digital health intervention

数字卫生干预
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景和目的:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是全球第三大死亡原因。肺康复(PR)计划对于减轻COPD症状和改善COPD患者的生活质量很重要。数字健康干预措施最近在公关计划中被采用,这使得COPD患者可以低障碍地参与此类计划。这项研究的目的是回顾和讨论数字健康干预对COPD患者PR结局的影响。材料和方法:为了实现研究目标,使用PubMed(MEDLINE)进行了系统的文献检索,CINAHL,AMED,SPORTDiscus和物理治疗证据数据库。如果符合特定标准,则纳入随机临床试验(RCT)。两名审稿人独立检查标题,摘要,并进行了全文筛选和数据提取。分别根据PEDRO量表和Cochrane偏差风险工具2进行质量评估和偏差风险。结果:13项RCTs纳入了1525例COPD患者的系统评价。这项系统评价显示了数字健康PR对6分钟和12分钟步行测试所测量的运动能力的潜在积极影响。肺功能,呼吸困难和健康相关的生活质量。没有证据表明数字健康公关在改善焦虑方面的优势,抑郁症,和自我效能感。结论:数字健康PR在改善COPD患者的肺部和身体预后方面比传统PR更有效,但这两个公关项目在改善心理社会结局方面没有差异.本综述结果的确定性受到纳入研究数量少的影响。
    Background and Objectives: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the third most common cause of death globally. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes are important to reduce COPD symptoms and improve the quality of life of people with COPD. Digital health interventions have recently been adopted in PR programmes, which allow people with COPD to participate in such programmes with low barriers. The aim of this study is to review and discuss the reported effects of digital health interventions on PR outcomes in people with COPD. Materials and Methods: To achieve the study goals, a systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, AMED, SPORTDiscus and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were included if they met specified criteria. Two reviewers independently checked titles, abstracts, and performed full-text screening and data extraction. The quality assessment and risk of bias were performed in accordance with the PEDRO scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2, respectively. Results: Thirteen RCTs were included in this systematic review with 1525 participants with COPD. This systematic review showed the potential positive effect of digital health PR on the exercise capacity-measured by 6- and 12-min walking tests, pulmonary function, dyspnoea and health-related quality of life. There was no evidence for advantages of digital health PR in the improvement of anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy. Conclusions: Digital health PR is more effective than traditional PR in improving the pulmonary and physical outcomes for people with COPD, but there was no difference between the two PR programmes in improving the psychosocial outcomes. The certainty of the findings of this review is affected by the small number of included studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数字健康正被用作改善传统医疗保健系统的加速器,帮助各国实现可持续发展目标。布基纳法索旨在协调其数字卫生干预措施,以指导其未来几年的数字卫生战略。当前的评估代表了指导该战略计划制定的上游工作。
    方法:这是定量的,2022年9月至2023年4月之间进行的描述性研究。它涉及一个由两部分组成的调查:一份自我管理的问卷,分发给设施中的医疗信息管理人员,以及与软件开发人员进行的直接访谈。此外,还对该国关于数字化转型的战略和标准文件进行了文献审查。
    结果:布基纳法索拥有与数字化转型有关的相对全面的治理文件。该研究共确定了35种数字健康干预措施。分析显示,89%的资金来自技术和金融合作伙伴以及私营部门。虽然使用开源技术来开发应用程序,软件,或用于实施这些数字健康干预措施的平台已经建立(77%),来自不同平台的数据集成仍然存在缺陷。此外,数字卫生干预措施的分类揭示了不同要素在各个领域之间的分布不均:卫生系统,数字健康干预措施(DHI)的分类,以及国家卫生信息系统(NHIS)的子系统。大多数数字健康干预项目仍处于试点阶段(66%),孤立的电子病历计划仍然不完整。在公共部门,这些记录通常采取电子登记册或医院中孤立的专业记录的形式。在私营部门,工具的实现根据表达的需求而有所不同。在工具设计过程中坚持互操作性规范和标准的挑战依然存在,对实现的工具生成的数据的利用率最低。
    结论:本研究对布基纳法索的数字健康环境进行了有见地的概述,并强调了干预策略方面的重大挑战。这些发现是制定数字健康战略计划的基础资源。通过解决已确定的缺点,该计划将为有效指导未来的数字健康计划提供一个框架。
    BACKGROUND: Digital health is being used as an accelerator to improve the traditional healthcare system, aiding countries in achieving their sustainable development goals. Burkina Faso aims to harmonize its digital health interventions to guide its digital health strategy for the coming years. The current assessment represents upstream work to steer the development of this strategic plan.
