behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia

痴呆的行为和心理症状
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究调查了痴呆症患者在口腔保健期间所表现出的抗护理行为(CRB)的日常变化,以及一天中的时间对CRB轨迹的潜在影响。
    方法:对75位在口腔护理活动中表现出CRB的老年痴呆症患者的样本进行了二次分析。超过21天,在上午和下午的口腔护理期间,使用修订的护理抵抗能力量表(RTC-r)测量CRB。基于组的轨迹建模用于识别轨迹模式并评估上午和下午CRB模式之间的差异。
    结果:确定了三种轨迹模式:早晨CRB轨迹模式显示,50.6%的痴呆症患者的RTC-r评分始终较低,37.5%的痴呆症患者表现出波动,中等RTC-r分数,11.9%的人表现出RTC-r分数开始较高,然后随着时间的推移而下降。同样,下午口腔护理期间的CRB轨迹模式显示,54.5%的RTC-r得分持续较低,38.6%的痴呆症患者的RTC-r得分波动适中。然而,第三个CRB轨迹组遵循一个高增长的轨迹,对于6.9%的痴呆症患者,RTC-r评分开始较高,并继续增加。
    结论:CRB是动态的,并且在几天和一段时间内变化;但是,在管理CRB的干预措施中通常不考虑一天中的时间。因此,重要的是要考虑为痴呆症患者提供口腔护理的时机。根据轨迹的特征,我们建议早上的口腔活动可能更有效。
    OBJECTIVE: This study examined day-to-day variation in care-resistant behaviors (CRBs) exhibited by persons living with dementia during mouth health care and the potential influence of time-of-day on CRB trajectories.
    METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted on a sample of 75 nursing home-dwelling persons living with dementia who exhibited CRBs during mouth care activities. Over 21 days, CRBs were measured using the revised Resistiveness to Care Scale (RTC-r) during morning and afternoon mouth care sessions. Group-based Trajectory Modeling was used to identify trajectory patterns and assess differences between morning and afternoon CRB patterns.
    RESULTS: Three trajectory patterns were identified: morning CRB trajectory patterns showed 50.6% of persons living with dementia had consistently low RTC-r scores, 37.5% of persons living with dementia exhibited fluctuating, moderate RTC-r scores, and 11.9% exhibited RTC-r scores that started high and then decreased over time. Similarly, CRB trajectory patterns during afternoon mouth care showed a consistently low RTC-r score for 54.5% and a fluctuating moderate RTC-r score for 38.6% of persons living with dementia. However, the third CRB trajectory group followed a high-increasing trajectory, with RTC-r scores starting high and continuing to increase for 6.9% of persons living with dementia.
    CONCLUSIONS: CRBs are dynamic and vary within days and over time; however, the time of the day is often not considered in interventions to manage CRBs. Thus, it is important to consider the timing of providing mouth care for persons living with dementia. Based on the characteristics of the trajectories, we suggest that morning mouth activities may be more efficient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:系统评价痴呆患者情感淡漠的现状及其相关因素。
    方法:我们检索了中文和英文数据库,收集了从发病到2023年3月14日痴呆患者冷漠相关因素的研究。两名研究人员独立筛选了文献,评估质量,结果:共纳入20项研究,痴呆患者的冷漠发生率为21%至90%。根据Massimo在2018年提出的冷漠模型,将相关因素分为痴呆患者的个体因素,照顾者因素,和环境因素。痴呆患者冷漠的个体因素主要包括人口学特征,认知障碍的严重程度,痴呆症的其他行为和心理症状的组合,急性医疗问题或药物不良反应,未满足的需求,和营养不良。照顾者因素主要包括对痴呆症患者和照顾者对未来美好生活的期望的敌意或批评的情绪表达。环境因素主要包括过高或过低的刺激和缺乏日间活动。结论:现有研究表明,痴呆患者冷漠的发生率较高,并受到多维因素的影响。对痴呆患者个体因素的研究较多,对照顾者和环境因素的研究较少。在未来,需要大量高质量的研究来证明痴呆患者冷漠的机制,并找到更多的相关因素。
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the current status of apathy in dementia patients and its associated factors.
