drug provocation testing

药物激发试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    英国过敏和临床免疫学协会(BSACI)的护理标准委员会以及专家和主要利益相关者委员会已经制定了该指南,用于评估和测试未经证实的青霉素过敏标签的患者。该指南适用于未经过敏或免疫学培训的英国临床医生,但他们希望为患者开发青霉素过敏去标签服务。它旨在补充BSACI2015指南“青霉素和其他β-内酰胺过敏的管理”,因此没有详细说明青霉素过敏的流行病学或病因。因为这在2015年指南(1)中被广泛涵盖。该指南仅适用于具有青霉素过敏标签的患者,不适用于其他β-内酰胺过敏。这些建议包括一份清单,以识别过敏风险较低的患者,以及一个由非过敏专家进行药物激发试验的框架。指南中有成人和儿科的单独部分,认识到报告的过敏史和真正过敏可能性的共同差异。
    The Standards of Care Committee of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) and a committee of experts and key stakeholders have developed this guideline for the evaluation and testing of patients with an unsubstantiated label of penicillin allergy. The guideline is intended for UK clinicians who are not trained in allergy or immunology, but who wish to develop a penicillin allergy de-labelling service for their patients. It is intended to supplement the BSACI 2015 guideline \"Management of allergy to penicillin and other beta-lactams\" and therefore does not detail the epidemiology or aetiology of penicillin allergy, as this is covered extensively in the 2015 guideline (1). The guideline is intended for use only in patients with a label of penicillin allergy and does not apply to other beta-lactam allergies. The recommendations include a checklist to identify patients at low risk of allergy and a framework for the conduct of drug provocation testing by non-allergists. There are separate sections for adults and paediatrics within the guideline, in recognition of the common differences in reported allergy history and likelihood of true allergy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    While opioids represent one of the most common medication allergy labels, these labels are often unsubstantiated in clinical practice. The removal of erroneous opioid allergy labels has a unique importance in the population with acute or chronic pain. The current approach to patients with pseudo-allergy to opioids is switching to an alternative opioid with less histamine release. Thus, allergy labels to relatively lower potency opioids such as codeine may be feasibly result in the prescription of stronger medications like fentanyl that would otherwise not be indicated.This narrative review provides an overview of the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of opioid allergy labels commonly encountered by pain management practitioners along with recommendations for evaluation and management.A literature search of PubMed was performed using the comprehensive MeSH term, \"Opioid Allergy\".In recent years, it has become apparent that a substantial proportion of patients labeled as opioid allergic are found to be tolerant of these agents. Opioid skin testing and IgE assays are of limited application. DPT is the yet underutilized gold standard for diagnosis. There is also an increasing call for studies evaluating basophil activation testing in opiate allergy.Opioid allergy labels require a closer look especially in view of the current opioid epidemic. The low likelihood of true reactivity, combined with the conceivable clinical relevance of an opioid allergy label, calls for further characterization of this label in populations with acute or chronic pain diagnoses. Future directions should include larger prospective studies with systematic evaluation and classification of opioid allergy labels to determine future viability of opioid use.AbbreviationsEHRelectronic health recordNMBAneuromuscular blocking agentIgEimmunoglobulin EMCmast cellGPCRG-protein coupled receptorMRGPRX2mas-related G-protein receptorQAIquaternary ammonium ionsSCARsevere cutaneous adverse reactionAGEPacute generalized exanthematous pustulosisSDRIFEsymmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthemaBATbasophil activation testingDPTdrug provocation testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实的青霉素过敏标签在手术患者中很常见,通过避免手术部位感染的最佳一线预防和耐药细菌菌株的感染增加,可能导致重大伤害。高达98%的青霉素过敏标签在测试时是不正确的。由于所有医疗保健系统中训练有素的过敏症专家的匮乏,只有少数手术患者有机会在手术前接受测试和去标签。可以在选定的患者中修改和缩短测试途径。各种医疗保健专业人员可以,经过适当的培训,并与过敏症专家合作,为选定的患者提供测试。我们回顾了如何评估患者,可以使用的适当测试策略,和安全测试的最低标准。
    Unsubstantiated penicillin-allergy labels are common in surgical patients, and can lead to significant harm through avoidance of best first-line prophylaxis of surgical site infections and increased infection with resistant bacterial strains. Up to 98% of penicillin-allergy labels are incorrect when tested. Because of the scarcity of trained allergists in all healthcare systems, only a minority of surgical patients have the opportunity to undergo testing and de-labelling before surgery. Testing pathways can be modified and shortened in selected patients. A variety of healthcare professionals can, with appropriate training and in collaboration with allergists, provide testing for selected patients. We review how patients might be assessed, the appropriate testing strategies that can be used, and the minimum standards of safe testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号