    METHODS: This was a quantitative, descriptive study conducted between September 2022 and April 2023. It involved a two-part survey: a self-administered questionnaire distributed to healthcare information managers in facilities, and direct interviews conducted with software developers. This was complemented by a documentary review of the country\'s strategic and standards documents on digital transformation.
    RESULTS: Burkina Faso possesses a relatively comprehensive collection of governance documents pertaining to digital transformation. The study identified a total of 35 digital health interventions. Analysis showed that 89% of funding originated from technical and financial partners as well as the private sector. While the use of open-source technologies for the development of the applications, software, or platforms used to implement these digital health interventions is well established (77%), there remains a deficiency in the integration of data from different platforms. Furthermore, the classification of digital health interventions revealed an uneven distribution between the different elements across domains: the health system, the classification of digital health interventions (DHI), and the subsystems of the National Health Information System (NHIS). Most digital health intervention projects are still in the pilot phase (66%), with isolated electronic patient record initiatives remaining incomplete. Within the public sector, these records typically take the form of electronic registers or isolated specialty records in a hospital. Within the private sector, tool implementation varies based on expressed needs. Challenges persist in adhering to interoperability norms and standards during tool design, with minimal utilization of the data generated by the implemented tools.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an insightful overview of the digital health environment in Burkina Faso and highlights significant challenges regarding intervention strategies. The findings serve as a foundational resource for developing the digital health strategic plan. By addressing the identified shortcomings, this plan will provide a framework for guiding future digital health initiatives effectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数字糖尿病预防计划(dDPP)是有效的“数字处方”,但流失率和计划未完成。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种个性化的自动消息传递系统(PAMS),该系统利用SMS文本消息传递和数据集成到临床工作流程中,通过增强的患者-提供者沟通来提高dDPP参与度.初步数据显示阳性结果。然而,需要进一步调查,以确定如何根据用户的偏好优化PAMS等支持技术的定制,以提高其dDPP参与度。
    目的:本研究评估利用机器学习(ML)开发dDPP用户的数字参与表型,并评估ML预测dDPP活动参与的准确性。这项研究将用于PAMS优化过程,通过结合参与度预测和数字表型来改善PAMS个性化。本研究旨在(1)证明使用dDPP用户收集的数据来构建预测参与度并有助于识别数字参与度表型的ML模型的可行性,(2)描述使用dDPP数据集开发ML模型的方法,并给出初步结果,和(3)基于ML模型输出提供有关用户剖析的初步数据。
    方法:使用梯度增强森林模型,我们预测参与4个dDPP个人活动(体力活动,教训,社会活动,和称重)和一般活动(参与任何活动)基于应用程序中先前的短期和长期活动。接收器工作特性曲线下的面积,精确度-召回率曲线下的面积,和Brier得分指标决定了模型的性能。Shapley值反映了模型的特征重要性,并通过潜在的配置文件分析确定了哪些变量为用户提供了信息。
    结果:我们使用每周和每日DPP数据集开发了2个模型(328,821和704,242条记录,分别),预测准确率超过90%。尽管两种模型都非常准确,每日模型更适合我们的研究计划,因为它预测了个人活动的每日变化,这对创造“数字表型”至关重要。“为了更好地理解对模型预测结果有贡献的变量,我们计算了两个模型的Shapley值,以确定对模型拟合贡献最大的特征;在过去7天中参与dDPP中的任何活动具有最大的预测能力.我们在与dDPP接触2周后(贝叶斯信息标准=-3222.46)对用户进行潜在配置文件分析,并确定了6个用户配置文件,包括那些参与度高的人,最小的参与,和减员。
    结论:初步结果表明,应用具有预测能力的ML方法是定制和优化消息传递干预措施以支持患者参与和坚持数字处方的可接受机制。这些结果使我们能够在未来优化现有的消息传递平台,并将该方法扩展到其他临床领域。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04773834;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04773834.