    METHODS: We searched Chinese and English databases to collect studies on the associated factors of apathy in patients with dementia from inception to March 14, 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, evaluated the quality, and extracted the data RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included, and the incidence of apathy in patients with dementia ranged from 21 % to 90 %. According to the model of apathy proposed by Massimo in 2018, the associated factors were divided into individual factors for dementia patients, caregiver factors, and environmental factors. The individual factors of apathy in patients with dementia mainly include demographic characteristics, the severity of cognitive impairment, a combination of other behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, acute medical problems or adverse drug reactions, unmet needs, and malnutrition. Caregiver factors mainly include emotional expressions of hostility or criticism towards dementia patients and caregivers\' expectations for a better life in the future. Environmental factors mainly include too high or too low stimulation and a lack of daytime activities CONCLUSIONS: Existing studies have shown that the incidence of apathy in dementia patients is high and is affected by multi-dimensional factors. There are more studies on individual factors in dementia patients and fewer studies on caregivers and environmental factors. In the future, a large number of high-quality studies are needed to demonstrate the mechanism of apathy in dementia patients and to find more related factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    除了非药物干预,药物治疗,特别是非典型抗精神病药被认为对痴呆(BPSD)的行为和心理症状有效.
    这项回顾性研究调查了包括抗精神病药物在内的药物治疗在门诊或住院BPSD患者中的有效性和安全性。
    在2011年3月至8月之间开始治疗BPSD的所有阿尔茨海默型痴呆(AD)患者中,共有102名可接受12个月随访的患者包括本图表中的受试者。其中,68(66.7%)在门诊或住院环境中继续治疗,在3、6和12个月后,他们的MMSE评分从基线时的17.3±3.6提高到18.3±3.53、17.9±3.80和17.0±4.14,分别。相比之下,他们的NPI评分从基线时的11.7±11.2到3、6和12个月后的4.86±5.40、3.56±4.65和2.27±3.77有显著差异,分别。在可接受随访的36名住院患者中,27(75%)同时服用抗精神病药(氯丙嗪[CP]等效,162.2mg)在基线时同时服用抗精神病药(CP当量,212.5mg)12个月后,while,在可接受随访的66名门诊病人中,13(19.7%)同时服用抗精神病药(CP当量,93.4mg)在基线时同时服用抗精神病药(CP当量,113.0mg)12个月后。
    研究结果证实了日本AD患者BPSD长达12个月的研究治疗的有效性和安全性。如何在临床环境中最好地将抗精神病药纳入BPSD的治疗中,掌握在我们日本临床医生的手中。
    UNASSIGNED: Alongside non-pharmacological intervention, pharmacotherapy particularly with atypical antipsychotics is assumed to be effective for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD).
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study investigated the effectiveness and safety of pharmacotherapy including antipsychotics in outpatients or inpatients with BPSD.
    UNASSIGNED: Of all Alzheimer-type dementia (AD) patients with BPSD initiating treatment between March and August 2011, a total of 102 patients available for 12-month follow-up comprised the subjects in this chart review. Of these, 68 (66.7%) continued treatment in the ambulatory or inpatient setting, with their MMSE scores improved from 17.3 ± 3.6 at baseline to 18.3 ± 3.53, 17.9 ± 3.80 and 17.0 ± 4.14 after 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. In contrast, their NPI scores were significantly different from 11.7 ± 11.2 at baseline to 4.86 ± 5.40, 3.56 ± 4.65 and 2.27 ± 3.77 after 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. Of the 36 inpatients available for follow-up, 27 (75%) on concurrent antipsychotics (chlorpromazine [CP] equivalent, 162.2 mg) at baseline remained on concurrent antipsychotics (CP equivalent, 212.5 mg) after 12 months, while, of the 66 outpatients available for follow-up, 13 (19.7%) on concurrent antipsychotics (CP equivalent, 93.4 mg) at baseline remained on concurrent antipsychotics (CP equivalent, 113.0 mg) after 12 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Study results confirmed the effectiveness and safety of the study treatment in Japanese AD patients with BPSD for up to 12 months. How best to incorporate antipsychotics into the treatment of BPSD in clinical settings lies in the hands of us Japanese clinicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)在痴呆症患者中很常见,并具有多种负面影响。基于人工智能的技术(AIT)有潜力帮助护士早期前驱检测BPSD。尽管最近对该主题的浓厚兴趣以及可用的适当设备的数量不断增加,关于使用AIT来帮助护士尽早发现BPSD的信息很少。
