背景:退行性颈椎病(DCM),成人脊髓功能障碍的主要原因,在临床表现中表现出不同的相互关联的症状和显著的异质性。这项研究试图使用基于机器学习的聚类算法来识别手术干预后不同的患者临床特征和功能轨迹。
方法:在本研究中,我们应用k-means和潜在谱分析(LPA)来识别患者表型,使用来自三个主要DCM试验的汇总数据。Nurick评分的组合,NDI(颈部残疾指数),颈部疼痛,以及运动和感觉评分促进聚类。拟合优度指数用于确定最佳聚类数。方差分析和事后Tukey检验评估结果差异,而多项逻辑回归确定了组成员的重要预测因素。
结果:共1047例DCM患者(平均[SD]年龄:56.80[11.39]岁,411[39%]女性)在手术后完成了一年的结果评估。潜在谱分析确定了四种DCM表型:“严重多峰损害”(n=286),“最小损害”(n=116),“运动显性”(n=88)和“疼痛显性”(n=557)组。每种表型都表现出独特的症状特征和不同的功能恢复轨迹。“严重多式联运损害组”,包括虚弱的老年患者,在一年内表现出最差的总体结果(SF-36PCS平均值[SD]:40.01[9.75];SF-36MCS平均值[SD],46.08[11.50]),但在手术后经历了实质性的神经系统恢复(ΔmJOA平均值[SD]:3.83[2.98])。应用k-means算法产生了类似的四类解。较高的虚弱评分和阳性吸烟状况预测“严重多模态损害”组的成员资格(分别为OR1.47[95%CI1.07-2.02]和1.58[95%CI1.25-1.99]),在接受前路手术和较长的症状持续时间与“疼痛主导”组相关(OR2.0[95%CI1.06-3.80]和3.1[95%CI1.38-6.89],分别)。
结论:基于多个临床指标的无监督学习预测了不同的患者表型。症状聚类提供了一个有价值的框架来识别DCM亚群,超过单个患者报告的结果指标,如mJOA。
背景:目前的工作没有收到资金。原始研究由AOSpineNorthAmerica资助。
BACKGROUND: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), the predominant cause of spinal cord dysfunction among adults, exhibits diverse interrelated symptoms and significant heterogeneity in clinical presentation. This study sought to use machine learning-based clustering algorithms to identify distinct patient clinical profiles and functional trajectories following surgical intervention.
METHODS: In this study, we applied k-means and latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify patient phenotypes, using aggregated data from three major DCM trials. The combination of Nurick score, NDI (neck disability index), neck pain, as well as motor and sensory scores facilitated clustering. Goodness-of-fit indices were used to determine the optimal cluster number. ANOVA and post hoc Tukey\'s test assessed outcome differences, while multinomial logistic regression identified significant predictors of group membership.
RESULTS: A total of 1047 patients with DCM (mean [SD] age: 56.80 [11.39] years, 411 [39%] females) had complete one year outcome assessment post-surgery. Latent profile analysis identified four DCM phenotypes: \"severe multimodal impairment\" (n = 286), \"minimal impairment\" (n = 116), \"motor-dominant\" (n = 88) and \"pain-dominant\" (n = 557) groups. Each phenotype exhibited a unique symptom profile and distinct functional recovery trajectories. The \"severe multimodal impairment group\", comprising frail elderly patients, demonstrated the worst overall outcomes at one year (SF-36 PCS mean [SD]: 40.01 [9.75]; SF-36 MCS mean [SD], 46.08 [11.50]) but experienced substantial neurological recovery post-surgery (ΔmJOA mean [SD]: 3.83 [2.98]). Applying the k-means algorithm yielded a similar four-class solution. A higher frailty score and positive smoking status predicted membership in the \"severe multimodal impairment\" group (OR 1.47 [95% CI 1.07-2.02] and 1.58 [95% CI 1.25-1.99, respectively]), while undergoing anterior surgery and a longer symptom duration were associated with the \"pain-dominant\" group (OR 2.0 [95% CI 1.06-3.80] and 3.1 [95% CI 1.38-6.89], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Unsupervised learning on multiple clinical metrics predicted distinct patient phenotypes. Symptom clustering offers a valuable framework to identify DCM subpopulations, surpassing single patient reported outcome measures like the mJOA.
BACKGROUND: No funding was received for the present work. The original studies were funded by AO Spine North America.