behavioral expressions

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为痴呆症患者中痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)的非药物干预措施,治疗性撒谎(TL)背后的接受和伦理继续引起激烈的辩论。本文讨论了痴呆症患者对TL感知的道德和文化挑战,他们的家人,和卫生保健专业人员。此外,分析TL之前的决策,包括TL的类型,其功效和影响,TL的替代品,以及背后的道德原则。该分析的结果表明,TL是BPSD的常见做法。它的好处包括减少这些症状以及使用物理或化学约束。然而,对其作为一种方法的适用性没有共识,也不应该以适当的方式使用它。需要更多的实验研究来创建法律和临床干预协议,尊重痴呆症患者的基本权利,促进一致性,良好的道德实践,以及以人为本的护理指南。
    The acceptance and ethics behind therapeutic lying (TL) as a non-pharmacological intervention for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) among persons with dementia continues to generate heated debates. This article presents a discussion of the ethical and cultural challenges on the perception of TL by people with dementia, their families, and health care professionals. Additionally, decision-making before TL was analyzed, including the types of TL, its efficacy and implications, alternatives to TL, and the ethical principles behind it. The results from this analysis show that TL is a common practice for BPSD. Its benefits include the reduction of these symptoms as well as the use of physical or chemical restraints. However, there is no consensus on its suitability as an approach, nor on the appropriate way it should be used. More experimental studies are needed to create legal and clinical intervention protocols that respect the fundamental rights of people with dementia promoting coherence, good ethical practices, and guidelines for person-centered care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:关于宗教和灵性(R/S)与健康的联系的文献正在增长。然而,目前尚不清楚R/S如何影响结局,并在痴呆症患者(PWDs)中进行评估.在这篇综合评论中,我们评估已发布的R/S测量值,并综合PWD的R/S结果。
    未经授权:我们搜索了五个数据库(ATLAReligion,CINAHL,PsychInfo,PubMed,SocIndex)并确定了1043项研究中的14项进行审查。我们评估研究的信息,质量,措施,和结果。
    UNASSIGNED:我们确定了17种R/S措施:6种适用于PWD,只有2种用于PWD;大多数研究仅报告了可靠性措施,Cronbach的阿尔法.研究结果支持R/S与认知功能之间的显着正相关,以及R/S与抑郁和行为表达之间的负相关。
    UNASSIGNED:两个经过验证的量表显示了可接受的有效性,总体可靠性良好。然而,需要多样化的样本和严格的研究设计,以改善R/S措施,并检查随着时间的推移,PWD的相关性。
    UNASSIGNED:在痴呆症(PWD)患者中,很少有用于测量宗教和灵性(R/S)的量表得到验证;需要进行其他测试。大多数R/S测量仅报告具有Cronbachα的量表可靠性。研究支持R/S与健康之间的正相关,但很少有研究存在。进行了。只有一种精神干预,精神上的回忆,是为PWD找到的.需要更严格的R/S研究来检查痴呆症的健康结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Literature on the association of religion and spirituality (R/S) and health is growing. However, it is unclear how R/S affects outcomes and is assessed in persons with dementia (PWDs). In this integrative review, we evaluate published R/S measures and synthesize R/S findings for PWDs.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched five databases (ATLA Religion, CINAHL, PsychInfo, PubMed, SocIndex) and identified 14 of 1043 studies for review. We assess the studies\' information, quality, measures, and results.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 17 measures for R/S: six were adapted for use with PWDs and only two were validated for PWDs; most studies reported only measures\' reliability, with Cronbach\'s alpha. The studies\' findings support significant positive associations between R/S and cognitive function and negative associations between R/S and depression and behavioral expressions.
    UNASSIGNED: The two validated scales indicated acceptable validity with overall good reliability. Nevertheless, diverse samples and rigorous study designs are needed to improve R/S measures and to examine associations over time for PWDs.
    UNASSIGNED: Few scales for measuring religion and spirituality (R/S) have been validated in persons with dementia (PWD); additional testing is needed.Most R/S measures only reported scale reliability with Cronbach\'s alpha.Studies supported positive associations between R/S and health yet few studies exist. conducted.Only one spiritual intervention, spiritual reminiscence, was found for PWD.More rigorous R/S studies are needed to examine health outcomes in dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Psychosocial and environmental care practices are recommended to address behavioral expressions in persons with dementia, but their use has been limited partly because guidance is lacking regarding implementation. In response, we developed a simple \"how-to\" guide of evidence-based protocols for aromatherapy, natural light, familiar music, and robotic pets; trained staff in four assisted living (AL) communities to use the practices; provided materials; met with them regularly; and evaluated fidelity, facilitators and barriers to implementation, and staff knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy. After two months, staff reported more familiarity, confidence, and use; barriers such as difficulty locating supplies and task-focused staff with limited time; and staff \"champion\" facilitators. Notable differences were identified across communities, suggesting that just as care to individuals must be person-centered, practices embraced by communities must fit that community. Through strategic adoption, successful implementation is possible. The \"how-to\" guide is appropriate for AL, nursing homes, and persons\' own homes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号