    目的:本研究的目的是确定有关引入AIT以支持护理干预措施以早期检测和管理BPSD的现有出版物的数量和特征。
    方法:于2023年9月对PubMed数据库中涉及AIT和痴呆症的出版物进行了文献综述。详细分析试图确定这些出版物的特征。使用叙述方法报告了结果。
    结果:共确定了来自14个国家的25种出版物,大多数描述前瞻性观察性研究。我们确定了使用AIT的三类出版物,它们是(1)预测行为和痴呆的阶段和进展,(2)筛查和评估临床症状,(3)管理痴呆和BPSD。大多数出版物都提到治疗痴呆症和BPSD。
    结论:尽管人们越来越感兴趣,目前使用的大多数AIT旨在支持治疗和护理现有BPSD临床体征的社会心理方法。因此,AIT在早期和实时检测BPSD方面仍未得到充分测试和使用。他们可以,然而,为护士提供准确、可靠的评估系统,监测,规划,并支持安全的治疗干预措施。
    BACKGROUND: The behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common among people with dementia and have multiple negative consequences. Artificial intelligence-based technologies (AITs) have the potential to help nurses in the early prodromal detection of BPSD. Despite significant recent interest in the topic and the increasing number of available appropriate devices, little information is available on using AITs to help nurses striving to detect BPSD early.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify the number and characteristics of existing publications on introducing AITs to support nursing interventions to detect and manage BPSD early.
    METHODS: A literature review of publications in the PubMed database referring to AITs and dementia was conducted in September 2023. A detailed analysis sought to identify the characteristics of these publications. The results were reported using a narrative approach.
    RESULTS: A total of 25 publications from 14 countries were identified, with most describing prospective observational studies. We identified three categories of publications on using AITs and they are (1) predicting behaviors and the stages and progression of dementia, (2) screening and assessing clinical symptoms, and (3) managing dementia and BPSD. Most of the publications referred to managing dementia and BPSD.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite growing interest, most AITs currently in use are designed to support psychosocial approaches to treating and caring for existing clinical signs of BPSD. AITs thus remain undertested and underused for the early and real-time detection of BPSD. They could, nevertheless, provide nurses with accurate, reliable systems for assessing, monitoring, planning, and supporting safe therapeutic interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:照顾痴呆症患者的人容易承受负担。痴呆的行为和心理症状(BPSD)可能会影响照顾者的负担。在拉丁美洲国家,缺乏关于照顾者负担的研究。我们旨在确定哪种BPSD对秘鲁痴呆症患者的照顾者负担影响最大;并比较BPSD对不同类型痴呆症的照顾者负担的影响。
    方法:对231名患有老年痴呆症(AD)的患者进行横断面研究,行为变异额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD),路易体痴呆(DLB)和血管性痴呆(VD),和他们的照顾者在秘鲁记忆诊所就诊。用神经精神量表(NPI)评估BPSD。使用Zarit负担清单(ZBI)评估了照顾者的负担。我们使用方差分析来比较AD,bvFTD,DLB和VD组。ZBI和NPI子量表得分之间的相关性用Spearman相关性评估。
    结果:DLB护理人员的负担水平明显高于其他患者组(P&lt;0.05),NPI总分高于其他患者组的护理人员(P<0.05)。bvFTD照顾者NPI总分显著高于AD和VD照顾者(P<0.05)。幻觉,异常运动行为,和冷漠是那些照顾DLB的患者中与照顾者负担最显著相关的症状,bvFTD,和AD患者,分别。
    结论:DLB护理人员的神经精神症状较高。幻觉,异常运动行为,和冷漠是与负担相关的主要症状。
    BACKGROUND: People caring for patients with dementia are prone to suffering from burden. Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) may have an impact on caregiver burden. In Latin American countries, there is a lack of research on caregiver burden. We aimed to determine which BPSD have the greatest impact on caregiver burden among Peruvian patients with dementia and to compare the effects of BPSD on caregiver burden across different types of dementia.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 231 patients living with Alzheimer\'s dementia (AD), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and vascular dementia (VD) and their caregivers who attended a Peruvian memory clinic. BPSD were assessed with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Caregiver burden was assessed with the Zarit Burden Inventory. We used analysis of variance to compare the AD, bvFTD, DLB, and VD groups. Correlations between Zarit Burden Inventory and NPI subscale scores were assessed with Spearman\'s correlation.