    RR2-10.2196/26750。
    BACKGROUND: Digital diabetes prevention programs (dDPPs) are effective \"digital prescriptions\" but have high attrition rates and program noncompletion. To address this, we developed a personalized automatic messaging system (PAMS) that leverages SMS text messaging and data integration into clinical workflows to increase dDPP engagement via enhanced patient-provider communication. Preliminary data showed positive results. However, further investigation is needed to determine how to optimize the tailoring of support technology such as PAMS based on a user\'s preferences to boost their dDPP engagement.
    OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates leveraging machine learning (ML) to develop digital engagement phenotypes of dDPP users and assess ML\'s accuracy in predicting engagement with dDPP activities. This research will be used in a PAMS optimization process to improve PAMS personalization by incorporating engagement prediction and digital phenotyping. This study aims (1) to prove the feasibility of using dDPP user-collected data to build an ML model that predicts engagement and contributes to identifying digital engagement phenotypes, (2) to describe methods for developing ML models with dDPP data sets and present preliminary results, and (3) to present preliminary data on user profiling based on ML model outputs.
    METHODS: Using the gradient-boosted forest model, we predicted engagement in 4 dDPP individual activities (physical activity, lessons, social activity, and weigh-ins) and general activity (engagement in any activity) based on previous short- and long-term activity in the app. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the precision-recall curve, and the Brier score metrics determined the performance of the model. Shapley values reflected the feature importance of the models and determined what variables informed user profiling through latent profile analysis.
    RESULTS: We developed 2 models using weekly and daily DPP data sets (328,821 and 704,242 records, respectively), which yielded predictive accuracies above 90%. Although both models were highly accurate, the daily model better fitted our research plan because it predicted daily changes in individual activities, which was crucial for creating the \"digital phenotypes.\" To better understand the variables contributing to the model predictor, we calculated the Shapley values for both models to identify the features with the highest contribution to model fit; engagement with any activity in the dDPP in the last 7 days had the most predictive power. We profiled users with latent profile analysis after 2 weeks of engagement (Bayesian information criterion=-3222.46) with the dDPP and identified 6 profiles of users, including those with high engagement, minimal engagement, and attrition.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results demonstrate that applying ML methods with predicting power is an acceptable mechanism to tailor and optimize messaging interventions to support patient engagement and adherence to digital prescriptions. The results enable future optimization of our existing messaging platform and expansion of this methodology to other clinical domains.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04773834; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04773834.
    UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.2196/26750.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数字健康干预措施(DHIs)具有使公共最终用户,比如公民和病人,管理和改善他们的健康。尽管可用DHI的数量正在增加,在公共卫生系统中成功建立DHI的例子有限。为了抵消不使用DHI,在整合最终用户的同时,应该对它们进行全面评估。不幸的是,根据评价方法,存在很大的变异性和异质性,这就带来了方法论上的挑战。
    目的:本范围审查旨在概述当前已建立的DHI评估流程,包括方法,指标,和最终用户的参与。该审查不仅限于特定的医学领域或DHI类型,还提供了整体概述。
    方法:本范围审查是根据Arksey&O'Malley框架的JBI范围审查方法进行的,并符合PRISMA-ScR(系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的Meta分析扩展)指南。三个科学数据库(PubMed,Scopus,和ScienceDirect)于2023年4月进行了搜索。在评估明确针对公共最终用户的DHI时,考虑了2008年至2023年之间的英语和德语研究。研究选择的过程是由几位研究人员进行的,以避免审阅者的偏见。
    结果:搜索策略确定了9618种出版物,其中包括160个。在这些包括的文章中,得出并分析了200项评估。结果表明,在评估DHI的方法上没有共识,也没有公认的评估指标的定义或用法。这导致了各种各样的评估实践。这与现有文献的观察结果一致。发现缺乏对评估DHI的现有框架的参考。大多数纳入的研究都涉及以用户为中心的方法,并在评估过程中涉及最终用户。作为对开发和评估DHI的人员的协助,并作为思考评估DHI的适当方法的基础,我们创建了一个结果矩阵,每个DHI集群将这些结果合并在一起.此外,为DHI评估人员制定了一般性建议。
    结论:根据公共最终用户的DHI评估方法,本范围审查的结果提供了多样性和异质性的整体概述。应鼓励这些DHI的评估者参考已建立的框架或衡量标准进行论证。这将缓解数字卫生部门类似评估研究中结果的可转移性,从而增强该领域研究的连贯性和可比性。
    BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions (DHIs) have the potential to enable public end users, such as citizens and patients, to manage and improve their health. Although the number of available DHIs is increasing, examples of successfully established DHIs in public health systems are limited. To counteract the nonuse of DHIs, they should be comprehensively evaluated while integrating end users. Unfortunately, there is a wide variability and heterogeneity according to the approaches of evaluation, which creates a methodological challenge.
    OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the current established processes for evaluating DHIs, including methods, indicators, and end-user involvement. The review is not limited to a specific medical field or type of DHI but offers a holistic overview.
    METHODS: This scoping review was conducted following the JBI methodology for scoping reviews based on the framework by Arksey & O\'Malley and complies with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Three scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct) were searched in April 2023. English and German studies between 2008 and 2023 were considered when evaluating DHIs that explicitly address public end users. The process of study selection was carried out by several researchers to avoid reviewer bias.
    RESULTS: The search strategy identified 9618 publications, of which 160 were included. Among these included articles, 200 evaluations were derived and analyzed. The results showed that there is neither a consensus on the methods to evaluate DHIs nor a commonly agreed definition or usage of the evaluated indicators, which results in a broad variety of evaluation practices. This aligns with observations of the existing literature. It was found that there is a lack of references to existing frameworks for the evaluation of DHIs. The majority of the included studies referred to user-centered approaches and involved end users in the evaluation process. As assistance for people developing and evaluating DHIs and as a basis for thinking about appropriate ways to evaluate DHIs, a results matrix was created where the findings were combined per DHI cluster. Additionally, general recommendations for the evaluators of DHIs were formulated.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this scoping review offer a holistic overview of the variety and heterogeneity according to the approaches of evaluation of DHIs for public end users. Evaluators of these DHIs should be encouraged to reference established frameworks or measurements for justification. This would ease the transferability of the results among similar evaluation studies within the digital health sector, thereby enhancing the coherence and comparability of research in this area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究数字卫生干预措施在增强患者激活方面的功效,并使用WHO分类系统确定这些干预措施的独特特征。
    方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统审查和荟萃分析。在Scopus进行了一次搜查,PubMed,和ProQuest。随机对照试验(RCT),准随机对照试验,纳入了纳入年龄≥18岁患者并进行患者激活测量(PAM)评分的前后研究,并纳入了包括健康教育或健康相关行为的任何方面的数字干预措施.使用Downs和Black质量评估工具来评估文章的质量。
    结果:在三种不同类型的荟萃分析中,实施干预导致PAM评分增加(平均差(MD)),范围从最小值(MD=0.2014,95%CI=0.0871-0.3158)和高度显著的p值0.0006到最大值(MD=2.7882,95%CI=1.5558-4.0206)和p值<.0001。虽然2014的M.D.分数似乎相对较低,这足以将患者从一个激活水平提升到四个激活水平中更高的一个。
    结论:结果表明,在不同的环境和背景下,数字健康干预对患者激活的有效性。暗示着潜在的普遍性。使用WHO分类,所有经过审查的数字干预措施都解决了信息的挑战,利用率,以及卫生系统的效率,但不是与公平相关的挑战。该研究将在线健康社区(OHCs)视为数字干预的子集,可通过社会支持增强患者的激活。
    OBJECTIVE: Study the efficacy of digital health interventions in enhancing patient activation and identify the distinct features of these interventions using the WHO classification system.
    METHODS: Asystematic reviewand meta-analysis were carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and ProQuest. Randomized controlled trials (RCT), quasi-randomized controlled trials, and before-and-after studies enrolling patients ≥ 18 years of age with the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) score measurement and contain digital intervention with any aspects of health education or health-related behavior were included. The Downs and Black quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of the articles.
