worldwide. With the advent of high-quality audio and visual platforms, telemedicine has facilitated remote healthcare delivery, enabling healthcare professionals to provide exceptional care from a distance. This is particularly relevant in the context of CKD and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients, where the need for continuous care and monitoring is critical. This editorial underscored the escalating incidence of ESKD, driven by prevalent risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, and the disparities in access to treatments among different populations. The integration of telemedicine in CKD and dialysis care presents a pathway toward a more accessible, efficient, and cost-effective healthcare delivery. It offers numerous benefits, including the convenience of remote monitoring, enhanced patient compliance, reduced healthcare costs, and improved patient satisfaction and quality of life. Telemedicine facilitates a multidisciplinary approach to care, allowing for timely intervention and follow-ups, which are crucial for patients undergoing dialysis. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of telemedicine, showcasing its effectiveness in maintaining continuity of care amid restrictions on patient contact. Despite its promising potential, its implementation of telemedicine faces several challenges, including regulatory hurdles, concerns about the security of medical information, and the adequacy of virtual platforms to capture crucial health indicators. In addition, the financial implications of telemedicine and its long-term sustainability remain areas requiring further investigation. In conclusion, telemedicine holds significant promise in enhancing the care and management of CKD and dialysis patients. It offers a vital solution to overcome the geographical barrier, improve access to care, and alleviate the strain on healthcare systems. However, further research is needed to fully understand its benefits compared to traditional care models and to address the challenges associated with implementation. The expansion of telemedicine in kidney care signifies a step toward a more inclusive, efficient, and patient-centered healthcare future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)和终末期肾脏疾病(ESKD)的发病率在全球范围内不断增加。血液透析(HD)是ESKD患者肾脏替代治疗的主要手段。与HD患者晚期动静脉瘘(AVF)失败相关的危险因素研究甚少。因此,本研究的目的是确定HD患者晚期AVF衰竭的相关因素.
    纳入2009年9月至2018年8月在重庆医科大学附属第二医院接受前臂或上臂AVF血管成形术的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者。随访36个月。使用电子病历(EMR)收集基线特征。使用Cox比例风险模型确定与晚期AVF失败相关的变量。
    有137名患者(64%为男性,36%的女性)包括在这项研究中,50(36.5%)经历AVF故障。单变量对数秩分析表明,年龄,C反应蛋白(CRP),红细胞沉降率(ESR),完整的甲状旁腺激素(iPTH),白蛋白(ALB),发生和未经历AVF失败的患者之间的AVF通畅率显着不同。Cox回归分析显示CRP[P=0.002,危险比(HR)=2.719,HR的95%置信区间(CI)为1.432-5.164],ESR(P=0.030,HR=2.431,95%CI:1.088-5.434),iPTH(P=0.013,HR=0.325,95%CI:0.133-0.793),ALB(P=0.040,HR=0.539,95%CI:0.299-0.972)与AVF失败独立相关。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,6、12、18、24、30和36个月的AVF累积通畅率为84%,74%,69%,64%,64%,64%,分别。
    CRP,ESR,iPTH,ALB和ALB与AVF失败相关,应作为临床实践参考。
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is increasing worldwide. Hemodialysis (HD) is the mainstay of renal replacement therapy for patients with ESKD. Risk factors associated with late arteriovenous fistula (AVF) failure in HD patients are poorly investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify factors associated with late AVF failure in HD patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who underwent forearm or upper arm AVF angioplasty at Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between September 2009 and August 2018 were included. Patients were followed up for 36 months. Baseline characteristics were collected using electronic medical records (EMRs). Variables associated with late AVF failure were identified using Cox proportional hazards models.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 137 patients (64% male, 36% female) included in this study, with 50 (36.5%) experiencing AVF failure. Univariable log-rank analysis showed that age, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), albumin (ALB), and AVF patency rate were significantly different between patients who did and did not experience AVF failure. Cox regression analysis showed that CRP [P=0.002, hazard ratio (HR) =2.719, 95% confidence interval (CI) for HR: 1.432-5.164], ESR (P=0.030, HR =2.431, 95% CI: 1.088-5.434), iPTH (P=0.013, HR =0.325, 95% CI: 0.133-0.793), and ALB (P=0.040, HR =0.539, 95% CI: 0.299-0.972) were independently associated with AVF failure. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the cumulative patency rates of AVF at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months were 84%, 74%, 69%, 64%, 64%, and 64%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: CRP, ESR, iPTH, and ALB were associated with AVF failure and should be used as reference in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    健康的社会决定因素是影响健康的非医学因素。对于慢性肾脏病(CKD)进展为肾衰竭的患者,健康的社会决定因素对透析方式选择的影响(血液透析与腹膜透析(PD))尚未完全了解。
    回顾性队列研究,对981例晚期CKD患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者转诊至渥太华医院多重护理肾脏诊所(加拿大),并于2010年至2021年进行了透析。多变量逻辑回归用于衡量健康的社会决定因素(教育,employment,婚姻状况和居住地)和透析开始方式。
    平均年龄和估计的肾小球滤过率分别为64和18mL/min/1.73m2。与拥有大学学位相比,没有高中学位与通过PD开始透析的几率较低相关(29%与48%,OR0.55(95%置信区间(CI)0.34-0.88))。与积极就业相比,失业与通过PD开始透析的几率较低相关(38%与62%,OR0.40(95%CI0.27-0.60))。与已婚相比,单身与通过PD开始透析的几率较低(35%与48%,调整后OR0.52(95%CI0.39-0.70))。与与家人一起住在家里相比,单独住在家里通过PD开始透析的几率较低(33%vs.47%,调整后OR0.55(95%CI0.39-0.78))。
    健康的社会决定因素,包括教育,employment,婚姻状况和居住地与透析方式选择有关。解决这些“上游”社会因素可能会在从晚期CKD到肾衰竭的过渡过程中获得更公平的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Social determinants of health are non-medical factors that impact health. For patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progressing to kidney failure, the influence of social determinants of health on dialysis modality selection (haemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis (PD)) is incompletely understood.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort study of 981 consecutive patients with advanced CKD referred to the Ottawa Hospital Multi-Care Kidney Clinic (Canada) who progressed to dialysis from 2010 to 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure odds ratios (OR) for the associations between social determinants of health (education, employment, marital status and residence) and modality of dialysis initiation.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age and estimated glomerular filtration rate were 64 and 18 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Not having a high school degree was associated with lower odds of initiating dialysis via PD compared to having a college degree (29% vs. 48%, OR 0.55 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.88)). Unemployment was associated with lower odds of initiating dialysis via PD compared to active employment (38% vs. 62%, OR 0.40 (95% CI 0.27-0.60)). Being single was associated with lower odds of initiating dialysis via PD compared to being married (35% vs. 48%, adjusted OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.39-0.70)). Living alone at home was associated with lower odds of initiating dialysis via PD compared to living at home with family (33% vs. 47%, adjusted OR 0.55 (95% CI 0.39-0.78)).
