OBJECTIVE: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic rheumatic, musculoskeletal, inflammatory disease with a propensity to present as sacroiliitis, which manifests as low back, buttock, or thigh pain. Effective primary management of axSpA requires a comprehensive approach specific to each patient and disease severity. Non-pharmacological measures form the cornerstone of treatment. With refractory disease, management also consists of local periarticular and intraarticular injections. The use of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) corticosteroid injections for the treatment of axSpA and localised inflammation, however, is a continuously burgeoning management option. This narrative review aims to present consolidated findings and summarise previously unreferenced or recently available evidence regarding corticosteroid injections to the SIJ for treating sacroiliitis and axSpA.
METHODS: A comprehensive literary review with the following electronic databases was searched: MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE.
RESULTS: The initial search yielded a total of 126 references. After duplicates were removed and the remainder analysed for inclusion criteria, 7 studies were included. To stratify each study, injection methodology and characteristics were defined.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of SIJ corticosteroid injections can be an appropriate and effective treatment option for refractory axSpA. The studies presented in this review reported a general trend towards a reduction in pain severity after SIJ corticosteroid injections. Because of the complexity and heterogeneity of the anatomy of the SIJ, image guidance is recommended when performing SIJ injections. Image-guided injections seem to produce better outcomes when compared to anatomic landmark-guided injections.

UNASSIGNED: Rapidly progressive hip osteoarthritis (OA) leading to femoral head collapse (FHC) following intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid injections is a perplexing variant of OA. We explored eight cases of chronic joint pain treated with IA corticosteroid injections. Subsequently, they experienced swift deterioration of the femoral head integrity within as little as 10 weeks. These cases underscore the need for a comprehensive assessment of risk factors versus benefits in this patient population.
UNASSIGNED: The study reveals a complex interplay between comorbidities, treatments, and outcomes. Patients exhibited various health factors, including obesity, smoking history, cancer treatment, and deficiencies in Vitamin D levels, which have been found to increase the risk of FHC. Furthermore, the study explores the chondrotoxicity of corticosteroids and local anesthetics used in IA injections. In vitro studies show complete loss of chondrocyte viability after a single dose of corticosteroids, potentially leading to cartilage degradation. In addition, local anesthetics may induce cellular demise and structural alterations in the articular cartilage. These factors highlight various influences affecting treatment outcomes in patients with OA.
UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, this case series highlights the rare adverse outcome of rapidly progressive hip OA and FHC following IA corticosteroid injections and possible risk factors. While a definitive etiology remains unclear, the study provides valuable conclusions to aid in future treatment decision-making.

OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence rate of sinus tarsi syndrome after lateral ankle sprain and observe the clinical efficacy of sinus tarsal corticosteroid injections.
METHODS: From January 2021 to Janury 2022, 391 patients with lateral ankle sprain and 88 patients with sinus tarsi syndrome using corticosteroid injections (compound betamethasone 1 ml+ lidocaine hydrochloride 4 ml) were retrospectively analyzed. There were 22 males and 66 females, aged from 29 to 60 years old with an average of (41.00±7.52) years old, duration of the disease from 1 to 12 months with an average of (5.6±4.2) months. The visual analogue scale(VAS) and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS) scores were collected before, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after treatment.
RESULTS: All 88 patients completed a 12-month follow-up. The incidence rate of sinus tarsi syndrome after lateral ankle sprain was 22.5%. One month after treatment, VAS was 1.20±0.89, AOFAS score was 88.70±7.04. Three months after treatment, VAS was 1.60±1.35, AOFAS score was 85.20±10.95. Six months after treatment, VAS 2.35±1.39, AOFAS 80.30±9.75. Twelve months after treatment, VAS was 2.80±1.51, AOFAS score was 79.1±9.94. Significant differences were found before and after treatment at all four time points of follow-up(P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that the incidence rate of sinus tarsi syndrome after lateral ankle sprain was 22.5%. Corticosteroid injections were effective in the short term with a 65% recurrence rate of symptoms within 1 year. For patients with no significant long-term effect of conservative treatment, clinicians may explore alternative approaches, including options like ankle arthroscopy.