    RESULTS: In the three different types of meta-analyses, implementing the intervention led to a PAM score increase (Mean Difference (M.D.)), ranging from a minimum of (MD = 0.2014, 95 % CI = 0.0871-0.3158) and a highly significant p-value 0.0006 to a maximum of (MD = 2.7882, 95 % CI = 1.5558-4.0206) and a p-value < .0001. While the M.D. score of 0.2014 may seem relatively low, it is enough to elevate the patient from one activation level to a higher one out of the four activation levels.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest the effectiveness of digital health interventions on patient activation across diverse settings and contexts, implying potential generalizability. Using WHO classification, all examined digital interventions addressed the challenges of information, utilization, and efficiency in the health system, but not equity-related challenges. The study recognized online health communities (OHCs) as a subset of digital interventions that enhance patient activation through social support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于正念的治疗在偏头痛治疗中越来越受欢迎。在这份手稿中,我们报告了一项单臂开放式试点研究的结果,该研究评估了基于网络的多模式干预结合家庭药物戒断的影响。患者教育,和基于在线正念的干预措施。我们旨在解决我们的程序是否有能力显示观察参数的变化,因此该研究应作为早期阶段试验。
    方法:连续纳入与药物过度使用头痛相关的慢性偏头痛患者,随访12个月,在一个包括家庭停药的项目中,关于正确使用药物和生活方式问题的教育,定制的药物预防处方,参加六个在线正念课程。我们测试了该计划对改善头痛频率的影响,药物摄入量,生活质量(QoL),头痛的影响,抑郁症,自我效能感,痛苦的灾难。
    结果:共有37名患者完成了研究(10名退出)。我们观察到头痛频率有了很大的改善,药物摄入量,头痛的影响,和QoL,疼痛灾难化中度改善,抑郁症状轻度改善;从基线到每次随访,70%~76%的患者头痛频率减少50%或更多(p<.01).
    结论:我们的多模式项目结果显示头痛频率显著改善,药物摄入量,和患者报告的结果。需要进行未来的研究,以更好地识别可能从数字健康干预中受益最大的患者,并至少证明与在医院环境中进行的面对面计划的结果等效。
    BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based treatments gained popularity for migraine treatment. In this manuscript we report the results of a single-arm open pilot study that evaluated the impact of a multimodal web-based intervention combining home-based medication withdrawal, patients\' education, and online mindfulness-based interventions. We aimed to address whether our program had the ability to show a change in the observed parameters and the study should therefore be intended as an early phase trial.
    METHODS: Consecutive patients with chronic migraine associated with medication overuse headache were enrolled, followed-up for 12 months, in a program that included home-based medication withdrawal, education on the correct use of drugs and lifestyle issues, prescription of tailored pharmacological prophylaxis, and attendance to six online mindfulness-based sessions. We tested the effect of the program on improving headache frequency, medication intake, quality of life (QoL), headache impact, depression, self-efficacy, and pain catastrophizing.
    RESULTS: A total of 37 patients completed the study (10 dropped out). We observed a large improvement in headache frequency, medication intake, headache impact, and QoL, a moderate improvement in pain catastrophizing and a mild improvement in depression symptoms; 70% to 76% of patients achieved 50% or more reduction in headache frequency from baseline to each follow-up (p < .01).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of our multimodal program showed significant improvements in headache frequency, medication intake, and patient-reported outcomes. Future studies are needed to better identify patients who might benefit most from Digital Health Interventions and to demonstrate at least an equivalence in outcome with in-person programs carried out in hospital settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非自杀性自伤(NSSI),指故意伤害自己的身体而不打算自杀的行为,发生在20%的年轻人中。有趣的是,大约90%的人在NSSI行为前不久报告了自残的心理意象。先前的研究表明,图像脚本(IR)是治疗侵入性心理图像和相关临床症状的有效技术,比如情绪失调,在各种精神疾病中。然而,没有关于自我伤害青少年IR的研究。因此,本研究旨在探讨使用IR进行两节短期干预以减少青少年NSSI和相关临床症状的有效性和可行性.该干预得到了基于应用程序的数字健康干预(DHI)的支持。
    具有三个后评估的单案例系列A-B设计(1周,1个月,干预后3个月)实施。七名青少年接受了两次IR治疗,在会话之间由DHI支持。NSSI(SITBI),情绪调节(ERQ),情绪困扰(BDI-II,STAI-T),自我效能感(WIRKALL_r),和治疗满意度(BIKEP)进行评估。
    在干预后3个月内,适应性情绪调节策略有所增加。此外,患者的自我效能得到改善,抑郁,焦虑,和NSSI症状学。开发的DHI被描述为有用和支持的工具。
    干预措施已显示初步证据对进行NSSI的青少年是可行和有益的。DHI已被证明是治疗自残青年的宝贵工具。
    UNASSIGNED: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), which refers to the deliberate act of causing harm to one\'s own body without the intent to commit suicide, occurs in 20% of youth. Interestingly, approximately 90% of individuals who engage in self-harm report intrusive mental imagery thereof shortly prior to the act of NSSI. Previous research has demonstrated that imagery rescripting (IR) is an effective technique to treat intrusive mental images and associated clinical symptoms, such as emotion dysregulation, in various psychiatric disorders. However, there is no research on IR for adolescents who self-harm. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of a two-session short-intervention using IR to reduce NSSI and associated clinical symptoms in adolescents. The intervention was supported by an app-based digital health intervention (DHI).
