common factors

常见因素
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的几十年里,儿童过敏性疾病的发病率在全球范围内增加,它们对受影响儿童的影响超出了过敏本身。有证据表明儿童过敏性疾病与神经系统疾病的发展之间存在关联。一些研究表明过敏性疾病和抽动障碍(TD)之间存在相关性,过敏性疾病可能是TD的重要危险因素。影响这些疾病发展的可能因素包括神经递质失衡,母亲焦虑或抑郁,肠道微生物疾病,睡眠障碍,产妇过敏状况,接触烟草,和环境因素。此外,肠道微生物紊乱,改变了免疫学特征,变应性疾病患者DNA甲基化可能是TD发生发展的潜在机制。深入研究儿童过敏性疾病与TD之间的关系对于预防和治疗TD具有重要意义。
    Over the past few decades, the incidence of childhood allergic diseases has increased globally, and their impact on the affected child extends beyond the allergy itself. There is evidence of an association between childhood allergic diseases and the development of neurological disorders. Several studies have shown a correlation between allergic diseases and tic disorders (TD), and allergic diseases may be an important risk factor for TD. Possible factors influencing the development of these disorders include neurotransmitter imbalance, maternal anxiety or depression, gut microbial disorders, sleep disturbances, maternal allergic status, exposure to tobacco, and environmental factors. Moreover, gut microbial disturbances, altered immunological profiles, and DNA methylation in patients with allergic diseases may be potential mechanisms contributing to the development of TD. An in-depth investigation of the relationship between allergic diseases and TD in children will be important for preventing and treating TD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:心理治疗作为“谈话治疗”的特征强调了积极倾听者对谈话疗效的重要性。我们测试工作联盟及其利益是否来自声音的表达,本身,或者是否需要主动倾听。我们研究了倾听在工作联盟的社会认同模型中的作用。
    方法:在实验室实验中,大学生参与者向另一个人(同盟国学生)谈论压力管理,他们要么参与或不参与积极倾听。参与者报告了他们对联盟的看法,关键的社会心理变量,和幸福。
    结果:积极倾听导致联盟的评分明显更高,程序正义,社会认同,和身份领导力,与没有积极倾听相比。积极倾听也会带来更大的积极影响和满意度。最终,支持一种解释路径模型,其中主动倾听通过社会认同预测工作联盟,身份领导力,程序正义。
    结论:听力质量以与工作联盟的社会身份模型一致的方式增强联盟和福祉,是促进治疗联盟的战略。
    OBJECTIVE: Characterization of psychotherapy as the \"talking cure\" de-emphasizes the importance of an active listener on the curative effect of talking. We test whether the working alliance and its benefits emerge from expression of voice, per se, or whether active listening is needed. We examine the role of listening in a social identity model of working alliance.
    METHODS: University student participants in a laboratory experiment spoke about stress management to another person (a confederate student) who either did or did not engage in active listening. Participants reported their perceptions of alliance, key social-psychological variables, and well-being.
    RESULTS: Active listening led to significantly higher ratings of alliance, procedural justice, social identification, and identity leadership, compared to no active listening. Active listening also led to greater positive affect and satisfaction. Ultimately, an explanatory path model was supported in which active listening predicted working alliance through social identification, identity leadership, and procedural justice.
    CONCLUSIONS: Listening quality enhances alliance and well-being in a manner consistent with a social identity model of working alliance, and is a strategy for facilitating alliance in therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管在众所周知的心理治疗改变模型中被提及,额外治疗因素的概念似乎已经随着时间的推移离开了现场,被共同因素结构的逐步细化所吞噬。本研究的目的是更好地了解治疗外因素概念的历史演变及其对当今心理治疗的重要性。
    方法:这是一篇关于治疗外因素和心理治疗结果和过程的文献综述。
    结论:越来越多的证据表明,客户和治疗师的特征具有决定性作用,以及治疗联盟和关系在促进变革中的重要性。在此背景下,治疗外因素的概念仍然值得适当关注,而不是被降级为剩余和消失的类别。
    结论:对治疗外因素的新兴趣可能会重新激发关于心理治疗与生活环境和条件之间关系的争论。就复杂性和系统而言,什么都不思考,先验,真的超出了心理治疗的范围,反过来,心理治疗不是一种可以从实践的背景或客户和治疗师的生活中抽象出来的实践。
    OBJECTIVE: Despite being mentioned in well-known models of psychotherapeutic change, the concept of extra-therapeutic factors seems to have left the scene across time, eaten away by the progressive refinement of the construct of common factors. Aim of the present study is to better understanding the historical evolution of the concept of extra-therapeutic factors and its importance for psychotherapy today.
