car driving

汽车驾驶
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些国家的目标指南建议不要在中风后不久驾驶;然而,一些患者在发病后一个月内恢复驾驶。这项研究旨在研究重症监护病房(ICU)入院与首次急性中风/脑出血后30天内恢复机动车驾驶的神经和社会背景因素之间的关系。材料和方法数据是从与日本国家脑和心血管中心管理办公室中风数据库相关的单个中心的医疗记录中提取的。数据包括年龄,性别,日本昏迷量表(JCS),美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS),就业状况,家庭情况,以及在卒中发作后24小时内,持有有效驾驶执照并被送往ICU的患者恢复驾驶的结果。使用时间到事件分析来探索这些因素与恢复驾驶之间的关联,数据从发病后30天审查。结果总计,239名患者有完整的医疗记录,其中66人恢复驾驶。多变量Cox比例风险分析表明,年龄≥65岁的患者比年龄<65岁的患者少(风险比0.46;95%置信区间:0.25-0.84;p=0.009)。NIHSS评分≥5和JCS评分≥1的患者与评分<5的患者(0.22;0.08-0.56;p=0.008)和0(0.13;0.04-0.37;p<0.001)相比,恢复驾驶的可能性也较小。分别。结论年龄,NIHSS得分,入住ICU时的JCS评分与卒中发病后30天内恢复驾驶的可能性独立相关。这些发现可能有助于提供支持和教育,以促进急性事件后有效恢复驾驶。
    Objectives Guidelines in several countries recommend against driving soon after a stroke; however, some patients resume driving within one month after onset. This study aimed to examine the relationship between neurological and social background factors at intensive care unit (ICU) admission and resumption of motor vehicle driving within 30 days of the first acute stroke/cerebral hemorrhage. Materials and methods Data were extracted from medical records of a single center linked to the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Administration Office for Stroke Data Bank in Japan. The data included age, sex, Japan Coma Scale (JCS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), employment status, family situation, and outcomes of driving resumption in patients with a valid driving license transported to the ICU within 24 hours of stroke onset. Time-to-event analysis was used to explore the associations between these factors and driving resumption, with data censored 30 days from onset. Results In total, 239 patients had complete medical records, of whom 66 resumed driving. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that fewer patients aged ≥65 years resumed driving than those aged <65 years (hazard ratio 0.46; 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.84; p=0.009). Patients with NIHSS scores ≥5 and JCS scores ≥1 were also less likely to resume driving compared with those with scores <5 (0.22; 0.08-0.56; p=0.008) and 0 (0.13; 0.04-0.37; p<0.001), respectively. Conclusions Age, NIHSS score, and JCS score at ICU admission are independently associated with the likelihood of resuming driving within 30 days of stroke onset. These findings may aid with the provision of support and education to facilitate the efficient resumption of driving after an acute event.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Mobility is crucial for independent living in old age. Older people with reduced physical ability (frailty) begin to limit their personal range of activities to their immediate living environment and ultimately to their immediate home. Diseases of the musculoskeletal system as well as neurological, psychological, cognitive, sensory, and circulatory disorders can limit functional competence (ability to live independently).In the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS), from which selected results are reported in this article, participants were categorized into different functional classes (Robust, postRobust, preFrail, Frail) using the LUCAS functional index. The results show that losses in functional competence were associated with impaired mobility and reduced car driving. Impaired mobility led to restricted radius of action.The aim of healthcare in old age is to preserve independence and quality of life as long as possible. Car driving is an important part of older peoples\' activities of daily living. Therefore, primary care physicians should address car driving regularly because preventive measures to strengthen functional health also strengthen car driving ability in older persons.