    UNASSIGNED: A single case series A-B design with three post-assessments (1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-intervention) was implemented. Seven adolescents received two treatment sessions of IR, supported by a DHI between sessions. NSSI (SITBI), emotion regulation (ERQ), emotional distress (BDI-II, STAI-T), self-efficacy (WIRKALL_r), and treatment satisfaction (BIKEP) were evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: There was an increase in adaptive emotion regulation strategies up to 3 months post-intervention. Furthermore, patients improved regarding their self-efficacy, depressiveness, anxiety, and NSSI symptomatology. The developed DHI was described as a helpful and supportive tool.
    UNASSIGNED: The intervention has shown initial evidence to be feasible and beneficial for adolescents conducting NSSI. The DHI has demonstrated to be a valuable tool in the treatment of self-harming youth.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨科关节置换患者的最佳康复计划可确保更快地恢复功能,早些时候出院,提高患者满意度。数字健康干预措施有望成为重新启用的支持工具。
    目的:这项混合方法研究的主要目标是从患者和临床医生的角度检查AIMS平台的可用性。这项研究的目的是评估我们开发的重新启用平台,该平台使用整体系统方法来解决住院患者中发生的禁用问题。老年人口风险最大。积极和独立管理系统(AIMS)平台有望通过教育和跟踪医院和出院后康复进展的能力,改善患者对康复和自我管理的参与。
    方法:使用了两种众所周知的工具来测量可用性:系统可用性量表(SUS),包含10个项目和,为了更精细的粒度,包含26个项目的用户体验问卷(UEQ)。总之,26名物理治疗师和医疗保健专业人员评估了AIMS临床门户;44名住院患者进行了全膝关节置换术,全髋关节置换术,或动态髋螺钉植入物评估AIMS应用程序。
    结果:对于AIMS临床门户,获得的平均SUS评分为82.88(SD13.07,中位数86.25),根据经过验证的形容词评定量表,这将被认为是良好/优秀的。对于UEQ,归一化分数的平均值(范围-3到+3)如下:吸引力=2.683(SD0.100),敏锐度=2.775(SD0.150),效率=2.775(SD0.130),可靠性=2.300(SD0.080),刺激=1.950(SD0.120),新颖性=1.625(标准差0.090)。因此,所有尺寸都被归类为优于基准,确认SUS问卷的结果。对于AIMS应用程序,获得的平均SUS评分为74.41(SD10.26),中位数为77.50,根据上述形容词评定量表,这将被认为是好的。对于UEQ,归一化分数的平均值如下:吸引力=2.733(SD0.070),敏锐度=2.900(SD0.060),效率=2.800(SD0.090),可靠性=2.425(SD0.060),刺激=2.200(SD0.010),新颖性=1.450(0.260)。因此,所有维度都被归类为优于基准(除了新颖性,被归类为好),提供比SUS问卷略好的结果。
    结论:该研究表明,AIMS临床门户和AIMS应用程序都具有良好到出色的可用性得分,该平台为下一阶段的研究奠定了坚实的基础,这将涉及评估该平台在改善全膝关节置换术后患者预后方面的有效性,全髋关节置换术,或动态髋螺钉。
    BACKGROUND: Optimal rehabilitation programs for orthopedic joint replacement patients ensure faster return to function, earlier discharge from hospital, and improved patient satisfaction. Digital health interventions show promise as a supporting tool for re-enablement.