    METHODS: This is a position paper based on a literature review on extra-therapeutic factors and psychotherapy outcome and process.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is growing evidence of the decisive role of clients\' and therapists\' characteristics, as well as of the importance of therapeutic alliances and relationships in promoting change. Within this context, the concept of extra-therapeutic factors still deserves proper attention, rather than being relegated to a residual and vanishing category.
    CONCLUSIONS: A renewed interest on extra-therapeutic factors could reinvigorate the debate over the relationship between psychotherapy and life contexts and conditions. In terms of complexity and systems thinking nothing, a priori, really falls outside the realm of psychotherapy and, in turn, psychotherapy is not a practice that could be abstracted from the context in which it is practiced or from clients\' and therapists\' lives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本文为基于证据的酒精或其他药物(AOD)疗法共享的核心过程的知识和实践做出了贡献。这是该系列中的第四个,在这里,我们讨论有效治疗的最普遍公认的成分-治疗关系。我们考虑文献中的各种相关术语和定义,但在本次审查中,我们提供了一个强调行为变化背景的定义。
    方法:本研究进行了文献综述和定性内容分析,以得出一套促进和维持治疗关系的原则和实践。这次审查的来源包括政府发布的实践指南,治疗手册或书籍,演示视频,和同行评审的文章(61个来源)。在NVIVO中进行了内容分析,可靠性分析表明,评估者之间的一致性中等(kappa=0.60)。
    结果:确定了6项原则和16项实践。原则和实践的分布可以分为三类:1)促进客户行为改变机制(即,自决,动机,自我效能),2)伙伴关系考虑因素(例如,目标和任务对齐),和3)治疗师人际交往能力(例如,移情)。
    结论:治疗关系是行为改变过程的基础。我们将其构建为更广泛的人际考虑的组合(即,人类纽带)和对客户行为改变的关键机制的关注(即,自决,动机,自我效能感)。目前的工作为学员提供了一种新颖的资源,临床医生,和临床主管有兴趣在AOD或其他行为改变设置中促进与客户的治疗关系。
    BACKGROUND: This article contributes to knowledge and practice of core processes that are shared by evidence-based alcohol or other drug (AOD) therapies. It is the fourth in a series with this aim, and here we discuss perhaps the most universally acknowledged ingredient of effective therapy - the therapeutic relationship. We consider various related terms and definitions in the literature, but in the present review, we offer a definition that underscores the context of behavior change.
    METHODS: This study conducted a literature review and qualitative content analysis to derive a set of principles and practices for facilitating and maintaining the therapeutic relationship. The sources for this review included government-issued practice guidelines, therapy manuals or books, demonstration videos, and peer-reviewed articles (61 sources). The content analysis was performed in NVIVO, and reliability analysis showed moderate agreement between raters (kappa = 0.60).
    RESULTS: Six principles and 16 practices were identified. The distribution of principles and practices could be broken into three categories: 1) the facilitation of client behavior change mechanisms (i.e., self-determination, motivation, self-efficacy), 2) partnership considerations (e.g., goal and task alignment), and 3) therapist interpersonal skills (e.g., empathy).