    UNASSIGNED: Mobilität ist auch im höheren Alter maßgeblich für die selbstständige Lebensführung. Ältere Menschen beginnen bei geringerer körperlicher Leistungsfähigkeit (Gebrechlichkeit, engl. Frailty) ihren persönlichen Aktionsradius auf das nähere Wohnumfeld und schließlich die unmittelbare Häuslichkeit zu begrenzen. Erkrankungen des Bewegungsapparates, neurologische, psychische, kognitive, Sinnes- oder Kreislaufstörungen können die funktionale Kompetenz (Fähigkeit, unabhängig zu leben) einschränken.In einer Längsschnittstudie zur Alterung urbaner Kohorten (LUCAS), aus der in diesem Artikel ausgewählte Ergebnisse berichtet werden, wurden die Teilnehmenden mittels des LUCAS-Funktions-Index unterschiedlichen Funktionsklassen zugeordnet (Robust, postRobust, preFrail und Frail). Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass zunehmende Verluste funktionaler Kompetenz mit abnehmender Mobilität und weniger häufigem selbstständigen Autofahren verknüpft waren. Beeinträchtigungen der Mobilität engten den Aktionsradius ein.Das Ziel der gesundheitlichen Versorgung im Alter ist es, Unabhängigkeit und Lebensqualität der Menschen lange zu erhalten. Autofahren ist ein wichtiger Teil der Alltagsaktivitäten älterer Menschen. Deshalb sollte insbesondere hausärztlich auch regelmäßig wiederholt die Frage nach dem Autofahren gestellt werden, denn präventive Maßnahmen zum Erhalt funktionaler Gesundheit dienen auch dem Erhalt der Fahreignung älterer Menschen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    事故分析反复报告了越野事故对道路交通死亡的重大贡献,尽管辅助技术在减轻破坏性后果方面取得了相当大的进步,在这种事故情况下,对司机的大脑反应知之甚少。虽然各种文献记载神经与转向运动相关,司机的精神状态,以及分心和疲劳对驾驶性能的影响,汽车与道路连续偏离的皮质基质-即大脑如何代表预期和观察到的汽车位置之间的不同差异,并随后分配定制水平的纠正措施-尚不清楚。此外,多个子过程的叠加,如视觉和错误的反馈处理,性能监控,或电机控制,使汽车驾驶任务中参与的大脑区域的清晰解释复杂化。在本研究中,因此,我们试图解开这些子过程,在无误差和容易出错的车辆操作条件下采用被动和主动转向条件。我们记录了13个疗程中26个参与者的脑电图信号,在汽车驾驶任务期间,同时测量成对执行者(主动转向)和观察者(严格遵守)。我们观察到了执行人员的常见大脑模式,无论车辆操作是否无差错或容易出错,尽管在错误的条件下,光谱活动从运动β振荡到枕骨α振荡。Further,观察者和执行者之间的重大前沿差异,追溯到尾前扣带皮质,在主动转向条件下出现,表明运动行为认知控制水平增加。最后,我们给出了转向信号和汽车位置的回归结果,表明利用EEG回归与道路的连续偏差可能是可行的。
    Accident analyses repeatedly reported the considerable contribution of run-off-road incidents to fatalities in road traffic, and despite considerable advances in assistive technologies to mitigate devastating consequences, little insight into the drivers\' brain response during such accident scenarios has been gained. While various literature documents neural correlates to steering motion, the driver\'s mental state, and the impact of distraction and fatigue on driving performance, the cortical substrate of continuous deviations of a car from the road - i.e., how the brain represents a varying discrepancy between the intended and observed car position and subsequently assigns customized levels of corrective measures - remains unclear. Furthermore, the superposition of multiple subprocesses, such as visual and erroneous feedback processing, performance monitoring, or motor control, complicates a clear interpretation of engaged brain regions within car driving tasks. In the present study, we thus attempted to disentangle these subprocesses, employing passive and active steering conditions within both error-free and error-prone vehicle operation conditions. We recorded EEG signals of 26 participants in 13 sessions, simultaneously measuring pairs of Executors (actively steering) and Observers (strictly observing) during a car driving task. We observed common brain patterns in the Executors regardless of error-free or error-prone vehicle operation, albeit with a shift in spectral activity from motor beta to occipital alpha oscillations within erroneous conditions. Further, significant frontocentral differences between Observers and Executors, tracing back to the caudal anterior cingulate cortex, arose during active steering conditions, indicating increased levels of motor-behavioral cognitive control. Finally, we present regression results of both the steering signal and the car position, indicating that a regression of continuous deviations from the road utilizing the EEG might be feasible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    驾驶过程中长时间坐着与颈部疼痛有关,不舒服的身体姿势,和重复的动作。认识到这些挑战,本研究旨在调查汽车驾驶员的宫颈健康参数。
    样本由160名25至45岁的汽车驾驶员组成。然后根据颈部疼痛将该受试者分为两组。参加者符合规定的标准,比如年龄在25-45岁之间,保持BMI为18-24,每天至少驾驶2小时,至少3-5年。为了评估结果,我们在智能手机上使用了测斜仪和指南针应用程序来测量颈椎运动范围(CROM)。我们使用Surgimap软件来估计颅骨角度(CVA),使用CROM装置(颈椎活动范围)进行本体感受评估.