    OBJECTIVE: The main goal of this mixed methods study was to examine the usability of the AIMS platform from the perspectives of both patients and clinicians. The aim of this study was to evaluate a re-enablement platform that we have developed that uses a holistic systems approach to address the de-enablement that occurs in hospitalized inpatients, with the older adult population most at risk. The Active and Independent Management System (AIMS) platform is anticipated to deliver improved patient participation in recovery and self-management through education and the ability to track rehabilitation progression in hospital and after patient discharge.
    METHODS: Two well-known instruments were used to measure usability: the System Usability Scale (SUS) with 10 items and, for finer granularity, the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) with 26 items. In all, 26 physiotherapists and health care professionals evaluated the AIMS clinical portal; and 44 patients in hospital for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, or dynamic hip screw implant evaluated the AIMS app.
    RESULTS: For the AIMS clinical portal, the mean SUS score obtained was 82.88 (SD 13.07, median 86.25), which would be considered good/excellent according to a validated adjective rating scale. For the UEQ, the means of the normalized scores (range -3 to +3) were as follows: attractiveness=2.683 (SD 0.100), perspicuity=2.775 (SD 0.150), efficiency=2.775 (SD 0.130), dependability=2.300 (SD 0.080), stimulation=1.950 (SD 0.120), and novelty=1.625 (SD 0.090). All dimensions were thus classed as excellent against the benchmarks, confirming the results from the SUS questionnaire. For the AIMS app, the mean SUS score obtained was 74.41 (SD 10.26), with a median of 77.50, which would be considered good according to the aforementioned adjective rating scale. For the UEQ, the means of the normalized scores were as follows: attractiveness=2.733 (SD 0.070), perspicuity=2.900 (SD 0.060), efficiency=2.800 (SD 0.090), dependability=2.425 (SD 0.060), stimulation=2.200 (SD 0.010), and novelty=1.450 (0.260). All dimensions were thus classed as excellent against the benchmarks (with the exception of novelty, which was classed as good), providing slightly better results than the SUS questionnaire.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study has shown that both the AIMS clinical portal and the AIMS app have good to excellent usability scores, and the platform provides a solid foundation for the next phase of research, which will involve evaluating the effectiveness of the platform in improving patient outcomes after total knee replacement, total hip replacement, or dynamic hip screw.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    数字医疗已被证明可以在资源有限的环境中提高医疗服务提供的效率和规模。了解影响其使用的因素可以加快其在常规实践中的实施过程。
    我们于2021年1月至5月在Buea和Tiko卫生区进行了横断面分析研究。我们包括使用多阶段分层抽样选择的医护人员。使用数字健康被定义为由医护人员使用至少两个数字工具和一个数字健康干预(DHI)或至少两个DHI。使用EpiInfo进行统计分析。二元logistic回归用于评估与使用数字健康相关的因素。
    总共,221名参与者被纳入研究。平均年龄33±9.1岁,76.5%为女性。只有39.4%(n=87)的参与者使用数字健康。用于健康相关目的的最常用的数字工具包括:Microsoft(MS)Excel(29.9%),MSPowerPoint(26.8%)和MSWord(39.1%)。使用的DHIs主要为研究型(30.2%)和诊断型(24.1%)软件。数字健康的主要用途是研究(75.6%)。拥有笔记本电脑(调整后的优势比(AOR)=1.98,95%CI,1.01-3.86),在医疗机构中提供互联网连接(1.99,1.05-3.7),并接受ICT/计算机科学方面的专业培训(2.04,1.06-3.93),与使用数字健康的几率更高相关。
    这项研究表明,医护人员对数字健康的使用水平较低。提供较新的设备,卫生设施中的互联网连接以及对医护人员的ICT培训可以提高其使用率。
    UNASSIGNED: digital health has been demonstrated to improve the efficiency and scale of health service delivery in resource-limited settings. Understanding factors influencing its use could accelerate the process of its implementation in routine practice.
