defined daily dose

定义的每日剂量
  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    这项工作以前4年(2016-2019年)的处方趋势为基准,分析了COVID-19对大流行第一年(2020年)抗抑郁药消费的影响。为此,圣克鲁斯德特内里费岛省和组成它的4个岛屿被视为一个地理区域。
    将社区药房的销售数据作为汇总数据库。每个居民和每天的剂量被用作消耗的指标。
    在ELHierro和LaGomera岛,人口的增加本身并不能证明在抗抑郁药和可能的COVID-19的消费中观察到的相关增加是合理的,其对人口健康的影响可能是这些增加的原因。在特内里费岛,人口的增加可以证明,在很大程度上,观察到的消费量略有增加。LaPalma岛增长了1.40%,但低于以过去4年的处方趋势为基准的预期值,尽管人口增长了0.95%。所有的岛屿在抗抑郁药和活性药物成分的不同亚组的消费方面呈现相同的趋势,虽然有轻微的变化,除了LaPalma岛,它呈现出统计上不同的行为和趋势。
    这些差异可能与每个岛屿的社会卫生和人口特征有关。
    UNASSIGNED: This work analyzed the impact of COVID-19 on antidepressant consumption during the first year of the pandemic (2020) taking as a baseline the prescribing trends during the previous 4 years (2016-2019). For this, the province of Santa Cruz de Tenerife and the 4 islands that make it up were taken as a geographical area.
    UNASSIGNED: Sales data in community pharmacies were taken as an aggregated database. The dose per inhabitant and day was used as an indicator of consumption.
    UNASSIGNED: In the islands of EL Hierro and La Gomera, the increase in population does not in itself justify the relevant increases observed in the consumption of antidepressants and possibly COVID-19 and its consequences on the health of the population could be responsible for these increases. On the island of Tenerife, the increase in population could justify, to a large extent, the slight increase in consumption observed. The island of La Palma presents an increase of 1.40%, but lower than the expected value taking as baseline the prescribing trends in the last 4 years, despite an increase in population of 0,95%. All the islands present the same trends in the consumption of the different subgroups of antidepressants and active pharmaceutical ingredients, although with slight variations, with the exception of the island of La Palma which presents a statistically different behavior and trends.
    UNASSIGNED: These differences could be related to the socio-sanitary and demographic characteristics of each of the islands.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:抗生素监测数据对于制定策略以促进其在医院和社区层面的最佳使用至关重要。我们在印度北部的“国家抗菌药物消费网络”核心网站对7年来的抗生素消费纵向趋势进行了全面分析。(2)方法:从医院的中央药店获得住院抗生素消费数据(2017-2023年),并组织如下:每100张床天定义的每日剂量;根据WHO访问的抗生素消费,观察和储备分类;总体和不同抗生素类别的消费趋势;抗生素的儿科配方;以及医院抗生素的年度支出。(3)结果:在7年的研究期间,在总体抗生素消费量中没有观察到显著的趋势(平均每年百分比变化,AAPC:9.22;95%CI:-16.46,34.9)和成本(AAPC:13.55;-13.2,40.3)。与往年相比,从2021年起,“储备”组中的抗生素消费量比例更高,但7年来的总体趋势并不显著(AAPC:319.75;-137.6,777.1)。抗生素组合,归入世界卫生组织“不推荐”类别,包括相当比例的抗生素消耗。在2020年和2021年期间,阿奇霉素和多西环素的消费量显着增加,与COVID-19大流行相吻合。(4)结论:优化抗生素使用的一些建议是促进窄谱“准入”群体药物的使用;将抗菌素耐药性和消费数据联系起来,以制定有效的治疗性和预防性抗生素使用指南;以及采用限制性抗生素政策。
    (1) Background: Antibiotic surveillance data are crucial to map out strategies to promote their optimal use at hospital and community levels. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of longitudinal trends in antibiotic consumption over 7 years at a core \"National Antimicrobial Consumption Network\" site in North India. (2) Methods: In-patient antibiotic consumption data (2017-2023) were obtained from the hospital\'s central drug store and organised as follows: defined daily dose per 100 bed-days; antibiotic consumption as per the WHO access, watch and reserve classification; trends in overall and different antibiotic classes\' consumption; paediatric formulations of antibiotics; and hospital\'s annual expenditure