cluster analysis

聚类分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童超重和肥胖是全球关注的问题,在过去的几十年中,西班牙的儿童超重和肥胖有所增加。生活方式行为的组合(即,饮食,睡眠,和沉默症)与体重状态高度相关。因此,这项研究旨在确定马德里市儿童的生活方式,并分析与超重患病率的关系,肥胖,和腹部肥胖,考虑社会经济因素。
    方法:对来自ENPIMAD研究的4545名儿童进行了横断面分析,并获得了饮食数据,睡眠,人体测量学,和社会经济变量。K-means聚类分析用于识别生活方式簇,和逻辑回归被用来检验社会经济指标和集群成员之间的关联,以及群集和体重状态之间的关系。
    结果:研究结果表明三种生活方式(健康,混合,和不健康),男孩和年龄较大的孩子在不健康群体中的比例更高。粮食不安全和社会经济地位低与男孩和女孩群体不健康有关。不健康人群中的儿童更有可能患有肥胖和腹部肥胖。然而,在控制粮食不安全后,这些协会在女孩中消失了。
    结论:这些结果提供了与儿童肥胖相关的行为和社会经济因素组合的见解,这可能有助于设计未来的干预措施。
    BACKGROUND: Childhood overweight and obesity is a global concern and has increased in Spain over the last decades. Combinations of lifestyle behaviors (i.e., diet, sleep, and sedentarism) are highly related to weight status. Therefore, this study aimed to identify lifestyle patterns among children from Madrid City, and analyze associations with the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity, considering socio-economic factors.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 4545 children from the ENPIMAD study with data on diet, sleep, anthropometric, and socio-economic variables. K-means cluster analysis was used to identify lifestyle clusters, and logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between socio-economic indicators and cluster membership, and between clusters and weight status.
    RESULTS: Findings show three lifestyle clusters (healthy, mixed, and unhealthy), with boys and older children more represented in the unhealthy cluster. Food insecurity and low socio-economic status were associated with unhealthier clusters in boys and girls. Children in unhealthier clusters were more likely to have obesity and abdominal obesity. However, these associations disappeared in girls after controlling for food insecurity.
    CONCLUSIONS: These results provide insight into the combination of behaviors and socio-economic factors associated with childhood obesity that may aid in the design of future interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据累积的长期状况(LTC)作为轨迹,将老年人分类为簇,表征集群并量化它们与全因死亡率的关联。
    方法:我们进行了一项纵向研究,使用英国纵向老龄化研究超过9年(n=15091,年龄在50岁及以上)。基于群体的轨迹建模用于基于随时间累积的LTC将人分类成群。派生聚类用于量化轨迹成员之间的关联,社会人口统计学特征和全因死亡率,通过回归模型。
    结果:确定了五个不同的累积LTC轨迹簇,并将其表征为:\'无LTC\'(18.57%),“单一LTC”(31.21%),“不断发展的多发病率”(25.82%),“中度多浊度”(17.12%)和“高多浊度”(7.27%)。年龄的增长始终与更多的LTC相关。少数民族(校正后的OR=2.04;95%CI1.40至3.00)与“高多重性”群相关。随着时间的推移,高等教育和有偿就业与LTC数量增加的可能性较低相关。所有群集的全因死亡率均高于“无LTC”群集。
    结论:随着时间的推移,多种疾病的发展遵循不同的轨迹。这些是由不可修改的(年龄,种族)和可改变的因素(教育和就业)。通过聚类对风险进行分层将使从业者能够识别出随着时间的推移LTC恶化的可能性较高的老年人,以制定有效的干预措施来预防死亡。
    OBJECTIVE: To classify older adults into clusters based on accumulating long-term conditions (LTC) as trajectories, characterise clusters and quantify their associations with all-cause mortality.
    METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal study using the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing over 9 years (n=15 091 aged 50 years and older). Group-based trajectory modelling was used to classify people into clusters based on accumulating LTC over time. Derived clusters were used to quantify the associations between trajectory memberships, sociodemographic characteristics and all-cause mortality by conducting regression models.