    结果显示,颈部疼痛组的参与者的颈椎运动范围(CROM)值比没有颈部疼痛组的低。同样,颈痛组的头椎角(CVA)较小(平均差-6.3°),表示更向前的头部姿势。颈部疼痛导致本体感觉准确性的平均差异为-4.5°。这表明颈部疼痛会影响CROM,CVA,和汽车司机的本体感受。
    汽车驾驶会显著影响颈部疼痛患者的颈椎参数,减少颈椎的活动范围,颅骨角度改变,本体感觉准确性下降。这些发现强调了为驾驶员量身定制的人体工程学干预和本体感受训练的必要性。未来的研究应扩大人口统计学参数,并考虑潜在的混杂因素,以全面了解汽车驾驶与颈部健康之间的关系。
    UNASSIGNED: Prolonged sitting during driving is linked to neck pain, uncomfortable body positions, and repetitive motions. Recognizing these challenges, this study aimed to investigate Cervical Health Parameters in Car Drivers.
    UNASSIGNED: The sample consisted of 160 car drivers between 25 and 45 years. This subject was then divided into two groups based on neck pain. Participants met the required criteria, such as being between 25-45 years of age, maintaining a BMI of 18-24, and driving for at least 2 hours each day for at least 3-5 years. To evaluate the results, we employed a clinometer and compass app on a smartphone to measure the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM). We used Surgimap software to estimate the Craniovertebral Angle (CVA), and a (Cervical range of motion) CROM device was used for proprioception assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: The result shows the participants in neck pain group displayed lower Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) values than without neck Pain Group. Similarly, the Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) was smaller in the neck Pain Group (mean difference of -6.3°), indicating a more forward head posture. Neck pain resulted in a mean difference of -4.5° in proprioception accuracy. This indicates that neck pain affects CROM, CVA, and proprioception in car drivers.
    UNASSIGNED: Car driving significantly impacts cervical parameters in individuals with neck pain, reducing cervical range of motion, altered craniovertebral angle, and diminished proprioceptive accuracy. These findings emphasize the need for ergonomic interventions and proprioceptive training tailored for drivers. Future research should broaden demographic parameters and consider potential confounders to provide a holistic understanding of the relationship between car driving and neck health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨环境噪声对驾驶员认知能力的影响,这项研究,以车内语音交互为例,进行了实验室实验,以评估道路交通噪声的影响,娱乐噪音,以及白噪声对驾驶员注意力和短期记忆的刺激。模拟汽车行驶过程中模拟声学条件的噪声水平范围为35dB(A)至65dB(A)。结论如下:(1)噪声水平直接影响主观烦恼水平,随着噪声水平的升高,烦恼线性增加;(2)驾驶员的注意力和短期记忆任务反应时间均受噪声类型的显着影响。与交通噪声和白噪声相比,在娱乐噪音下,司机的认知效率较低。(3)与简单的认知任务相比,复杂认知任务的表现更容易受到噪声水平的影响;(4)在实验上,结果发现,当环境噪声水平为55dB(A)时,驾驶员在认知任务中表现出最高的认知效率,与35dB(A)的噪声水平相反,45dB(A),和65分贝(A)。
    To investigate the impact of environmental noise on the cognitive abilities of drivers, this study, using in-vehicle voice interaction as an example, conducted laboratory experiments to assess the effects of road traffic noise, entertainment noise, and white noise stimuli on drivers\' attention and short-term memory. The noise levels simulated to mimic acoustic conditions during car driving ranged from 35 dB(A) to 65 dB(A). The conclusions drawn were as follows: (1) Noise levels directly influenced subjective annoyance levels, with annoyance linearly increasing as noise levels escalated; (2) Both attention and short-term memory task reaction