■在普遍存在的健康不平等的背景下,公共卫生专业人员,英国的研究人员和非学术合作伙伴正在动员起来,以了解社区资产如何以及以何种方式解决复杂系统中的大规模健康差异。虽然人们认识到文化,自然资源和社区资源可以改善健康结果,这些不平等的分散,缺乏融入社区、卫生和社会护理系统。研究生活中的循证替代方案,富有想象力,被创伤,综合,体现系统(REALITIES)是一个由57人组成的参与性行动研究苏格兰财团,在五个地方建立了社区资产中心,具有牢固的关系,将相互冲突的看待世界的方式结合在一起。我们的集体生活和感受经验社区成员,社区嵌入式研究人员,学者和非学者借鉴了各种实践,方法,数据集和哲学,以扩大解决健康不平等的现有方法。
■我们为我们共同制作的系统级模型提供了概念和理论基础,并通过测试三个弱势地区的REALITIES(2022年11月,正在进行中)提供了实证结果。在解释了导致开发集成公共系统与\'资产\'接口的新可扩展REALITIES模型的上下文之后,我们详细介绍了我们的模型的哲学支柱和指导原则,以及我们如何应用这些机制来解释综合伙伴关系的工作如何能够改善多个公共系统的健康结果.
■我们通过联合制作和测试模型进行了荟萃分析,展示了衡量复杂公共系统的变化如何涉及对人民的关键调查,Process,Place,价格,权力和目的。我们的批评反映了研究实践政策(RPP)伙伴关系中的权力失衡和不平等,以及如何培育健康生态系统的建议:克服障碍和促进参与;反思扩大规模的挑战,RPP伙伴关系的可测试性和复杂性;从孤立的学习转向实践中的跨学科合作;确保知识交流对社区和一线从业者有直接影响;将关系伦理和保障纳入日常实践。
■我们提出了REALITIES模型来统一替代方案,有时相互冲突,通过不断反思关于知识的不同假设之间的纠缠来思考公共系统和社区资产的方式,现实,证据,以及创造性方法论和科学方法之间不必要的二进制文件。
UNASSIGNED: Under the backdrop of pervasive health inequalities, public health professionals, researchers and non-academic partners in the United Kingdom are mobilising to understand how and in what ways community assets can address health disparities at scale in complex systems. While there is recognition that cultural, natural and community resources can improve health outcomes, these are unequally dispersed with lack of integration in communities and health and social care systems. Researching Evidence-based Alternatives in Living, Imaginative, Traumatised, Integrated, Embodied Systems (REALITIES) is a participatory action research Scottish consortium of 57 with established community asset hubs in five localities with strong relationships uniting conflicting ways of seeing the world. Our collective of lived and felt experience community members, community-embedded researchers, academics and non-academics draws upon a variety of practices, methods, datasets and philosophies to expand existing approaches to tackling health inequalities.
UNASSIGNED: We present conceptual and theoretical underpinnings for our co-produced systems-level model and empirical findings from testing REALITIES across three disadvantaged localities (November 2022, ongoing). After explaining the context that led to the development of the new scalable REALITIES model for integrated public systems to interface with \'assets\', we detail philosophical pillars and guiding principles for our model and how we applied these mechanisms to explain how integrated partnership working can lead to improved health outcomes across multiple public systems.
UNASSIGNED: We present a meta-analysis from co-producing and testing the model, showing how measuring change in complex public systems involves critical investigation of People, Process, Place, Price, Power and Purpose. Our critique reflects on power imbalances and inequities in Research-practice-Policy (RPP) partnerships and suggestions for how to nurture healthy ecosystems: overcoming barriers and enabling participation; reflecting on challenges of scaling up, testability and complexity of RPP partnerships; moving from siloed learning to transdisciplinary collaboration in practice; ensuring knowledge exchange has direct impact on communities and frontline practitioners; embedding relational ethics and safeguarding into daily practice.
UNASSIGNED: We propose the REALITIES model to unite alternative, sometimes conflicting, ways of thinking about public systems and community assets by continuously reflecting on entanglements between different assumptions about knowledge, reality, evidence, and unnecessary binaries between creative methodologies and scientific method.