on antibiotics. (3) Results: During the 7-year study period, no significant trend could be observed in the overall antibiotic consumption (average annual percent change, AAPC: 9.22; 95% CI: -16.46, 34.9) and cost (AAPC: 13.55; -13.2, 40.3). There was a higher proportion of the consumption of antibiotics in the \"reserve\" group from 2021 onwards compared to previous years, but the overall trend over 7 years was not significant (AAPC: 319.75; -137.6, 777.1). Antibiotic combinations, classified under the WHO \"not recommended\" category, comprised a significant proportion of antibiotics consumed. A remarkably increased consumption of azithromycin and doxycycline was recorded during 2020 and 2021, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. (4) Conclusions: Some recommendations to optimise antibiotic use are promoting the use of narrow spectrum \"access\" group agents; linking antimicrobial resistance and consumption data to formulate effective therapeutic and prophylactic antibiotic use guidelines; and the adoption of restrictive antibiotic policy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着第一批国家重点监测和合理使用药品(第一批NKMRUD)控制药品成本增长的显着效果,国家卫生健康委员会发布第二份NKMRUD,进一步加强合理用药。不幸的是,第二个NKMRUD包括国家批量采购和国家基本药物的一些药物,这对三种药品的药事管理提出了挑战。
    本研究的主要目的是调查第二NKMRUDs的患病率并探索其监测指标。
    对第二次NKMRUDs进行了经调整的WHO点患病率调查方法。对于监测指标,我们试图通过比较DDD和DOT与处方日剂量(PDD)之间的差异,探索确定的日剂量(DDD)和治疗天数(DOT)是否适用于第二次NKMRUDs.
    在935名患者中,29.20%的患者接受了至少一种第二NKMRUD。总共给273名患者施用487次第二次NKMRUDs。其中,162,62,49名患者接受了一项治疗,两个,和三个或更多的特工,分别。最常见的第二NKMRUD是复合氨基酸,布地奈德,还有头孢他啶.第二NKMRUD的总DDDs和DOT分别为3360.68和1819.80,PDD为1865.26。DDDs与PDDs的偏差(80.17%)显著大于DOT的偏差(-2.44%)。
    第二NKMRUDs的患病率是通过在三级大学医院使用适应的PPS方法获得的。发现DOT指标比第二NKMRUD的DDD指标更准确地反映实际消耗。建议使用DOT指示器监控第二个NKMRUD。
    UNASSIGNED: With the remarkable effect of controlling the increase in drug costs by the first batch of National Key Monitoring and Rational Use Drugs (first NKMRUDs), the National Health Commission of the People\'s Republic of China releases the second NKMRUDs to further strengthen the reasonable use of drugs. Unfortunately, the second NKMRUDs include some drugs of National Volume-based Procurement and National Essential Medicines, which challenges the management of pharmaceutical affairs on the three kinds of drugs.
    UNASSIGNED: The main objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of the second NKMRUDs and explore their monitoring indicators.
    UNASSIGNED: An adapted WHO methodology for point prevalence surveys was conducted for the second NKMRUDs. For the monitoring indicators, we sought to explore whether the defined daily dose (DDD) and days of therapy (DOT) can be suitable for the second NKMRUDs through comparing differences between DDD and DOT with the prescribed daily dose (PDD).
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 935 included patients, 29.20% of the patients received at least one of the second NKMRUDs. A total of 273 patients were administered with 487 times of the second NKMRUDs. Among them, 162 , 62 , and 49 patients were receiving one, two, and three or more agents, respectively. The most commonly prescribed second NKMRUDs were compound amino acids, budesonide, and ceftazidime. The total DDDs and DOTs of the second NKMRUDs were 3360.68 and 1819.80, respectively, with the PDDs of 1865.26. The deviations (80.17%) of DDDs from PDDs were significantly greater than those (-2.44%) of DOTs.
    UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of the second NKMRUDs was obtained by using the adapted PPS methodology at a tertiary university hospital. The DOT indicator is found to more accurately reflect actual consumption than the DDD indicator for second NKMRUDs. It is recommended to use the DOT indicator to monitor second NKMRUDs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了在重症监护病房(ICU)中量化抗菌药物使用的四个指标之间的差异:定义的每日剂量(DDD),规定的每日剂量(PDD),治疗持续时间(DOT),和治疗时间(LOT),并推荐最临床相关的方法。分析了至少接受过一种抗菌药物的患者的回顾性数据。记录不完整或过期的患者被排除在外。与28391/1000PDs的DDD相比,治疗持续时间(24433/1000PDs)和LOTs(12832/1000PDs)低估了抗菌药物的总体消耗量。而PDD(46699/1000PDs)高估了它。比较分析检测到DDD和DOT之间的百分比差异为13.94、23.92和54.80%,DDD和PDD,还有DDD和LOT,指标分别。线性回归显示更强(r2=0.86),中等(r2=0.50),DDD和DOT之间的中度(R2=0.60)相关性,DDD和PDD以及DDD和LOT指标。根据调查结果,结合DOT和DDD是一种更实用的方法来量化医院ICU中的抗菌药物消耗。
    Deshwal公关,TiwariP.调查重症监护病房抗菌药物使用量化指标的变异性:真实世界证据分析。印度J暴击护理中心2024;28(7):662-676。
    This study investigated variability among four indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use in intensive care units (ICUs): defined daily doses (DDD), prescribed daily doses (PDD), duration of therapy (DOT), and length of therapy (LOT) and recommended the most clinically relevant approach. Retrospective data from patients who had received at least one antimicrobial was analyzed. Patients whose records were incomplete or expired were excluded. Duration of therapy (24433/1000 PDs) and LOTs (12832/1000 PDs) underestimated the overall consumption of antimicrobials compared with DDD of 28391/1000 PDs. Whereas PDD (46699/1000 PDs) overestimated it. Comparison analysis detected % differences of 13.94, 23.92, and 54.80% between DDD and DOT, DDD and PDD, and DDD and LOT, indicators respectively. Linear regression revealed stronger (r 2 = 0.86), moderate (r 2 = 0.50), and moderate (r 2 =0.60) correlation between DDD and DOT, DDD and PDD and DDD and LOT indicators respectively. According to findings, combining DOT and DDD is a more practical method to quantify antimicrobial consumption in hospital ICUs.
    UNASSIGNED: Deshwal PR, Tiwari P. Investigating the Variability among Indicators for Quantifying Antimicrobial Use in the Intensive Care Units: Analysis of Real-world Evidence. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):662-676.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在COVID-19大流行的早期阶段,后来被证明是不正确的初步结果表明,抗感染药物如阿奇霉素治疗SARS-CoV-2感染的可能疗效。这些初步数据可能影响了阿奇霉素的处方。然而,目前尚无个体层面的数据将该抗生素的使用与急性SARS-CoV-2感染联系起来.本分析旨在填补这一空白。
    方法:采用基于人群的回顾性队列设计,纳入2020年2月至2022年2月期间诊断为SARS-CoV-2感染的患者。抗生素消费的数据来源是艾米利亚-罗马涅地区(意大利)门诊处方的药物数据库。根据解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类系统对抗生素进行分类。将感染急性期的阿奇霉素DDDs(定义的每日剂量)的消耗率和百分比与先前的对照期和急性期进行比较。根据诊断时流行的病毒变异,按四组进行分层分析。
    结果:将先前的对照期与感染的急性期进行比较,阿奇霉素的消费率(DDD每1000个人每天)从1.17增加到23.11,从0.80增加到33.03,从0.81增加到21.01,从1.02增加到9.76,阿尔法,Delta,和Omicron周期,分别。同样,接受阿奇霉素的人的百分比,与对照组相比,感染急性期的阿奇霉素DDDs占全身抗生素DDDs的百分比增加。急性期后的消耗率和百分比恢复到感染前水平。在学习期间,在Emilia-Romagna的整个成年人口中,使用阿奇霉素的12.9%归因于急性SARS-CoV-2感染。
    结论:考虑到细菌合并感染的可能性较低,SARS-CoV-2感染急性期阿奇霉素用量增加,提示该抗生素的处方不当.
