breakthrough infections

突破性感染
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:SARS-CoV-2疫苗在全球范围内对感染和严重的COVID-19疾病安全有效。某些共病病症引起免疫功能障碍并且可能降低对疫苗接种的免疫应答。相比之下,有合并症的患者可以实施感染预防策略.因此,在最近的疫苗接种后期间,合并症对SARS-CoV-2感染的实际临床影响尚不明确.进行这项研究是为了了解Omicron突破性感染的流行病学,并评估接种疫苗和增强人群中合并症数量的关联。
    结果:利用西北医药企业数据仓库进行了一项回顾性临床队列研究。我们的研究人群被确定为至少有一个加强剂的完全接种疫苗的成年人。感兴趣的主要风险因素是合并症的数量。主要结果是Omicron主导时代首次SARS-CoV-2分子检测阳性的发生率和时间。多变量Cox建模分析以确定SARS-CoV-2感染的危害按日历时间(第1期:2022年1月1日至6月30日;第2期:2022年7月1日至12月31日)分层,因为违反了比例风险假设。总的来说,分析了133,191例患者。在第1期,有3+合并症与突破风险增加相关(HR=1.16CI1.08-1.26)。在研究的第二阶段,有2种合并症(HR=1.4595%CI1.26-1.67)和有3+合并症(HR1.73,95%CI1.51-1.97)与Omicron突破的危险增加相关.在随访的第1期,年龄较大与风险降低相关。日历时间的相互作用项表明,在随访期的第一半和第二半之间,许多因素的危险发生了显着变化。
    结论:Omicron突破是常见的,对于我们最脆弱的患有多种合并症的患者来说,风险明显更高。年龄在突破性感染中起着重要作用,在年轻人中发病率最高。这可能是由于年龄相关的行为因素。这些发现反映了对COVID-19易感人群在免疫和暴露风险行为方面的现实差异。
    BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are safe and effective against infection and severe COVID-19 disease worldwide. Certain co-morbid conditions cause immune dysfunction and may reduce immune response to vaccination. In contrast, those with co-morbidities may practice infection prevention strategies. Thus, the real-world clinical impact of co-morbidities on SARS-CoV-2 infection in the recent post-vaccination period is not well established. This study was performed to understand the epidemiology of Omicron breakthrough infection and evaluate associations with number of comorbidities in a vaccinated and boosted population.
    RESULTS: A retrospective clinical cohort study was performed utilizing the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse. Our study population was identified as fully vaccinated adults with at least one booster. The primary risk factor of interest was the number of co-morbidities. The primary outcome was the incidence and time to the first positive SARS-CoV-2 molecular test in the Omicron predominant era. Multivariable Cox modeling analyses to determine the hazard of SARS-CoV-2 infection were stratified by calendar time (Period 1: January 1 -June 30, 2022; Period 2: July 1 -December 31, 2022) due to violations in the proportional hazards assumption. In total, 133,191 patients were analyzed. During Period 1, having 3+ comorbidities was associated with increased hazard for breakthrough (HR = 1.16 CI 1.08-1.26). During Period 2 of the study, having 2 comorbidities (HR = 1.45 95% CI 1.26-1.67) and having 3+ comorbidities (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.51-1.97) were associated with increased hazard for Omicron breakthrough. Older age was associated with decreased hazard in Period 1 of follow-up. Interaction terms for calendar time indicated significant changes in hazard for many factors between the first and second halves of the follow-up period.