    RESULTS: Five distinct clusters of accumulating LTC trajectories were identified and characterised as: \'no LTC\' (18.57%), \'single LTC\' (31.21%), \'evolving multimorbidity\' (25.82%), \'moderate multimorbidity\' (17.12%) and \'high multimorbidity\' (7.27%). Increasing age was consistently associated with a larger number of LTCs. Ethnic minorities (adjusted OR=2.04; 95% CI 1.40 to 3.00) were associated with the \'high multimorbidity\' cluster. Higher education and paid employment were associated with a lower likelihood of progression over time towards an increased number of LTCs. All the clusters had higher all-cause mortality than the \'no LTC\' cluster.
    CONCLUSIONS: The development of multimorbidity in the number of conditions over time follows distinct trajectories. These are determined by non-modifiable (age, ethnicity) and modifiable factors (education and employment). Stratifying risk through clustering will enable practitioners to identify older adults with a higher likelihood of worsening LTC over time to tailor effective interventions to prevent mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    父母的健康素养对儿童的健康和发展很重要,尤其是头三年。然而,很少有研究探索有效的干预策略来提高父母的识字能力。
    本研究旨在确定基于微信公众号(WOA)的干预措施对0-3岁儿童主要照顾者父母健康素养的影响。
    这项集群随机对照试验招募了闵行区所有13个社区卫生中心(CHC)的1332个照顾者-儿童双子体,上海,中国,2020年4月至2021年4月。干预CHC的参与者通过WOA收到了有目的地设计的视频,自动记录每个参与者的观看时间,补充了来自其他受信任的基于网络的来源的阅读材料。视频的内容是根据WHO(世界卫生组织)/欧洲(WHO/欧洲)的全面父母健康素养模型构建的。对照CHC的参与者接受了与干预组相似的印刷材料。所有参与者均随访9个月。两组都可以在随访期间像往常一样获得常规的儿童保健服务。主要结果是通过经过验证的仪器测量的父母健康素养,中国父母健康素养问卷(CPHLQ)0-3岁儿童。次要结果包括育儿行为和儿童健康结果。我们使用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)进行数据分析,并进行了不同的亚组分析。β系数,风险比(RR),他们的95%CI用于评估干预效果。
    经过9个月的干预后,69.4%(518/746)的护理人员观看了至少1个视频。干预组患者CPHLQ总分(β=2.51,95%CI0.12~4.91)和心理评分(β=1.63,95%CI0.16~3.10)均高于对照组。干预组还报告了6个月时纯母乳喂养(EBF)的发生率更高(38.9%vs23.44%;RR1.90,95%CI1.07-3.38),并且6个月以下婴儿对维生素D补充的知晓率更高(76.7%vs70.5%;RR1.39,95%CI1.06-1.82)。对CPHLQ的身体评分没有检测到显著影响,母乳喂养率,常规检查率,和儿童的健康结果。此外,尽管干预对总CPHLQ评分和EBF率的影响有轻微的亚组差异,在这些亚组因素和干预因素之间未观察到交互作用.
    通过WOA使用基于WHO扫盲模型的健康干预措施有可能在6个月时提高父母的健康素养和EBF率。然而,需要创新的策略和基于证据的内容,以吸引更多的参与者,并实现更好的干预效果。
    UNASSIGNED: Parental health literacy is important to children\'s health and development, especially in the first 3 years. However, few studies have explored effective intervention strategies to improve parental literacy.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to determine the effects of a WeChat official account (WOA)-based intervention on parental health literacy of primary caregivers of children aged 0-3 years.
    UNASSIGNED: This cluster randomized controlled trial enrolled 1332 caregiver-child dyads from all 13 community health centers (CHCs) in Minhang District, Shanghai, China, between April 2020 and April 2021. Participants in intervention CHCs received purposefully designed videos via a WOA, which automatically recorded the times of watching for each participant, supplemented with reading materials from other trusted web-based sources. The contents of the videos were constructed in accordance with the comprehensive parental health literacy model of WHO (World Health Organization)/Europe (WHO/Europe). Participants in control CHCs received printed materials similar to the intervention group. All the participants were followed up for 9 months. Both groups could access routine child health services as usual during follow-up. The primary outcome was parental health literacy measured by a validated instrument, the Chinese Parental Health Literacy Questionnaire (CPHLQ) of children aged 0-3 years. Secondary outcomes included parenting behaviors and children\'s health outcomes. We used the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) for data analyses and performed different subgroup analyses. The β coefficient, risk ratio (RR), and their 95% CI were used to assess the intervention\'s effect.