    RESULTS: DLB caregivers had significantly higher levels of burden than the other patient groups (p < 0.05) and higher total NPI scores than caregivers for other patient groups (p < 0.05). bvFTD caregivers had significantly higher total NPI scores than AD and VD caregivers (p < 0.05). Hallucinations, aberrant motor behavior, and apathy were the symptoms most significantly correlated with caregiver burden in those caring for DLB, bvFTD, and AD patients, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychiatric symptoms are higher in DLB caregivers. Hallucinations, aberrant motor behavior, and apathy are the main symptoms correlated with burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:综合现有痴呆护理临床指南中关于评估和管理痴呆行为和心理症状(BPSD)的建议,以学习和适应加拿大描述BPSD的背景和语言。
    方法:系统评价。
    方法:关于痴呆症护理的中度至高质量临床实践指南,对BPSD评估或管理提出了1项或多项建议。
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,Embase,JBIEBM,PsycINFO,AgeLine,和灰色文献关于痴呆症护理的临床指南,对BPSD提出建议,在2011年1月1日至2022年10月13日之间发布。两名独立的审查员进行了研究筛选和数据抽象。四名独立审查员使用研究与评估指南(AGREE)II工具完成了质量评估;包括的指南的平均总体AGREEII评分≥4。
    结果:我们的系统评价确定了23个中、高质量指南(264个建议)。AGREEII工具的平均总体质量评分为4至6.5。建议被清楚地呈现(呈现分数的平均清晰度为73.5%),但指南适用性未得到一致解决(平均适用性得分为39.3%).BPSD是描述神经精神症状的最普遍的术语(指南数量[n]=14)。有生活经验的人贡献了6个指南(26.1%)。十项指南(43.5%)描述了一种或多种健康公平考虑因素。指南提出了评估和管理躁动的建议(n=12),侵略(n=10),精神病(n=11),抑郁症(n=9),焦虑(n=5),冷漠(n=6),不适当的性行为(n=3),夜间行为(n=5),和进食障碍(n=3)。建议声明存在很大差异,分配给每个陈述的证据质量,和建议的强度。
    结论:有几个中到高质量的指南对BPSD评估和管理提出了建议,但是不同指南的推荐声明的差异性以及对指南适用性的考虑不足可能会阻碍指南在临床实践中的传播和实施.
    OBJECTIVE: To synthesize recommendations on assessing and managing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSDs) in existing clinical practice guidelines on dementia care to learn from and adapt recommendations to a Canadian context and language for describing BPSDs.
    METHODS: Systematic review.
    METHODS: Moderate to high-quality clinical practice guidelines on dementia care that made 1 or more recommendations on BPSD assessment or management.
    METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, JBI EBM, PsycINFO, AgeLine, and gray literature for clinical practice guidelines on dementia care making recommendations on BPSD, published between January 1, 2011, and October 13, 2022. Two independent reviewers conducted study screening and data abstraction. Four independent reviewers completed quality appraisal using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool; included guidelines had a mean overall AGREE II score ≥4.