    OBJECTIVE: In the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, preliminary results that later proved to be incorrect suggested the possible efficacy of anti-infective drugs such as azithromycin for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. These preliminary data may have influenced the prescription of azithromycin. However, no individual-level data linking the use of this antibiotic to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection are available. The present analysis aims to fill this gap.
    METHODS: A retrospective population-based cohort design was used including patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the period ranging from February 2020 to February 2022. The data source for antibiotic consumption was the drug database of outpatient prescriptions of Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy). Antibiotics were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. Consumption rates and percentages of azithromycin DDDs (defined daily doses) during the acute phase of the infection were compared with a previous control period and with the post-acute phase. Analyses were stratified by four groups according to the prevalent virus variant at time of diagnosis.
    RESULTS: Comparing the previous control period with the acute phase of infections, the rates of azithromycin consumption (DDD per 1000 individuals per day) increased from 1.17 to 23.11, from 0.80 to 33.03, from 0.81 to 21.01, and from 1.02 to 9.76, in the pre-Alpha, Alpha, Delta, and Omicron periods, respectively. Similarly, the percentages of individuals receiving azithromycin, and the azithromycin DDDs percentages over total systemic antibiotics DDDs increased in acute phases of infection compared with control periods. The consumption rates and percentages returned to preinfection levels in the post-acute phase. In the study period, 12.9% of the use of azithromycin in the entire adult population of Emilia-Romagna was attributable to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    CONCLUSIONS: Considering the low likelihood of bacterial coinfections, the increased azithromycin consumption in the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection suggests inappropriate prescribing of this antibiotic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:越来越多的证据表明,癌症患者使用抗生素(ATB)可能与患者预后相关。有趣的是,这些药物的使用在结直肠癌(CRC)患者手术中并不少见;然而,它们在临床中的预后价值从未得到解决。
    方法:手术过程中使用ATB的数据,包括累积每日剂量(cDDD)和类别数,被收集。低cDDD和高cDDD亚组之间以及≤4和>4类别的亚组之间的临床数据差异。此外,比较了这些亚组和特定类别之间的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS).最后,Cox比例风险模型用于验证结局的危险因素.
    结果:类别的数量,而不是cDDD,是DFS(P=0.043)和OS(P=0.039)的显著预测因子。患有梗阻的患者更有可能患有高cDDD,而老年患者更可能有多个类别。低cDDD和高cDDD亚组患者的DFS(logrank=1.36,P=0.244)和OS(logrank=0.40,P=0.528)差异无统计学意义。而与>4类患者相比,≤4类患者的DFS(logrank=9.92,P=0.002)和OS(logrank=8.30,P=0.004)均较好.具体来说,喹诺酮类药物的使用对生存有害(DFS:logrank=3.67,P=0.055;OS:logrank=5.10,P=0.024),而大环内酯类药物的使用有利于生存(DFS:logrank=12.26,P<0.001;OS:logrank=9.77,P=0.002)。最后,分类数是DFS(HR=2.05,95%CI:1.35~3.11,P=0.001)和OS(HR=1.82,95%CI:1.14~2.90,P=0.012)的独立危险因素.
    结论:I-III期CRC患者手术期间ATB的cDDD与预后无关;然而,多个类别或特定类别的患者的生存率可能较差.这些结果表明,在临床中为这些患者选择ATB时应特别谨慎。
    OBJECTIVE: Accumulating evidence indicates that the use of antibiotics (ATBs) in cancer patients is potentially correlated with patient prognosis. Interestingly, the use of these agents is not uncommon in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients during surgery; however, their prognostic value in the clinic has never been addressed.
    METHODS: Data on ATB use during surgery, including the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and the number of categories, were collected. Differences in the clinical data between the low and high cDDD subgroups and between subgroups with ≤ 4 and >4 categories. Additionally, the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among these subgroups and the specific categories were compared. Finally, a Cox proportional hazard model was used to validate the risk factors for the outcome.
