BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by synovial inflammation, joint swelling, and pain involving multiple joints. While biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) are popular treatments for RA, there is limited research on their combined use. This study examined a cohort of RA patients who demonstrated inadequate response to bDMARDs and subsequently initiated combination therapy with tofacitinib and bDMARDs, assessing both the efficacy and safety profile of this therapeutic approach.
METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively collected the electronic medical records (EMR) of 62 adult patients with RA who were admitted to the Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine between August 2018 and December 2022. All patients had received at least one bDMARD treatment for more than 3 months and still exhibited moderate-to-high disease activity. Tofacitinib 5 mg bid was added to their original biological treatment in 28 cases, and other 34 cases switched to another bDMARD or tsDMARD as control group. Treatment was continued for 24 weeks following the initiation of combination therapy. Changes in DAS28-ESR and ACR20, 50, 70 response rates at week 24 were collected and analyzed from baseline, while changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 were also collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: After 24 weeks of treatment, the DAS28-ESR score in combined treatment group decreased significantly from a baseline of 5.26 ± 0.90 (3.87-8.31) to 2.67 ± 0.86 (1.41-5.11), with remission achieved by 19 patients (67.9%) and low disease activity achieved by five patients (17.9%). The DAS28-ESR in the control group exhibited a decrease from 5.20 ± 0.77 (3.87-7.23) at baseline to 3.25 ± 1.29 (1.54-5.69). In all, 13 patients (38.2%) achieved remission, while another 11 patients (32.4%) achieved low disease activity. The ACR20, 50, 70 response rates were 85.71%, 75%, and 39.29% in the combined treatment group, whereas it were 75.0%, 53.57%, 21.43% in the control group. Additionally, both ESR and CRP levels decreased significantly during the course of treatment without any reported adverse events leading to discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings offer some evidence, supporting the effectiveness and safety of combining bDMARD with JAKi tofacitinib in RA patients who have an inadequate response to bDMARD monotherapy. This combination effectively manages disease activity while maintaining a relatively low and manageable incidence of adverse events. Further prospective randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are anticipated to provide evidence-based medical support.

BACKGROUND: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) have improved the clinical course and quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some patients failed to respond or have an insufficient response to bDMARD early in the course of the treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of RA patients who need to switch due to ineffectiveness in the first year of treatment and to identify specific baseline features as possible predictors of switch due to ineffectiveness in the first year of treatment.
METHODS: An observational retrospective study was conducted with patients with RA that started their first bDMARD. Demographic data, disease characteristics, disease activity data scores, laboratory parameters and treatment at baseline were collected. The proportion of patients who failed to respond and who switched to another bDMARD in the first year of treatment was calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 437 (364 females, 83.3%) patients with RA were included. The majority of these patients started an anti-TNF-α agent (n=315, 72.1%). Forty-eight (11.0%) patients failed to respond to the bDMARD in the first year of treatment. There were significantly more current or former smokers (p=0.030), with a history of depression (p=0.003) and positive for RF at baseline (p=0.014) in the switch group. In the multivariate analysis, anti-TNF-α agents use (OR 8.3, 95% CI 2.4-28.8, p=0.001), tobacco exposure (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8, p=0.02) and history of depression (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-7.7) seem to predict the need to switch in the first year of treatment due to ineffectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study, tobacco exposure and depression appear to be modifiable risk factors associated with early switching due to ineffectiveness. Addressing these factors in daily clinical practice is crucial to enhance the overall response to therapy and improve the well-being of patients.