De Quervain\'s tenosynovitis causes pain and impairment of thumb function. Conservative treatments comprise corticosteroid injection and immobilization, and it is unclear which offers greater efficacy. Previous reviews were limited by the small number of included studies; thus an updated review and meta-analysis is warranted.
A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted. Randomized control trials comparing corticosteroid injection to immobilization were included. Two authors screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analyses using the random-effects model were conducted, calculating pooled relative risks and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals.
16 studies comprising 1206 patients were included. Corticosteroid injection showed greater treatment success than immobilization (relative risk: 1.61; 95% confidence interval: 1.21-2.15). Combining treatments demonstrated greater efficacy than immobilization (relative risk: 2.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.77-2.62) or injection alone (relative risk: 1.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.12-1.34). Pain and disability scores were lower with injection than immobilization and with combined treatment than with either alone.
Corticosteroid injection is more effective than immobilization for De Quervain\'s tenosynovitis, and combining the two treatments provides additional benefit. We recommend corticosteroid injection in first line treatment and immobilization as adjuvant therapy. Further research is required regarding optimal corticosteroid and local anesthetic formulations.

UNASSIGNED: Current treatment for knee Osteoarthritis (OA) includes exercise and intra-articular injections with corticosteroid (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), etc., which address OA-related pain and functional limitation. While these interventions can be given together, little is known about the efficacy of a multi-modal approach. The purpose of this scoping review is to examine studies that compare combining exercise and intra-articular knee injections to exercise alone for the management of knee OA.
UNASSIGNED: A search was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, and Clinicaltrials.gov with MeSH terms \"knee osteoarthritis\" AND \"exercise\" AND \"injections\". Abstracts were screened to meet inclusion criteria of both intervention groups including exercise and one group receiving an injection for treatment of knee OA. Full text articles were screened to meet inclusion criteria and rated using the Pedro Scale.
UNASSIGNED: 11 studies that met inclusion criteria. The included studies utilized CS, hyaluronic acid (HA), and Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC), botulinum toxin A, or a combination of dextrose and lidocaine injections. Most studies included supervised exercise interventions with all studies including strengthening of the quadriceps. CS and exercise compared to exercise alone showed similar improvements in pain. The HA injection studies yielded mixed results with two studies finding HA and exercise was not superior than exercise alone while two other studies found that HA and exercise were superior.
UNASSIGNED: There was a paucity of literature investigating multimodal approaches. Most of the included studies did not find superior effects of adding a knee injection to exercise compared to exercise alone for knee OA.

UNASSIGNED: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology is typically diagnosed and treated with fluoroscopy-guided intraarticular injections. Most practitioners use only an anteroposterior (AP) or oblique view. Although injection into the periarticular space may yield adequate pain relief, intraarticular needle placement is imperative to identify SIJ pathology and plan future management. This study highlights the importance of obtaining an additional lateral view during fluoroscopy to better evaluate SIJ disease.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review of 38 patients who underwent fluoroscopy guided SIJ injection was conducted, for which IRB approval was granted by the MetroWest Medical Center Institutional Review Board. Patient demographics (age, sex, BMI) and pre- and post-operative numerical rating scale (NRS) scores were collected, and initial needle location was reviewed. Patients were placed into groups according to initial needle location. Statistical analysis was conducted using a Mann-Whitney U-test with significance defined as p < 0.05.
UNASSIGNED: The 21 females and 17 males had a mean age and BMI of 70.5 years and 27.8 kg/m2, respectively. Thirty-one patients had initial intraarticular needle placement confirmed with lateral arthrogram, and 7 patients had initial periarticular needle placement, requiring needle readjustment in lateral confirmatory view. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups\' mean NRS score improvement (p=0.108).
UNASSIGNED: Using only the AP or oblique view during needle placement results in miss rates of nearly 20% while adding a lateral view can lower miss rates to near 0%. While pain relief may be adequate in either case, proper diagnosis and future management relies upon accurate needle placement.

BACKGROUND: Sub-Tenon\'s triamcinolone acetonide (STA) is less effective than intravitreal corticosteroids in the treatment of uveitic macular edema (ME), but does have some relative advantages, including substantially lower cost and decreased risk of post-injection ocular hypertension. It would be useful for clinicians to know which eyes may respond well to STA and not necessarily require intravitreal therapy. The objective of this study is to identify risk factors for failing STA for the treatment of uveitic ME.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Medical records were reviewed of patients who underwent STA for the treatment of uveitic ME between January 1, 2013, and July 31, 2022, at the University of Colorado Hospital. Uveitic ME was defined by a central subfield thickness (CST) greater than 320 μm or the presence of intra-retinal cystoid spaces on optical coherence tomography (OCT), or by the presence of petaloid macular leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA). Data collected included age, race/ethnicity, sex, history of diabetes mellitus, anatomic classification of uveitis, use of corticosteroids, use of immunomodulatory therapy, presence of intra-retinal fluid on OCT, CST on OCT, and presence of petaloid macular leakage on FA. STA failure was defined as the need for additional therapy within 12 weeks of STA due to persistent or worsening uveitic ME. One hundred eighty eyes from 131 patients were included. Forty-two eyes (23.3%) were considered treatment failures. In univariate and multivariable analysis, higher baseline CST was associated with a higher likelihood of failing STA (OR 1.17 for each 30 μm increase in CST, P = 0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: STA, while not as potent as intravitreal corticosteroids for the treatment of uveitic ME, was still an effective therapy, particularly for patients with lower baseline CST. Given its lower side effect profile and cost compared to intravitreal treatments, clinicians could consider STA as an initial treatment for mild uveitic ME.