times of drivers were significantly influenced by noise types. Compared to traffic noise and white noise, drivers\' cognitive efficiency was lower under entertainment noise. (3) Performance in complex cognitive tasks was more susceptible to noise levels compared to simple cognitive tasks; (4) Experimentally, it was found that drivers exhibited the highest cognitive efficiency in cognitive tasks when the environmental noise level was 55 dB(A), as opposed to noise levels of 35 dB(A), 45 dB(A), and 65 dB(A).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    前方碰撞警告系统(FCWS)监测前方道路并在碰撞时间达到某一阈值时警告驾驶员。使用驾驶模拟器,这项研究比较了新手驾驶员(无证驾驶员)和有经验的驾驶员(持有驾驶执照至少四年)在近碰撞事件中的FCWSs的影响,以及视觉和驾驶行为。实验驱动持续了大约六个小时,连续六个星期。视觉行为(例如,平均注视次数)和驾驶行为(例如,制动反应时间)是在汽车跟随任务期间发生的无缘无故的近碰撞事件期间收集的,带(FCWS组)或不带FCWS(无自动化组)。FCWS的存在大大减少了近碰撞事件的数量,并增强了这些事件期间的视觉行为。出乎意料的是,观察到FCWS的制动反应时间明显更长,提示与警告过程相关的认知成本。尽管如此,由于为情况分析提供的帮助,FCWS对新手驾驶员有轻微的安全益处。在警告事件之外,FCWS的存在也影响了跟车行为。驾驶员获得了额外的安全余量,可能是为了防止意外触发警告。这些数据启发了与FCWS相关的认知过程的性质。总之,研究结果支持通过大幅减少近碰撞事件的数量观察到的FCWSs的总体效率,并指出需要进一步调查。
    Forward collision warning systems (FCWSs) monitor the road ahead and warn drivers when the time to collision reaches a certain threshold. Using a driving simulator, this study compared the effects of FCWSs between novice drivers (unlicensed drivers) and experienced drivers (holding a driving license for at least four years) on near-collision events, as well as visual and driving behaviors. The experimental drives lasted about six hours spread over six consecutive weeks. Visual behaviors (e.g., mean number of fixations) and driving behaviors (e.g., braking reaction times) were collected during unprovoked near-collision events occurring during a car-following task, with (FCWS group) or without FCWS (No Automation group). FCWS presence reduced the number of near-collision events drastically and enhanced visual behaviors during those events. Unexpectedly, brake reaction times were observed to be significantly longer with FCWS, suggesting a cognitive cost associated with the warning process. Still, the FCWS showed a slight safety benefit for novice drivers attributed to the assistance provided for the situation analysis. Outside the warning events, FCWS presence also impacted car-following behaviors. Drivers took an extra safety margin, possibly to prevent incidental triggering of warnings. The data enlighten the nature of the cognitive processes associated with FCWSs. Altogether, the findings support the general efficiency of FCWSs observed through a massive reduction in the number of near-collision events and point toward the need for further investigations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:汽车驾驶越来越自动化,到了这样的程度,没有主动转向控制的驾驶正在成为现实。虽然主动驾驶需要使用视觉信息来指导行动(即,转向车辆),被动驾驶只需要查看驾驶场景,而不需要采取任何行动(即,人类是被动驱动的)。
    方法:经过对科学文献的仔细搜索,11个不同的研究,提供17个对比,用于进行全面的荟萃分析,将主动驾驶与被动驾驶进行对比。
    结果:与被动驾驶相比,主动驾驶更一致地招募了两个大脑区域,左中央前回(BA3和BA4)和左中央后回(BA4和BA3/40),与主动驾驶相比,被动驾驶中一组大脑区域被更一致地招募:左额中回(BA6),小脑的右前叶和左后叶,右叶下丘脑,右前前额叶皮层(BA10),右侧枕下回(BA17/18/19),右颞下回(BA37),和左阴户(BA17)。
    结论:从理论角度来看,这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即视觉扫描过程对相同活动的输出要求可以触发不同的大脑通路,与不同的认知过程相关。在主动驾驶过程中发现了背流优势,而在被动驾驶过程中获得了腹侧流优势。从实践的角度来看,与人为因素社区的主导地位相反,我们的研究结果支持以下观点:从被动驾驶到主动驾驶的转变仍然具有挑战性,因为被动驾驶和主动驾驶使用不同的神经网络.