    RESULTS: The number of categories, rather than the cDDD, was a significant predictor of both DFS (P = 0.043) and OS (P = 0.039). Patients with obstruction are more likely to have a high cDDD, whereas older patients are more likely to have multiple categories. There were no significant differences in the DFS (log rank = 1.36, P = 0.244) or OS (log rank = 0.40, P = 0.528) between patients in the low- and high-cDDD subgroups, whereas patients with ≤ 4 categories had superior DFS (log rank = 9.92, P = 0.002) and OS (log rank = 8.30, P = 0.004) compared with those with >4 categories. Specifically, the use of quinolones was harmful to survival (DFS: log rank = 3.67, P = 0.055; OS: log rank = 5.10, P = 0.024), whereas the use of macrolides was beneficial to survival (DFS: log rank = 12.26, P < 0.001; OS: log rank = 9.77, P = 0.002). Finally, the number of categories was identified as an independent risk factor for both DFS (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.35-3.11, P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.14-2.90, P = 0.012).
    CONCLUSIONS: The cDDD of ATBs during surgery in stage I-III CRC patients did not correlate with outcome; however, patients in multiple categories or a specific category are likely to have inferior survival. These results suggest that particular caution should be taken when selecting ATBs for these patients in the clinic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多药耐药(MDR)细菌引起的感染通常与高发病率和死亡率相关。特别是在易受伤害的个体中,例如长期住院的患者,免疫受损的个体,和老人。这项研究旨在通过多学科团队的合作,提供有关针对革兰氏阴性菌的抗生素耐药性流行的上市后监测结果。相关患者已经接受了新的抗菌药物治疗,特别是头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(C/A),美罗培南/伐巴坦(M/V),cefiderocol,和头孢洛赞/他唑巴坦(C/T)。耐药性最强的细菌是克雷伯菌属。,铜绿假单胞菌,和鲍曼不动杆菌.收集并分析了意大利药品管理局(AIFA)住院患者的监测记录,评估患者的特征。已使用描述性分析方法报告了不良药物反应(ADR)和涉及的药物。所有数据均从患者的病历中进行回顾性收集,并输入电子病例报告表(CRF)。在104名接受治疗的患者中,克雷伯菌属。占感染的50.1%,铜绿假单胞菌占32.7%,3%的鲍曼不动杆菌,和其他细菌种类为1.92%配置多微生物感染。关于治疗结果,61例(58.6%)患者治愈,23例(22.1%)患者死亡,8例(7.7%)患者停止经验性治疗,3例(2.9%)患者失访。尽管引入了对革兰氏阴性菌具有活性的新抗菌药物,但临床情况正在改善,至关重要的是,新抗菌药物的使用应通过适当的抗菌管理来实施,监视程序,和监测努力,以防止抵抗进一步蔓延。这项研究表明,新的抗生素对MDR细菌具有良好的疗效,并且副作用可以忽略不计。
    Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are typically associated with high morbidity and mortality, especially in vulnerable individuals such as patients with prolonged hospitalizations, immunocompromised individuals, and the elderly. This study aimed to provide post-marketing surveillance results concerning the prevalence of antibiotic resistance against Gram-negative bacteria through the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team. Patients involved have been treated with new antibacterial drugs, in particular ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A), meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V), cefiderocol, and ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T). The most resistant bacterial species were Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii. Italian Drug Agency (AIFA) monitoring records for inpatients have been collected and analyzed, assessing the characteristics of the patients involved. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and drugs involved have been reported using a descriptive analytical approach. All data have been collected retrospectively from patient\'s medical records and entered into an electronic case report form (CRF). Among the 104 treated patients, Klebsiella spp. accounted for 50.1% of infections, Pseudomonas aeruginosa for 32.7%, Acinetobacter baumannii for 3%, and other bacterial species for 1.92% configuring polymicrobial infections. Regarding treatment outcomes, healing was achieved in 61 (58.6%) patients, 23 (22.1%) patients died, 8 (7.7%) patients discontinued empirical therapy, and 3 (2.9%) patients were lost to follow-up. Despite the introduction of new antibacterial drugs active against Gram-negative bacteria is improving the clinical scenario, it is crucial that the use of new antibacterial drugs be implemented by appropriate antimicrobial stewardship, surveillance programs, and monitoring efforts to prevent further spread of resistance. This study showed that the new antibiotics have good efficacy against MDR bacteria and cause negligible side effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究深入研究了那不勒斯3南部当地卫生机构的两年阿片类药物处方趋势,坎帕尼亚地区,意大利。这项研究旨在阐明处方模式,人口统计,以及占全国总数1.7%的人口中的剂量类别。讨论了人工智能研究的前景。