    CONCLUSIONS: Omicron breakthrough is common with significantly higher risk for our most vulnerable patients with multiple co-morbidities. Age plays an important role in breakthrough infection with the highest incidence among young adults, which may be due to age-related behavioral factors. These findings reflect real-world differences in immunity and exposure risk behaviors for populations vulnerable to COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:用两剂灭活疫苗(CoronaVac)初次接种后,针对SARS-CoV-2的体液免疫动力学和持久性的数据有限。这项研究评估了先前感染的顺序效应,用mRNA-1273(Moderna)进行异源增强,以及此后发生Omicron疫苗突破感染(VBI)。
    方法:我们评估了在两剂CoronaVac引发的印度尼西亚医护人员(2021年8月至2022年8月)中mRNA-1273增强后一年内的抗标IgG(Abbott)和中和(cPASS/GenScript)抗体(nAb)滴度。我们使用线性混合模型来估计抗体水平的变化率,和逻辑回归检查抗体水平和VBI之间的关联。
    结果:在138名参与者中,52(37.7%)曾感染过,78(56.5%)接受了mRNA-1273加强剂。两次注射CoronaVac后,抗体滴度在180天内显著下降,不管以前的感染。mRNA-1273加强后,抗标IgG(1.47%/天下降)和OmicronB.1.1.529/BA.2nAbs在第28-90天之间下降,IgG滴度在第90-360天之间趋于稳定。在BA.1/BA.2浪潮期间(2022年2月至3月),34.6%(27/78)的个体经历了VBI(mRNA-1273后中位181天),虽然没有人患上严重疾病。VBI与低VBI前抗尖峰IgG和B.1.1.529/BA.2nAbs相关,在VBI后恢复。
    结论:两剂CoronaVac后加强mRNA-1273并不能预防BA.1/BA.2VBI。可能需要定期接种疫苗以对抗新出现的SARS-CoV-2变体。
    BACKGROUND: Data on the dynamics and persistence of humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after primary vaccination with two-dose inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) are limited. This study evaluated the sequential effects of prior infection, heterologous boosting with mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and the occurrence of Omicron vaccine-breakthrough infection (VBI) thereafter.
    METHODS: We evaluated anti-spike IgG (Abbott) and neutralising (cPASS/GenScript) antibody (nAb) titers up to one year after mRNA-1273 boost in two-dose-CoronaVac-primed Indonesian healthcare workers (August 2021-August 2022). We used linear mixed modeling to estimate the rate of change in antibody levels, and logistic regression to examine associations between antibody levels and VBI.
    RESULTS: Of 138 participants, 52 (37.7%) had a prior infection and 78 (56.5%) received an mRNA-1273 booster. After two-dose CoronaVac, antibody titers had significantly declined within 180 days, irrespective of prior infection. After mRNA-1273 booster, anti-spike IgG (1.47% decline/day) and Omicron B.1.1.529/BA.2 nAbs declined between day 28-90, and IgG titers plateaued between day 90-360. During the BA.1/BA.2 wave (February-March 2022), 34.6% (27/78) of individuals experienced a VBI (median 181 days after mRNA-1273), although none developed severe illness. VBI was associated with low pre-VBI anti-spike IgG and B.1.1.529/BA.2 nAbs, which were restored post-VBI.
    CONCLUSIONS: mRNA-1273 booster after two-dose CoronaVac did not prevent BA.1/BA.2 VBI. Periodic vaccine boosters may be warranted against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SARS-CoV-2大流行加剧了人们对免疫保护的担忧,特别是对于具有先天免疫错误(IEI)的个人。虽然COVID-19疫苗在健康个体中引发强烈的免疫反应,它们在IEI患者中的有效性仍不清楚,特别是针对新的病毒变体和疫苗制剂。这种不确定性导致了焦虑,长时间的自我隔离,IEI患者反复接种,但获益不确定。尽管接种疫苗有一定程度的免疫反应,IEI个体保护性免疫的定义仍然未知.鉴于他们对重症COVID-19的易感性,免疫球蛋白替代疗法(IgRT)和单克隆抗体等策略已被用于提供被动免疫,以及针对当前和新兴变体的保护。这篇综述探讨了COVID-19疫苗和基于抗体的疗法在IEI患者中的疗效,它们识别病毒变体的能力,以及使用IEI持续保护人们所需的必要进展。