    Car driving is more and more automated, to such an extent that driving without active steering control is becoming a reality. Although active driving requires the use of visual information to guide actions (i.e., steering the vehicle), passive driving only requires looking at the driving scene without any need to act (i.e., the human is passively driven).
    After a careful search of the scientific literature, 11 different studies, providing 17 contrasts, were used to run a comprehensive meta-analysis contrasting active driving with passive driving.
    Two brain regions were recruited more consistently for active driving compared to passive driving, the left precentral gyrus (BA3 and BA4) and the left postcentral gyrus (BA4 and BA3/40), whereas a set of brain regions was recruited more consistently in passive driving compared to active driving: the left middle frontal gyrus (BA6), the right anterior lobe and the left posterior lobe of the cerebellum, the right sub-lobar thalamus, the right anterior prefrontal cortex (BA10), the right inferior occipital gyrus (BA17/18/19), the right inferior temporal gyrus (BA37), and the left cuneus (BA17).
    From a theoretical perspective, these findings support the idea that the output requirement of the visual scanning process engaged for the same activity can trigger different cerebral pathways, associated with different cognitive processes. A dorsal stream dominance was found during active driving, whereas a ventral stream dominance was obtained during passive driving. From a practical perspective, and contrary to the dominant position in the Human Factors community, our findings support the idea that a transition from passive to active driving would remain challenging as passive and active driving engage distinct neural networks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    车道偏离警告系统(LDWS)是在立即车道偏离的情况下警告驾驶员的自动化系统。虽然LDWS与提高道路安全性相关,关于LDWS和方向盘后面的驾驶员之间的合作的神经方面知之甚少。本研究通过将功能磁共振成像和驾驶模拟相结合,为经验丰富的新手驾驶员解决了这个问题。结果显示,警告后立即激活的大脑区域:它涉及与警觉网络相关的区域(中脑,丘脑,前扣带皮质),运动动作和计划(运动和运动前皮层;BA4/6-小脑)和注意力重定向(上额叶皮层;BA10)。在这个大脑区域网络中,有经验的驾驶员和新手驾驶员之间没有差异。然而,先前的驾驶经验调节车道偏离的数量。结果可以改进文献中早期提出的合作模型,通过增加大脑维度。
    Lane Departure Warning Systems (LDWS) are automation that warn drivers in case of immediate lane departure. While LDWS are associated with increased road safety, little is known about the neural aspects of the cooperation between an LDWS and the driver behind the wheel. The present study addresses this issue by combining fMRI and driving simulation for experienced and novice drivers. The results reveal brain areas activated immediately after warning: it involves areas linked to the alertness network (midbrain, thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex), to motor actions and planning (motor and premotor cortexes; BA4/6 -cerebellum) and to attentional redirection (superior frontal cortex; BA10). There were no differences between experienced and novice drivers in this network of cerebral areas. However, prior driving experience mediates the number of lane departures. The results allow for refining a model of cooperation proposed earlier in the literature, by adding a cerebral dimension.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    很少有研究在确定中风患者恢复驾驶汽车的适用性方面检查了运动功能。偏瘫患者通常用未受影响的下肢控制踏板。然而,中风患者未受影响一侧的运动控制也受损。本研究旨在阐明偏瘫患者紧急制动时踏板切换控制的神经电生理特征。
    研究参与者包括10名左侧偏瘫司机和10名年龄匹配的健康司机。实验踏板用于测量制动过程中的肌肉活动和运动学数据,由放置在驱动器前面的发光二极管发出的光触发。
    患者组的反应时间与健康组相同。然而,从视觉刺激到油门踏板的释放,与健康组相比,患者组胫骨前肌和股直肌的肌肉活动较高,髋关节和膝关节屈曲的角速度较快。此外,患者组屈肌和伸肌之间的共收缩活动较高.从油门踏板释放到制动触点,患者组的髋关节内收角速度较慢,内部旋转,踝关节背屈,内部回报,和内旋比健康组。
    偏瘫患者在整个踏板切换任务中,使用未受影响的一侧,对踏板切换的控制不佳。这些结果表明,在决定患者是否可以在中风后恢复驾驶汽车时,应仔细评估与汽车踏板控制相关的安全性。
    UNASSIGNED: Few studies have examined motor function in determining the suitability of patients with stroke to resume driving a car. Patients with hemiplegia usually control car pedals with the unaffected lower limb. However, motor control on the unaffected side is also impaired in patients with stroke. This study aimed to clarify the neurophysiological characteristics of pedal switching control during emergency braking in patients with hemiplegia.