    CONCLUSIONS: The therapeutic relationship is foundational to the behavior change process. We frame it as a combination of broader interpersonal considerations and attention to key mechanisms of client behavior change. The present work provides a novel resource for trainees, clinicians, and clinical supervisors interested in fostering therapy relationships with clients in AOD or other behavior change settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迷幻药的治疗和致命性作用已归因于心理治疗或类似心理治疗的过程,这些过程可以在急性迷幻药经历及以后展开。目前,在迷幻经历的背景下,没有可用的心理计量学工具来全面评估心理治疗过程(如经验心理治疗研究所概念化的)。
    我们报告了一般变化机制问卷(GCMQ)的初步验证,一种自我报告工具,旨在测量心理治疗的五种经验建立的一般变化机制(GCM)-(1)资源激活,(2)治疗关系,(3)问题驱动,(4)澄清,和(5)掌握-在迷幻经验的背景下。
    对1153名讲英语的迷幻者和714名讲德语的迷幻者进行了一项在线调查,以评估GCMQ的同时开发的英语和德语版本。
    确认了基于理论的因子结构。五个GCMQ量表表现出良好的内部一致性。获得了与外部措施收敛有效性的证据。与不同的环境和治疗有显著的关联,享乐,逃避现实的使用动机证实了与GCM相关的迷幻体验的假设上下文依赖性。表明潜在的治疗效果,累积的压力生活事件与幸福感之间的关联受到资源激活的显著调节,澄清,和掌握。因子混合模型揭示了与GCM相关的迷幻体验的五个不同特征。
    初步测试表明GCMQ是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于未来的临床和非临床迷幻药研究。与GCM相关的经验的五个确定的概况可能与迷幻药的临床使用和迷幻药危害减少有关。
    UNASSIGNED: Therapeutic and salutogenic effects of psychedelic drugs have been attributed to psychotherapeutic or psychotherapy-like processes that can unfold during the acute psychedelic experience and beyond. Currently, there are no psychometric instruments available to comprehensively assess psychotherapeutic processes (as conceptualized by empirical psychotherapy research) in the context of psychedelic experiences.
    UNASSIGNED: We report the initial validation of the General Change Mechanisms Questionnaire (GCMQ), a self-report instrument designed to measure five empirically established general change mechanisms (GCMs) of psychotherapy-(1) resource activation, (2) therapeutic relationship, (3) problem actuation, (4) clarification, and (5) mastery-in the context of psychedelic experiences.
    UNASSIGNED: An online survey in a sample of 1153 English-speaking and 714 German-speaking psychedelic users was conducted to evaluate simultaneously developed English- and German-language versions of the GCMQ.
    UNASSIGNED: The theory-based factor structure was confirmed. The five GCMQ scales showed good internal consistency. Evidence for convergent validity with external measures was obtained. Significant associations with different settings and with therapeutic, hedonic, and escapist use motives confirmed the hypothesized context dependence of GCM-related psychedelic experiences. Indicating potential therapeutic effects, the association between cumulative stressful life events and well-being was significantly moderated by resource activation, clarification, and mastery. Factor mixture modeling revealed five distinct profiles of GCM-related psychedelic experiences.
    UNASSIGNED: Initial testing indicates that the GCMQ is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in future clinical and nonclinical psychedelic research. The five identified profiles of GCM-related experiences may be relevant to clinical uses of psychedelics and psychedelic harm reduction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    具有公共因素的空间面板的动态通用嵌套空间计量模型是目前最先进的模型。它通过内生空间滞后来解释局部空间依赖性,外生空间滞后,和误差项的空间滞后。它通过滞后的因变量来解释动态效应,因变量在空间和时间上都滞后。最后,它通过横截面平均值或具有异质系数的主成分来解释全局横截面依赖性,它通过单元特定和时间特定的效果来概括时间不变和空间不变变量的传统控件。本文概述了支持每个模型组件的主要论点,以及一些潜在的陷阱。
    The dynamic general nesting spatial econometric model for spatial panels with common factors is the most advanced model currently available. It accounts for local spatial dependence by means of an endogenous spatial lag, exogenous spatial lags, and a spatial lag in the error term. It accounts for dynamic effects by means of the dependent variable lagged in time, and the dependent variable lagged in both space and time. Finally, it accounts for global cross-sectional dependence by means of cross-sectional averages or principal components with heterogeneous coefficients, which generalizes the traditional controls for time-invariant and spatial-invariant variables by unit-specific and time-specific effects. This paper provides an overview of the main arguments in favor of each of these model components, as well as some potential pitfalls.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究评估了接受度,针对具有边缘性人格障碍(BPD)症状的成人(18岁及以上)和青年(16至18岁)的短期团体计划的可行性和安全性。被称为道路地图,从BPD的循证治疗中确定的常见治疗因素为内容和发展提供了依据.
