OBJECTIVE: To date, there is no reported effective biomarker that can predict which Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) patients will respond to donepezil and which will not. This study aimed to investigate whether baseline values of Aβ oligomers (AβOs), measured by the Multimer Detection System-Oligomeric Aβ (MDS-OAβ), can be used to predict responders after 6 months of donepezil medication.
METHODS: The study enrolled 104 patients diagnosed with probable AD. After 6 months of donepezil medication, the response to treatment was evaluated by re-assessing the Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale-Sum of Box (CDR-SB) scales conducted at baseline. The patients were categorized into two groups according to the baseline MDS-OAβ values known as the cut-off for AD diagnosis: a group with values below 0.78 and another group with values equal to or above 0.78.
RESULTS: After 6 months of medication, the number of responders was 50 (49.5%). Responders exhibited significantly worse baseline CDR, CDR-SB, K-MMSE, and Barthel index compared with non-responders. There was a significantly higher number of responders among patients with MDS-OAβ values below the cut-off of 0.78 compared with those with values equal to or above this threshold. Furthermore, there was a significant improvement in the K-MMSE and CDR-SB after 6 months of donepezil medication in patients with MDS-OAβ values below 0.78 compared with those with values equal to or above 0.78.
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline MDS-OAβ values might constitute a novel biochemical marker for the efficacy of 6 months of donepezil treatment in AD. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the add-on effects of oral Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), when used in addition to donepezil compared to donepezil alone.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing these treatments across all types of MCI were identified from nine databases and three registers until August 2023. Outcome measures were Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and adverse events (AEs). Methodological quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and evidence certainty was evaluated using the GRADE method.
RESULTS: Involving 1611 participants across 20 studies, meta-analysis results indicate that oral CHM combined with donepezil significantly improved cognitive function in MCI patients compared to donepezil alone, as evidenced by MMSE (1.88 [1.52, 2.24], I2 = 41%, 12 studies, 993 participants) and MoCA (MD: 2.01 [1.57, 2.44], I2 = 52%, 11 studies, 854 participants). Eleven studies reported details of AEs, identifying gastrointestinal symptoms and insomnia as the most common symptoms. No significant difference in AEs frequency was found between the groups (RR: 0.91 [0.59, 1.39], I2 = 4%, 11 studies, 808 participants). All 20 studies were evaluated as having \"some concerns\" regarding the overall risk of bias. The certainty of evidence for MMSE was \"moderate\" and \"low\" for MoCA. From frequently utilized herbs, two classical CHM formulae were identified: Kai xin san and Si wu decoction. The observed treatment effects of commonly used herbs may be exerted through multiple pharmacological mechanisms, including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative stress, anti-apoptotic actions, promotion of neuronal survival and modulation of the cholinergic system.
CONCLUSIONS: The concurrent use of oral CHM and donepezil appears to be more effective than donepezil alone in improving the cognitive function of MCI, without leading to an increase in AEs. While recognizing concerns of overall methodological quality, this combined therapy should be considered as an alternative option for clinical practice.

UNASSIGNED: Deep brain stimulation (DBS), the direct electrical stimulation of neuronal tissue in the basal forebrain to enhance release of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, is under consideration as a method to improve executive function in patients with dementia. While some small studies indicate a positive response in the clinical setting, the relationship between DBS and acetylcholine pharmacokinetics is incompletely understood.
UNASSIGNED: We examined the cortical acetylcholine response to different stimulation parameters of the basal forebrain.
UNASSIGNED: 2-photon imaging was combined with deep brain stimulation. Stimulating electrodes were implanted in the subpallidal basal forebrain, and the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex was imaged. Acetylcholine activity was determined using the GRABACh-3.0 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor sensor, and blood vessels were imaged with Texas red.
UNASSIGNED: Experiments manipulating pulse train frequency demonstrated that integrated acetylcholine induced fluorescence was insensitive to frequency, and that peak levels were achieved with frequencies from 60 to 130 Hz. Altering pulse train length indicated that longer stimulation resulted in higher peaks and more activation with sublinear summation. The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil increased the peak response to 10s of stimulation at 60Hz, and the integrated response increased 57% with the 2 mg/kg dose, and 126% with the 4 mg/kg dose. Acetylcholine levels returned to baseline with a time constant of 14 to 18 seconds in all experiments.
UNASSIGNED: These data demonstrate that acetylcholine receptor activation is insensitive to frequency between 60 and 130 Hz. High peak responses are achieved with up to 900 pulses. Donepezil increases total acetylcholine receptor activation associated with DBS but did not change temporal kinetics. The long time constants observed in the cerebral cortex add to the evidence supporting volume in addition to synaptic transmission.

