This study represents our second investigation into NIPT, involving a more extensive patient cohort with a specific emphasis on the high-risk group. The high-risk group was subsequently divided into two further groups to compare confirmed cases versus unconfirmed via direct methods. The methodology encompassed the analysis of 1400 consecutive cases from a single genetic center in western Romania, where NIPT was used to assess the risk of specific fetal chromosomal abnormalities. All high-risk cases underwent validation through direct analysis of fetal cells obtained via invasive methods, including chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. The confirmation process utilized QF-PCR, karyotyping, and SNP-Array methods customized to each case. Results: A high risk of aneuploidy at NIPT was identified in 36 out of 1400 (2.57%) cases and confirmed in 28 cases. The study also detected an increased risk for copy number variations (CNVs) in 1% of cases, confirmed in two instances involving one large microdeletion and one large microduplication. Trisomy 21 was the exclusive anomaly where NIPT confirmed all cases with identified risk. High-risk NIPT results which were not validated by invasive methods, were classified as false positives; parents in these cases determined to continue the pregnancy. In conclusion, NIPT can serve as a screening method for all pregnancies; however, in high-risk cases, an invasive confirmation test is strongly recommended.

BACKGROUND: To explore reasons for the failure of noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) for cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) in maternal peripheral blood, and discuss appropriate treatment schemes after the failure of the test.
METHODS: Altogether 41,136 pregnant women participated in NIPT. Blood samples were taken again from pregnant women who failed the first blood collection upon their informed consent. Prenatal genetic counseling or prenatal diagnosis was recommended for pregnant women with final NIPT failure.
RESULTS: The first failure rate of NIPT was 0.737% (303/41136), and the reason for the failure was the low ratio of cffDNA in 135 (44.6%) of the 303 pregnant women. After the second or third blood sampling, the final failure rate was 0.182% (75/41136). The low ratio of cffDNA was the main reason for test failure in 42 (56.0%) of the 75 pregnant women who finally failed NIPT, among whom 44 (58.7%) had underlying diseases, including 21 (47.7%) with more than two coexisting underlying diseases. Only 27 (36.0%) of the 75 pregnant women with NIPT failure underwent interventional prenatal diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The main reason for NIPT failure was the low ratio of cffDNA. Postponing the gestational weeks of blood collection may improve the success rate. Resampling and retesting upon informed consent in pregnant women who failed the first test could improve the success rate. For pregnant women who finally failed NIPT, it is suggested strengthening the genetic counseling, prenatal examination, and ultrasound evaluation, and carry out interventional prenatal diagnosis if necessary.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a pioneering technique that has consistently advanced the field of prenatal testing to detect genetic abnormalities and conditions with the aim of decreasing the incidence and prevalence of inherited conditions. NIPT remains a method of choice for common autosomal aneuploidies, mostly trisomy 21, and several monogenic disorders. The advancements in gene sequencing techniques have expanded the panel of conditions where NIPT could be offered. However, basic research on the impact of several genetic conditions lags behind the methods of detection of these sequence aberrations, and the impact of the expansion of NIPT should be carefully considered based on its utility. With interest from commercial diagnostics and a lack of regulatory oversight, there remains a need for careful validation of the predictive values of different tests offered. NIPT comes with many challenges, including ethical and economic issues. The scientific evidence, technical feasibility, and clinical benefit of NIPT need to be carefully investigated before new tests and developments are translated into clinical practice. Moreover, the implementation of panel expansion of NIPT should accompany expert genetic counseling pre- and post-testing.

The screening of fetal aneuploidies and non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic diseases (NIPD-MD) both rely on the study of free fetal DNA in maternal circulation, but their respective rise was unequal. Development of NIPD-MD has taken longer as it represents a less attractive commercial dynamic for industry, but also because it usually involves the development of tailored tests specific to each pathogenic variant.
We have carried out a review of the literature on the various indications and technologies involved in the use of NIPD-MM. We present its current implementation and its development in France.
To date, NIPD-MD has been routinely offered in France for several years by the laboratories of the French NIPD-MD network but remains mostly limited to the exclusion of paternal or de novo variants, the exclusion DPNI-MD. Indeed, it is still difficult to study the transmission of maternal variants from circulating free DNA analysis, due to its biological complexity: coexistence and predominance of similar DNA sequences of maternal origin. Different strategies, either direct or indirect, are being evaluated to establish fetal status regardless of the parental origin of the disease or its transmission mode. The emergence of commercial screening solutions for monogenic diseases complements the arsenal of prenatal exploration tools for these diseases.
The multitude of existing technologies and protocols may complicate the information provided during antenatal consultations, but mastery of know-how and knowledge of ethical issues of NIPD-MD will ensure optimal service and better management of pregnancies at risk of transmitting monogenic disease.

