BACKGROUND: Although combination therapy of echinocandins with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) has been reported for patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP), the effectiveness of this combination therapy in patients with PCP without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection remains unknown.
METHODS: Data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database was used to identify non-HIV patients who underwent their first hospitalisation for PCP between April 2012 and March 2022. The patients were divided into those treated with TMP-SMX alone and those treated with TMP-SMX combined with echinocandins. We performed propensity-score overlap-weighting analysis to estimate in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: Among the 1,324 eligible patients, 122 received TMP-SMX plus echinocandins, while 1,202 received TMP-SMX alone. The propensity-score overlap-weighting analysis showed that the combination therapy was not associated with reduced in-hospital mortality in comparison with TMP-SMX alone (22.2% vs. 26.9%; risk difference, 4.6%; 95% confidence interval, -6.1% to 15.3%; P = 0.398).
CONCLUSIONS: Echinocandins combined with TMP-SMX may not improve in-hospital mortality due to PCP in patients without HIV infection.

BACKGROUND: Drug resistance to echinocandins, first-line drugs used to treat Candida auris infection, is rapidly emerging. However, the accumulation of mutations in genes other than FKS1 (before an isolate develops to resistance via FKS1 mutations), remains poorly understood. Methods: Four clinical cases and 29 isolates associated with the incremental process of echinocandin resistance were collected and analyzed using antifungal drug susceptibility testing and genome sequencing to assess the evolution of echinocandin resistance.
RESULTS: Six echinocandin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)-elevated C. auris strains and seven resistant strains were isolated from the urinary system of patients receiving echinocandin treatment. Meanwhile, phylogenetic analyses illustrated that the echinocandin-resistant strains were closely related to other strains in the same patient. Genomic data revealed that the echinocandin-resistant strains had FKS1 mutations. Furthermore, three categories (ECN-S/E/R) of non-synonymous mutant SNP genes (such as RBR3, IFF6, MKC1, MPH1, RAD2, and MYO1) in C. auris appeared to be associated with the three-stage-evolutionary model of echinocandin resistance in C. glabrata: cell wall stress, drug adaptation, and genetic escape (FKS mutation).
CONCLUSIONS: Echinocandin-resistant C. auris undergoes spatial and temporal phase changes closely related to echinocandin exposure, particularly in the urinary system. These findings suggest that FKS1 mutations mediate an evolutionary accumulation of echinocandin resistance followed by modulation of chromosome remodelling and DNA repair processes that ultimately lead to FKS1 hot spot mutations and the development of drug resistance. This study provides an in-depth exploration of the molecular pathways involved in the evolution of Candida auris echinocandin resistance.

BACKGROUND: Rezafungin, a novel, once-weekly echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis (IC) was non-inferior to caspofungin for Day 30 all-cause mortality (ACM) and Day 14 global cure in the Phase 3 ReSTORE trial (NCT03667690). We conducted pre-planned subgroup analyses for patients with a positive culture close to randomization in ReSTORE.
METHODS: ReSTORE was a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized trial in patients aged ≥18 years with candidemia and/or IC treated with once-weekly intravenous rezafungin (400 mg/200 mg) or once-daily intravenous caspofungin (70 mg/50 mg). This analysis comprised patients with a positive blood culture drawn between 12 hours before and 72 hours after randomization, or a positive culture from another normally sterile site sampled between 48 hours before and 72 hours after randomization. Efficacy endpoints included Day 30 ACM, Day 14 global cure rate, and Day 5 and 14 mycological response. Adverse events were evaluated.
RESULTS: This analysis included 38 patients randomized to rezafungin and 46 to caspofungin. In the rezafungin and caspofungin groups, respectively: Day 30 ACM was 26.3% and 21.7% (between-group difference [95% confidence interval] 4.6% [-13.7, 23.5]); Day 14 global response was 55.3% and 50.0% (between-group difference 5.3% [-16.1, 26.0]); and Day 5 mycological eradication was 71.1% and 50.0% (between-group difference 21.1% [-0.2, 40.2]). Safety was comparable between treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the efficacy and safety of rezafungin compared with caspofungin for the treatment of candidemia and/or IC in patients with a positive culture close to randomization, with potential early treatment benefits for rezafungin.