    The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has heightened concerns about immunological protection, especially for individuals with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). While COVID-19 vaccines elicit strong immune responses in healthy individuals, their effectiveness in IEI patients remains unclear, particularly against new viral variants and vaccine formulations. This uncertainty has led to anxiety, prolonged self-isolation, and repeated vaccinations with uncertain benefits among IEI patients. Despite some level of immune response from vaccination, the definition of protective immunity in IEI individuals is still unknown. Given their susceptibility to severe COVID-19, strategies such as immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) and monoclonal antibodies have been employed to provide passive immunity, and protection against both current and emerging variants. This review examines the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines and antibody-based therapies in IEI patients, their capacity to recognize viral variants, and the necessary advances required for the ongoing protection of people with IEIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疫苗突破性SARS-CoV-2感染是常见的,并引起临床和公共卫生关注。然而,对因这些感染而住院的患者的免疫学特征知之甚少。我们旨在调查和比较接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的重症COVID-19住院患者的免疫细胞亚群和诱导的免疫反应。
    一项针对成年人(≥18岁)的巢式病例对照研究符合资格,这些成年人在2021年1月7日至2022年2月1日期间接受了至少两剂mRNA-COVID-19疫苗并因SARS-CoV-2突破性感染和严重COVID-19住院。鉴定年龄和性别匹配的未接种对照。使用定制设计的10色流式细胞术预制的冻干抗体组(DuraClone,贝克曼·库尔特(BC),Brea,加州)。TruCulture(无数RBM,奥斯汀,美国)用于评估全血中诱导的免疫反应,揭示不同的关键信号通路作为免疫功能的代理。所有样品均在入院后48小时内获得。
    总共,纳入20例严重COVID-19和突破性SARS-CoV-2感染的住院患者,10名接种疫苗和10名未接种疫苗的患者。接种疫苗的患者CD19B细胞浓度较低(p=0.035),幼稚CD4T细胞(p=0.015),γδ1T细胞比例较高(p=0.019),和更高的未刺激的免疫细胞释放IL-10(p=0.015)。
    我们观察到由于严重的COVID-19而住院的接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的患者之间的免疫学差异,这表明接种疫苗的患者的B细胞浓度较低,较低浓度的CD4初始T细胞,偏斜的伽马-δV1/V2比,入院时IL-10反应夸张。这些结果可能表明与SARS-CoV-2突破性感染有关的免疫反应欠佳,在接种疫苗的成年人中导致严重的COVID-19。然而,样本量很小,需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Vaccine breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections are common and of clinical and public health concern. However, little is known about the immunological characteristics of patients hospitalized due to these infections. We aimed to investigate and compare immune cell subpopulations and induced immune responses in vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19.
    UNASSIGNED: A nested case-control study on adults (≥ 18 years) who received at least two doses of a mRNA-COVID-19 vaccine and were hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections and severe COVID-19 between January 7, 2021, and February 1, 2022, were eligible for inclusion. Age- and sex-matched non-vaccinated controls were identified. Immunophenotyping was performed using a custom-designed 10-color flow cytometry prefabricated freeze-dried antibody panel (DuraClone, Beckman Coulter (BC), Brea, Calif). TruCulture (Myriad RBM, Austin, USA) was used to assess induced immune response in whole blood, revealing different critical signaling pathways as a proxy for immune function. All samples were obtained within 48 hours of admission.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 20 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 and a breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection were included, ten vaccinated and ten non-vaccinated patients. Vaccinated patients had lower concentrations of CD19 B cells (p = 0.035), naïve CD4 T cells (p = 0.015), a higher proportion of γδ1 T cells (p = 0.019), and higher unstimulated immune cell release of IL-10 (p = 0.015).
