本文继续IBPS中的“本体论”讨论,解决本体论问题对当代文化心理学发展的重要性问题。语言心理科学被认为是一个本体论问题,也是文化心理学最热门的问题。旨在“构建一种在包容文化的同时具有普遍性的心理学”(Valsiner2009,第2页)。本体论问题可能保持隐含和被忽视,只要\'etant,“存在的模式”,在同一所学校的信徒圈子中讨论了“特殊性”,他含蓄地想到了同样的入口。然而,一旦讨论涉及不同学校的代表,本体论问题对于相互理解至关重要,必须阐明单词的含义。像“心灵”这样的词,“主观性”,\"社会\",\"文化\",等。,-当发音或由不同理论趋势的代表撰写时,通常意味着不同的东西。在没有明确说明正在考虑的入口的情况下,对\'etant的讨论很可能会变成Babel。全球现代性需要在多元化的全球科学界中不断努力和持续的相互理解愿望。因此,认识论发展中的创造性合作必须基于对辩论者本体论立场的清晰理解。
The paper continues the \"ontological\" discussion in IBPS, addressing the question of the importance of ontological issues for contemporary development of cultural psychology. The language psychological science speaks is considered as an ontological issue and a most topical one for cultural psychology, aiming at \"constructing a psychology that is universal while being culture-inclusive\" (Valsiner 2009, p.2). Ontological issues could stay implicit and neglected, as long as the \'etant, \"the mode of being\", \"the particularities\" were discussed within the circle of adherents of one and the same school, who implicitly had in mind the same \'entre. However, as soon as the discussion involves representatives of different schools, ontological issues become crucial for mutual understanding and meanings of the words have to be explicated. Same words like \"psyche\", \"subjectivity\", \"social\", \"culture\", etc., - often mean different things when they are pronounces or written by representatives of different theoretical trends. The discussion of the \'etant without clear indicating of the \'entre under consideration is likely to turn into a Babel. Global modernity requires constant efforts and insistent desire for mutual understanding across the diversified global scientific community. Thus, creative collaboration in epistemological developments has to ground on clear comprehension of the ontological stances of the debaters.