    RESULTS: Our systematic review identified 23 moderate to high-quality clinical practice guidelines (264 recommendations). The mean overall quality score on the AGREE II tool ranged from 4 to 6.5. Recommendations were clearly presented (mean clarity of presentation score 73.5%), but guideline applicability was not consistently addressed (mean applicability score 39.3%). BPSD was the most prevalent term describing neuropsychiatric symptoms (number of guidelines [n] = 14). People with lived experience contributed to 6 guidelines (26.1%). Ten guidelines (43.5%) described 1 or more health equity considerations. Guidelines made recommendations for assessing and managing agitation (n = 12), aggression (n = 10), psychosis (n = 11), depression (n = 9), anxiety (n = 5), apathy (n = 6), inappropriate sexual behavior (n = 3), nighttime behavior (n = 5), and eating disturbances (n = 3). There was substantial variability in recommendation statements, evidence quality assigned to each statement, and strength of recommendations.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are several moderate to high-quality clinical practice guidelines making recommendations on BPSD assessment and management, but variability in recommendation statements across guidelines and insufficient consideration of guideline applicability may hamper guideline dissemination and implementation in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common among people with dementia from the early stages and can appear even in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the prognostic impact of BPSD is unclear. This study examined the association between BPSD and mortality among people with cognitive impairment.
    METHODS: This longitudinal study involved 1,065 males and 1,681 females (mean age: males = 77.1 years; females = 78.6 years) with MCI or dementia diagnosis, from the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology-Life Stories of People with Dementia (NCGG-STORIES), a single-center memory clinic-based cohort study in Japan that registered first-time outpatients from 2010-2018. Information about death was collected through a mail survey returned by participants or their close relatives, with an up to 8-year follow-up. BPSD was assessed using the Dementia Behavior Disturbance Scale (DBD) at baseline.
    RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 229 (28.1%) male and 254 (15.1%) female deaths occurred. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that higher DBD scores were significantly associated with increased mortality risk among males, but not females (compared with the lowest quartile score group, hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] for the highest quartile score group = 1.59 [1.11-2.29] for males and 1.06 [0.66-1.70] for females). Among the DBD items, lack of interest in daily living, excessive daytime sleep, and refusal to receive care had a higher mortality risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest a potential association between BPSD and poor prognosis among males with cognitive impairment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    痴呆患者的神经精神症状(NPS)导致照顾者负担并恶化患者的预后。尽管已经进行了许多神经影像学研究,NPS的病因仍然很复杂。我们假设大脑结构不对称可能在NPS的出现中起作用。
    这项研究探讨了阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的NPS与大脑不对称之间的关系。
    从多中心日本数据库中提取121例轻度AD病例的人口统计学和MRI数据。通过比较左脑和右脑区域的灰质体积来评估脑不对称性。使用神经精神量表(NPI)评估NPS。随后,我们对大脑不对称和NPS之间的相关性进行了综合评估.
    在每个NPS中,侵袭性NPS与额叶的不对称性显着相关,提示右侧萎缩(r=0.235,p=0.009)。即使在多次比较调整后,这种相关性仍具有统计学意义(p<0.01)。事后分析进一步证实了这种关联(p<0.05)。相比之下,其他NPS亚型没有发现显著的相关性,包括情感和冷漠症状。
    这项研究表明额叶不对称,尤其是右半球的相对萎缩,可能与早期AD的攻击行为有关。这些发现揭示了NPS的神经生物学基础,有助于开发潜在的干预措施。
    UNASSIGNED: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in patients with dementia lead to caregiver burdens and worsen the patient\'s prognosis. Although many neuroimaging studies have been conducted, the etiology of NPS remains complex. We hypothesize that brain structural asymmetry could play a role in the appearance of NPS.
    UNASSIGNED: This study explores the relationship between NPS and brain asymmetry in patients with Alzheimer\'s disease (AD).
    UNASSIGNED: Demographic and MRI data for 121 mild AD cases were extracted from a multicenter Japanese database. Brain asymmetry was assessed by comparing the volumes of gray matter in the left and right brain regions. NPS was evaluated using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Subsequently, a comprehensive assessment of the correlation between brain asymmetry and NPS was conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: Among each NPS, aggressive NPS showed a significant correlation with asymmetry in the frontal lobe, indicative of right-side atrophy (r = 0.235, p = 0.009). This correlation remained statistically significant even after adjustments for multiple comparisons (p < 0.01). Post-hoc analysis further confirmed this association (p < 0.05). In contrast, no significant correlations were found for other NPS subtypes, including affective and apathetic symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: The study suggests frontal lobe asymmetry, particularly relative atrophy in the right hemisphere, may be linked to aggressive behaviors in early AD. These findings shed light on the neurobiological underpinnings of NPS, contributing to the development of potential interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:虚拟现实(VR)越来越被认为是痴呆症患者的有价值的治疗工具。然而,仍然需要严格的研究来评估其对痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)以及护理环境中的生活质量(QoL)的影响.