    方法:两百八人同意参加研究试验并完成基线测量。干预参与者对该组的可接受性和主观体验进行了评分。损耗率告知可行性,对严重不良事件进行追踪以确定潜在危害.
    结果:参与者对小组的可接受性和主观体验的小组后评分在成人和青年人群中均高于平均水平。小组开始后的损耗率为成人38%,青年为27%。在6个月后,急诊科就诊的发生率降低了41%,相对于组前6个月。
    结论:本研究为诊断为BPD的患者的短期团体治疗方案的可接受性和可行性提供了初步支持。在更广泛的阶梯式护理模型中,路线图可能是有用的中间干预措施。澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心,https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000849796。aspx,(ACTRN12622000849796)。
    OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the acceptance, feasibility and safety of a short-term group program for adults (18 years and older) and youth (16 to 18 years) with borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptoms. Termed Road Maps, the content and development were informed by common treatment factors identified from evidence-based therapies for BPD.
    METHODS: Two-hundred and eight people consented to participate in the research trial and completed baseline measures. Intervention participants rated the acceptability and subjective experience of the group. Attrition rates informed feasibility, and serious adverse events were tracked to identify potential harms.
    RESULTS: Participant post-group ratings of the group\'s acceptability and subjective experience were above average across both adult and youth populations. Attrition rate after commencement of group was 38% for adults and 27% among youth. The incidence rate of emergency department presentations was reduced by 41% in the 6 months post-group, relative to 6 months pre-group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides preliminary support for the acceptability and feasibility of a short-term group therapy program for people with a diagnosis of BPD. Road Maps may be a useful intermediate intervention in a broader model of stepped care. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000849796.aspx, (ACTRN12622000849796).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:治疗师促进人际交往能力(FIS)已显示可预测治疗结果,证明高FIS治疗师比低FIS治疗师更有效。需要更深入地了解治疗师技能的优缺点。这项研究调查了修订和扩展的FIS评分是否会导致衡量治疗师人际交往能力的更多差异。此外,我们探索性地研究是否可以根据人际反应的差异来区分治疗师的亚组。
    方法:使用二次数据分析,93名治疗师接触了7个FIS剪辑。对使用原始和扩展FIS评分的治疗师的反应进行了评级。
    结果:在扩展的FIS评分中发现了三个因素来区分支持,表现力,和治疗师的有说服力的人际反应。潜在的概况分析启发了六个治疗师亚组的存在。
    结论:使用修订和扩展的FIS评分有助于我们理解人际交往能力在治疗环境中的作用,因为我们解开了对谁有效的问题。
    OBJECTIVE: The therapist-facilitative interpersonal skills (FIS) has shown to predict therapy outcomes, demonstrating that high FIS therapists are more effective than low FIS therapists. There is a need for more insight into the variability in strengths and weaknesses in therapist skills. This study investigates whether a revised and extended FIS-scoring leads to more differentiation in measuring therapists\' interpersonal skills. Furthermore, we explorative examine whether subgroups of therapists can be distinguished in terms of differences in their interpersonal responses.
    METHODS: Using secondary data analysis, 93 therapists were exposed to seven FIS-clips. Responses of therapists using the original and the extended FIS scoring were rated.