    从原始数据集,从2022年1月到2023年10月,我们处理了多个变量,包括人口统计数据,药物,剂量,药物消费,和管理路线。根据规定的每日剂量(DDD)计算分配量。
    分析揭示了阿片类药物治疗的保守方法。在20岁以下的受试者中,处方在2022年占2.1%,在2023年下降到1.4%。扑热息痛/可待因的药物组合是最常用的处方,其次是他汀类药物。大约三分之二的消费涉及口服制剂。透皮制剂为15%(芬太尼9.8%,2022年丁丙诺啡5.1%);16.6%(芬太尼10%,丁丙诺啡6.6%),2023年。这些数据通过DDD分析得到证实。趋势分析表明,从2022年到2023年,成年人(40-69岁)的处方阿片类药物数量显着减少(p<0.001)。速效阿片类药物(ROO)的研究,专门用于突破性癌症疼痛的药物,在女性中显示出更高的剂量(>267微克)消费量,而男性的剂量较低(<133mcg)。芬太尼果胶喷鼻剂约占所有ROO的五分之一。
    尽管有限制,该研究为涉及重要研究人群的处方实践提供了有价值的见解。调查结果强调了需要量身定制的处方方法,认识到疼痛管理在不同情况下的复杂性。这项研究可以为正在进行的关于阿片类药物使用的讨论做出贡献,倡导创新策略,优化治疗结果,同时降低潜在风险。
    UNASSIGNED: This study delves into the two-year opioid prescription trends in the Local Sanitary Agency Naples 3 South, Campania Region, Italy. The research aims to elucidate prescribing patterns, demographics, and dosage categories within a population representing 1.7% of the national total. Perspectives on artificial intelligence research are discussed.
    UNASSIGNED: From the original dataset, spanning from January 2022 to October 2023, we processed multiple variables including demographic data, medications, dosages, drug consumption, and administration routes. The dispensing quantity was calculated as defined daily doses (DDD).
    UNASSIGNED: The analysis reveals a conservative approach to opioid therapy. In subjects under the age of 20, prescriptions accounted for 2.1% in 2022 and declined to 1.4% in 2023. The drug combination paracetamol/codeine was the most frequently prescribed, followed by tapentadol. Approximately two-thirds of the consumption pertains to oral formulations. Transdermal formulations were 15% (fentanyl 9.8%, buprenorphine 5.1%) in 2022; and 16.6% (fentanyl 10%, buprenorphine 6.6%) in 2023. These data were confirmed by the DDD analysis. The trend analysis demonstrated a significant reduction ( p < 0.001) in the number of prescribed opioids from 2022 to 2023 in adults (40-69 years). The study of rapid-onset opioids (ROOs), drugs specifically used for breakthrough cancer pain, showed higher dosage (>267 mcg) consumption among women, whereas a lower dosage (<133 mcg) was calculated for men. Fentanyl pectin nasal spray accounted for approximately one-fifth of all ROOs.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite limitations, the study provides valuable insights into prescribing practices involving an important study population. The findings underscore the need for tailored approaches to prescribing practices, recognizing the complexities of pain management in different contexts. This research can contribute to the ongoing discourse on opioid use, advocating for innovative strategies that optimize therapeutic outcomes while mitigating potential risks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗生素过量处方在儿科急诊医学中很普遍,受临床医生-护理人员动态和诊断不确定性的影响,并带来巨大的风险,如增加抗菌抗性,药物不良反应,增加医疗支出。虽然抗菌药物管理计划已被证明在优化住院医疗环境中的抗生素使用方面是有效的,它们在儿科急诊医学中的实施提出了具体的挑战。现有的生物标志物,如白细胞计数,C反应蛋白,降钙素原,和presepsin在区分(严重)细菌感染和其他发热病因的能力方面存在局限性。此外,旨在指导儿童抗生素处方的快速抗原检测测试和指南并没有持续减少不必要的抗生素使用。为了改善抗生素处方实践,潜在的战略包括利用决策支持工具,审计和反馈,建立后续程序,实施安全网系统,并提供全面的培训和监督。值得注意的是,宿主基因组特征也因其促进快速和精确诊断炎症综合征的潜力而受到关注.标准化指标对于评估儿科医疗机构中的抗菌药物使用至关重要,能够建立评估抗生素使用的基准,提高质量举措,和研究努力。
