UNASSIGNED: Studies have reported conflicting findings on the relationship between smoking and surgical site infection (SSI) post fixation for ankle and calcaneal fractures. This meta-analysis explored the effect of smoking on SSI incidence following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of these fractures.
UNASSIGNED: Full-text studies on smoking\'s influence on post-ORIF SSI rates for closed ankle and calcaneal fractures were sourced from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, with no consideration given to language or publication date. Study quality was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding 95% CIs were determined using random-effects models. This meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023429372).
UNASSIGNED: The analysis incorporated data from 16 cohort and case-control studies, totaling 41 944 subjects, 9984 of whom were smokers, with 956 SSI cases. Results indicated smokers faced a higher SSI risk (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.32-1.97, P < 0.0001) post ORIF, with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 26%). Smoking was identified as a significant deep SSI risk factor (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.42-3.09; P = 0.0002; I 2 = 31%). However, the subgroup analysis revealed no association between smoking and superficial SSI (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.82-1.33; P = 0.70; I 2 = 0%).
UNASSIGNED: Smoking is associated with increased SSI risk after ORIF for closed ankle and calcaneus fractures. Although no clear link was found between superficial SSI and smoking, the data underscore the negative influence of smoking on deep SSI incidence.

OBJECTIVE: With the development of surgical technology, the level of digital medicine is constantly improving. The birth of new technologies has a certain impact on traditional methods. At present, robot-assisted technology has been applied to patients with calcaneal fractures, which poses a challenge to traditional surgery. We aimed to assess whether robot-assisted internal fixation confers certain surgical advantages through a literature review.
METHODS: The databases PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and the Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform were systematically searched for both randomized and nonrandomized studies involving patients with calcaneal fractures.
RESULTS: Five studies were identified that compared clinical indexes. For the clinical indexes, robot-assisted surgery is generally feasible because of intraoperative fluoroscopy, complications, the Gissane angle, the calcaneal width, and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score 3 and 6 months after the operation (P < 0.05). However, on the operation time, Böhler\'s angle at 3 and 6 months, Gissane angle and calcaneal width at 6 months after the operation did not show good efficacy compared with those of the traditional group (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current evidence, the advantages of robot-assisted fixation over traditional fixation are clear. The long-term clinical effects of the two methods are also good, and the short-term effect of robot assistance is better. However, the quality of some studies is low, and more high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed for further verification.

Background: The treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) is debated. This study compares open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with minimally invasive osteosynthesis (MIOS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 70 patients with DIACF treated between January 2018 and September 2022, divided into ORIF (n = 50) and MIOS (n = 20) groups. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Maryland Foot Score (MFS) and the Creighton-Nebraska Health Foundation Assessment Scale (CNHFAS). Radiographic outcomes, complication rates, and reintervention rates were evaluated. A chi-square analysis examined the correlation between Sanders classification and treatment choice. Results: The chi-square analysis indicated no significant correlation between the complexity of the fracture and the type of treatment chosen (χ2 = 0.175, p = 0.916). Additionally, the Cochran-Armitage test for trend showed no significant trend in the choice of treatment based on fracture complexity (statistic = 0.048, p = 0.826). A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a longer time to reintervention for MIOS (p = 0.029). Complication rates were similar, with specific complications varying between groups. Quality-of-life outcomes were comparable. Conclusions: ORIF is preferable for high-demand patients due to better anatomical outcomes, while MIOS suits high-risk patients by reducing reinterventions and complications. Further randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with incision complications following the modified \"L\" approach for calcaneal fractures.
METHODS: Data from 100 patients treated with the modified \"L\" approach for calcaneal fractures between January 2018 and December 2021 were analyzed. These included 52 cases in the poorly healing group and 48 in the well-healing group. Variables such as patient age, sex, body mass index, fracture type (Sanders classification), smoking history, alcohol consumption, diabetes status, timing of surgery, tourniquet use, bone grafting, suture method, and postoperative incision care were evaluated. A nomogram was developed using R software to predict the risk of incision complications, validated through the area under the ROC curve, C-index, and decision curve analysis.
RESULTS: Both univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified fracture type, smoking history, diabetes, timing of surgery, and duration of tourniquet application as significant predictors of incision complications. These factors were incorporated into a clinical predictive nomogram. The nomogram\'s calibration curves demonstrated high accuracy, both internally and externally. The unadjusted concordance indes (C-index) was 0.793 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.825-0.995], and the area under the curve for the nomogram was 0.7875882. Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical applicability of the model at a threshold probability of 20-60%.
CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a reliable clinical nomogram to predict the risk factors for incision complications in the modified \"L\" approach for calcaneal fractures, enhancing decision-making in clinical settings.