The emergence of fungal pathogens and changes in the epidemiological landscape are prevalent issues in clinical mycology. Reports of resistance to antifungals have been reported. This review aims to evaluate molecular and nonmolecular mechanisms related to antifungal resistance. Mutations in the ERG genes and overexpression of the efflux pump (MDR1, CDR1 and CDR2 genes) were the most reported molecular mechanisms of resistance in clinical isolates, mainly related to Azoles. For echinocandins, a molecular mechanism described was mutation in the FSK genes. Furthermore, nonmolecular virulence factors contributed to therapeutic failure, such as biofilm formation and selective pressure due to previous exposure to antifungals. Thus, there are many public health challenges in treating fungal infections.
[Box: see text].

UNASSIGNED: During the COVID-19 pandemic, antimicrobial and antifungal stewardship programs have lost their priority. Although all parenteral antifungals were used with the recommendations of infectious diseases specialists in the pre-pandemic period, most consultations were delayed during the pandemic because of the workload of infectious diseases specialists. In this period, antifungal treatments in hospitalized patients were managed by mostly primary physicians. Therefore, we aimed to detect the change in the consumption of antifungals during the pandemic.
UNASSIGNED: The data on the antifungal drug use by month and clinics, the number of beds, and the occupancy rate of the clinics were obtained from the hospital information registration system. We defined each drug according to the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (WHO ATC) coding system and determined the defined daily dose (DDD). The antifungal consumption (DDD/ 100 bed-days) in pre-pandemic and pandemic periods was compared.
UNASSIGNED: During the pandemic, the antifungal consumption increased two-fold (2019:7.43; 2020:18.03 DDD/100 bed-days). The highest antifungal consumption rate was in the hematology- oncology-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) clinics with 2.5-fold (2019:39.86; 2020:98.48 DDD/ 100 bed-days) increase. Liposomal amphotericin B consumption made up the majority of this with a four-fold increase in the hematology-oncology-HSCT clinics.
UNASSIGNED: We detected a dramatic increase in antifungal consumption in both ICUs and inpatient clinics during pandemic. A novel antifungal stewardship approach is urgently needed.

BACKGROUND: Although neurotoxicity is a major adverse event associated with busulfan, little information is available regarding the association between drug interactions and neurological symptoms during busulfan-based regimens. This study evaluated the association between prophylactic echinocandins and neurological complications in patients receiving busulfan-containing conditioning regimens for stem cell transplantation.
METHODS: We retrospectively included consecutive patients who administered intravenous busulfan as a conditioning regimen at our facility between 2007 and 2022. Prophylactic echinocandin use was defined as the use of an echinocandin antifungal drug to prevent invasive fungal disease in SCT recipients. The primary outcome was the incidence of neurological complications within 7 days of busulfan initiation and was compared between the echinocandin group (patients received prophylactic echinocandin) and nonechinocandin group (patients received prophylactic antifungal drugs other than echinocandin and those without antifungal prophylaxis).
RESULTS: Among the 59 patients included in this study, the incidence of neurological complications in the echinocandin (n = 26) and nonechinocandin groups (n = 33) was 30.8% and 63.6%, respectively. We observed a negative association between prophylactic echinocandin use and the development of neurological complications after adjusting for the propensity score for receiving prophylactic echinocandins (adjusted odds ratio 0.294, 95% confidence interval 0.090 to 0.959). We observed a lower incidence of neurological complications in the echinocandin group than in the nonechinocandin group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that the choice of antifungal prophylaxis is associated with busulfan neurotoxicity.

Rezafungin is a long-acting, intravenously administered echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis (IC). Non-inferiority of rezafungin vs caspofungin for the treatment of adults with candidemia and/or IC was demonstrated in the Phase 3 ReSTORE study based on the primary endpoints of day 14 global cure and 30-day all-cause mortality. Here, an analysis of ReSTORE data evaluating efficacy outcomes by baseline Candida species is described. Susceptibility testing was performed for Candida species using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference broth microdilution method. There were 93 patients in the modified intent-to-treat population who received rezafungin; 94 received caspofungin. Baseline Candida species distribution was similar in the two treatment groups; C. albicans (occurring in 41.9% and 42.6% of patients in the rezafungin and caspofungin groups, respectively), C. glabrata (25.8% and 26.6%), and C. tropicalis (21.5% and 18.1%) were the most common pathogens. Rates of global cure and mycological eradication at day 14 and day 30 all-cause mortality by Candida species were comparable in the rezafungin and caspofungin treatment groups and did not appear to be impacted by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for either rezafungin or caspofungin. Two patients had baseline isolates with non-susceptible MIC values (both in the rezafungin group: one non-susceptible to rezafungin and one to caspofungin, classified as intermediate); both were candidemia-only patients in whom rezafungin treatment was successful based on the day 30 all-cause mortality endpoint. This analysis of ReSTORE demonstrated the efficacy of rezafungin for candidemia and IC in patients infected with a variety of Candida species.

