Objective: Exploring the efficacy and safety of bridging blinatumomab (BiTE) in combination with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy for the treatment of adult patients with acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) . Methods: Clinical data from 36 adult B-ALL patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University from August 2018 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 36 cases were included: 18 men and 18 women. The median age was 43.5 years (21-72 years). Moreover, 21 cases of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia were reported, and 16 of these cases were relapsed or refractory. Eighteen patients underwent blinatumomab bridging followed by CAR-T cell therapy, and 18 patients received CAR-T cell therapy. This study analyzed the efficacy and safety of treatment in two groups of patients. Results: In the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group, 16 patients achieved complete remission (CR) after BiTE immunotherapy, with a CR rate of 88.9%. One month after bridging CAR-T therapy, bone marrow examination showed a CR rate of 100.0%, and the minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate was higher than the nonbridging therapy group (94.4% vs. 61.1%, Fisher, P=0.041). The incidence of cytokine release syndrome and other adverse reactions in the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group was lower than that in the nonbridging therapy group (11.1% vs. 50.0%, Fisher, P=0.027). The follow-up reveals that 13 patients continued to maintain MRD negativity, and five patients experienced relapse 8.40 months (2.57-10.20 months) after treatment. Two of five patients with relapse achieved CR after receiving the second CAR-T cell therapy. In the nonbridging therapy group, 10 patients maintained continuous MRD negativity, 7 experienced relapse, and 6 died. The 1 year overall survival rate in the BiTE bridge-to-CAR-T group was higher than that in the nonbridging therapy group, with a statistically significant difference at the 0.1 level (88.9%±10.5% vs. 66.7%±10.9%, P=0.091) . Conclusion: BiTE bridging CAR-T cell therapy demonstrates excellent efficacy in adult B-ALL treatment, with a low recent recurrence rate and ongoing assessment of long-term efficacy during follow-up.
目的： 探讨贝林妥欧单抗桥接嵌合抗原受体T（CAR-T）细胞疗法治疗急性B淋巴细胞白血病（B-ALL）患者的疗效及安全性。 方法： 回顾性分析2018年8月至2023年5月在苏州大学附属第一医院住院治疗的36例成人B-ALL患者的临床资料。男18例，女18例，中位年龄为43.5（21~72）岁。其中费城染色体阳性急性淋巴细胞白血病（Ph(+)ALL）21例，复发/难治16例。18例患者接受贝林妥欧单抗桥接CAR-T细胞治疗，18例患者仅接受CAR-T细胞治疗，分析两组患者的疗效及安全性。 结果： 贝林妥欧单抗桥接CAR-T组中16例患者贝林妥欧单抗治疗后获得完全缓解（CR），CR率88.9%。桥接CAR-T治疗1个月后复查骨髓象，CR率为100.0%，微小残留病（MRD）阴性率高于未接受贝林妥欧单抗桥接治疗组（94.4%对61.1%，Fisher，P=0.041）。贝林妥欧单抗桥接CAR-T组患者细胞因子释放综合征（CRS）及其他不良反应发生率低于未接受贝林妥欧单抗桥接治疗组（11.1%对50.0%，Fisher，P=0.027）。截至随访终点，贝林妥欧单抗桥接CAR-T组中13例患者持续MRD阴性状态，5例患者（包含2例经贝林妥欧单抗治疗无效的病例）在治疗后2.57~10.20个月复发，2例复发患者后续接受第二次CAR-T细胞治疗后达CR。未接受贝林妥欧单抗桥接治疗组中10例患者持续MRD阴性状态，7例复发，6例死亡。贝林妥欧单抗桥接CAR-T组患者1年总生存率高于未接受桥接治疗组，差异在0.1水平有统计学意义[（88.9±10.5）%对（66.7±10.9）%，P=0.091]。 结论： 贝林妥欧单抗桥接CAR-T细胞治疗成人B-ALL疗效及安全性值得肯定，清除肿瘤残留效果好，近期疗效复发率低，不良反应少。.