BACKGROUND: Previous evidence has demonstrated an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients receiving corticosteroid injection (CSI) within 3 months of surgery. The study aimed to determine if PJI risk after TKA varied among different corticosteroid agents.
METHODS: A total of 85,073 patients undergoing primary TKA from 2009 to 2019 were identified from a large national database. Of these, 1,092 (1.3%) received an ipsilateral, intra-articular CSI within 90 days of TKA. These patients were compared to those not receiving CSI using multivariate logistic regressions following 1:4 propensity score matching, with PJI development as the primary outcome.
RESULTS: Patients given an injection of any corticosteroid within 90 days of TKA had significantly higher PJI rates compared to controls (1.6 versus 0.41%; P < .001). This finding was driven by patients receiving methylprednisolone acetate (n = 543) or betamethasone (n = 153), with prevalence rates of 1.7 and 2.6%, respectively (P = .003 and P = .01, respectively). No significant increase in the rate of PJI was observed for patients receiving triamcinolone (1.2%; P = .08; n = 342) or dexamethasone (0.0%; P = 1; n = 54) within 90 days preceding TKA. PJI risk for all agents, administered more than 90 days preoperatively normalized to control levels (0.51 versus 0.34%).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PJI risk varies with CSI type. In this large database study, only patients given methylprednisolone acetate or betamethasone injections within 90 days of surgery had significantly higher PJI rates compared to controls.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections (CSI) may increase the risk of peri-prosthetic infections (PJI) following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Our study specifically assessed the risk of PJI in patients who received CSI: (1) less than 4 weeks prior to TSA; (2) 4-8 weeks prior to TSA; and (3) 8-12 weeks prior to TSA.
METHODS: A national all-payer database was queried to identify patients who underwent TSA with a shoulder osteoarthritis diagnosis from October 1, 2015 to October 31, 2020 (n = 25,422). There were four cohorts: CSI within 4 weeks of TSA (n = 214), CSI 4-8 weeks prior to TSA (n = 473), CSI 8-12 weeks prior to TSA (n = 604), and a control cohort that did not receive CSI (n = 15,486). Bivariate chi-square analyses of outcomes were performed in addition to multivariate regression.
RESULTS: A significant increase in PJI risk at 1 year (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.29, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.19-3.99, p = 0.007) and 2 years (OR = 2.03, CI = 1.09-3.46, p = 0.016) in patients who received CSI within 1 month of TSA was noted. PJI risk was not significantly increased at any time point for patients who received a CSI greater than 4 weeks prior to TSA (all p ≥ 0.396).
CONCLUSIONS: PJI risk is increased at both 1 and 2 years post-operatively in patients who received a CSI within 4 weeks of TSA. Therefore, TSA should be deferred at least 4 weeks after a patient receives a CSI to mitigate PJI risk.
METHODS: Level III.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular corticosteroid injections (ICSI) are commonly used in orthopedic practice. Due to concerns about their immunosuppressive effects, we conducted a prospective observational audit, to monitor for COVID-19 infection amongst a group of foot and ankle patients who received an ICSI during the pandemic.
METHODS: Included were 68 patients (25 males - 43 females, mean age 59.1 years, SD 15.0, range 19 - 90 years) who received a fluoroscopy-guided ICSI within a two-month period during the pandemic. The American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade was I in 35 % of patients, II in 58 % and III in 7 %. 16 % of patients had black, Asian or minority ethnic (BAME) background. The dose of methylprednisolone injected was 20 mg for 28 % of the patients, 40 mg for 29 % and 80 mg for 43 %.
RESULTS: All patients were available for follow up at one and four weeks post-injection. None reported COVID-19 infection symptoms within this period. The only complication was a flare-up of joint pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the risk of COVID-19 infection to patients receiving foot or ankle ICSI is low. The limitations of this work must be considered, but our findings support the judicious use of corticosteroid injections during the current crisis.