    UNASSIGNED: After the 9-month intervention, 69.4% (518/746) of caregivers had watched at least 1 video. Participants in the intervention group had higher CPHLQ total scores (β=2.51, 95% CI 0.12-4.91) and higher psychological scores (β=1.63, 95% CI 0.16-3.10) than those in the control group. The intervention group also reported a higher rate of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) at 6 months (38.9% vs 23.44%; RR 1.90, 95% CI 1.07-3.38) and a higher awareness rate of vitamin D supplementation for infants younger than 6 months (76.7% vs 70.5%; RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.06-1.82). No significant effects were detected for the physical score on the CPHLQ, breastfeeding rate, routine checkup rate, and children\'s health outcomes. Furthermore, despite slight subgroup differences in the intervention\'s effects on the total CPHLQ score and EBF rate, no interaction effect was observed between these subgroup factors and intervention factors.
    UNASSIGNED: Using a WHO literacy model-based health intervention through a WOA has the potential of improving parental health literacy and EBF rates at 6 months. However, innovative strategies and evidence-based content are required to engage more participants and achieve better intervention outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    岩溶地下水,它是最重要的饮用水源之一,由于其与地表水的封闭水力关系,因此容易受到污染。因此,识别地下水源对控制地下水污染非常重要。主要离子之间的皮尔逊相关系数(Na+K+,Ca2+,Mg2+,HCO3-,SO42-,和Cl-)用于推导中梁山的地下水类型,中国西南地区。然后,采用主成分分析和聚类分析相结合的方法对中国西南典型岩溶地区的地下水源进行了识别。结果表明:(1)阳离子和阴离子之间的高度正相关表明Ca-HCO3,Ca-SO4,(NaK)-Cl的水岩反应,和Mg-SO4。(2)代表CaSO4和Ca-HCO3水岩反应的主要两个主要成分将,分别,解释60.41%和31.80%的地下水信息。(3)基于两个主成分,通过层次聚类,将33个地下水样本分为8组,每组都有相似的水岩反应。研究结果将用于预测涌水,这是隧道建设和运营的重要工作。实践要点:地下水的成分与水岩反应高度相关。主成分分析筛选地下水的类型。聚类分析确定了地下水源。
    Karst groundwater, which is one of most important drinking water sources, is vulnerable to be polluted as its closed hydraulic relation with surface water. Thus, it is very important to identify the groundwater source to control groundwater pollution. The Pearson correlation coefficient among major ions (Na + K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3 -, SO4 2-, and Cl-) was employed to deduce the groundwater types in Zhong Liang Mountain, Southwest China. Then, the combined method of principal component analysis and cluster analysis were employed to identify the groundwater sources in a typical karst region of southwest China. The results shown that (1) the high positive correlation between cations and anions indicated the water-rock reaction of Ca-HCO3, Ca-SO4, (Na + K)-Cl, and Mg-SO4. (2) The major two principal components that would represent water-rock reaction of CaSO4 and Ca-HCO3 would, respectively, explain 60.41% and 31.80% of groundwater information. (3) Based on the two principal components, 33 groundwater samples were clustered into eight groups through hierarchical clustering, each group has similar water-rock reaction. The findings would be employed to forecast the surge water, that was an important work for tunnel construction and operation. PRACTITIONER POINTS: The components of groundwater was highly correlated with water-rock reaction. The principal component analysis screens the types of groundwater. The cluster analysis identifies the groundwater sources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)是一种异质性疾病,其特征是大量自身抗体和广泛的临床体征和症状,导致不同的结局。我们的目标是识别不同的,同质SLE患者表型。
    方法:这项回顾性研究招募了符合系统性狼疮国际合作诊所(SLICC)分类标准的SLE患者,参加法国多中心“APS(抗磷脂综合征)和SLE注册表”。根据29个变量选择涵盖广泛的临床和实验室(不包括自身抗体)SLE表现,无监督的多重对应分析,然后是分配不同表型的分层上升聚类分析。
    结果:我们纳入了440例患者,主要是女性(94.3%)。诊断为SLE的中位年龄为24(IQR19-32)岁。聚类分析根据累积的临床表现产生了三个不同的亚组,不是自身抗体模式。第1组(n=91)主要包括白种人患者,与APS相关的临床和生物学表现,例如,Livedo,癫痫发作,血小板减少症和溶血性贫血。集群2(n=221),最大的,包括临床表现轻微的患者,主要是关节,更常与干燥综合征相关,自身抗体阳性频率更低。第3组(n=128)包括SLE特异性临床表现最大组的患者(皮肤,关节,增生性肾炎,胸膜,心脏和血液学),最常见的自身抗体阳性,低补体水平,更多来自亚洲和撒哈拉以南非洲。
    结论:这种无监督聚类方法区分了三个不同的SLE患者亚组,突出SLE异质性。
    OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) is a heterogenous disease characterised by a large panel of autoantibodies and a wide spectrum of clinical signs and symptoms that engender different outcomes. We aimed to identify distinct, homogeneous SLE patients\' phenotypes.
    METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled SLE patients meeting the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) classification criteria, enrolled in the French multicentre \"APS (antiphospholipid syndrome) and SLE‿ Registry. Based on 29 variables selected to cover a broad range of clinical and laboratory (excluding autoantibodies) SLE manifestations, unsupervised multiple correspondence analysis followed by hierarchical ascendent-clustering analysis assigned different phenotypes.
    RESULTS: We included 440 patients, mostly women (94.3%). Median age at SLE diagnosis was 24 (IQR 19-32) years. Cluster analysis yielded three distinct subgroups based on cumulative clinical manifestations, not autoantibody pattern. Cluster 1 (n=91) comprised mostly Caucasian patients, with APS-associated clinical and biological manifestations, e.g., livedo, seizure, thrombocytopaenia and haemolytic anaemia. Cluster 2 (n=221), the largest, included patients with mild clinical manifestations, mainly articular, more frequently associated with Sjögren\'s syndrome and with less frequent autoantibody-positivity. Cluster 3 (n=128) consisted of patients with the largest panel of SLE-specific clinical manifestations (cutaneous, articular, proliferative nephritis, pleural, cardiac and haematological), the most frequent autoantibody-positivity, low complement levels, and more often of Asian and sub-Saharan African origin.
    CONCLUSIONS: This unsupervised clustering method distinguished three distinct SLE patient subgroups, highlighting SLE heterogeneity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医院中过度使用实验室测试是一种医疗废物,也会伤害患者。制定和评估减少这种形式的医疗浪费的干预措施至关重要。我们详细介绍了我们研究的协议,该协议旨在实施和评估基于证据的影响,在不列颠哥伦比亚省成人医院的住院患者中重复使用常规实验室检测的多组分干预束,加拿大。
    方法:我们设计了一个阶梯式楔形整群随机试验,以评估加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省16家医院的多组分干预措施的影响。我们将使用知识到行动周期来指导实施,并使用RE-AIM框架来指导干预措施的评估。主要结果将是在干预与对照期间每个患者每天订购的常规实验室检查的数量。次要结果衡量标准将评估实施保真度,使用的所有常见实验室测试的数量,对医疗成本的影响,和安全结果。该研究将包括入住成人病房(内科或家庭医学)的患者,以及在参与医院的这些病房工作的医疗保健提供者。在24周的基线期后,我们将在一个医院现场进行为期16周的试点。新的集群(包含大约2-3家医院)将每12周接受一次干预。我们将在最终集群实施后24周评估实施的可持续性。用意向来治疗,我们将使用广义线性混合模型进行分析,以评估干预对结局的影响.
    结论:该研究建立在先前已证明有效的多组分干预措施的基础上。干预束的元素很容易适应其他设置,促进未来在更广泛的背景下采用。研究结果预计将产生积极影响,因为它们将减少重复性实验室测试的使用,并为完成这项工作提供经验支持的措施和工具。
    背景:这项研究于2024年4月8日通过ClinicalTrials.gov协议注册和结果系统(NCT06359587)进行了前瞻性注册。https://经典。
    结果:gov/ct2/show/NCT06359587?term=NCT06359587&recrs=ab&draw=2&rank=1。
    BACKGROUND: Laboratory test overuse in hospitals is a form of healthcare waste that also harms patients. Developing and evaluating interventions to reduce this form of healthcare waste is critical. We detail the protocol for our study which aims to implement and evaluate the impact of an evidence-based, multicomponent intervention bundle on repetitive use of routine laboratory testing in hospitalized medical patients across adult hospitals in the province of British Columbia, Canada.
