carotid body tumor

颈动脉体瘤
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    UNASSIGNED: This case study presents the clinical details of a 37-year-old woman who presented with an asymptomatic swelling in the right supraclavicular region, ultimately diagnosed as a carotid body tumor (CBT).
    METHODS: The patient\'s medical background, which included her brother\'s CBT, prompted further investigation. Upon clinical examination and imaging studies, a tissue mass surrounding the right internal carotid artery was identified. Subsequent surgical resection of the tumor was performed, and histological analysis confirmed a neoplastic proliferation consistent with paraganglioma.
    UNASSIGNED: This case highlights the significance of taking into account familial history and conducting comprehensive diagnostic assessments for patients exhibiting similar symptoms. The successful multidisciplinary management of this rare tumor underscores the importance of early detection and appropriate therapeutic interventions.
    CONCLUSIONS: This report offers valuable insights into the clinical presentation, diagnostic process, and treatment of CBTs, emphasizing the necessity for a comprehensive approach to managing this uncommon neoplasm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈动脉体瘤是颈动脉分叉附近罕见的神经内分泌生长。虽然有些人提倡术前栓塞以减少出血,其他人避免它,由于并发症。这项研究分享了单个中心在不进行术前栓塞的情况下管理颈动脉体瘤患者的经验。
    方法:这是一项针对2020年至2024年之间颈动脉体瘤患者的横断面研究。数据收集自医院登记处。必要时,血常规检查,颈部超声检查,并进行计算机断层扫描。根据Shamblin分类对肿瘤进行分类。平均随访时间为20个月。
    结果:该研究涉及25名患者,22(88%)女性和3(12%)男性。他们的年龄从27岁到85岁不等。20例(80%)颈部肿胀,6人(24%)有阳性病史。肿瘤主要在右侧(52%),20(80%)显示不明确的颈部肿块。肿瘤大小从1.5到7厘米,在大多数病例中发现了ShamblinII型肿瘤(72%)。肿瘤类型与肿瘤大小显著相关(p值<0.05)。5例(20%)需要输血,三个来自III型,两个来自II型,I型无(p值=0.001)。3例(12%)出现暂时性神经功能缺损。无功能障碍或死亡记录。
    结论:颈动脉体瘤是一种病因不明的罕见肿瘤。不进行术前栓塞的手术可能是可行的,结果可接受。
    BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumors are uncommon neuroendocrine growths near the carotid bifurcation. While some advocate preoperative embolization to minimize bleeding, others avoid it due to complications. This study shares the experience of a single center in managing patients with carotid body tumors without practicing preoperative embolization.
    METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with carotid body tumors managed between 2020 and 2024. Data were collected from the hospital\'s registry. When necessary, routine blood tests, neck ultrasonography, and computed tomography scans were conducted. The tumors were categorized according to Shamblin\'s classification. The average duration of follow-up was 20 months.
    RESULTS: The study involved 25 patients, 22 (88%) females and 3 (12%) males. Their ages ranged from 27 to 85 years old. Twenty (80%) cases presented with neck swelling, and six (24%) had a positive medical history. Tumors were mainly on the right side (52%), with 20 (80%) showing ill-defined neck masses. Tumor sizes ranged from 1.5 to 7 cm, with Shamblin type II tumors being discovered in the majority of cases (72%). Types of tumors were significantly associated with the tumor size (p-value < 0.05). Blood transfusion was required in five cases (20%), three from type III and two from type II, with none from type I (p-value = 0.001). Temporary neurological deficits occurred in 3 cases (12%). No functional impairment or mortality was recorded.
