目的:促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)试验是评价下丘脑-垂体-性腺(HPG)轴诊断中枢性早熟(CPP)的金标准。然而,具有CPP临床特征,同时具有边缘LH峰的病例的诊断仍然存在挑战.我们旨在评估在GnRH刺激测试期间测量的LH水平的平均值的诊断性能。
方法:对诊断为CPP和早熟(PT)的GnRH刺激试验结果进行回顾性分析。人体测量(体重,高度,和体重指数),年龄和性别特定的标准差分数,生长速度,青春期阶段,骨龄,血清FSH,LH,和雌二醇水平通过电化学发光免疫学方法(ECLIA)测量,和GnRH刺激测试结果,通过获取基础静脉血样本,20th,FSH和LH测量40分钟,被记录下来。
结果:共有76名女孩(38CPP,38PT)被包括在内。我们检测到LH的平均峰值截断值为4.25IU/L,灵敏度为94.7%,特异性为97.4%。97.3%的阳性预测值,GnRH检验的阴性预测值为94.9%,可区分CPP和PT。
结论:这是第一项评估在GnRH刺激试验期间测量的平均LH水平的诊断实用性的研究。我们表明,两次LH测量的平均值具有很高的诊断性能。因此,它可以用作评估HPG轴激活的有效和可靠的诊断工具,特别是对于具有边缘峰值LH水平的情况。
OBJECTIVE: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) test is the gold standard test to evaluate the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis for the diagnosis of central precocious puberty (CPP). However, the diagnosis of cases with clinical features of CPP whilst have borderline peak luteinizing hormone (LH) remain challenges. We aimed to evaluate diagnostic performance of the average of LH levels measured during GnRH stimulation test.
METHODS: Cases with diagnosis of CPP and premature thelarche (PT) who had a GnRH stimulation test results were retrospectively reviewed. Anthropometric measurements (weight, height, and body mass index), age and sex-specific standard deviation scores, growth velocity, puberty stages, bone ages, serum FSH, LH, and estradiol levels were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunological method (ECLIA), and the GnRH stimulation test results, which performed by obtaining venous blood samples at basal, 20th, and 40th minutes for FSH and LH measurement, were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 76 girls (38 CPP, 38 PT) were included. We detected an average peak LH cut-off value of 4.25 IU/L with 94.7 % sensitivity and 97.4 % specificity, a 97.3 % positive predictive value, and a 94.9 % negative predictive value in GnRH test to differentiate cases with CPP from PT.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study evaluating the diagnostic utility of the average of LH levels measured during GnRH stimulation test. We showed that the average of two LH measurements has a high diagnostic performance. Therefore, it can be used as a valid and reliable diagnostic tool for assessment of HPG axis activation, particularly for cases with a borderline peak LH level.