    UNASSIGNED: We observed immunological differences between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 that indicate that vaccinated patients had lower B cell concentrations, lower concentrations of CD4 naïve T cells, a skewed gamma-delta V1/V2 ratio, and an exaggerated IL-10 response at admission. These results could indicate a suboptimal immune response involved in SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections that cause severe COVID-19 in vaccinated adults. However, the sample size was small, and further research is needed to confirm these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项纵向前瞻性对照多中心研究旨在监测COVID-19疫苗接种后突破性感染(BTI)引起的三种暴露所产生的免疫力,考虑到预先存在的对普通冠状病毒(CoV)的细胞介导免疫力,这可能会影响细胞对SARS-CoV-2的反应性。在完全接种疫苗的(F)个体中确定了抗SARS-CoV-2-尖峰IgG抗体(抗S-IgG)和针对尖峰蛋白(S)-和核衣壳蛋白(N)蛋白的细胞反应性PCR确认感染后1至24周,与部分接种疫苗(PBTI)和未接种疫苗(U)相比,经历了BTI(FBTI)或加强疫苗接种(FBooster)。与U相比,在F+BTI中发现了高亲和力抗S-IgG,后者表现出增加的持久促炎细胞因子对S-刺激。CoV在U中与较高的细胞反应性相关,而在F中没有发现相关性。该研究表明,在FBTI中,通过三种暴露可诱导显着的S特异性细胞反应,从而建立基本免疫。只有U似乎受益于预先存在的CoV免疫,但与在BTI后从增强的体液和细胞免疫免疫中免疫受益的F+BTI相比,显示了炎性免疫应答。这项研究表明,具有来自COVID-19疫苗接种和BTI的混合免疫的个体获得了稳定的体液和细胞免疫应答,并维持了至少6个月。我们的发现证实了卫生当局通过三种S蛋白暴露来建立基本免疫力的建议。
    This longitudinal prospective controlled multicenter study aimed to monitor immunity generated by three exposures caused by breakthrough infections (BTI) after COVID-19-vaccination considering pre-existing cell-mediated immunity to common-corona-viruses (CoV) which may impact cellular reactivity against SARS-CoV-2. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike-IgG antibodies (anti-S-IgG) and cellular reactivity against Spike-(S)- and nucleocapsid-(N)-proteins were determined in fully-vaccinated (F) individuals who either experienced BTI (F+BTI) or had booster vaccination (F+Booster) compared to partially vaccinated (P+BTI) and unvaccinated (U) from 1 to 24 weeks post PCR-confirmed infection. High avidity anti-S-IgG were found in F+BTI compared to U, the latter exhibiting increased long-lasting pro-inflammatory cytokines to S-stimulation. CoV was associated with higher cellular reactivity in U, whereas no association was seen in F. The study illustrates the induction of significant S-specific cellular responses in F+BTI building-up basic immunity by three exposures. Only U seem to benefit from pre-existing CoV immunity but demonstrated inflammatory immune responses compared to F+BTI who immunologically benefit from enhanced humoral and cellular immunity after BTI. This study demonstrates that individuals with hybrid immunity from COVID-19-vaccination and BTI acquire a stable humoral and cellular immune response that is maintained for at least 6 months. Our findings corroborate recommendations by health authorities to build on basic immunity by three S-protein exposures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:截至2024年,疫苗接种仍然是对抗COVID-19的主要缓解措施,但关于艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)受到疫苗保护的程度是否低于无艾滋病毒感染者(PLWoH),存在矛盾的结果。在这项研究中,我们比较了PLWH和PLWoH完全接种疫苗后SARS-CoV-2感染和COVID-19住院的风险。
    方法:我们链接了来自疫苗接种注册的数据,COVID-19监测系统和来自意大利四个地区的医疗保健/药理登记处。我们确定了PLWH完全接种疫苗(主要周期完成后14天),并在疫苗施用周时将其与PLWoH以1:4的比例进行匹配。年龄,性别,居住地区和合并症。随访于2021年1月24日开始,最长持续234天。我们使用Kaplan-Meier估计量来计算两组的感染和COVID-19住院的累积发生率,我们以PLWoH为参照组,使用风险差异和比率比较了风险.
