Intraglandular dissemination is an important pathological feature of thyroid cancer, yet the biological characteristics of this phenomenon remain relatively underexplored. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of its biological behaviors, protein expressions, and identification methods. Several retrospective studies have found that thyroid cancers with intraglandular dissemination have higher rates of lymph node metastasis, capsule invasion, and vascular invasion, exhibiting more aggressive biological behavior. Immunohistochemistry results show abnormal expression of proteins such as FKBP5, CENPF, CX26, KIF11, PTK7, which are associated with poor prognosis in thyroid cancers with intraglandular dissemination, offering potential guidance for specific targeted therapy in the future. Moreover, adjunctive techniques including ultrasound, fine-needle aspiration, and genetic testing offer valuable support in accurately identifying these cases, facilitating moreproactive treatment and closer follow-up.

Complete surgical resection of differentiated papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is associated with an excellent prognosis. However, for locally invasive PTC, disease-specific morbidity and mortality increases when microscopic margin negative resection (R0) or complete macroscopic resection (R1) is not feasible. Neoadjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib (DT) used in BRAF V600E-positive, unresectable anaplastic thyroid cancer has allowed for R0 or R1 resection and improved survival rates. We demonstrate feasibility of using neoadjuvant DT in a patient with BRAF V600E and TERT-mutated PTC for whom R0/R1 resection was initially aborted due to predicted unacceptable morbidity. The patient was treated with neoadjuvant DT for 5 months, at which time disease was undetectable on imaging with near resolution on final pathology; however, subsequent rapid recurrence after discontinuation of neoadjuvant DT occurred. Neoadjuvant DT offers promise in future cohorts of patients with locally invasive BRAF V600E and TERT-mutated PTC for whom neoadjuvant therapy can reduce surgical morbidity while still allowing for R0/R1 resection.

Background: The treatment of BRAF V600E gliomas with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFis) and MEK inhibitors (MEKis) has been increasingly integrated into clinical practice for pediatric low-grade gliomas (PLGGs) and pediatric high-grade gliomas (HGGs). However, some questions remain unanswered, such as the best time to start targeted therapy, duration of treatment, and discontinuation of therapy. Given that no clinical trial has been able to address these critical questions, we developed a Canadian Consensus statement for the treatment of BRAF V600E mutated pediatric as well as adolescent and young adult (AYA) gliomas. Methods: Canadian neuro-oncologists were invited to participate in the development of this consensus. The consensus was discussed during monthly web-based national meetings, and the algorithms were revised until a consensus was achieved. Results: A total of 26 participants were involved in the development of the algorithms. Two treatment algorithms are proposed, one for the initiation of treatment and one for the discontinuation of treatment. We suggest that most patients with BRAF V600E gliomas should be treated with BRAFis ± MEKis upfront. Discontinuation of treatment can be considered in certain circumstances, and we suggest a slow wean. Conclusions: Based on expert consensus in Canada, we developed algorithms for treatment initiation of children and AYA with BRAF V600E gliomas as well as a discontinuation algorithm.

BACKGROUND: BRAF V600E substitution predicts sensitivity of a cancer to BRAF inhibitor therapy. The mutation is rarely found in soft-tissue sarcomas. Here we describe a case of undifferentiated spindle cell sarcoma showing primary insensitivity to standard chemotherapy and pronounced but non-sustained response to BRAF/MEK inhibitors at recurrence.
METHODS: A 13-year-old girl was diagnosed with low-grade spindle cell sarcoma of pelvic localization, BRAF exon 15 double-mutated: c.1799T>A p.V600E and c.1819T>A p.S607T in cis-position. The tumor showed resistance to CWS-based first-line chemotherapy and was treated surgically by radical resection. Seven months after surgery the patient developed metastatic relapse with abdominal carcinomatosis. Combined targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors afforded complete response in 1 month and was continued, though complicated by severe side effects (fever, rash) necessitating 1-2 week toxicity breaks. After 4 months from commencement the disease recurred and anti-BRAF/MEK regimen consolidation was unsuccessful. Intensive salvation chemotherapy was ineffective. Empirical immunotherapy afforded a transient partial response giving way to fatal progression with massive, abdominal cocoon-complicated peritoneal carcinomatosis.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of spindle cell sarcoma BRAF V600E/S607T double-mutated, responding to a combination of B-Raf and MEK inhibitors. Despite the low histological grade and radical surgical treatment of the tumor at primary manifestation, the disease had aggressive clinical course and the response to BRAF/MEK targeted therapy at recurrence was complete but nondurable. Empirical use of pembrolizumab provided no unambiguous evidence on the clinical relevance of immunotherapy in protein kinase -rearranged spindle cell tumors.