OBJECTIVE: Alzheimer\'s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline, behavioral changes, and functional impairments. Apathy, a common symptom in Alzheimer\'s disease, refers to a lack of motivation, interest, and emotional responsiveness. It can significantly impact patients\' quality of life and increase caregiver burden. This study aimed to determine the effects of a diversified rehabilitation program combined with donepezil on apathy, cognitive function, and family caregiver burden of Alzheimer\'s disease patients.
METHODS: A total of 105 Alzheimer\'s disease patients treated at our hospital between January 2020 and January 2023 were selected and analyzed retrospectively. They were assigned to the control group (n = 50) or the observation group (n = 55). The two groups did not differ in terms of general data such as age and sex. All patients were treated with donepezil orally. The control group was given routine nursing, whereas the observation group was given a diversified rehabilitation program intervention, including cognitive training and emotional support. The Hasegawa\'s dementia scale, mini-mental state examination, and Montreal cognitive assessment scale were adopted to evaluate the cognitive function of the two groups before and after treatment. A caregiver burden scale, the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and the Apathy Evaluation Scale Informant version (AES-I) were used to evaluate the caregiver burden and apathy of the two groups.
RESULTS: A significantly higher overall response rate to treatment was found in the observation group (94.55%) than in the control group (80.00%) (p = 0.024). After treatment, scores on the Hasegawa\'s dementia scale, mini-mental state examination, and Montreal cognitive assessment scale of the two groups increased to varying degrees, with greater increases in the observation group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The ZBI and AES-I scores of the two groups decreased to different degrees after treatment, with greater decreases in the observation group than in the control group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A diversified rehabilitation program combined with donepezil can substantially alleviate the apathy of Alzheimer\'s disease patients, improve their cognitive function, and reduce the burden on their families.

OBJECTIVE: Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) often coexists with cognitive dysfunction in patients, leading to significant challenges in treatment and management. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of combined application of donepezil and nimodipine on patients with comorbid CSVD and cognitive dysfunction and the effects on patients\' albumin and prealbumin levels.
METHODS: The records of 112 patients with comorbid CSVD and cognitive dysfunction treated at the People\'s Hospital of Suzhou New District from January 2019 to December 2022 were analysed retrospectively. A total of 50 patients receiving donepezil were allocated to the control group, and 62 patients receiving both nimodipine and donepezil to the study group. Outcomes compared between the two groups included serum homocysteine (Hcy), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), albumin, and prealbumin before and after therapy, efficacy, and adverse reactions. Additionally, logistic regression was performed to analyze the risk factors impacting patient prognosis.
RESULTS: Prior to therapy, the two groups did not differ significantly in Hcy and hs-CRP levels (p > 0.05), whereas after therapy, the levels in both groups dropped significantly (p < 0.01), with more obvious lower levels in the study group (p < 0.05). After treatment, the study group presented significantly higher albumin and prealbumin levels than the control group (p < 0.001). An obvious higher overall response rate was observed in the study group compared to the control group (p = 0.012). No significant inter-group discrepancy was found regarding the total incidence of adverse reactions (p = 0.752). Univariate analysis identified age, course of disease, heart rate (HR), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), drinking history, as well as medication regimen as risk factors impacting patient prognosis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified SBP, DBP, and medication regimen as the independent risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined application of donepezil and nimodipine can effectively treat patients with comorbid CSVD and cognitive dysfunction. It can significantly lower the Hcy and hs-CRP levels and improve the nutritional status without increasing the frequency of adverse reactions. In addition, for CSVD patients with cognitive dysfunction, age, course of disease, MoCA score, HR, SBP, DBP, drinking history, and medication regimen are risk factors impacting patient prognosis, while SBP, DBP, and medication regimen are independent risk factors.

BACKGROUND: GB-5001 is an intramuscular (IM) formulation of donepezil under development for the treatment of Alzheimer\'s disease. The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for donepezil in both IM and oral formulations, and to optimize the IM dosage of GB-5001 using bioequivalence (BE) simulation.
METHODS: A population PK model of donepezil was developed using NONMEM. It was based on plasma concentration data from a Phase 1 dose escalation study, which involved a single administration of donepezil IM formulation at doses of 70, 140, and 280 mg, and the oral formulation at 10 mg. The model was evaluated based on goodness-of-fit plots, conditional weighted residuals, visual predictive checks, and bootstrapping. BE simulations were conducted using a parallel design between various doses of the IM formulation and the 10-mg dose of oral formulation.
RESULTS: The PKs of donepezil were best described by a two-compartment model, which incorporated distinct absorption compartments for the IM (dual first-order absorption and simultaneous zero-order absorption with lag time) and oral (first-order absorption with lag time) formulations. Based on the simulation results, an IM dosage range of 210-215 mg in a sample size of over 92 was estimated to achieve a success rate of approximately 80% for BE.
CONCLUSIONS: The population PK model well explained the PKs of donepezil following administration of both the IM and oral formulations. This model could be applied for the design and dose selection of future BE trials.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05525780.