    Antibiotic overprescribing is prevalent in pediatric emergency medicine, influenced by clinician-caregiver dynamics and diagnostic uncertainties, and poses substantial risks such as increasing antibacterial resistance, adverse drug reactions, and increased healthcare expenditures. While antimicrobial stewardship programs have proven effective in optimizing antibiotic use within inpatient healthcare settings, their implementation in pediatric emergency medicine presents specific challenges. Existing biomarkers like white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and presepsin have limitations in their ability to distinguish (serious) bacterial infections from other etiologies of fever. Furthermore, rapid antigen detection tests and guidelines aimed at guiding antibiotic prescriptions for children have not consistently reduced unnecessary antibiotic use. To improve antibiotic prescribing practices, potential strategies include the utilization of decision support tools, audit and feedback, establishing follow-up procedures, implementing safety netting systems, and delivering comprehensive training and supervision. Notably, host genome signatures have also gained attention for their potential to facilitate rapid and precise diagnoses of inflammatory syndromes. Standardized metrics are crucial for evaluating antimicrobial use within pediatric healthcare settings, enabling the establishment of benchmarks for assessing antibiotic utilization, quality enhancement initiatives, and research endeavors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是研究碳青霉烯限制性抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)对感染剂耐药性变化的影响,抗生素的使用量,在重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间,死亡率和成本。
    方法:将2020年7月1日至2021年5月1日期间在ICU住院的患者纳入研究。这项研究分为两个不同的时期,碳青霉烯类非限制期(CNRP)和碳青霉烯类非限制期(CRP)。在CNRP期间,碳青霉烯被任何限制使用,在CRP中,在感染期间首选替代抗生素来替代碳青霉烯类抗生素.使用定义的每日剂量(DDD)-100患者日(PD)方法来计算抗生素消耗。
    结果:在纳入研究的572名患者中,62.2%的患者为男性,平均年龄为70.5岁.在血液培养中,最常见的革兰氏阴性菌是鲍曼不动杆菌(25%)。鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染与MDR,这两个时期的XDR差异显著(CNRP:95.6%(22),CRP:66.6%(8)p=0.04)。观察到医院感染的发生率和发生率逐渐降低(p=0.06)。在研究期间,美罗培南的消耗量在两个时期间显著下降(CNRP-CRP:21.19~6.37DDD/100PDp=0.007).ASP提供了8600美元的抗生素成本节约和每个患者总共14%的患者成本节约(p<0.05)。
    结论:我们认为,将有效的ASP与全面的感染控制计划相结合,将减轻耐药菌的出现。
    BACKGROUND: Carbapenems are antibiotics used for serious infections. The consumption of carbapenems has increased worldwide due to increasing microbial resistance.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of a carbapenem-restricted antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) on changes in the resistance profiles of infectious agents, the amount of antibiotics used, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), mortality, and costs.
    METHODS: Patients hospitalized in ICU between July 1st, 2020 and May 1st, 2021 were divided into two periods: the carbapenem-non-restricted period (CNRP); and the carbapenem-restricted period (CRP) in which alternative antibiotics to carbapenems were preferred during infection. The defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 patient-day methodology was used to calculate the antibiotic consumption.
    RESULTS: Of the 572 patients included in the study, 62.2% were male, and mean age was 70.5 years. In the blood culture the most frequently Gram-negative agent was Acinetobacter baumannii (25%). A. baumannii bloodstream infections with multidrug-resistant and extensively drug resistant micro-organisms were significantly different between the two periods (CNRP: 95.6% (N = 22), CRP: 66.6% (N = 8); P = 0.04). There was a gradual decrease in the incidence density and rate of nosocomial infection (P = 0.06), and a significant decrease in meropenem consumption between the two periods (CNRP vs CRP: 21.19 vs 6.37 DDD per 100 patient-days respectively; P = 0.007). ASP yielded US$8,600 of antibiotic cost savings and a total of 14% patient cost savings (P < 0.05) per patient.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combining an effective ASP with a comprehensive infection control programme may mitigate the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号