According to recent reports, ovarian serous borderline tumor (SBT) harboring the BRAF V600E mutation is associated with a lower risk of progression to low-grade serous carcinoma. Preliminary observations suggest that there may be an association between eosinophilic cells (ECs) and the above-mentioned mutation, so this study aimed to evaluate interobserver reproducibility for assessing ECs. Forty-two samples of SBTs were analyzed for ECs with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. Immunohistochemical staining and genetic pro-filing were performed in all cases to verify the BRAF V600E mutation. A BRAF V600E mutation was found in 19 of 42 (45%) cases. Inter-observer reproducibility in the assessment of ECs was substantial (κ = 0.7). The sensitivity and specificity for predicting the mutation were 79% and 91%, respectively. Patients with BRAF-mutated SBTs were significantly younger than those without mutation (p = 0.005). SBTs with BRAF mutation were less likely to be accompanied by non-invasive implants than wild-type SBT: 12% (2/17) versus 33% (6/18). Seven cases were excluded due to incomplete cytoreductive surgery. Nevertheless, Fisher\'s exact test showed no significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.228). Overall, this study strengthens the idea that ECs in ovarian SBTs may represent a mutation with prognostic significance, which can serve as a primary screening test for BRAF V600E mutation in this pathologic entity.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancers (CRC) with BRAF V600E mutation exhibit limited chemotherapy response and a poor prognosis. Safety and efficacy of the VIC (Vemurafenib/Irinotecan/Cetuximab) regimen in the first-line setting for patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC remain undetermined.
METHODS: In the prospective cohort study, the untreated, BRAF V600E-mutated, unresectable or metastatic CRC patients were enrolled. The VIC regimen and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy were compared in the first-line setting. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.
RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat analysis, 38 patients received VIC regimen and 40 received bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. The ORR and DCR in the VIC group were significantly higher than in the bevacizumab-therapy group (ORR: 63.2% vs. 37.5%, P = .025; DCR: 94.7% vs. 75.0%, P = .019). The VIC regimen significantly outperformed bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in both PFS (11.9 vs. 7.7 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.87; P = .010) and OS (25.3 vs. 14.6 months; HR = 0.43, 95% CI, 0.22-0.82; P = .011). In the VIC group, the conversion resection rate for liver metastases was 34.8% (8 of 23 patients), and for unresectable local CRC it was 54.5% (6 of 11 patients). The adverse events rates of Grade 3 to 4 were 34.2% and 32.5% for the VIC regimen and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Among Asian patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, the VIC regimen showed favorable outcomes compared to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in terms of tumor response and oncological survival, with a tolerable and manageable toxicity profile in the first-line setting.

Gliomas are the most common adult and pediatric primary brain tumors. Molecular studies have identified features that can enhance diagnosis and provide biomarkers. IDH1/2 mutation with ATRX and TP53 mutations defines diffuse astrocytomas, whereas IDH1/2 mutations with 1p19q loss defines oligodendroglioma. Focal amplifications of receptor tyrosine kinase genes, TERT promoter mutation, and loss of chromosomes 10 and 13 with trisomy of chromosome 7 are characteristic features of glioblastoma and can be used for diagnosis. BRAF gene fusions and mutations in low-grade gliomas and histone H3 mutations in high-grade gliomas also can be used for diagnostics.

OBJECTIVE: This Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to analyze the associations between clinicopathological characteristics and BRAF mutations in ameloblastoma (AM) patients and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy.
METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched from 2010 to 2024. The search terms used were specific to BRAF and AM. Observational studies or randomized controlled trials were considered eligible. The incidence of BRAF mutation and corresponding clinicopathological features in AM patients were subjected to Bayesian network analyses and diagnostic accuracy evaluation.
RESULTS: A total of 937 AM patients from 20 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of BRAF mutations in AM patients was 72%. According to the Bayesian network analysis, BRAF mutations are more likely to occur in younger (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; credible interval [CrI]: 1.2-4.5), mandible site (OR, 3.6; 95% CrI: 2.7-5.2), and unicystic (OR, 1.6; 95% CrI: 1.1-2.4) AM patients. Similarly, higher diagnostic accuracy was found in the younger, mandible, and unicystic AM groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence, risk, and diagnostic accuracy of BRAF mutation in AM were greater in younger patients, those with mandible involvement, and those with unicystic AM than in patients with other clinicopathological features. In addition, there was a strong concordance in the diagnostic accuracy between molecular tests and immunohistochemical analysis.

BRAF V600E mutation-positive advanced recurrent colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis. Encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab were approved for use to treat this cancer in 2020 in Japan. Here, we present the case of a patient with BRAF V600E mutation-positive colorectal cancer, who was treated with encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab, and developed grade 3 pancreatitis at our hospital. After pancreatitis treatment, the drug doses were reduced from 300 mg to 225 mg of encorafenib and from 90 mg to 60 mg of binimetinib, and the treatment was resumed. Since then, no grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed. Although pancreatitis has been reported to occur after the use of encorafenib and binimetinib, it is rare. With appropriate dose reduction and attention to side effects, this regimen is considered feasible for the long-term treatment of BRAF V600E mutation-positive advanced recurrent colorectal cancer in patients aged >70 years.

The v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogenic homolog B1 (BRAF) V600E is a rare mutation that functions as an oncogenic driver in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) leading to the overactivation of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK (MAPK) pathway and the subsequent uncontrolled cell proliferation. Understanding the mechanism behind BRAF mutation, its inhibition, and relationship to the upstream and downstream effector is essential for advancing treatment strategies for NSCLC patients with the BRAF V600E mutation. Next-generation sequencing studies have identified the presence of breast cancer susceptibility gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) mutations in NSCLC patients, which are pathogenic variants associated with breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. Although poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are currently an approved treatment option for malignant tumors linked to BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants, the therapeutic potential of PARP inhibitors in NSCLC remains unclear. The development of genetic testing provides a platform for investigating the pathophysiological mechanisms of genetic mutations above. Here, we report a novel case of a middle-aged non-smoking female diagnosed with BRAF V600E and BRCA2 germline mutated lung adenocarcinoma, who had previously undergone a diverse array of cancer-targeted therapies, including PARP inhibitor, before the identification of the BRAF V600E mutation. Following this, a combination of dabrafenib and trametinib was administered and induced a rapid and positive response within two months. Our case not only highlights the importance of dynamic and repetitive genetic testing in managing patients, but contributes to the growing body of clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of BRAF/MEK co-inhibition in patients harboring a BRAF V600E mutation and provokes thinking for further research into the impact of PARP inhibitors in BRCA1/2-mutated NSCLC.