coronavirus disease-2019

冠状病毒病 - 2019
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行由于其广泛的影响而损害了许多人的生活质量(QoL)。然而,很少有研究探讨COVID-19对青少年心理健康的具体影响,特别是创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。这项研究考虑了与COVID-19相关的PTSD对中国青少年QoL的影响,失眠的中介作用,以及韧性的调节作用。参与者包括使用综合抽样方法选择的50,666名12-18岁青少年。我们从1月8日到1月18日进行了数据收集,2023年,使用儿童修订的事件影响量表,匹兹堡睡眠质量指数,十项康纳-戴维森弹性量表,在儿童和青少年问卷中筛选和促进与健康相关的生活质量,以收集数据。与女性相比,男性青少年的PTSD和失眠水平明显较低,心理弹性和总体QoL得分明显较高。失眠在PTSD和QoL之间起中介作用。心理韧性通过对失眠的影响来调节COVID-19相关压力对青少年生活质量的影响。COVID-19大流行导致的PTSD通过失眠影响青少年的生活质量。心理弹性在这一过程中起着调节作用。培养青少年心理韧性能有效增强青少年应对突发公共事件影响的能力。
    The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impaired the quality of life (QoL) for many due to its extensive impacts. However, few studies have addressed the specific impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of adolescents, particularly post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This study considered the impact of COVID-19-related PTSD on the QoL of adolescents in China, the mediating effects of insomnia, and the moderating effects of resilience. Participants included 50,666 adolescents aged 12-18 years selected using a comprehensive sampling method. We performed data collection from January 8th to January 18th, 2023, using the Children\'s Revised Impact of Event Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Ten-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and Screening for and Promotion of Health-related QoL in Children and Adolescents Questionnaire for data collection. Male adolescents exhibited significantly lower levels of PTSD and insomnia compared to females and scored significantly higher in psychological resilience and overall QoL. Insomnia played a mediating role between PTSD and QoL. Psychological resilience moderated the impact of COVID-19-related stress on adolescents\' QoL through its influence on insomnia. PTSD resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic affects the QoL of adolescents through the presence of insomnia. Psychological resilience plays a moderating role in this process. Cultivating psychological resilience in adolescents can effectively enhance their ability to cope with the impacts of sudden public events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    检查住院精神障碍患者2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染后抗精神病药浓度的变化,并分析影响这些变化的因素。
    数据来自北京回龙观医院2022年12月12日至2023年1月11日在COVID-19前后的住院患者。根据精神疾病诊断和统计手册,第五版,纳入329例精神障碍住院患者(3例排除不完整数据)。主要结果评估了COVID-19前后抗精神病药物浓度的变化,而次要结果检查了与浓度增加和抗精神病药物剂量调整相关的因素。
    氯氮平(P<0.001),阿立哌唑(P<0.001),喹硫平(P=0.005),奥氮平(P<0.001),利培酮(P<0.001),和帕潘立酮(P<0.001)浓度增加后COVID-19患有精神疾病的患者。值得注意的是,超过感染前水平的氯氮平浓度最高。与奥氮平(17.5%)和其他抗精神病药相比,氯氮平使用者更有可能调整剂量(50.4%)。此外,COVID-19感染期间的中成药和抗生素与抗精神病药物减少或停药有关(分别为OR=2.06,P=0.0247;OR=7.53,P=0.0024)。
    在COVID-19感染后,住院精神障碍患者的抗精神病药物浓度增加,这可能不仅与COVID-19有关,也与感染期间使用中成药有关。感染前的浓度和抗精神病药物的类型,患者的性别,以及中药或抗生素的组合,被发现与药物浓度增加相关的因素,需要调整剂量。
    UNASSIGNED: Examine the alterations in antipsychotic concentrations following coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection among hospitalized patients with mental disorders and conduct an analysis of the factors influencing these changes.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were collected from inpatients at Beijing Huilongguan Hospital between December 12, 2022, and January 11, 2023, pre- and post-COVID-19. Based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, 329 inpatients with mental disorders were included (3 with incomplete data excluded). Primary outcomes assessed changes in antipsychotic concentrations pre- and post-COVID-19, while secondary outcomes examined factors linked to concentration increases and antipsychotic dose adjustments.