Recent epidemiological studies documented an alarming increase in the prevalence of echinocandin-resistant (ECR) Candida glabrata blood isolates. ECR isolates are known to arise from a minor subpopulation of a clonal population, termed echinocandin persisters. Although it is believed that isolates with a higher echinocandin persistence (ECP) are more likely to develop ECR, the implication of ECP needs to be better understood. Moreover, replacing laborious and time-consuming traditional approaches to determine ECP levels with rapid, convenient, and reliable tools is imperative to advance our understanding of this emerging concept in clinical practice. Herein, using extensive ex vivo and in vivo systemic infection models, we showed that high ECP isolates are less effectively cleared by micafungin treatment and exclusively give rise to ECR colonies. Additionally, we developed a flow cytometry-based tool that takes advantage of a SYTOX-based assay for the stratification of ECP levels. Once challenged with various collections of echinocandin-susceptible blood isolates, our assay reliably differentiated ECP levels in vitro and predicted ECP levels in real time under ex vivo and in vivo conditions when compared to traditional methods relying on colony-forming unit counting. Given the high and low ECP predictive values of 92.3% and 82.3%, respectively, our assay showed a high agreement with traditional approach. Collectively, our study supports the concept of ECP level determination in clinical settings and provides a robust tool scalable for high-throughput settings. Application of this tool facilitates the interrogation of mutant and drug libraries to further our understanding of persister biology and designing anti-persister therapeutics.
OBJECTIVE: Candida glabrata is a prevalent fungal pathogen able to replicate inside macrophages and rapidly develop resistance against frontline antifungal echinocandins. Multiple studies have shown that echinocandin resistance is fueled by the survival of a small subpopulation of susceptible cells surviving lethal concentrations of echinocandins. Importantly, bacterial pathogens that exhibit high antibiotic persistence also impose a high burden and generate more antibiotic-resistant colonies. Nonetheless, the implications of echinocandin persistence (ECP) among the clinical isolates of C. glabrata have not been defined. Additionally, ECP level determination relies on a laborious and time-consuming method, which is prone to high variation. By exploiting in vivo systemic infection and ex vivo models, we showed that C. glabrata isolates with a higher ECP are associated with a higher burden and more likely develop echinocandin resistance upon micafungin treatment. Additionally, we developed an assay that reliably determines ECP levels in real time. Therefore, our study identified C. glabrata isolates displaying high ECP levels as important entities and provided a reliable and convenient tool for measuring echinocandin persistence, which is extendable to other fungal and bacterial pathogens.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the resistance mechanisms to micafungin and fluconazole in a clinical isolate of Candida glabrata.
METHODS: The isolate was whole-genome sequenced to identify amino acid changes in key proteins involved in antifungal resistance, and the isolate was further characterised by pathogenicity-related phenotypic assays that supported the sequencing results.
RESULTS: Amino acid substitutions were detected in 8 of 17 protein candidates. Many of these substitutions were novel, including in CHS3, CHS3B, and KRE5, which are involved in the development of micafungin resistance. Regarding fluconazole resistance, overexpression of efflux pumps was observed. Our isolate did not exhibit an increased virulence potential compared with the control strain; however, a significant increase in chitin content and potential to resist the cell surface disruptant sodium dodecyl sulphate was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This clinical Candida glabrata isolate experienced a change in cell wall architecture, which correlates with the development of micafungin resistance.

UNASSIGNED: Despite advancements, invasive fungal infections (IFI) still carry high mortality rates, often exceeding 30%. The challenges in diagnosis, coupled with limited effective antifungal options, make managing IFIs complex. Antifungal drugs are essential for IFI management, but their efficacy can be diminished by drug-drug interactions and pharmacokinetic variability. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), especially in the context of triazole use, has emerged as a valuable strategy to optimize antifungal therapy.
UNASSIGNED: This review provides current evidence regarding the potential benefits of TDM in IFI management. It discusses how TDM can enhance treatment response, safety, and address altered pharmacokinetics in specific patient populations.
UNASSIGNED: TDM plays a crucial role in achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes in IFI management, particularly for certain antifungal agents. Preclinical studies consistently show a link between therapeutic drug levels and antifungal efficacy. However, clinical research in mycology faces challenges due to patient heterogeneity and the diversity of fungal infections. TDM\'s potential advantages in guiding Echinocandin therapy for critically ill patients warrant further investigation. Additionally, for drugs like Posaconazole, assessing whether serum levels or alternative markers like saliva offer the best measure of efficacy is an intriguing question.