Home hospitalization represents an alternative to traditional hospitalization, providing comparable clinical safety for hematological patients. At-home therapies can range from the delivery of intravenous antibiotics to more complex scenarios, such as the care during the early period after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Early discharge from conventional hospitalization is feasible and helps reduce hospital resources and waiting lists. The coordinated efforts of multidisciplinary teams, including hematologists, nurses, and pharmacists, ensure patient safety and continuity of care. The traditional model of home hospitalization relies on home visits and telephone consultations with physicians and nurses. However, the use of eHealth technologies, such as MY-Medula, can enhance communication and monitoring, and thereby improve patient outcomes with no additional costs. The active involvement of a clinical pharmacist in home hospitalization programs is essential, not only for the proper logistical management of the medication but also to ensure its appropriateness, optimize treatment, address queries from the team and patients, and promote adherence. In conclusion, the implementation of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy home hospitalization programs that use both an eHealth tool and a multidisciplinary care model can optimize patient care and improve quality of life without increasing healthcare costs.

The one-year survival rate for patients experiencing a relapse of B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL) following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is approximately 30%. Patients experiencing a relapse after allogeneic HSCT frequently encounter difficulties in obtaining autologous CAR-T products. We conducted a study involving 14 patients who received donor-derived CAR-T therapy for relapsed B-ALL following HSCT between August 2019 and May 2023 in our center. The results revealed a CR/CRi rate of 78.6% (11/14), a GVHD rate of 21.4% (3/14), and a 1-year overall survival (OS) rate of 56%. Decreased bone marrow donor cell chimerism in 9 patients recovered after CAR-T therapy. The main causes of death were disease progression and infection. Further analysis showed that GVHD (HR 7.224, 95% CI 1.42-36.82, P = 0.017) and platelet recovery at 30 days (HR 6.807, 95% CI 1.61-28.83, P = 0.009) are significantly associated with OS after CAR-T therapy. Based on the findings, we conclude that donor-derived CAR-T cells are effective in treating relapsed B-ALL patients following HSCT. Additionally, GVHD and poor platelet recovery impact OS, but further verification with a larger sample size is needed.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies are a paradigm-shifting therapeutic in patients with hematological malignancies. However, some concerns remain that they may cause serious cardiovascular adverse events (AEs), for which data are scarce. In this study, gradient boosting machine algorithm-based model was fitted to identify safety signals of serious cardiovascular AEs reported for tisagenlecleucel in the World Health Organization Vigibase up until February 2024. Input dataset, comprised of positive and negative controls of tisagenlecleucel based on its labeling information and literature search, was used to train the model. Then, we implemented the model to calculate the predicted probability of serious cardiovascular AEs defined by preferred terms included in the important medical event list from European Medicine Agency. There were 467 distinct AEs from 3,280 safety cases reports for tisagenlecleucel, of which 363 (77.7%) were classified as positive controls, 66 (14.2%) as negative controls, and 37 (7.9%) as unknown AEs. The prediction model had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.76 in the test dataset application. Of the unknown AEs, six cardiovascular AEs were predicted as the safety signals: bradycardia (predicted probability 0.99), pleural effusion (0.98), pulseless electrical activity (0.89), cardiotoxicity (0.83), cardio-respiratory arrest (0.69), and acute myocardial infarction (0.58). Our findings underscore vigilant monitoring of acute cardiotoxicities with tisagenlecleucel therapy.

Aim: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) with standard of care (SoC; salvage chemoimmunotherapy, followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue for responders) for second-line (2L) treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL) in the pivotal ZUMA-7 trial data from a Japanese payer perspective. Materials & methods: A three-state partitioned survival model was utilized using population and clinical inputs from the ZUMA-7 trial data over a lifetime horizon. Results: Axi-cel was associated with greater incremental quality-adjusted life-years (2.06) and higher incremental total costs ($48,685.59/¥6.9 million) leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $23,590.34/¥3.3 million per quality-adjusted life-years compared with SoC. Conclusion: Axi-cel is a cost-effective treatment alternative to SoC for 2L treatment of adults with r/r LBCL.
[Box: see text].

T-cell redirecting therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cells and bispecific antibodies, are emerging as a novel class of immunotherapeutic agents for treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Their use is associated with an increased risk of infectious adverse events, fostered by cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinemia and T-cell exhaustion. Multiple ongoing clinical trials and real-world studies are investigating safety of T-cell therapy, highlighting the need for strategies to prevent and monitor the risk of infection. Recommended measures for risk mitigation include intravenous immunoglobulin supplementation, adequate prophylaxis therapy, vaccination and careful assessment for early diagnosis and treatment of infection. Here, we summarize available data on the risk of infections with approved and under development T-cell redirecting therapies for the treatment of MM.