    目的:本研究的主要目的是评估VR疗法对管理BPSD的影响,falls,逗留时间,住院痴呆症患者的QoL和QoL被送往急性护理医院。次要目的是在可接受性方面评估干预措施的可行性,安全,和病人的经验。
    方法:前瞻性,开放标签,混合方法,随机对照临床试验于2019年4月至2020年3月期间进行.共有69名参与者(年龄≥65岁,诊断为痴呆症且不符合排除标准)被随机分配到对照组(n=35,51%)或VR组(n=34,49%)。研究人员拜访了实验(VR)手臂的参与者,并在头戴式显示器上观看了360°VR电影,每1至3天观看20分钟,而对照组的个体接受标准治疗.从护士的每日笔记中收集每日BPSD和跌倒的实例。QoL是通过半结构化访谈和晚期痴呆症量表中的生活质量来测量的。结构化观察和半结构化访谈用于衡量治疗可行性。根据意向治疗方法,以95%的显著性水平分析主要结果。
    结果:VR疗法对降低侵袭性具有统计学上的显着影响(即,身体攻击性和大声叫喊;P=.01)。VR治疗对其他BPSD没有发现实质性影响(例如,冷漠),falls,逗留时间,或使用晚期痴呆症生活质量量表测量的QoL。平均VR治疗疗程持续6.8(SD6.6;范围0-20)分钟,对于参与者来说,干预措施总体上是一种可接受且令人愉快的体验.VR治疗没有发生不良事件。
    结论:沉浸式VR疗法似乎对急性护理痴呆患者的攻击行为有影响。尽管由于COVID-19的限制,随机对照试验在达到预期样本量之前就停止了,结果的趋势是有希望的。我们建议用更大的样本进行未来的试验,在某些情况下,更敏感的数据收集工具。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT03941119;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03941119。
    RR2-10.2196/22406。
    BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly considered a valuable therapeutic tool for people with dementia. However, rigorous studies are still needed to evaluate its impact on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSDs) and quality of life (QoL) across care settings.
    OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of VR therapy on managing BPSDs, falls, length of stay, and QoL in inpatients with dementia admitted to an acute care hospital. The secondary aim was to evaluate the intervention\'s feasibility in terms of acceptability, safety, and patient experience.
    METHODS: A prospective, open-label, mixed methods, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted between April 2019 and March 2020. A total of 69 participants (aged ≥65 years with a diagnosis of dementia and who did not meet the exclusion criteria) were randomly assigned to either the control (n=35, 51%) or VR (n=34, 49%) arm. Participants in the experimental (VR) arm were visited by a researcher and watched 360° VR films on a head-mounted display for up to 20 minutes every 1 to 3 days, whereas individuals in the control arm received standard of care. Instances of daily BPSDs and falls were collected from nurses\' daily notes. QoL was measured through semistructured interviews and the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia scale. Structured observations and semistructured interviews were used to measure treatment feasibility. The primary outcomes were analyzed at a 95% significance level based on the intention-to-treat method.
    RESULTS: VR therapy had a statistically significant effect on reducing aggressiveness (ie, physical aggression and loud vociferation; P=.01). Substantial impact of VR therapy was not found for other BPSDs (eg, apathy), falls, length of stay, or QoL as measured using the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia scale. The average VR therapy session lasted 6.8 (SD 6.6; range 0-20) minutes, and the intervention was overall an acceptable and enjoyable experience for participants. No adverse events occurred as a result of VR therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Immersive VR therapy appears to have an effect on aggressive behaviors in patients with dementia in acute care. Although the randomized controlled trial was stopped before reaching the intended sample size owing to COVID-19 restrictions, trends in the results are promising. We suggest conducting future trials with larger samples and, in some cases, more sensitive data collection instruments.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03941119; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03941119.
    UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.2196/22406.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号