BACKGROUND: Foot and ankle fractures present common challenges in emergency departments, warranting careful follow-up protocols for optimal patient outcomes. This study investigates the predictors of orthopaedic follow-up for these injuries after an emergency department (ED) visit.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study of 1450 patients seen in the ED with foot or ankle fractures from July 2015 to February 2023 was conducted. All included patients were discharged with instructions to follow-up with an orthopaedic provider. Demographic data, fracture details, and follow-up patterns were extracted from medical records. Social vulnerability was assessed using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of follow-up. A subgroup analysis comparing patients who followed up >7 days from ED presentation (ie, delayed follow-up) to those who followed up within 7 days of presentation was then performed. Statistical significance was assessed at P < .05.
RESULTS: Overall, 974/1450 (67.2%) patients followed up with orthopaedics at an average time of 4.16 days. After risk adjustment, Medicaid coverage (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56, P = .018), increased overall social vulnerability (OR = 0.83, P = .032), and increased vulnerability across the dimensions of socioeconomic status (P = .002), household characteristics (P = .034), racial and ethnic minority status (P = .007), and household type and transportation (P = .032) were all associated with lower odds of follow-up. Phalangeal fractures were also associated with decreased odds of follow-up (OR = 0.039, P < .001), whereas ankle fractures were more likely to follow-up (OR = 1.52, P = .002). In the subgroup analysis, patients of older age (P = .008), non-white race (P = .024), motor vehicle accident (MVA) (P = .027) or non-private insurance (P = .027), those experiencing phalangeal fractures (P = .015), and those seen by an orthopaedic provider in the ED (P = .006) were more likely to present with delayed follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with increased social vulnerability and Medicaid insurance are less likely to seek follow-up care after presentation to the ED with foot and ankle fractures.

Background: The biomechanical outcomes of intra-articular calcaneal fracture treatment have not been fully explored. The purpose of this study was to analyze pedobarographic assessments of balance and body weight distribution over the lower limbs in patients following calcaneal fracture treatment with the Ilizarov method and to compare the results with those of a control group. Materials and Methods: The data for our retrospective study came from cases of intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated with the Polish modification of the Ilizarov method in the period between 2021 and 2022. The experimental group (21 patients; 7 women, 14 men) included Sanders classification calcaneal fractures type 2 (n = 3), type 3 (n = 5), and type 4 (n = 13). The control group comprised 21 sex-matched healthy volunteers, with no significant differences from the experimental group in terms of age or BMI. The examination included an assessment of balance and weight distribution over the lower limbs. The device used was a FreeMED MAXI pedobarographic platform (SensorMedica). Results: The mean displacement of the center of gravity in the experimental group was significantly higher at 1307.31 mm than in the control group (896.34 mm; p = 0.038). The mean area of the center of gravity was not significantly different between the groups. An analysis of weight distribution over the operated and uninjured limb in the experimental group and the non-dominant and dominant limb, respectively, in the control group revealed no significant differences. We observed no significant differences in the percentage of weight distribution over the lower limbs between the operated limb in the experimental group and the non-dominant limb in the control group, or between the uninjured limb in the experimental group and the dominant limb in the control group. Conclusions: The use of the Ilizarov method in calcaneal fracture treatment helps normalize the percentage weight distribution in the lower limbs, with the results comparable with those obtained in the healthy control group. The mean displacement of the center of gravity was worse in the experimental group than in controls; whereas the mean area of the center of gravity was comparable between the two groups. Treatment of calcaneal fractures with the Ilizarov method does not help achieve completely normal static parameters of lower-limb biomechanics. Patients treated for calcaneal fractures with the Ilizarov method require longer and more intense rehabilitation and follow-up.