    结果:我们匹配了42,771PLWH和171,084PLWoH。两组的突破性感染总体风险相似,比率(RR)为1.10(95%置信区间(CI):0.80-1.53)。在研究期结束时,PLWH组的组间绝对差异为每10,000人天8.28个事件(95CI:-18.43-40.29)。PLWH患者COVID-19住院风险无显著增加(RR:1.90;95CI:0.93-3.32),相当于每10,000人6.73次住院(95CI:-0.57至14.87/10,000)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,在一次mRNA疫苗接种后,PLWH突破性SARS-CoV-2感染或COVID-19住院的风险并未增加。
    BACKGROUND: As of 2024, vaccination remains the main mitigation measure against COVID-19, but there are contradictory results on whether people living with HIV (PLWH) are less protected by vaccines than people living without HIV (PLWoH). In this study we compared the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalisation following full vaccination in PLWH and PLWoH.
    METHODS: We linked data from the vaccination registry, the COVID-19 surveillance system and from healthcare/pharmacological registries in four Italian regions. We identified PLWH fully vaccinated (14 days post completion of the primary cycle) and matched them at a ratio of 1:4 with PLWoH by week of vaccine administration, age, sex, region of residence and comorbidities. Follow-up started on January 24, 2021, and lasted for a maximum of 234 days. We used the Kaplan-Meier estimator to calculate the cumulative incidence of infection and COVID-19 hospitalisation in both groups, and we compared risks using risk differences and ratios taking PLWoH as the reference group.
    RESULTS: We matched 42,771 PLWH with 171,084 PLWoH. The overall risk of breakthrough infection was similar in both groups with a rate ratio (RR) of 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI):0.80-1.53). The absolute difference between groups at the end of the study period was 8.28 events per 10,000 person-days in the PLWH group (95%CI:-18.43-40.29). There was a non-significant increase the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation among PLWH (RR:1.90; 95%CI:0.93-3.32) which corresponds to 6.73 hospitalisations per 10,000 individuals (95%CI: -0.57 to 14.87 per 10,000).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest PLWH were not at increased risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 hospitalisation following a primary cycle of mRNA vaccination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    ZF2001疫苗在预防2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)方面表现出很高的疗效。然而,接种疫苗者突破性感染的临床特征和COVID-19患者不良结局的危险因素仍不清楚.我们在中南大学湘雅医院进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究,包括2022年12月5日至2023年1月31日期间210名完全接种COVID-19的住院患者。临床特征数据,实验室发现,疾病严重程度,治疗,收集并分析预后。我们的发现显示,COVID-19住院患者在发病时仍然会出现常见症状,但是大多数实验室发现都在正常范围内,除了白细胞计数(WBC),淋巴细胞计数,和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平。在标准治疗之后,95.7%的患者出院。我们确定了七个变量与较高的不良结局风险显着相关,包括65岁以上白细胞计数升高,淋巴细胞计数减少,血尿素氮(BUN)水平较高,LDH,肌钙蛋白,D-二聚体,和降钙素原.这项研究支持ZF2001疫苗对COVID-19患者的实质性临床益处。此外,65岁以上,白细胞计数升高,淋巴细胞计数减少,和更高的血尿素氮水平,LDH,D-二聚体,和降钙素原可作为完全接种COVID-19的住院患者疾病进展的预测因子。
    The ZF2001 vaccine has demonstrated high efficacy in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the clinical characteristics of breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals and the risk factors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients remain unclear. We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, including 210 fully vaccinated COVID-19 inpatients from December 5, 2022, to January 31, 2023. Data on clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, disease severity, treatment, and prognosis were collected and analyzed. Our findings revealed that COVID-19 inpatients still experienced common symptoms at the onset of illness, but most laboratory findings were within the normal range, except for white blood cell count (WBC), lymphocyte count, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Following standard treatment, 95.7% of patients were discharged from the hospital. We identified seven variables significantly associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes, including age over 65, elevated WBC count, reduced lymphocyte count, higher levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), LDH, troponin, D-dimer, and procalcitonin. This study supports the substantial clinical benefits of the ZF2001 vaccine for COVID-19 patients. Additionally, age over 65, elevated WBC count, reduced lymphocyte count, and higher blood levels of BUN, LDH, D-dimer, and procalcitonin may be used as predictive factors for disease progression in fully vaccinated COVID-19 inpatients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号