Recent data highlight genomic events driving antigen escape as a recurring cause of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) and bispecific T-cell engager (TCE) resistance in multiple myeloma (MM). Yet, it remains unclear if these events, leading to clonal dominance at progression, result from acquisition under treatment selection or selection of pre-existing undetectable clones. This differentiation gains importance as these immunotherapies progress to earlier lines of treatment, prompting the need for innovative diagnostic testing to detect these events early on. By reconstructing phylogenetic trees and exploring chemotherapy mutational signatures as temporal barcodes in 11 relapsed refractory MM patients with available whole genome sequencing data before and after CART/TCE treatment, we demonstrated that somatic antigen escape mechanisms for BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeting therapies are acquired post-diagnosis, likely during CART/TCE treatment. Longitudinal tracking of these mutations using digital PCR in 4 patients consistently showed that genomic events promoting antigen escape were not detectable during the initial months of therapy but began to emerge nearly 1 year post therapy initiation. This finding reduces the necessity for a diagnostic panel to identify these events before CART/TCE. Instead, it underscores the importance of surveillance and identifying patients at higher risk of acquiring these events.

The promising results seen in the treatment of refractory hematologic malignancies with tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah), the pioneering Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy, has stimulated a fast growth in research and clinical testing of novel CAR-T constructs, targets, and various generations of CAR T-cells. Pharmacists may receive inquiries about active clinical trials or may be contributing to the care of patients participating in these studies. This briefing discusses the on-going clinical trials that explore novel CAR T-cell immunotherapies in pediatric refractory malignancies of hematologic and solid organ origins. It can be valuable in assisting practitioners in navigating the rapidly evolving field of CAR T-cell immunotherapies.

Aim: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was performed to compare axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) and lisocabtagene (liso-cel) for treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in adult patients after ≥2 lines of therapy in Japan. Materials & methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using the partition survival mixture cure model based on the ZUMA-1 trial and adjusted to the JULIET and TRANSCEND trials using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons. Results & conclusion: Axi-cel was associated with greater incremental life years (3.13 and 2.85) and incremental quality-adjusted life-years (2.65 and 2.24), thus generated lower incremental direct medical costs (-$976.29 [-¥137,657] and -$242.00 [-¥34,122]), compared with tisa-cel and liso-cel. Axi-cel was cost-effective option compared with tisa-cel and liso-cel from a Japanese payer\'s perspective.
[Box: see text].

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells obtained long-term durability in about 30% to 40% of relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Maintenance therapy after CAR-T is necessary, and PD1 inhibitor is one of the important maintenance therapy options.
METHODS: A total of 173 r/r B-NHL patients treated with PD1 inhibitor maintenance following CD19/22 CAR-T therapy alone or combined with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from March 2019 to July 2022 were assessed for eligibility for two trials. There were 81 patients on PD1 inhibitor maintenance therapy.
RESULTS: In the CD19/22 CAR-T therapy trial, the PD1 inhibitor maintenance group indicated superior objective response rate (ORR) (82.9% vs 60%; P = 0.04) and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (59.8% vs 21.3%; P = 0.001) than the non-maintenance group. The estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) was comparable in the two groups (60.1% vs 45.1%; P = 0.112). No difference was observed in the peak expansion levels of CD19 CAR-T and CD22 CAR-T between the two groups. The persistence time of CD19 and CD22 CAR-T in the PD1 inhibitor maintenance group was longer than that in the non-maintenance group. In the CD19/22 CAR-T therapy combined with ASCT trial, no significant differences in ORR (81.4% vs 84.8%; P = 0.67), 2-year PFS (72.3% vs 74.9%; P = 0.73), and 2-year OS (84.1% vs 80.7%; P = 0.79) were observed between non-maintenance and PD1 inhibitor maintenance therapy groups. The peak expansion levels and duration of CD19 and CD22 CAR-T were not statistically different between the two groups. During maintenance treatment with PD1 inhibitor, all adverse events were manageable. In the multivariable analyses, type and R3m were independent predictive factors influencing the OS of r/r B-NHL with PD1 inhibitor maintenance after CAR-T therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: PD1 inhibitor maintenance following CD19/22 CAR-T therapy obtained superior response and survival in r/r B-NHL, but not in the trial of CD19/22 CAR-T cell therapy combined with ASCT.