This comprehensive review delves into the multifaceted landscape of calcaneal fractures, thoroughly examining their aetiology, clinical presentation, and diverse management strategies. Encompassing surgical and non-surgical approaches, the review scrutinises critical aspects such as patient compliance, rehabilitation protocols, and long-term follow-up considerations. Surgical modalities, propelled by recent innovations like minimally invasive techniques and advanced fixation materials, are juxtaposed with non-surgical interventions, emphasising the pivotal role of patient education and adherence to optimise outcomes. The synthesis of critical findings underscores the need for individualised care and multidisciplinary collaboration in clinical practice. Moreover, the review outlines recommendations for healthcare practitioners and identifies promising areas for future research, including biomechanical studies and telerehabilitation. This comprehensive exploration aims to contribute to the ongoing evolution of calcaneal fracture management, ultimately enhancing patient care and outcomes in this complex orthopaedic realm.

BACKGROUND: Treating complex calcaneus fractures remains challenging. This study evaluated the influence of 3D printing and simulation on precision screw insertion into the calcaneus sustentaculum tali (ST).
OBJECTIVE: 3D printing and simulation improve the treatment for calcaneal fracture.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 85 patients admitted with 93 Sanders type II-IV intra-articular fractures from January 2015 to June 2020. Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) images were used in the conventional group, and MSCT data were used to construct a 3D model of the calcaneus to simulate screw insertion and verify parameter accuracy in the 3D group.
RESULTS: The designed parameters (upward and backward oblique angles and screw-path length) were similar to the actual values in the 3D group (p=0.428,0.287,0.585) but not in the conventional group (p=0.01,0.002,0.023). The Maryland foot functional score, accuracy rate, and average screw number were higher and operative time was shorter in the 3D group (p=0.005,0.007,0.000,0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative simulation using the 3D printing model helped guide the screws into the ST more accurately, lending better-quality treatment for Sanders type II-IV calcaneal fractures.
METHODS: III; Retrospective case-control study.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Accurately classifying displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) is essential for orthopedic surgeons to choose optimal treatment methods and provide results evaluation and communication. Many authors studying used Sanders classification reported moderate intra- and interobserver reliability. Taking the software opportunity of 3D virtual exarticulation, Goldzak updated French tri-dimensional Utheza classification, providing an alternative framework for classifying DIACFs. The aim of this study was to compare the intra- and interobserver reliability of Sanders versus Goldzak classification systems.
METHODS: The CT scans of 30 patients with displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures, treated in the same trauma center between 2014-2018, were analyzed by 16 medical doctors (specialists and residents in orthopedic surgery, specialists and residents in radiology), and classified according to Sanders and Goldzak classifications. The same images were sent on two separate sessions, in a randomized order. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility were assessed using Kappa statistics and Gwet\'s AC1 coefficient.
RESULTS: Interobserver reliability using Gwet reported a value of 0.36 for Goldzak classification and 0.30 for Sanders classification (corresponding to \"fair assessment\" in both cases). In absence of subclasses, \"substantial assessment\" was reported for Goldzak classification (Gwet of 0.61) and \"moderate assessment\" for Sanders classification (Gwet of 0.46). Goldzak system had a greater interobserver reliability in the group of radiology residents. Intraobserver reliability coefficient was 0.60 for Goldzak classification and 0.69 for Sanders classification, indicating a substantial agreement for both classifications.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the better view of the fracture lines provided by 3D reconstructions, this study failed to prove the superiority of Goldzak classification compared to Sanders classification for DIACFs.