    METHODS: We have designed a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to assess the impact of a multicomponent intervention bundle across 16 hospitals in the province of British Columbia in Canada. We will use the Knowledge to Action cycle to guide implementation and the RE-AIM framework to guide evaluation of the intervention bundle. The primary outcome will be the number of routine laboratory tests ordered per patient-day in the intervention versus control periods. Secondary outcome measures will assess implementation fidelity, number of all common laboratory tests used, impact on healthcare costs, and safety outcomes. The study will include patients admitted to adult medical wards (internal medicine or family medicine) and healthcare providers working in these wards within the participating hospitals. After a baseline period of 24 weeks, we will conduct a 16-week pilot at one hospital site. A new cluster (containing approximately 2-3 hospitals) will receive the intervention every 12 weeks. We will evaluate the sustainability of implementation at 24 weeks post implementation of the final cluster. Using intention to treat, we will use generalized linear mixed models for analysis to evaluate the impact of the intervention on outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study builds upon a multicomponent intervention bundle that has previously demonstrated effectiveness. The elements of the intervention bundle are easily adaptable to other settings, facilitating future adoption in wider contexts. The study outputs are expected to have a positive impact as they will reduce usage of repetitive laboratory tests and provide empirically supported measures and tools for accomplishing this work.
    BACKGROUND: This study was prospectively registered on April 8, 2024, via ClinicalTrials.gov Protocols Registration and Results System (NCT06359587). https://classic.
    RESULTS: gov/ct2/show/NCT06359587?term=NCT06359587&recrs=ab&draw=2&rank=1.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引发患者价值观的严重疾病对话(SIC),目标,和护理偏好减少焦虑和抑郁,提高生活质量,但癌症患者很少发生。针对临床医生和/或患者的行为经济实施策略(轻推)可能会增加SIC完成。
    测试临床医生和患者轻推对SIC完成的独立和综合影响。
    A2×2阶乘,本研究于2021年9月7日至2022年3月11日在宾夕法尼亚州和新泽西州大型学术卫生系统内的4家医院和6个社区中心的肿瘤科诊所进行,纳入163名内科和妇科肿瘤临床医师和4450名具有高死亡风险(180日死亡率风险≥10%)的癌症患者中.
    临床医师集群和患者被独立随机分配接受常规治疗和轻推,产生4个武器:(1)主动控制,在试验开始前运行2年,由临床医生短信提醒组成,以完成高死亡率风险患者的SIC;(2)仅临床医生轻推,包括主动控制加上每周同行比较临床医生水平的SIC完成率;(3)仅患者微动,由主动控制和临床前电子通信组成,旨在为患者提供SIC;(4)结合临床医生和患者的轻推。
    主要结果是参与者在随机分组后首次就诊后6个月内电子健康记录中记录的SIC。在患者水平的意向治疗基础上进行分析。
    该研究累积了4450名患者(中位年龄,67年[IQR,59-75岁];163名临床医生观察到2352名女性[52.9%],随机分为主动对照(n=1004),临床医生轻推(n=1179),患者轻推(n=997),或组合推动(n=1270)。主动控制臂的6个月SIC完成的总体患者水平率为11.2%(1004个中的112个),临床医生推臂的11.5%(1179个中的136个),11.5%的患者推臂(115/997),和14.1%的组合推动臂(1270个中的179个)。与主动控制相比,综合推动与SIC率的增加相关(风险比[rHR],1.55[95%CI,1.00-2.40];P=0.049),而临床医生轻推(HR,0.95[95%CI,0.64-1.41;P=0.79)和患者轻推(HR,0.99[95%CI,0.73-1.33];P=.93)没有。
    在这项整群随机试验中,与主动对照相比,结合临床医生同伴比较和患者启动问卷的轻推与记录在案的SIC略有增加相关。结合临床和患者指导的轻推可能有助于在常规癌症护理中促进SIC。
    ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04867850。
    UNASSIGNED: Serious illness conversations (SICs) that elicit patients\' values, goals, and care preferences reduce anxiety and depression and improve quality of life, but occur infrequently for patients with cancer. Behavioral economic implementation strategies (nudges) directed at clinicians and/or patients may increase SIC completion.