    CONCLUSIONS: Carotid body tumors are rare tumors with an unknown etiology. Operation without practicing preoperative embolization may be feasible with an acceptable outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:颈动脉体肿瘤(CBT)和压力感受器功能衰竭(BRF)是两种不同但相互关联的疾病,影响颈动脉体及其调节机制。我们旨在描述和量化单侧和双侧CBT切除后的BRF。
    方法:前瞻性队列研究。我们纳入了2021年4月至2023年1月接受切除的所有单侧或双侧CBT患者。分析了人口统计学和CBT特征;使用复合自主神经严重程度评分(CASS)进行压力感受器敏感性评估。使用R进行统计分析。显著性水平设定为2尾α=0.05。
    结果:共有30例CBT患者接受了手术切除,23例纳入研究(18例单侧CBT和5例双侧CBT).所有23人(100%)都是女性,中位年龄60岁。关于单侧CBT患者;术前,13有BRF,最常见的功能障碍亚型为混合型.术后,最常见的功能障碍亚型是交感神经功能衰竭.关于双侧CBT;2例患者术前没有自主神经功能障碍。双侧手术切除后,一名患者没有自主神经功能障碍;然而,所有其他患者坚持使用BRF.
    结论:术前13例单侧CBT患者和3例双侧肿瘤患者存在BRF;大多数将保留BRF,并且仅在术后改变特征。没有发现类型之间的关联,BRF和Shamblin分类或侧向性的严重性。至关重要的是,在这一领域的研究仍在继续,因为许多关于CBT发病机制的特征尚不清楚,因此,BRF可能存在,但不会显著影响生活质量。
    OBJECTIVE: Carotid body tumours (CBTs) and baroreceptor failure (BRF) are two distinct but interrelated conditions, affecting the carotid body and its regulatory mechanisms. We aim to describe and quantify BRF after unilateral and bilateral CBT resections.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study. We included all patients with unilateral or bilateral CBT undergoing resection from April 2021 to January 2023. Demographics and CBTs characteristics were analysed; baroreceptor sensitivity assessment was conducted using the Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS). Statistical analyses were performed using R. Significance level was set at a 2-tailed α = 0.05.
    RESULTS: A total of 30 patients with CBT underwent surgical resection, twenty-three were included in the study (18 unilateral and 5 bilateral CBTs). All 23 (100 %) were females, median age of 60 years. Regarding patients with unilateral CBT; preoperatively, 13 had BRF, the most common dysfunction subtype was mixed. Postoperatively, the most common dysfunction subtype was sympathetic failure. With regards to bilateral CBTs; 2 patients did not have autonomic dysfunction preoperatively. After bilateral surgical resection one patient remained without autonomic dysfunction; however, all other patients persisted with BRF.
    CONCLUSIONS: BRF was present in 13 patients with unilateral CBT and 3 patients with bilateral tumours preoperatively; most will remain with BRF and will only change the characteristics postoperatively. No associations were found between type, severity of BRF and Shamblin classification or laterality. It is paramount that research in this area continues as many features are yet unknown regarding CBT pathogenesis, hence, BRF may be present yet not affect significantly quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:彩色多普勒超声(CDU)对颈动脉体瘤(CBT)的围手术期评估和随访结果的价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨CDU在本中心CBT中的作用。
    方法:从2015年1月至2020年12月,75例CBT患者被纳入研究。收集并分析患者的CT血管造影(CTA)和CDU数据。总结术后恢复情况及随访结果。
    结果:共纳入75例患者中的91例CBTs。73.3%的患者有单侧病变,而26.7%有双侧病变。病变被归类为ShamblinI(4.4%),ShamblinII(52.7%),和ShamblinIII(42.9%)。79.5%的病灶采用手术切除治疗,12.3%采用人工血管重建颈内动脉手术切除,8.2%采用自体大隐静脉重建颈内动脉手术切除治疗。与CTA相比,CDU检测CBT的灵敏度为96.7%,CDU检测ShamblinⅠ病变的敏感性和特异性均为100%,对ShamblinⅡ的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和72.1%,分别,而ShamblinⅢ的敏感性和特异性分别为69.2%和100%,分别。CTA和CDU检测最大直径无统计学差异,CBT的体积和肿瘤末端与乳突之间的距离。79.7%的患者获得CDU随访。1例患者发生CBT复发。CDU显示1例和6例患者发生人工血管狭窄和闭塞,分别。2例自体大隐静脉闭塞。
    结论:CDU能准确诊断ShamblinⅠ型CBT,对ShamblinⅡ有较高的敏感性,对ShamblinⅢCBT有较高的特异性。它在诊断中起着重要的作用,CBT的围手术期评价及随访分析。
    OBJECTIVE: The value of Color Doppler Ultrasound (CDU) for perioperative evaluation and follow-up outcomes of carotid body tumor (CBT) remains elusive. This study aimed to investigate the role of CDU in CBT in our center.
    METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2020, 75 patients with CBT were included in the study. Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) and CDU data of patients were collected and analyzed. The postoperative recovery and follow-up outcomes were summarized.
    RESULTS: A total of 91 CBTs in 75 patients were included in the study. 73.3% of patients had unilateral lesions, while 26.7% had bilateral lesions. Lesions were categorized as Shamblin I (4.4%), Shamblin II (52.7%), and Shamblin III (42.9%). 79.5% lesions were treated by surgical resection, 12.3% were treated by surgical resection with internal carotid artery reconstructed by artificial vessel, while 8.2% were treated by surgical resection with internal carotid artery reconstructed by autogenous great saphenous vein. Compared with CTA, the sensitivity of CDU for detection of CBT was 96.7%, the sensitivity and specificity of CDU for detection of Shamblin Ⅰ lesions were both 100%, the sensitivity and specificity for Shamblin Ⅱ were 100% and 72.1%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity for Shamblin Ⅲ were 69.2% and 100%, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between CTA and CDU for detection of the maximal diameter, volume of CBT and distance between the end of the tumor and the mastoid process. 79.7% of patients were followed up with CDU. Recurrence of CBT occurred in 1 patient. CDU showed that stenosis and occlusion of artificial vessel occurred in 1 and 6 patients, respectively. Occlusion of autogenous great saphenous vein was found in 2 cases.
    CONCLUSIONS: CDU can accurately diagnose Shamblin Ⅰ CBT, have high sensitivity for Shamblin Ⅱ and high specificity for Shamblin Ⅲ CBT. It plays an important role in diagnosis, perioperative evaluation and follow-up analysis of CBT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    颈动脉间隙病变由于其不同的病因和不同的临床表现而提出了诊断挑战。本文批判性地回顾了颈动脉空间的解剖结构,并强调了这个复杂区域内的病理谱,由三个案例研究说明。这些病例进行了超声检查(USG),计算机断层扫描(CT),磁共振成像(MRI)。神经鞘瘤在平扫CT上出现不均匀低密度,在对比增强CT(CECT)上出现部分高密度,邻近船只的位移。迷走神经鞘瘤引起颈内动脉前内侧移位。副神经节瘤通常在CECT上均匀高密度,颈内动脉侧向位移时,颈动脉体起源。颈动脉间隙病变的治疗取决于肿瘤的可切除性;不可切除的肿瘤可通过化疗进行治疗。此概述增强了临床理解和诊断准确性,促进改善患者治疗颈动脉间隙病变的结果。
    Carotid space lesions present diagnostic challenges due to their diverse etiology and varied clinical manifestations. This article critically reviews the anatomy of the carotid space and highlights the spectrum of pathologies within this complex region, illustrated by three case studies. The cases were examined with ultrasonography (USG), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Schwannomas appeared heterogeneously hypodense on plain CT and partially hyperdense on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), with displacement of adjacent vessels. Vagal-origin schwannomas caused the anteromedial displacement of the internal carotid artery. Paragangliomas were typically homogeneously hyperdense on CECT, with lateral displacement of the internal carotid artery when of carotid body origin. The management of carotid space lesions depends on the resectability of the tumors; unresectable tumors are managed with chemotherapy. This overview enhances clinical understanding and diagnostic accuracy, facilitating improved patient outcomes in managing carotid space lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈侧块管理经常挑战外科医生。神经组织肿瘤是此类结节的罕见原因。神经源性肿瘤占头颈部肿瘤病变的一小部分。考虑到这个区域的神经数量,令人惊讶的是,这种肿瘤并不常见。
    方法:对所有到开罗国家癌症研究所就诊的患者进行了回顾性研究,埃及,头颈部神经源性肿瘤。