    UNASSIGNED: Clozapine (P < 0.001), aripiprazole (P < 0.001), quetiapine (P = 0.005), olanzapine (P < 0.001), risperidone (P < 0.001), and paliperidone (P < 0.001) concentrations increased post-COVID-19 in patients with mental disorders. Notably, clozapine concentration surpassing pre-infection levels was highest. Clozapine users were more likely to adjust their dose (50.4%) compared to olanzapine (17.5%) and other antipsychotics. Moreover, traditional Chinese patent medicines and antibiotics during COVID-19 infection were associated with antipsychotic reduction or withdrawal (OR = 2.06, P = 0.0247; OR = 7.53, P = 0.0024, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: Antipsychotic concentrations in hospitalized patients with mental disorders increased after COVID-19 infection, that may be related not only to COVID-19, but also to the use of Chinese patent medicines during infection. The pre-infection concentration and types of antipsychotics, patient\'s gender, and combination of traditional Chinese medicine or antibiotics, were factors found to correlate with increased drug concentrations and necessitate dose adjustments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述COVID-19气胸和纵隔气肿(PTX/PM)患者的特征及其与患者预后的关系。
    对2020年03月1日至2022年01月在五家梅奥诊所住院的患有COVID-19的成年人进行了评估。PTX/PM通过成像确定。描述性分析和匹配的(年龄,性别,入学月,进行COVID-19严重程度)队列比较。医院死亡率,停留时间(LOS)并评估了诱发因素。
    在6663名患者中,197有PTX/PM(3%)(75PM,40PTX,82两者)。中位年龄为59岁,男性占71%。PTX/PM前有创和无创机械通气和高流量鼻插管的暴露率为42%,17%,20%,分别。在孤立的PTX和PM/PTX患者中,70%和53.7%接受了干预,分别,而仅PM组的96%被保守跟踪。将171名PTX/PM患者与171名匹配的对照进行比较。PTX/PM患者有更多的潜在肺部疾病(40.9与23.4%,p<0.001)和较低的中位体重指数(BMI)(29.5vs.31.3kg/m2,p=.007)比对照。在有可用数据的患者中,PTX/PM患者的呼气末正压和平台压中位数高于对照组;然而,差异不显著(10vs.8cmH2O;p=0.38和28vs.22cmH2O;分别为p=0.11)。与对照组相比,PTX/PM患者的死亡率较高(调整后比值比[95CI]:3.37[1.61-7.07])和平均LOS较长(变化百分比[95CI]:39[9-77])。
    在严重程度相似的COVID-19患者中,PTX/PM患者有更多的潜在肺部疾病和更低的BMI。他们的死亡率和LOS显着增加。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe the characteristics of COVID-19 patients with pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum (PTX/PM) and their association with patient outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Adults admitted to five Mayo Clinic hospitals with COVID-19 between 03/2020-01/2022 were evaluated. PTX/PM was defined by imaging. Descriptive analyses and a matched (age, sex, admission month, COVID-19 severity) cohort comparison was performed. Hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and predisposing factors were assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 6663 patients, 197 had PTX/PM (3 %) (75 PM, 40 PTX, 82 both). The median age was 59, with 71 % males. Exposure to invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula before PTX/PM were 42 %, 17 %, and 20 %, respectively. Among isolated PTX and PM/PTX patients 70 % and 53.7 % underwent an intervention, respectively, while 96 % of the PM-only group was followed conservatively.A total of 171 patients with PTX/PM were compared to 171 matched controls. PTX/PM patients had more underlying lung disease (40.9 vs. 23.4 %, p < 0.001) and lower median body mass index (BMI) (29.5 vs. 31.3 kg/m2, p = .007) than controls. Among patients with available data, PTX/PM patients had higher median positive end-expiratory and plateau pressures than controls; however, differences were not significant (10 vs. 8 cmH2O; p = 0.38 and 28 vs. 22 cmH2O; p = 0.11, respectively). PTX/PM patients had a higher odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [95%CI]: 3.37 [1.61-7.07]) and longer mean LOS (percent change [95%CI]: 39 [9-77]) than controls.