In animal breeding, a species sex can influence the value of the animal. For example, in the horse breeding industry, mares are preferred as polo horses, while in wildlife breeding males with larger horns are more valuable. Therefore, the economic advantages of knowing the unborn fetus\' sex are important to successful animal management. Ultrasonography is used to determine the sex of unborn fetuses, but this method places additional stress on the animal and require specialized equipment and expertise. Conversely, molecular-based sexing techniques require less invasive sampling and can determine sex more reliably. Although in humans, various studies have evaluated the use of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) for prenatal sexing, very few animal studies have been published in this field. Several factors can affect the sensitivity of cffDNA-based sex determination, for example the gestational age. These factors are often not optimized and validated when establishing a protocol for prenatal sexing. In this review, we summarize the current literature on cffDNA in animals. We discuss the diagnostic applications and limitations in the use thereof in animal husbandry and wildlife management. Lastly, the feasibility of implementing diagnostic tests is evaluated and solutions are given to the current drawbacks of the technology.

In 1997, it was discovered that maternal plasma contains Cell-Free Fetal DNA (cffDNA). cffDNA has been investigated as a source of DNA for non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal pathologies, as well as for non-invasive paternity testing. While the advent of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) led to the routine use of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPT or NIPS), few data are available regarding the reliability and reproducibility of Non-Invasive Prenatal Paternity Testing (NIPPT or NIPAT). Here, we present a non-invasive prenatal paternity test (NIPAT) analyzing 861 Single Nucleotide Variants (SNV) from cffDNA through NGS technology. The test, validated on more than 900 meiosis samples, generated log(CPI)(Combined Paternity Index) values for designated fathers ranging from +34 to +85, whereas log(CPI) values calculated for unrelated individuals were below -150. This study suggests that NIPAT can be used with high accuracy in real cases.

Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) is released into the maternal circulation from trophoblastic cells during pregnancy, is detectable from 4 weeks and is representative of the entire fetal genome. The presence of this cffDNA in the maternal bloodstream has enabled clinical implementation of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) for monogenic disorders. Detection of paternally inherited and de novo mutations is relatively straightforward, and several methods have been developed for clinical use, including quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and PCR followed by restriction enzyme digest (PCR-RED) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). A greater challenge has been in the detection of maternally inherited variants owing to the high background of maternal cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Molecular counting techniques have been developed to measure subtle changes in allele frequency. For instance, relative haplotype dosage analysis (RHDO), which uses single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for phasing of high- and low-risk alleles, is clinically available for several monogenic disorders. A major drawback is that RHDO requires samples from both parents and an affected or unaffected proband, therefore alternative methods, such as proband-free RHDO and relative mutation dosage (RMD), are being investigated. cffDNA was thought to exist only as short fragments (<500 bp); however, long-read sequencing technologies have recently revealed a range of sizes up to ∼23 kb. cffDNA also carries a specific placental epigenetic mark, and so fragmentomics and epigenetics are of interest for targeted enrichment of cffDNA. Cell-based NIPD approaches are also currently under investigation as a means to obtain a pure source of intact fetal genomic DNA.

