背景:新冠肺炎大流行给全球卫生和社会护理部门的各个方面带来了前所未有的挑战。由于工作角色的快速和戏剧性变化,养老院的护士和医护人员尤其受到影响,工作负载,和工作环境,和居民多重性。由世界卫生组织开发,心理急救(PFA)是一个简短的培训课程,提供社会,情感,支持,和务实的支持,可以减少灾难后的最初痛苦,并促进未来的适应性运作。
目的:这篇综述旨在综合研究发现,探索PFA对护理和家庭护理工作人员福祉的有用性。
方法:在15个数据库中进行了系统搜索(SocialCareOnline,国王基金图书馆,Prospero,dynamed,BMJ最佳实践,SIGN,Nice,奥维德,Proquest,坎贝尔图书馆,临床试验,WebofKnowledge,Scopus,EbscoCINAHL,和Cochrane图书馆),识别从数据库开始到2021年6月20日用英语发表的同行评审文章。
结果:在筛选的1,159篇文章中,标题和摘要排除了1146篇;其余13篇文章全文筛选,所有这些都被排除在外。
结论:这篇综述强调,缺乏关于PFA对护理和家庭护理工作人员福祉影响的经验证据。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,PFA很可能被推荐给医护人员。此处缺乏证据,这迫切需要进行评估PFA结果的研究,特别是在养老院工作人员中。
BACKGROUND: The Covid-19 pandemic has produced unprecedented challenges across all aspects of health and social care sectors globally. Nurses and healthcare workers in care homes have been particularly impacted due to rapid and dramatic changes to their job roles, workloads, and working environments, and residents\' multimorbidity. Developed by the World Health Organisation, Psychological First Aid (PFA) is a brief training course delivering social, emotional, supportive, and pragmatic support that can reduce the initial distress after disaster and foster future adaptive functioning.
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to synthesise findings from studies exploring the usefulness of PFA for the well-being of nursing and residential care home staff.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across 15 databases (Social Care Online, Kings Fund Library, Prospero, Dynamed, BMJ Best Practice, SIGN, NICE, Ovid, Proquest, Campbell Library, Clinical Trials, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Ebsco CINAHL, and Cochrane Library), identifying peer-reviewed articles published in English language from database inception to 20th June 2021.
RESULTS: Of the 1,159 articles screened, 1,146 were excluded at title and abstract; the remaining 13 articles were screened at full text, all of which were then excluded.
CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights that empirical evidence of the impact of PFA on the well-being of nursing and residential care home staff is absent. PFA has likely been recommended to healthcare staff during the Covid-19 pandemic. The lack of evidence found here reinforces the urgent need to conduct studies which evaluates the outcomes of PFA particularly in the care home staff population.