    UNASSIGNED: In COVID-19 patients with similar severity, PTX/PM patients had more underlying lung disease and lower BMI. They had significantly increased mortality and LOS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫系统减弱会使患者容易受到多重耐药(MDR)细菌的医院感染(NI),并使其处于危险境地。这会导致长期住院,残疾,经济负担,甚至死亡。本研究旨在确定患有COVID-19的患者中NI的患病率。
    在这项回顾性研究中,我们考虑了重症监护病房(ICU)(2020年至2021年)中250例COVID-19患者的信息。为了进行统计分析,方差分析(ANOVA),配对样本t检验,采用SPSS-23软件进行卡方分析(p<0.05)。
    二百五十人住院(107名女性和143名男性,年龄的平均值±标准差(SD);56.50±17.20)名患者被考虑。处方最多的(97.60%)药物是雷德西韦。念珠菌属。(两名女性),大肠杆菌(两个雌性),不动杆菌属。(一个女性),柠檬酸杆菌属。(一个女性),假单胞菌属。(一名男性),鞘氨醇单胞菌属。(一名男性),窄食单胞菌属。(一名男性)和肠杆菌属。(一名男性)从患者的标本中分离出来。7种细菌中的4种对MDR呈阳性。在6名患者中诊断出NI。年龄与分离的微生物(P=0.154)和MDR(P=0.987)之间以及性别与常见微生物(P=0.576)和MDR(P=0.143)之间没有显着关系。
    在患者中观察到细菌和NI共存。大多数患者都服用了Remdesivir。大多数细菌对抗生素有抗药性,尤其是,β-内酰胺。
    UNASSIGNED: Having a weakened immune system can make patients easily get nosocomial infection (NI) with multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria and put them in a dangerous situation. It causes long hospital stays, disability, economic burden, and even death. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of NI in patients suffering from COVID-19.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, the information on 250 patients suffering from COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU) (2020 to 2021) was considered. For statistical analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), paired samples t-test, and chi-square using SPSS-23 software were used (p<0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Two hundred and fifty hospitalized (107 females and 143 males, mean ± standard deviation (SD) of age; 56.50 ± 17.20) patients were considered. The most (97.60%) medicine prescribed was remdesivir. Candida spp. (two females), Escherichia coli (two females), Acinetobacter spp. (one female), Citrobacter spp. (one female), Pseudomonas spp. (one male), Sphingomonas spp. (one male), Stenotrophomonas spp. (one male) and Enterobacter spp. (one male) were isolated from the patient\'s specimens. Four of seven bacterial isolates were positive for MDR. NI was diagnosed in six patients. There was no significant relationship between the age with the isolated microbes (P=0.154) and MDR (P=0.987) and also between gender with common microbes (P=0.576) and MDR (P=0.143).
    UNASSIGNED: The coexistence of bacteria and NI was observed in patients. Remdesivir was prescribed for most patients. Most bacteria were resistant to antibiotics, especially, β-lactams.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述患病率,特点,阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院医护人员(HCWs)感染COVID-19的危险因素,吉达,沙特阿拉伯。
    方法:从3月1日起对确认感染COVID-19的HCWs进行的前瞻性横断面研究,2020年12月31日,2022年。
    结果:共有746例HCWs被诊断为COVID-19。患者年龄为22-60岁,平均±标准偏差为37.4±8.7岁。584例(78.3%)HCWs中的感染是社区获得的。绝大多数(82.6%)受感染的HCW没有合并症。护士(400/746,占53.6%)是最大的职业群体,其次是医生(128/746或17.2%),行政人员(125/746或16.8%),呼吸治疗师(54/746或7.2%),和物理治疗师(39/746或5.2%)。症状包括发热(64.1%),咳嗽(55.6%),喉咙痛(44.6%),头痛(22.9%),流鼻涕(19.6%),呼吸急促(19.0%),疲劳(12.7%),身体疼痛(11.4%),腹泻(10.9%),呕吐(4.4%),和腹痛(2.8%)。大多数(647或86.7%)患者作为门诊患者进行管理。四名(0.5%)HCW死亡。
    结论:HCWs面临SARS-CoV-2感染的双重风险,来自社区暴露和医院环境。需要全面的感染控制策略来保护医院内外的医护人员。
    BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection among health care workers (HCWs) at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
    METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of HCWs confirmed to have COVID-19 infection from March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022.
    RESULTS: A total of 746 HCWs were diagnosed with COVID-19. Patients\' age ranged from 22 to 60 years with a mean ± standard deviation of 37.4 ± 8.7 years. The infection was community-acquired in 584 (78.3%) HCWs. The vast majority (82.6%) of the infected HCWs had no comorbidities. Nurses (400/746 or 53.6%) represented the largest professional group, followed by physicians (128/746 or 17.2%), administrative staff (125/746 or 16.8%), respiratory therapists (54/746 or 7.2%), and physiotherapists (39/746 or 5.2%). Symptoms included fever (64.1%), cough (55.6%), sore throat (44.6%), headache (22.9%), runny nose (19.6%), shortness of breath (19.0%), fatigue (12.7%), body aches (11.4%), diarrhea (10.9%), vomiting (4.4%), and abdominal pain (2.8%). Most (647 or 86.7%) patients were managed as outpatients. Four (0.5%) HCWs died.