We evaluated the feasibility of cffDNA extraction from the maternal blood samples regarding the threshold concentrations required for fetal sexing in pregnant cattle by PCR. In four trials, we 1) compared the extraction efficiency of seven methods using freshly harvested plasma/blood of cows carrying male fetii (150-240 d gestation) bovine amelogenin (bAML) and Y-specific gene sequences, 2) identified the minimum amounts of spiked cffDNA needed for a PCR for fetal sexing, 3) determined the most optimal protocol among three commercial kits for cffDNA extraction from neat and spiked plasma samples (181-240 d gestation) for PCR detection of Y-specific sequence and 4) tested Y-specific sequence PCR on pregnant cows at different stages of gestation (60-150 versus 151-240 d pregnant). In these experiments, blood samples from unbred dairy heifers (Canadian Holstein, n = 10), pregnant dairy cows (Canadian Holstein, 60-240 d gestation, n = 25 with male fetii), and aborting beef cows (Angus cross, n = 5, 100-150 d pregnant) were used for DNA extraction, spiking, and PCR. Extracted DNA from the blood samples of unbred heifers (n = 5) and bull calves (n = 5) served as controls in all trials. In the first trial, DNeasy Blood and Tissue, Qiagen DSP Virus, and NucleoMag cfDNA isolation kits were relatively successful among seven methods to isolate cffDNA from freshly harvested maternal plasma/blood of pregnant cows. In trial 2, using serial dilutions of cffDNA from male fetii spiked in cow plasma samples, a positive and unambiguous detection by PCR targeting Y-specific sequence and bAML gene was observed when spiked cffDNA concentration in plasma was >31.3 pg/ml and >2 ng/ml, respectively. In the third trial, the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit was most successful in extracting cffDNA spiked at the minimum concentrations in maternal plasma and subsequent PCR for Y-specific sequence. In our fourth trial, more cows in the second half (9/10) of gestation showed a positive Y-specific PCR outcome than those in the first half (3/9, Fischer\'s exact test; P < 0.05, 90%; CI: 55.5-99.75 vs 33%; CI: 7.5-70.1). In conclusion, we observed variability between different DNA extraction methodologies and stages of gestation results in the PCR for prenatal sexing. Thus, the current PCR methodologies are unreliable for detecting cffDNA in pregnant cows. Additionally, ≥10 (≥31.3 pg/ml of cffDNA) and ≥648 (≥2 ng/ml of cffDNA) copies of the whole fetal genome in bovine maternal plasma are needed for Y-specific PCR and bAML PCR, respectively.

Although they are considered rare disorders, muscular dystrophies have a strong impact on people\'s health. Increased disease severity with age, frequently accompanied by the loss of ability to walk in some people, and the lack of treatment, have directed the researchers towards the development of more effective therapeutic strategies aimed to improve the quality of life and life expectancy, slow down the progression, and delay the onset or convert a severe phenotype into a milder one. Improved understanding of the complex pathology of these diseases together with the tremendous advances in molecular biology technologies has led to personalized therapeutic procedures. Different approaches that are currently under extensive investigation require more efficient, sensitive, and less invasive methods. Due to its remarkable analytical sensitivity, droplet digital PCR has become a promising tool for accurate measurement of biomarkers that monitor disease progression and quantification of various therapeutic efficiency and can be considered a tool for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis and newborn screening. Here, we summarize the recent applications of droplet digital PCR in muscular dystrophy research and discuss the factors that should be considered to get the best performance with this technology.

UNASSIGNED: To report the frequency of maternal mosaicism contributing to false-positive chromosome X loss associated with noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at a single center.
UNASSIGNED: Pregnancies undergone NIPT using massively parallel sequencing at Guangzhou Women and Children\'s Medical Center between February 2015 and May 2020 were included in this study. Fetal karyotyping, quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) or microarray analysis was provided to patients with abnormal sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA) results for confirmatory testing, and QF-PCR was also employed to detect maternal sex chromosome status.
UNASSIGNED: cffDNA testing of 40682 pregnancies revealed 86 cases with NIPT results positive for chromosome X loss (0.21%). Among the 86 high-risk cases, 73 women had undergone confirmatory testing in our center, whereas 13 declined. Of the 73 women verified by invasive prenatal diagnosis, 27.4% (20/73) were true positive cases including six cases of monosomy X, two cases of microdeletion of Xp22.33, one case of deletion Xq27.2q28, one case of 47, XXX and ten cases with fetal sex chromosome mosaicism. Of the remaining 53 patients with fetal normal results, 30 cases had undergone QF-PCR analysis of maternal white blood cells. QF-PCR indicated that 36.7% (11/30) patients had an altered or mosaic maternal sex chromosome status. Statistical analysis indicated that cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) concentration estimated by chromosome X in maternal mosaic cases was significantly higher than that in the non-maternal mosaicism group (p < .05) and was related to maternal mosaicism rate (r = 0.88, p < .05).
UNASSIGNED: Our findings indicated that maternal mosaicism of sex chromosome was not uncommon in false-positive NIPT chromosome X loss cases. We recommend that this information should be disclosed to pregnancies during clinical counseling and maternal sex chromosome status should be confirmed for the cases with NIPT chromosome X loss.