    UNASSIGNED: To test the independent and combined effects of clinician and patient nudges on SIC completion.
    UNASSIGNED: A 2 × 2 factorial, cluster randomized trial was conducted from September 7, 2021, to March 11, 2022, at oncology clinics across 4 hospitals and 6 community sites within a large academic health system in Pennsylvania and New Jersey among 163 medical and gynecologic oncology clinicians and 4450 patients with cancer at high risk of mortality (≥10% risk of 180-day mortality).
    UNASSIGNED: Clinician clusters and patients were independently randomized to receive usual care vs nudges, resulting in 4 arms: (1) active control, operating for 2 years prior to trial start, consisting of clinician text message reminders to complete SICs for patients at high mortality risk; (2) clinician nudge only, consisting of active control plus weekly peer comparisons of clinician-level SIC completion rates; (3) patient nudge only, consisting of active control plus a preclinic electronic communication designed to prime patients for SICs; and (4) combined clinician and patient nudges.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was a documented SIC in the electronic health record within 6 months of a participant\'s first clinic visit after randomization. Analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis at the patient level.
    UNASSIGNED: The study accrued 4450 patients (median age, 67 years [IQR, 59-75 years]; 2352 women [52.9%]) seen by 163 clinicians, randomized to active control (n = 1004), clinician nudge (n = 1179), patient nudge (n = 997), or combined nudges (n = 1270). Overall patient-level rates of 6-month SIC completion were 11.2% for the active control arm (112 of 1004), 11.5% for the clinician nudge arm (136 of 1179), 11.5% for the patient nudge arm (115 of 997), and 14.1% for the combined nudge arm (179 of 1270). Compared with active control, the combined nudges were associated with an increase in SIC rates (ratio of hazard ratios [rHR], 1.55 [95% CI, 1.00-2.40]; P = .049), whereas the clinician nudge (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.64-1.41; P = .79) and patient nudge (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.73-1.33]; P = .93) were not.
    UNASSIGNED: In this cluster randomized trial, nudges combining clinician peer comparisons with patient priming questionnaires were associated with a marginal increase in documented SICs compared with an active control. Combining clinician- and patient-directed nudges may help to promote SICs in routine cancer care.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04867850.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在第三阶段的试验中(PANAMO,NCT04333420),vilobelimab,补体5a(C5a)抑制剂,机械通气COVID-19患者的28天死亡率降低。这项对368名患者的事后分析旨在通过无监督学习探索治疗异质性。使用基线时所有可用的临床变量作为输入。使用潜在类别分析(LCA)评估治疗异质性,沃德的分层聚类(HC)和对先前描述的临床脓毒症表型的判定。主要结果是28天死亡率。对于LCA,2类潜在模型被认为是最合适的。在LCA模型中,82例(22%)患者被分为1级,286例(78%)被分为2级。第1类定义为更严重的患者,死亡率明显更高。在调整后的逻辑回归中,未观察到不同类别间的治疗效果(HTE)异质性(p=0.998).对于HC,未发现显著类别(p=0.669).使用先前描述的临床脓毒症亚型,41例患者(11%)被裁定为α亚型(α),17(5%)β(β),112(30%)δ(δ)和198(54%)γ(γ)。在使用vilobelimab治疗δ亚型后,临床亚型之间观察到HTE(p=0.001),28天死亡率改善(OR=0.17,95%CI0.07-0.40,p<0.001)。在任何类别或临床亚型中均未观察到vilobelimab治疗的损害信号。总的来说,vilobelimab的治疗效果在不同类别和亚型之间是一致的,除了δ亚型,建议对最严重的患者有潜在的额外益处。