    结果:在埃及国家癌症研究所(2006-2015)的过去10年中,方法对40例头颈部神经源性肿瘤进行头颈部单元治疗。患者年龄为2至78岁,平均年龄为34.7岁。在这项研究中,儿童神经源性肿瘤仅占9例(22.5%)。诊断为这些肿瘤的男性患者包括16例,而女性患者包括24例,男女比例为1.5:1。患者的表现取决于肿瘤的生物学行为;例如,其中一些表现为缓慢增长的无痛性界限清楚的活动肿胀,和其他人表现为迅速增长的肿胀与神经缺陷。临床图片和影像学研究,如CT和MRI引起怀疑,可能有助于描绘此类肿瘤,但明确的诊断是通过组织活检获得的.手术是大多数头颈部神经源性肿瘤的主要治疗手段,而辅助治疗在某些类型的神经源性肿瘤中获益有限。恶性组的5年生存率为60%,而15例中有6例(40%)报告死亡。结论:大多数神经源性头颈部肿瘤是良性的。准确的术前评估和高度怀疑是管理的第一步。适当的治疗包括完整的手术切除;然而,除权程序具有重要作用。恶性神经源性肿瘤具有侵袭性,可通过根治性手术切除和放射疗法联合治疗。局部晚期不可切除或转移性疾病可尝试化疗。
    BACKGROUND: Lateral neck mass management frequently challenges surgeons. Nerve tissue neoplasms are an uncommon cause of such nodules. Neurogenic tumors form a tiny percentage of the head and neck neoplastic lesions. Considering the number of nerves in this area, it is surprising that such neoplasms are not more frequently seen.
    METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients who presented to the National Cancer Institute of Cairo, Egypt, with head and neck neurogenic neoplasms.
    RESULTS: During the last 10 years at the National Cancer Institute of Egypt (2006-2015), 40 cases of neurogenic tumors of the head and neck were treated at the head and neck unit. Patients\' ages ranged from two to 78 years with a mean age of 34.7 years. Childhood neurogenic tumors accounted for nine cases (22.5%) only in this study. Male patients diagnosed with these tumors comprised 16 cases, while female patients comprised 24 cases, with a female-to-male ratio of 1.5:1. Patient presentation depends on the biological behavior of the tumor; for instance, some of them present by slowly growing painless well-circumscribed mobile swelling, and others present by rapidly growing swelling with neurological deficit. Clinical picture and imaging studies such as CT and MRI raise suspicion and may help delineate such tumors, but a definitive diagnosis is obtained by tissue biopsy. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment in most head and neck neurogenic tumors, whereas adjuvant therapy is of limited benefit in some types of neurogenic tumors. The five-year survival rate was 60% for the malignant group, while death was reported in six out of 15 cases (40%).  Conclusion: Most neurogenic head and neck tumors are benign. Accurate preoperative assessment and a high degree of suspicion are the initial steps in the management. Proper treatment involves complete surgical excision; however, debulking procedures have an important role. Malignant neurogenic tumors are aggressive and are treated with combined radical surgical resection and radiation. Chemotherapy is tried for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    颈动脉体瘤在小儿年龄组中很少遇到病变,但在宫颈无痛性肿块的鉴别诊断中仍然存在。除了对比成像研究外,还应研究遗传和家族背景。完全外膜下切除,有或没有事先栓塞,这仍然是有争议的,是治疗的支柱.后续行动因其性质而变得重要。在这里,我们报告了一名9岁女孩,颈部单侧无症状肿块,诊断为颈动脉体瘤,手术治疗未栓塞。我们强调儿科年龄组的具体方面。
    Carotid body tumors are rarely encountered pathologies in the pediatric age group but still exist in the differential diagnosis of cervical painless masses. Genetic and familial background should be studied in addition to contrast imaging studies. Complete subadventitial resection, with or without prior embolization, which is still controversial, is the mainstay of therapy. Follow-up gains importance due to its nature. Herein, we report a nine-yearold girl presented with a unilateral asymptomatic mass on the neck with a diagnosis of carotid body tumor treated surgically without embolization. We emphasize the specific aspects of the pediatric age group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈动脉体副神经节瘤(CBP)是一种罕见的,高度血管化,和生长缓慢的神经内分泌肿瘤.手术切除是CBP的决定性治疗,然而,由于肿瘤靠近关键血管和颈神经,它仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在记录CBP的特征,并检查CBP手术切除后患者的临床结局。