BACKGROUND: The development of alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a major concern in public health, and cognitive impairments caused by alcohol are involved in this process. Emerging neurobiological evidence suggests that donepezil, an anticholinesterase agent, may improve AUD treatment outcomes by enhancing neurocognitive functioning. Previous research has also suggested that cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) could potentially improve cognitive function and AUD treatment outcomes. We present the rationale and design of a trial to evaluate the combination of donepezil and cognitive remediation therapy (donepezil + CRT) as an intervention for AUD.
METHODS: We propose a 13-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-subjects trial comparing 4 groups (donepezil + CRT vs. donepezil alone vs. CRT alone vs. placebos) as an intervention for AUD. The main goal of the study is to evaluate if donepezil + CRT is superior to placebo in reducing heavy drinking days and improving neurocognitive functioning. A total of 160 patients (4 groups, 40 per each group) with AUD between the ages of 18-80 years will be recruited at Yale University and the VA Connecticut Healthcare System. Primary outcome measures include 1) heavy drinking by Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) over 13 weeks and 2) global neurocognitive functioning by a global index of neurocognitive function score at 7 and 13 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: This protocol paper describes the rationale and proposed methods for the randomized controlled trial for improving AUD treatment outcomes. This project has significant clinical potential to help patients suffering from AUD by improving their cognition and reducing alcohol consumption.
BACKGROUND: NCT05042102.

In an effort to develop new and effective therapeutic agents for Alzheimer\'s disease, a series of hydrazone derivatives bearing piperidine rings have been designed and synthesized. The chemical structures of the compounds were characterized by various spectroscopic techniques. In vitro antioxidant and cholinesterase activities of the compounds were evaluated. Among the compounds, N12 exhibited the most antioxidant activity in all methods (CUPRAC, FRAP, DPPH, ABTS). In vitro acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity results of the compounds showed good IC50 values between 14.124 ± 0.084 and 49.680 ± 0.110 µM were obtained (IC50 = 38.842 ± 0.053 µM for Donepezil). Among the compounds, N7 and N6 are much more effective derivatives than the standard compound donepezil with IC50 values of 14.124 ± 0.084 and 17.968 ± 0.072 µM, respectively. In vitro, butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibition values of the compounds were between 13.505 ± 0.025 and 52.230 ± 0.027 μm. Among the compounds, N6 has the highest BChE inhibition with an IC50 value of 13.505 μm in the series. The cytotoxicity and AChE inhibitory activity of the compounds on SH-SY5Y cell lines were also evaluated. Kinetic studies were also performed to determine the behavior of the compounds as competitive or noncompetitive inhibitors. The binding modes of N6, which was determined to be highly effective according to in vitro analyses, with AChE and BChE were investigated using molecular docking studies, and the stability of the complexes was determined by molecular dynamics simulations. These findings indicated that AChE and BChE enzymes maintained their overall structural stability and compactness during interactions with compound N6.

UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to compare donepezil at 5 mg and 10 mg/day against a placebo to systematically evaluate its effectiveness in improving cognitive function among patients suffering from dementia at any stage.
UNASSIGNED: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we looked up Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library for articles on the efficacy of donepezil in dementia published in the past 20 years and summarized the placebo and intervention data. Initially, a total of 2,272 articles were extracted using our search query and after the inclusion and exclusion criteria set for extraction of data, 18 studies were included in this review using PRISMA flowchart. The ADAS-cog and MMSE assessment scales were used for measuring the outcomes using IBM SPSS 29.0 for the meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The meta-analysis comprised a total of 18 RCTs (randomized controlled trials) that were randomized to receive either donepezil 5 mg/day (n = 1,556), 10 mg/day (n = 2050) or placebo (n = 2,342). Meta-analysis concerning efficacy showed that donepezil at 10 mg/day significantly improved the MMSE score (g: 2.27, 95%CI: 1.25-3.29) but could not substantially reduce the ADAS-cog. At 5 mg/day donepezil, an overall slight improvement in MMSE score (Hedges\' g: 2.09, 95%CI: 0.88-3.30) was observed.
UNASSIGNED: Both donepezil 5 mg/day and 10 mg/day doses demonstrated improved cognitive functions for patients with dementia, however results indicated that the 10 mg/day dose was more efficacious.