目的:扁桃体切除术和腺样体切除术是引起持续性疼痛的常见外科手术,出血,和功能限制。我们旨在研究塞来昔布与安慰剂相比治疗扁桃体切除术或腺样体切除术后疼痛和其他不良事件的疗效。
方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
方法:我们在PubMed进行了系统的文献检索,科克伦,和谷歌学术数据库从成立到2023年7月。已将二分结果报告为风险比(RR),而使用平均差异(MD)报告连续结果。绘制漏斗图以调查发表偏倚。
结果:从确定的1394条记录中,纳入6项随机双盲试验,包括591名接受扁桃体切除术和/或腺样体切除术的参与者。高剂量(400mg)塞来昔布可有效降低手术后“最严重疼痛”的疼痛评分(MD:-10.98,[95%CI:-11.53,-10.42],p<.01,I2=0%),而低剂量(200mg)不显著有效(p=0.31)。对于管理其他结果,如呕吐(RR:1.37[95%CI:0.69,2.68],p=0.37,I2=67%),腹泻(RR:1.41,[95%CI:0.75,2.64],p=.29,I2=42%),头晕/困倦(RR:0.90,[95%CI:0.71,1.15],p=.48,I2=0%),功能恢复时间(p=0.74),头痛(p=.91),塞来昔布组与安慰剂组之间无显著差异,无论剂量如何.最后,无显著差异(RR:1.02,[95%CI:0.91,1.15],p=.69,I2=0%)干预对最小出血的影响,中度出血,大量出血。
结论:这项荟萃分析提供了来自高质量试验的有力证据,并提出了有关塞来昔布用于扁桃体切除术和/或腺样体切除术的疗效的疑问。挑战现有的观念。
OBJECTIVE: Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy are common surgical procedures that cause persistent pain, bleeding, and functional limitations. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of
celecoxib compared with a placebo for managing post-tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy pain and other adverse events.
METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases from inception until July 2023. Dichotomous outcomes have been reported as risk ratios (RR) while continuous outcomes were reported using mean differences (MD). A funnel plot was drawn to investigate publication bias.
RESULTS: From 1394 records identified, 6 randomised double-blind trials comprising 591 participants undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy were eligible for inclusion. A high dose (400 mg) of
celecoxib was effective in decreasing the pain score for \'worst pain\' after the procedure (MD: -10.98, [95% CI: -11.53, -10.42], p < .01, I2 = 0%) while a low dose (200 mg) was not significantly effective (p = 0.31). For managing other outcomes such as vomiting (RR: 1.37 [95% CI: 0.69, 2.68], p = 0.37, I2 = 67%), diarrhoea (RR: 1.41, [95% CI: 0.75, 2.64], p = .29, I2 = 42%), dizziness/drowsiness (RR: 0.90, [95% CI: 0.71, 1.15], p = .48, I2 = 0%), functional recovery time (p = .74), and headache (p = .91), there was no significant difference between the group on
celecoxib and the placebo group regardless of dosage. Finally, there was no significant difference (RR: 1.02, [95% CI: 0.91, 1.15], p = .69, I2 = 0%) in the effect of the intervention on minimum bleeding, moderate bleeding, and profuse bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence pooled from high-quality trials and raises questions about the efficacy of
celecoxib for tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy, challenging existing perceptions.