    UNASSIGNED: Social determinants of health including education, employment, marital status and residence are associated with dialysis modality selection. Addressing these \'upstream\' social factors may allow for more equitable outcomes during the transition from advanced CKD to kidney failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: In the United States, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is responsible for high mortality and significant healthcare costs, with the number of cases sharply increasing in the past 2 decades. In this study, we aimed to reduce these impacts by developing an ESKD model for predicting its occurrence in a 2-year period.
    UNASSIGNED: We developed a machine learning (ML) pipeline to test different models for the prediction of ESKD. The electronic health record was used to capture several kidney disease-related variables. Various imputation methods, feature selection, and sampling approaches were tested. We compared the performance of multiple ML models using area under the ROC curve (AUCROC), area under the Precision-Recall curve (PR-AUC), and Brier scores for discrimination, precision, and calibration, respectively. Explainability methods were applied to the final model.
    UNASSIGNED: Our best model was a gradient-boosting machine with feature selection and imputation methods as additional components. The model exhibited an AUCROC of 0.97, a PR-AUC of 0.33, and a Brier score of 0.002 on a holdout test set. A chart review analysis by expert physicians indicated clinical utility.
    UNASSIGNED: An ESKD prediction model can identify individuals at risk for ESKD and has been successfully deployed within our health system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾移植已成为终末期肾病(ESKD)患者最具成本效益的治疗方法,并为他们提供最高的生活质量。然而,由于对器官捐赠的文化和传统信仰,肾脏捐赠往往是无法获得的。我们研究的目的是使用接受意愿(WTA)技术评估肾脏捐赠的价值。我们还旨在了解影响个人捐赠器官意愿的因素。
    985名来自公众的参与者完成了一项自我管理的调查。选择的定量方法和调查设计使用描述性的,相关,非参数,和多变量统计检验。
    大多数受访者,895(90.9%)不愿意活着时捐赠肾脏。四百零五位(百分之四十一点一)受访者表示死后不愿意捐肾,而其余的人愿意在没有经济补偿的情况下在死后捐献肾脏。同样的态度也适用于其亲属捐赠的肾脏。根据逻辑回归模型的结果,预测死亡后鼓励捐赠一个肾脏的最低(最小)金额的重要预测因素是:婚姻状况;国籍;Adi卡持有人;了解需要肾脏捐赠的人;对医务人员的信心;并考虑家人对器官捐赠的意见。
    使用成本效益分析(CBA),为了评估个人接受创新医疗程序付款的意愿,比如肾脏捐赠,允许评估医疗程序的感知价值,并使决策者能够决定是否为肾脏捐赠分配资金或提供补贴,鉴于可用的医疗资源有限。在我们的研究中,我们发现大多数参与者不支持器官商业化.我们对政策制定者和卫生专业人员的建议是继续为肾脏捐赠提供足够的资金,并实施旨在改善对器官捐赠态度的教育计划。
    UNASSIGNED: Kidney transplantation has become the most cost-effective treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and offers them the highest quality of life. Yet, kidney donation is often inaccessible due to cultural and traditional beliefs about organ donation. The goal of our study is to assess the value of kidney donation using the Willingness to Accept (WTA) technique. We also aim to understand the factors influencing an individual\'s willingness to donate an organ.
    UNASSIGNED: A self-administered survey was completed by 985 participants from the general public. The quantitative method and survey design that were chosen used descriptive, correlational, nonparametric, and multivariate statistical tests.
    UNASSIGNED: Most of the respondents, 895 (90.9%) are not willing to donate a kidney while alive. Four hundred and five (41.1%) of the respondents are not willing to donate a kidney after their death, while the rest are willing to donate their kidney after their death without financial compensation. The same attitude applies to the donation of a kidney from their relatives. Significant predictors from the results of the logistic regression model in predicting the lowest (minimal) amount that will encourage donation of one kidney after death were: Marital status; Nationality; Adi card holder; Knowing people who need a kidney donation; confidence in the medical staff; and consideration of the family\'s opinions regarding organ donation.
    UNASSIGNED: Using cost benefit analysis (CBA), with the aim of evaluating the willingness of individuals to accept payment for innovative medical procedures, such as kidney donation, allows an assessment of the perceived value of the medical procedure and enables policymakers to decide whether to allocate funds or offer subsidies for kidney donation, given the limited healthcare resources available. During our research, we found that most participants did not support the commercialization of organs. Our recommendation for policymakers and health professionals is to continue providing adequate funding for kidney donations and to implement educational programs aimed at improving attitudes towards organ donation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号