    UNASSIGNED: The study participants consisted of 10 drivers with left hemiplegia and 10 age-matched healthy drivers. An experimental pedal was used to measure muscle activity and kinematic data during braking, triggered by the light from a light-emitting diode placed in front of the drivers.
    UNASSIGNED: The patient group took the same reaction time as the healthy group. However, from the visual stimulus to the release of the accelerator pedal, the patient group had higher muscle activity in the tibialis anterior and rectus femoris and had faster angular velocities of hip and knee flexion than the healthy group. In addition, the patient group had higher co-contraction activities between flexors and extensors. From the accelerator pedal release to brake contact, the patient group had slower angular velocities of hip adduction, internal rotation, ankle dorsiflexion, internal return, and internal rotation than the healthy group.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with hemiplegia exhibited poor control of pedal switching using their unaffected side throughout the pedal-switching task. These results indicate that the safety related to car-pedal control should be carefully evaluated while deciding whether a patient can resume driving a car after a stroke.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    车道偏离警告系统(LDWS)在车道即将偏离的情况下生成警告。LDWS已被证明是有效的,并且是相关的人机合作模型。在这项研究中,对于新手和有经验的驾驶员,已经对LDWS的接受度及其对视觉和转向行为的影响进行了为期六周的调查。随着三项驾驶任务的要求逐渐提高,对无端车道的偏离进行了分析。将这些观察结果与没有自动化的基线条件进行比较。LDWS大大减少了车道偏离的数量及其持续时间,在车道偏离事件期间,搜索的视觉范围较窄。研究结果证实了LDWS的有效性,并表明这些益处得到了视觉注意指导的支持。未发现驾驶经验对LDWS的具体影响,这表明类似的认知过程参与或没有驾驶经验。自动化使用后,驾驶员对LDWS的接受度降低,但LDWS的有效性在长期使用期间保持稳定。
    车道偏离警告系统(LDWS)旨在防止车道偏离碰撞。这里,LDWS在六周内的评估显示,随着时间的推移,车道偏离事件的数量大幅下降。在车道偏离事件期间,驾驶员的视觉注意力得到指导的支持。
    Lane Departure Warning Systems (LDWS) generate a warning in case of imminent lane departure. LDWS have proven to be effective and associated human-machine cooperation modelled. In this study, LDWS acceptance and its impact on visual and steering behaviour have been investigated over 6 weeks for novice and experienced drivers. Unprovoked lane departures were analysed along three driving tasks gradually more demanding. These observations were compared to a baseline condition without automation. The number of lane departures and their duration were dramatically reduced by LDWS, and a narrower visual spread of search during lane departure events was recorded. The findings confirmed LDWS effectiveness and suggested that these benefits are supported by visuo-attentional guidance. No specific influence of driving experience on LDWS was found, suggesting that similar cognitive processes are engaged with or without driving experience. Drivers\' acceptance of LDWS lowered after automation use, but LDWS effectiveness remained stable during prolonged use.Practitioner summary: Lane Departure Warning Systems (LDWS) have been designed to prevent lane departure crashes. Here, LDWS assessment over a 6-week period showed a major drop in the number of lane departure events increasing over time. LDWS effectiveness is supported by the guidance of drivers\' visual attention during lane departure events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号