    UNASSIGNED: we conducted a cross-sectional analytic study in Buea and Tiko health districts from January to May 2021. We included healthcare workers selected using multistage stratified sampling. Use of digital health was defined as using at least two digital tools and one digital health intervention (DHI) or at least two DHIs by a healthcare worker. Epi Info was used for statistical analysis. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with the use of digital health.
    UNASSIGNED: in total, 221 participants were included in the study. The mean age was 33±9.1 years and 76.5% were female. Only 39.4% (n=87) of participants used digital health. The most frequently used digital tools for health-related purposes included: Microsoft (MS) Excel (29.9%), MS PowerPoint (26.8%) and MS Word (39.1%). The main DHIs used were research (30.2%) and diagnosing (24.1%) software. The main use of digital health was for research (75.6%). Owning a laptop (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.98, 95% CI, 1.01 - 3.86), availability of internet connection in the health facility (1.99, 1.05 - 3.7) and receiving professional training in ICT/Computer Sciences (2.04, 1.06 - 3.93), were associated with higher odds of using digital health.
    UNASSIGNED: this study shows a low level of use of digital health by healthcare workers. Providing newer devices, internet connection in health facilities and training in ICT for healthcare workers could improve its uptake.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全球需要为从事护士教育的教育工作者的职业福祉提供更多支持,护士教育工作者在管理自己的职业福祉时遇到挑战。然而,缺乏对职业幸福感干预措施的研究。目的评估教育工作者自助干预在护士教育中的可用性和实用性。
    方法:2022年春季干预后进行了过程评估。
    方法:在芬兰提供国家规范的实践护士教育的教育组织。
    方法:护士教育者(n=37),完成8个工作周的干预。
    方法:使用自我报告的电子反馈问卷收集数据,问卷由三个部分组成:1)10项系统可用性量表,2)本研究开发的7项效用量表和3)4个开放式问题。对数据进行统计分析和内容分析。
    结果:发现干预是可用的;尤其是易于学习和使用数字SmartBreak-SHINE程序以及适用的练习。据估计,作为工作中的幸福和休息促进者,它是中等有用的。对于工作经验<5年的教育工作者来说,干预措施在工作时间内促进身体活动和恢复的效用比15年以上的教育工作者更积极。特别是在工作量问题上,发现了可用性和实用性障碍。
    结论:教育工作者自助干预支持护士教育工作者的职业福祉,并包括适合不同工作环境的福祉行动(例如,远程工作),而不需要不断的便利。发现干预措施对早期职业护士教育者最有利。教育工作者自助干预需要更多的发展来克服与工作量问题相关的可用性和实用性障碍。
    BACKGROUND: There is a global need for more support for the occupational well-being of educators working in nurse education, where nurse educators experience challenges when managing their own occupational well-being. However, there is a lack of research studies into occupational well-being interventions. Aim To evaluate the usability and utility of the Self-Help INtervention for Educators in nurse education.
    METHODS: A process evaluation was conducted after the intervention in Spring 2022.
    METHODS: Educational organisations providing national regulated practical nurse education in Finland.
    METHODS: Nurse educators (n = 37), completing the 8-workweek intervention.
    METHODS: Data were collected with the self-reported electronic feedback questionnaire consisting of three sections: 1) 10-item System Usability Scale, 2) 7-item Utility scale developed for this study and 3) 4 open ended questions. The data were analysed statistically and with content analysis.
    RESULTS: The intervention was found to be usable; especially the easy learnability and usage of the digital Smart Break-SHINE program and the applicable exercises. It was estimated to be moderately useful as a well-being and break promoter at work. The utility of the intervention to promote physical activity and recovery during working hours was statistically more positive for educators with <5 years of work experience than those with over 15 years. Usability and utility barriers were found especially regarding workload issues.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Self-Help INtervention for Educators supports the occupational well-being of nurse educators and includes well-being actions suitable for different work surroundings (e.g., remote working) without the need for constant facilitating. The intervention was found to be most beneficial for early career nurse educators. The Self-Help INtervention for Educators needs more development to overcome the usability and utility barriers related to workload issues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号