    CONCLUSIONS: HCWs face a dual risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, both from community exposure and within the hospital setting. Comprehensive infection control strategies are needed to protect HCWs both inside and outside the hospital environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在证明预后营养指数(PNI)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)如何帮助预测2型糖尿病(T2DM)和冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的严重程度和预后。
    这项回顾性队列研究包括501名T2DM患者(男性,42.1%;女性,57.9%)在2020年4月至2020年12月期间因COVID-19住院。患者分为幸存者和非幸存者。在比较了各组之间的人口统计学和实验室数据后,评估了PNI和SII与临床和实验室数据的相关性.
    非幸存者和幸存者组的中位数(四分位数)年龄分别为74(15)和69(14)岁,分别,差异显著(p<0.001)。非幸存者组的PNI显著低于幸存者组(p<0.001)。非幸存者组的SII显著高于幸存者组(p<0.001)。PNI与血糖水平呈负相关(r=-0.115,p=0.011)。如果使用截止PNI值29.1,敏感性和特异性分别为76.2%和76.3%,分别,预测2型糖尿病患者的疾病严重程度和死亡风险。
    因此,PNI和SII水平可有效预测COVID-19和T2DM患者的生存率和疾病严重程度.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to demonstrate how the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) help predict the severity and prognosis of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and coronavirus disease (COVID-19).
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study included 501 T2DM patients (male, 42.1%; female, 57.9%) who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 between April 2020 and December 2020. The patients were divided into survivors and non-survivors. After comparing demographic and laboratory data between the groups, the correlation of PNI and SII with clinical and laboratory data was evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: The median (interquartile) ages of the non-survivor and survivor groups were 74 (15) and 69 (14) years, respectively, and the difference was significant (p<0.001). The PNI was significantly lower in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group (p<0.001). The SII was significantly higher in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group (p<0.001). PNI was negatively correlated with glucose levels (r=-0.115, p=0.011). If the cut-off PNI value of 29.1 was used, it had a sensitivity and specificity of 76.2% and 76.3%, respectively, in predicting the severity of the illness and the risk of death in T2DM patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Consequently, the PNI and SII levels are effective in predicting survival and disease severity in patients with COVID-19 and T2DM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行严重影响了血液成分的供应和输血。这项研究旨在评估全国三级警报(2021年5月至7月)之后期间血液收集和输血的变化。
    方法:我们从台湾国民健康保险(NHI)数据库2019-2021检索了红细胞(RBC)的使用数据。
    结果:在3级警报期间,约85%的COVID-19病例(11,455/13,624)发生在台北。在台北,与大流行前水平相比,采血量下降了26.34%,红细胞输血量下降了17.14%.所有服务类型的RBC使用量都有所下降,在血液学/肿瘤学中观察到显著下降15.62%(-483例患者,-2425个单位)。在非台北地区,采血量下降了12.54%,比台北早一个月反弹。RBC输血量下降的时间比台北晚一个月,幅度要低得多(4.57%)。台北和非台北地区的血液供应紧张都发生在5月和6月。在7532例住院的COVID-19患者中,约6.9%的患者总共需要1,873次红细胞输血.COVID-19住院患者的迅速增加并没有显着增加血液需求的负担。
    结论:在3级警报期间,在台北观察到RBC收集和输血的最显著下降。在非台北地区,红细胞使用的减少只是微不足道的。值得注意的是,台北血液学/肿瘤学中RBC的使用显著减少.这项研究支持输血专家寻求有效的方法来应对类似的未来挑战。
    BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted the supply and transfusion of blood components. This study aims to evaluate changes in blood collection and transfusions during the period following the nationwide Level 3 alert (May-July 2021).
    METHODS: We retrieved usage data for red blood cells (RBC) from the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) database 2019-2021.
    RESULTS: During the Level 3 alert period, approximately 85% of COVID-19 cases (11,455/13,624) were in Taipei. In Taipei, blood collection declined by 26.34% and RBC transfusions decreased by 17.14% compared to pre-pandemic levels. RBC usage decreased across all service types, with a significant decrease observed in hematology/oncology by 15.62% (-483 patients, -2,425 units). In non-Taipei regions, blood collection declined by 12.54%, rebounding around one month earlier than in Taipei. The decline in RBC transfusions occurred one month later than in Taipei, with a much lower magnitude (4.57%). Strain on the blood supply occurred in May and June in both Taipei and non-Taipei regions. Among 7,532 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, approximately 6.9% patients required a total of 1,873 RBC transfusions. The rapid increase in COVID-19 inpatients did not significantly increase the burden of blood demands.