    In a phase 3 trial (PANAMO, NCT04333420), vilobelimab, a complement 5a (C5a) inhibitor, reduced 28-day mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. This post hoc analysis of 368 patients aimed to explore treatment heterogeneity through unsupervised learning. All available clinical variables at baseline were used as input. Treatment heterogeneity was assessed using latent class analysis (LCA), Ward\'s hierarchical clustering (HC) and the adjudication to previously described clinical sepsis phenotypes. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. For LCA, a 2-class latent model was deemed most suitable. In the LCA model, 82 (22%) patients were assigned to class 1 and 286 (78%) to class 2. Class 1 was defined by more severely ill patients with significantly higher mortality. In an adjusted logistic regression, no heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) between classes was observed (p = 0.998). For HC, no significant classes were found (p = 0.669). Using the previously described clinical sepsis subtypes, 41 patients (11%) were adjudicated subtype alpha (α), 17 (5%) beta (β), 112 (30%) delta (δ) and 198 (54%) gamma (γ). HTE was observed between clinical subtypes (p = 0.001) with improved 28-day mortality after treatment with vilobelimab for the δ subtype (OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.40, p < 0.001). No signal for harm of treatment with vilobelimab was observed in any class or clinical subtype. Overall, treatment effect with vilobelimab was consistent across different classes and subtypes, except for the δ subtype, suggesting potential additional benefit for the most severely ill patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定具有医学易感性的个体的症状负担是否表明躯体症状障碍(SSD)具有挑战性,鉴于该组中症状的现象学高度重叠。这项研究旨在提高对有心力衰竭风险的个体的认识。
    方法:分析了汉堡市健康研究的横断面数据,包括从汉堡普通人群中随机选择的个体,德国从2016年2月至2018年11月招募。通过应用聚类分析对使用躯体症状量表-8和躯体症状障碍量表-12评估的SSD症状进行分类,包括412名在未来十年内与心力衰竭相关的住院风险至少为5%的个体。使用ANOVA和卡方检验比较了集群的生物医学和心理因素。线性回归,适应社会人口统计学,生物医学,和心理因素,探索集群与全科医生就诊和生活质量之间的关联。
    结果:出现了三个簇:无(n=215;43%为女性),中度(n=151;48%为女性),和严重(n=46;女性54%)SSD症状负担。SSS-8平均总分为3.4(SD=2.7),中度为6.4(SD=3.4),严重SSD症状负担为12.4(SD=3.7)。SSD-12的平均总分为3.1(SD=2.6),12.2(SD=4.2)为中度,严重SSD症状负担为23.5(SD=6.7)。较高的SSD症状负担与生物医学因素相关(患有糖尿病:p=.005,呼吸困难:p≤.001)和心理负担增加(抑郁严重程度:p≤.001;焦虑严重程度:p≤.001),与心力衰竭风险无关(p=.202)。SSD症状增加与更多的全科医生就诊(β=0.172;p=0.002)和身体生活质量下降(β=-0.417;p≤0.001)相关。
    结论:生物医学因素似乎与心力衰竭风险个体的特征有关,心理因素影响SSD症状体验。了解SSD症状多样性和解决子组需求可能是有益的。
    OBJECTIVE: Identifying whether experienced symptom burden in individuals with medical predisposition indicates somatic symptom disorder (SSD) is challenging, given the high overlap in the phenomenology of symptoms within this group. This study aimed to enhance understanding SSD in individuals at risk for heart failure.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the Hamburg City Health Study was analyzed including randomly selected individuals from the general population of Hamburg, Germany recruited from February 2016 to November 2018. SSD symptoms assessed with the Somatic Symptom Scale-8 and the Somatic Symptom Disorder-12 scale were categorized by applying cluster analysis including 412 individuals having at least 5% risk for heart failure-related hospitalization within the next ten years. Clusters were compared for biomedical and psychological factors using ANOVA and chi-square tests. Linear regressions, adjusting for sociodemographic, biomedical, and psychological factors, explored associations between clusters with general practitioner visits and quality of life.