    方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,分析了接受CBP摘除的患者。我们检查了病人的人口统计,术前临床特征,肿瘤特征,血清和尿液中儿茶酚胺及其代谢物的水平。由一名血管外科医生进行手术,并在1、3、6个月和此后每年进行随访。进行Logistic回归分析以确定与永久性或暂时性宫颈颅神经麻痹(CNP)发生相关的危险因素。
    结果:从2020年9月至2023年2月,本研究检查了19例患者中进行的21例CBP去除手术。患者的平均年龄为38.9±10.9岁,男性的百分比为57.1%(n=12)。术前最常见的临床特征是无痛性颈部肿块(n=12;57.1%)。20例完全切除;不包括1例经病理证实的硬化性副神经节瘤。4例进行了血管手术(ECA切除术,n=2;无颈动脉分流的ICA撕裂的初次修复,n=1;ICA补片血管成形术伴颈动脉分流,n=1)。暂时性颅神经并发症,特别是误吸和声音嘶哑发生在四个(19.0%),和三例(14.3%),分别。在2例(9.5%)中,与永久性CNP相关的声音嘶哑持续超过6个月。随访期间未见复发或死亡。
    结论:手术切除是CBP的首选治疗方法;然而,它会带来血管或宫颈CNP的风险。术中估计的失血是CNP的唯一确定的危险因素。
    BACKGROUND: Carotid body paraganglioma (CBP) is a rare, highly vascularized, and slow-growing neuroendocrine tumor. Surgical resection is the definitive treatment for CBP, however, it remains challenging due to the tumor\'s proximity to critical blood vessels and cervical cranial nerves. This study aimed to document the characteristics of CBP and examine the clinical outcomes of patients following surgical extirpation of CBP.
    METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective review analyzed patients who underwent CBP extirpation. We examined the patient demographics, preoperative clinical features, tumor characteristics, levels of catecholamines and their metabolites in the serum and urine. Surgeries were performed by one vascular surgeon with follow-ups at 1,3,6 months and yearly thereafter. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of either permanent or temporary cervival cranial nerve palsy (CNP).
    RESULTS: From September 2020 to February 2023, this study examined 21 cases of CBP removal surgeries that were carried out in 19 patients. The mean age of the patients was 38.9 ± 10.9 years and the percentage of males was 57.1% (n = 12). The most common preoperative clinical feature was painless neck mass (n = 12; 57.1%). Complete resection was achieved in 20 cases; excluding one case with pathologically proven sclerosing paraganglioma. Vascular procedures were performed in four cases (ECA resection, n = 2; primary repair of ICA tear without carotid shunting, n = 1; and ICA patch angioplasty with carotid shunting, n = 1). Temporary cranial neurologic complications, specifically aspiration and hoarseness occurred in four (19.0%), and three (14.3%) cases, respectively. Hoarseness associated with permanent CNP persisted for more than 6 months in two cases (9.5%). No recurrence or mortality was observed during the follow-up period.
    CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection is the primay treatment approach for CBP; however, it poses risks of vascular or cervical CNP. The intraoperative estimated blood loss was the only identified risk factor for CNP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在颈动脉副神经节瘤手术中,放大对于正确评估肿块之间的解剖学关系至关重要,颈动脉壁,颅神经,肿瘤血管供应和筋膜包膜。这项研究的目的是描述显微外科技术,以及潜在的显微外科解剖结构,并评估疾病控制方面的结果,并发症和功能结果。
    26名患者,占29个颈动脉副神经节瘤,由同一位高级外科医生在35年的时间里接受显微外科手术治疗,包括在内。
    没有需要修复的颈动脉损伤,在这一系列病例中也没有发生围手术期或术后卒中.没有发生VII至XII颅神经主干的手术损伤。所有病例均获得完全切除,随访期间未观察到复发。
    研究规模小及其回顾性性质表明谨慎;然而,我们的研究结果表明,显微手术可以安全、精确地解剖颈动脉和神经。
    UNASSIGNED: In carotid paraganglioma surgery, magnification is crucial to properly evaluate the anatomical relationships between mass, carotid wall, cranial nerves, tumour vascular supply and fascial envelope. The aims of this study are to describe the microsurgical technique, along with the underlying microsurgical anatomy, and to assess outcomes in terms of disease control, complications and functional results.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-six patients, accounting for 29 carotid paragangliomas, treated with microsurgery by the same senior surgeon over a 35-year period, were included.