    CONCLUSIONS: During the Level 3 alert, the most significant decline in both RBC collection and transfusions was observed in Taipei. In non-Taipei regions, the decrease in RBC use was only marginal. Notably, there was a significant decrease in RBC use in hematology/oncology in Taipei. This study supports transfusion specialists in seeking efficient ways to address similar future challenges.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的是检查在印度严重急性呼吸道综合症冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行期间因冠状病毒病-2019(COVID-19)感染而入住重症监护病房的孕妇的结局。该研究的主要结果是第30天的产妇死亡率。次要结果是重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间,胎儿死亡率和早产。
    这是一项回顾性多中心队列研究。获得了道德许可。在2020年3月1日至10月31日期间,所有15-45岁的孕妇因SARS-CoV-2感染入院,包括2021年。
    数据来自9个中心和211例确诊为COVID-19的ICU产科患者。根据室内空气入院时的SpO2(外周血氧饱和度)水平将他们分为两组,也就是说,正常SpO2组(SpO2>90%)和低SpO2组(SpO2<90%)。平均年龄(30.06±4.25)岁,胎龄36±8周。孕产妇死亡率为10.53%。胎儿死亡和早产率分别为7.17和28.22%,分别。平均ICU和住院时间(LOS)分别为6.35±8.56和6.78±6.04天,分别。孕产妇死亡率(6.21比43.48%,p<0.001),早产(26.55vs52.17%,p=0.011)和胎儿死亡(5.08vs26.09%,p=0.003)在低SpO2组中明显更高。
    感染COVID-19的危重孕妇的总体孕产妇死亡率为10.53%。早产和胎儿死亡率分别为28.22%和7.17%,分别。入院时低SpO2(<90%)的患者与正常SpO2的患者相比,这些不良的母体和胎儿结局明显更高。
    SinhaS,保罗·G,沙巴,KarmataT,PaliwalN,DobariyaJ,etal.回顾性分析印度重症监护病房(Preg-CoV)的SARS-CoV-2感染孕妇的临床特征和结局:一项多中心研究。印度J暴击护理中心2024;28(3):265-272。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim was to examine the outcomes of pregnant women admitted to intensive care unit with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in India. The primary outcome of the study was maternal mortality at day 30. The secondary outcomes were the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, fetal mortality and preterm delivery.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective multicentric cohort study. Ethical clearance was obtained. All pregnant women of the 15-45-year age admitted to ICUs with SARS-CoV-2 infection during 1st March 2020 to 31st October, 2021 were included.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were collected from nine centers and for 211 obstetric patients admitted to the ICU with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. They were divided in to two groups as per their SpO2 (saturation of peripheral oxygen) level at admission on room air, that is, normal SpO2 group (SpO2 > 90%) and low SpO2 group (SpO2 < 90%). The mean age was (30.06 ± 4.25) years and the gestational age was 36 ± 8 weeks. The maternal mortality rate was10.53%. The rate of fetal death and preterm delivery was 7.17 and 28.22%, respectively. The average ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) were 6.35 ± 8.56 and 6.78 ± 6.04 days, respectively. The maternal mortality (6.21 vs 43.48%, p < 0.001), preterm delivery (26.55 vs 52.17%, p = 0.011) and fetal death (5.08 vs 26.09%, p = 0.003) were significantly higher in the low SpO2 group.
    UNASSIGNED: The overall maternal mortality among critically ill pregnant women affected with COVID-19 infection was 10.53%. The rate of preterm birth and fetal death were 28.22 and 7.17%, respectively. These adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were significantly higher in those admitted with low SpO2 (<90%) at admission compared with those with normal SpO2.