    RESULTS: Three factors were found on the extended FIS scoring distinguishing supportive, expressive, and persuasive interpersonal responses of therapists. A latent profile analysis enlightened the presence of six subgroups of therapists.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using the revised and extended FIS-scoring contributes to our understanding of the role of interpersonal skills in the therapeutic setting by unraveling the question what works for whom.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate associations between common factors (alliance, insight, problem solving) and therapists\' techniques. We expected a positive association between (1) supportive techniques and the alliance, (2) interpretative techniques and insight, and (3) a stronger association between interpretative techniques and insight for patients with more severe baseline symptoms. Other associations were analyzed in an exploratory way.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty sessions from 15 adult female patients diagnosed with personality disorder were analyzed using the Psychodynamic Interventions List (verbal techniques, observer-rated transcripts), and the Session Questionnaire for General and Differential Individual Psychotherapy (common factors, patient-rated after each session). Multilevel modeling was applied.
    UNASSIGNED: A greater use of supportive techniques was related to a higher therapeutic alliance (b = .28, 95% CI: .01-.55, p = .042). Neither the positive association between interpretative techniques and insight nor the moderating effect of baseline symptom severity could be confirmed. Exploratory analyses revealed associations between problem-solving and different verbal techniques.
    UNASSIGNED: Therapists\' use of supportive techniques seems to influence the therapeutic alliance positively in patients with personality disorders. The effect of interpretative techniques might depend on other factors like patient characteristics. In general, there seem to be differential and specific associations between different therapists\' verbal techniques and common factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查用于评估患者-提供者关系中的共同因素的两项调查的临床特性,并提出用于评估共同因素的筛选器选项,并报告其与疼痛和功能结局的相关性。
    方法:观察队列设置:门诊物理治疗参与者:100人(58%为女性,平均年龄=34,sd=15)在以下区域接受肌肉骨骼疼痛的物理治疗:44%下肢36%脊柱,19%上肢1%未确定。
    方法:不适用主要结果指标:参与者完成了工作联盟清单(WAI)和信誉和期望问卷(CEQ)。探索性因子分析(EFA)探讨了WAI和CEQ的因子结构。根据因子载荷对从保留的项目得出的量表进行内部一致性评估。最后,筛选工具的选项被提出,并根据其与原始调查以及疼痛和功能结局的相关性进行评估.
    结果:数据支持调查的四因素结构。由于交叉装载,一些WAI项目被排除在外。得出的四因素量表与原始调查(r=.89-.99)具有很强的相关性,并表现出良好的内部一致性(α=.824-.875)。提出了两种筛选选择:一种保留原始18个项目中的11个,另一种仅包含3个项目。两种筛查工具均与原始调查相关,并显示与疼痛和功能结局的改善相关(r=-.21-.34)。
    结论:所提出的筛选器提供了简洁的测量选项,以促进在临床实践中的使用。这些工具可以帮助促进患者沟通,特别是解决患者的期望并理解制定行为改变所需的任务。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinimetric properties of 2 surveys used to evaluate common factors in the patient-provider relation and present screener options for the assessment of common factors and report their correlation with pain and functional outcomes.
    METHODS: Observational cohort.
    METHODS: Outpatient physical therapy.
    METHODS: 100 individuals (58% women, mean age=34, SD=15; N=100) presenting to physical therapy with musculoskeletal pain in the following regions: 44% lower extremity, 36% spine, 19% upper extremity, 1% undetermined.
    METHODS: Not applicable.
    METHODS: Participants completed the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) and the Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) explored factor structure of the WAI and CEQ. Internal consistency was evaluated for scales derived from items retained based on factor loadings. Finally, options for screener tools were proposed and assessed based on their correlation to original surveys as well as pain and functional outcomes.
    RESULTS: The data supported a 4-factor structure for the surveys. Some WAI items were excluded due to cross-loading. The derived four-factor scales demonstrated strong correlations with the original surveys (r=.89-.99) and exhibited good internal consistency (α=.824-.875). Two screening options were suggested: 1 retaining 11 of the original 18 items and the other comprising just 3 items. Both screening tools correlated with the original surveys and showed associations with improvements in pain and functional outcomes (r=-.21-.34).
    CONCLUSIONS: The proposed screeners provide concise measurement options to facilitate use in clinical practice. These tools can aid in facilitating patient communication specifically addressing patient expectation and understanding the tasks required to enact behavior change.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号