    RESULTS: Three clusters emerged: none (n = 215; 43% female), moderate (n = 151; 48% female), and severe (n = 46; 54% female) SSD symptom burden. The SSS-8 mean sum scores were 3.4 (SD = 2.7) for no, 6.4 (SD = 3.4) for moderate, and 12.4 (SD = 3.7) for severe SSD symptom burden. The SSD-12 mean sum scores were 3.1 (SD = 2.6) for no, 12.2 (SD = 4.2) for moderate, and 23.5 (SD = 6.7) for severe SSD symptom burden. Higher SSD symptom burden correlated with biomedical factors (having diabetes: p = .005 and dyspnea: p ≤ .001) and increased psychological burden (depression severity: p ≤ .001; anxiety severity: p ≤ .001), irrespective of heart failure risk (p = .202). Increased SSD symptoms were associated with more general practitioner visits (β = 0.172; p = .002) and decreased physical quality of life (β = -0.417; p ≤ .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Biomedical factors appear relevant in characterizing individuals at risk for heart failure, while psychological factors affect SSD symptom experience. Understanding SSD symptom diversity and addressing subgroup needs could prove beneficial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解慢性病患病率,模式,同时发生对于有效的医疗保健计划和疾病预防策略至关重要。在本文中,我们旨在根据年龄≥50岁的印度成年人自我报告的非传染性疾病状态,确定他们中主要非传染性疾病的聚集性,并找出增加已确定疾病聚集风险的危险因素.
    我们利用了具有全国代表性的全球衰老与成人健康调查研究(SAGEWave-2)的数据。合格样本量为6298名年龄≥50岁的成年人。我们进行了潜在类别分析,以发现多发病率的潜在亚组,并进行了多项逻辑回归,以确定与观察到的潜在类别成员相关的因素。
    潜在类别分析将我们的>49岁的男性和女性样本分为三组-轻度多发病风险(41%),中度多发病风险(30%),和严重多发病风险(29%)。在轻度多发病风险组中,最普遍的疾病是哮喘和关节炎,中度多症风险组中的主要流行疾病是低近距/远距视力,其次是抑郁症,哮喘,和肺部疾病。心绞痛,糖尿病,高血压,和卒中是严重多发病风险类别中的主要疾病。与轻度多发病率类别中的人相比,年龄较高的人患有中度多发病率和重度多发病率的风险分别高18%和15%。女性更可能有中等风险(3.36倍)和2.82倍更可能有严重多发病风险。
    疾病的聚集突出了初级保健环境中综合疾病管理和改善医疗保健系统以适应个人需求的重要性。实施预防措施和量身定制的干预措施,加强健康和保健中心,为二级和三级住院提供全面的初级保健服务可以满足多病人的需求。
    UNASSIGNED: Understanding chronic disease prevalence, patterns, and co-occurrence is pivotal for effective health care planning and disease prevention strategies. In this paper, we aimed to identify the clustering of major non-communicable diseases among Indian adults aged ≥50 years based on their self-reported diagnosed non-communicable disease status and to find the risk factors that heighten the risk of developing the identified disease clusters.
    UNASSIGNED: We utilised data from the nationally representative survey Study on Global AGEing and Adult Health (SAGE Wave-2). The eligible sample size was 6298 adults aged ≥50 years. We conducted the latent class analysis to uncover latent subgroups of multimorbidity and the multinomial logistic regression to identify the factors linked to observed latent class membership.
    UNASSIGNED: The latent class analysis grouped our sample of men and women >49 years old into three groups - mild multimorbidity risk (41%), moderate multimorbidity risk (30%), and severe multimorbidity risk (29%). In the mild multimorbidity risk group, the most prevalent diseases were asthma and arthritis, and the major prevalent disease in the moderate multimorbidity risk group was low near/distance vision, followed by depression, asthma, and lung disease. Angina, diabetes, hypertension, and stroke were the major diseases in the severe multimorbidity risk category. Individuals with higher ages had an 18% and 15% higher risk of having moderate multimorbidity and severe multimorbidity compared to those in the mild multimorbidity category. Females were more likely to have a moderate risk (3.36 times) and 2.82 times more likely to have severe multimorbidity risk.
    UNASSIGNED: The clustering of diseases highlights the importance of integrated disease management in primary care settings and improving the health care system to accommodate the individual\'s needs. Implementing preventive measures and tailored interventions, strengthening the health and wellness centres, and delivering comprehensive primary health care services for secondary and tertiary level hospitalisation may cater to the needs of multimorbid patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号