    UNASSIGNED: Sinha S, Paul G, Shah BA, Karmata T, Paliwal N, Dobariya J, et al. Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Pregnant Women with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Admitted to Intensive Care Units in India (Preg-CoV): A Multicenter Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):265-272.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是探讨老年人群的心理不灵活是否与社交疏远恐惧症有关,并检查他们的病毒性焦虑,专注于睡眠,或者对不确定性的不容忍可能会调解这种关系。
    方法:在韩国65岁以上的老年人群中,我们在2023年1月和2月进行了匿名在线调查。我们收集了300名参与者的回答,收集的人口统计信息,和症状使用评定量表,如社交疏远恐惧症量表,对病毒流行的压力和焦虑-6项目(保存-6),不容忍不确定度量表-12(IUS-12),接受和行动问卷-II(AAQ-II),格拉斯哥睡眠努力量表(GSES)。
    结果:SAVE-6预期社交疏远恐惧症(β=0.34,p<0.001),IUS-12(β=0.18,p=0.003),线性回归分析中的GSES(β=0.18,p=0.001)。在调解分析中,心理僵化并没有直接影响社交疏远恐惧症。然而,病毒性焦虑,不容忍的不确定性,或对睡眠的专注完全介导了心理僵化对老年人群社交疏远恐惧症的影响。
    结论:心理僵化的管理,不容忍的不确定性,在设计干预措施以解决未来大流行中老年人群的社交距离恐惧症时,需要考虑或对睡眠的关注。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore whether psychological inflexibility in the elderly population is related to social-distancing phobia, and examine whether their viral anxiety, preoccupation with sleep, or intolerance of uncertainty may mediate the relationship.
    METHODS: Among the elderly population aged ≥65 in Korea, we conducted an anonymous online survey during January and February 2023. We collected the responses of 300 participants, collected demographic information, and symptoms using rating scales such as the Social-Distancing Phobia scale, Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-6 items (SAVE-6), Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12 (IUS-12), Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), and Glasgow Sleep Effort Scale (GSES).
    RESULTS: Social-distancing phobia was expected by the SAVE-6 (β=0.34, p<0.001), IUS-12 (β=0.18, p=0.003), and GSES (β=0.18, p= 0.001) in the linear regression analysis. In the mediation analysis, psychological inflexibility did not directly influence social-distancing phobia. However, viral anxiety, intolerance of uncertainty, or preoccupation with sleep completely mediated the influence of psychological inflexibility on social-distancing phobia among elderly population.
    CONCLUSIONS: The management of psychological inflexibility, intolerance of uncertainty, or preoccupation with sleep needs to be considered when designing interventions to address social-distancing phobia in elderly populations in future pandemics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:纽约市五个行政区的健康社会决定因素(SDH)对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)结果产生负面影响。这项研究的目的是确定史坦顿岛区内的社会人口统计学差异,与其他四个行政区相比,可能是导致史坦顿岛COVID-19结局不佳的原因。
    方法:数据来自公共数据来源。获得的社会人口统计数据包括年龄,家庭收入,贫困状况,和教育水平。COVID-19感染,住院治疗,史坦顿岛的死亡率与曼哈顿的死亡率进行了比较,皇后区,布鲁克林,和布朗克斯(2020年2月29日-2022年10月31日)。与所有四个行政区相比,史坦顿岛的COVID-19病例率的平均差异更高。
    结果:住院率和死亡率的平均差异高于曼哈顿,但与其他四个行政区相似。在史泰登岛内,邮政编码10306和10309的案件率最高。住院率和死亡率最高的史坦顿岛邮政编码10304。我们发现,在COVID-19结果较差的史坦顿岛的邮政编码中,高中学历以下的人更多,较低的平均家庭收入,年收入低于25,000美元的家庭比例更高,和更大比例的个人使用公共交通工具。
    结论:COVID-19感染的差异,住院治疗,死亡率存在于史坦顿岛的五个行政区之间和12个邮政编码之间。COVID-19结果的这些差异可以归因于不同的SDH。
    BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDH) negatively affected Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outcomes within the five boroughs of New York City. The goal of this study was to determine whether differences in social demographics within the borough of Staten Island, compared with the other four boroughs, may have contributed to poor COVID-19 outcomes in Staten Island.
    METHODS: Data were obtained from public data sources. Social demographics obtained included age, household income, poverty status, and education level. COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death rates reported from Staten Island were compared with rates from Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, and the Bronx (February 29, 2020-October 31, 2022). Mean differences in case rates of COVID-19 were higher in Staten Island compared to all four boroughs.
    RESULTS: Mean differences in hospitalization and death rates were higher than Manhattan but similar to the other four boroughs. Within Staten Island, case rates were highest in zip codes 10306 and 10309. Hospitalization and death rates were highest in Staten Island zip code 10304. We found that the zip codes of Staten Island with poorer COVID-19 outcomes had more individuals with less than a high school degree, lower mean household income, higher proportion of households earning less than $25,000 a year, and a greater proportion of individuals using public transportation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Differences in COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death rates exist between the five boroughs and between the 12 zip codes within Staten Island. These differences in COVID-19 outcomes can be attributed to different SDH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号