    UNASSIGNED: No carotid injury requiring repair, nor peri- or post-operative stroke occurred in this series. No surgical injury of the main trunk of VII to XII cranial nerves occurred. Complete excision was obtained in all cases and no recurrence was observed during follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: The small study size and its retrospective nature suggests caution; however, our results show that microsurgery can allow a safe and precise dissection of the carotids and nerves.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颈动脉体瘤是具有恶性潜能的罕见肿瘤。我们的目标是随访我们在2015年发表的初步经验,并比较使用后颈动脉夹层(RCD)与标准的尾颅(SCCD)技术的并发症发生率和术后结局。
    这是一个观察,病例对照研究,我们分析了1986年至2022年进行的所有颈动脉体瘤切除术。相应地使用参数和非参数检验。对Stata17进行统计分析。
    共包括181例外科手术,平均年龄56岁(±13.63),168例(93%)在女性中进行。RCD组的平均内外侧直径较大(2.85±1.57cmvs1.93±1.85cm;p=0.002),SCCD组的术前栓塞频率更高(27.5%vs0.7%;p<0.001)。使用SCCD技术共进行了40例(22.09%)切除。相比之下,在141例(77.91%)手术中使用了RCD技术。RCD组的平均手术时间较低(197.37±70.56分钟vs232±98.34分钟;p=0.01)。SCCD和RCD在血管病变方面无统计学差异(n=20[11.04%],15%对9%,分别为;p=0.36),短暂性或永久性神经损伤(25%vs33%,分别为;p=0.31),或平均术中出血(SCCD:689.95±680.05mL,RCD:619.64±837.94mL;p>0.05)。
    就术中出血或血管病变而言,RCD似乎是标准尾颅入路的安全且等效的替代方法,一个持续的,手术时间显著减少。
    UNASSIGNED: Carotid body tumors are rare neoplasms with malignant potential. We aim to follow up on our initial experience published in 2015 and compare the occurrence of complications and postoperative outcomes with the use of retrocarotid dissection (RCD) against the standard caudocranial (SCCD) technique.
    UNASSIGNED: This was an observational, case-control study in which we analyzed all of the carotid body tumor resections performed from 1986 to 2022. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used accordingly. Statistical analysis was performed on Stata 17.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 181 surgical procedures were included, mean age was 56 years (± 13.63), and 168 (93%) were performed in women. The mean medio-lateral diameter was larger in the RCD group (2.85 ± 1.57 cm vs 1.93 ±1.85 cm; p = 0.002) and presurgical embolization was more frequently performed in the SCCD group (27.5% vs 0.7%; p < 0.001). A total of 40 (22.09%) resections were performed using the SCCD technique. In contrast, in 141 (77.91%) procedures the RCD technique was used. The mean surgical time in the RCD group was lower (197.37 ± 70.56 min vs 232 ± 98.34 min; p = 0.01). No statistically significant difference was found between SCCD and RCD in terms of vascular lesions (n = 20 [11.04%], 15% vs 9%, respectively; p = 0.36), transient or permanent nerve injuries (25% vs 33%, respectively; p = 0.31), or mean intraoperative bleeding (SCCD: 689.95 ± 680.05 mL vs RCD: 619.64 ± 837.94 mL; p > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: RCD appears to be a safe and equivalent alternative to the standard caudocranial approach in terms of intraoperative bleeding or vascular lesions, with a sustained, significant decrease in surgical time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号