Given the ever-increasing number of approved therapies for the treatment of psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), head-to-head (H2H) comparative studies are essential. These are aimed primarily at a comparative analysis of treatment effectiveness. In both PsO and PsA, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) have been shown to be superior to conventional therapies in H2H studies. In PsO interleukin 17 (IL-17) and IL-23 inhibitors proved superiority compared to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (etanercept and adalimumab) in several studies. Ustekinumab was more effective than etanercept, but less effective than IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Only a few H2H studies have been published on the treatment of PsA. In the Spirit H2H study ixekizumab was superior to adalimumab using a combined endpoint of arthritis and psoriasis response (ACR-50 and PASI-100). When looking at arthritic symptoms only (ACR-20), secukinumab was not significantly superior to adalimumab in the EXCEED study but was superior in terms of the effect on skin involvement (PASI90). Other H2H studies focused on the treatment of enthesitis (ECLIPSA study), the efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition (SELECT-PSA-1) or the additional administration of methotrexate to bDMARD treatment (MUST study). The H2H data have been incorporated into the treatment guidelines and have led to IL-17 and IL-23 inhibition being preferred over TNF inhibition in cases of relevant skin involvement in PsA.
UNASSIGNED: Angesichts einer immer größeren Auswahl zugelassener Therapien zur Behandlung der Psoriasis (PsO) und Psoriasisarthritis (PsA) sind direkte Vergleichsstudien unerlässlich. Diese zielen insbesondere auf eine vergleichende Analyse der therapeutischen Wirksamkeit ab. Sowohl bei der PsO als auch der PsA haben sich in Head-to-Head-Studien (H2H) biologische krankheitsmodifizierende antirheumatische Medikamente (bDMARDs) gegenüber den konventionellen Therapien überlegen gezeigt. Bei der PsO zeigten sich in mehreren Studien die IL-17- und IL-23-Inhibitoren den TNF-Inhibitoren (Etanercept und Adalimumab) überlegen. Ustekinumab war wirksamer als Etanercept, aber weniger wirksam als die IL-17- und IL-23-Inhibitoren. Zur Behandlung der PsA wurden bisher nur wenige H2H-Studien veröffentlicht. In der Spirit-H2H-Studie war bei einem kombinierten Endpunkt zum Ansprechen der Arthritis und der Psoriasis (ACR-50 und PASI-100) Ixekizumab gegenüber Adalimumab überlegen. Wenn nur die arthritischen Beschwerden betrachtet wurden (ACR-20), zeigte sich in der EXCEED-Studie Secukinumab gegenüber Adalimumab nicht signifikant überlegen, hinsichtlich der Wirkung auf die Hautbeteiligung (PASI-90) aber schon. Weitere H2H-Studien beschäftigten sich mit der Enthesitisbehandlung (ECLIPSA-Studie), der Wirksamkeit von JAK-Inhibition (SELECT-PSA-1) oder von zusätzlichem Methotrexat bei bDMARD-Therapie (MUST-Studie). Die H2H-Daten finden Eingang in die Therapieleitlinien und haben zu einer bevorzugten Empfehlung von IL-17- und IL-23-Inhibition gegenüber TNF-Inhibition bei relevanter Hautbeteiligung bei der PsA geführt.

UNASSIGNED: Inflammatory arthritis refers to a group of diseases that have a common presentation of joint pain, stiffness, and inflammation. Meanwhile, major depressive disorder is a mental health disorder characterized by anhedonia and low mood. Inflammatory arthritis patients have high rates of major depressive disorder, estimated at being up to 38.8%. Depression leads to a significant reduction in patient\'s health-related quality of life, treatment adherence, and many other measures of health, both subjective and clinical.
UNASSIGNED: This literature review explores the effect that depression has on treatment response for the drugs used in inflammatory arthritis.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic search using PubMed was conducted identifying articles which were each reviewed for relevance and eligibility.
UNASSIGNED: Depression was negatively associated with treatment response to all classes of drugs used to manage inflammatory arthritis, with an increased disease activity and/or number of swollen/tender joints, as well as a reduced rate of remission being recorded for patients with depression compared to those without. However, this effect on treatment response was less clear when conventional synthetic Disease Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs were studied, possibly because their anti-inflammatory effects have wide impacts on the whole immune system, whereas biologic Disease Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs have very specific targets.
UNASSIGNED: Inflammatory arthritis patients have a significantly lowered response to most drugs when they have depression. Screening and treating depression may attenuate this association. It is recommended that further research focuses on screening for and treating depression in inflammatory arthritis patients.

The topic of fertility in women with spondyloarthritis (SpA) has been scarcely investigated to date. Recent systematic reviews and registry studies have brought renewed attention to the plight of women of childbearing age with rheumatic diseases, in particular SpA. Fertility may be impacted by physical impairment, hormonal imbalances and psychological distress. Several studies observed a reduction in anti-Müllerian hormone in women with SpA, reflecting a reduced ovarian reserve (OR). Furthermore, disease activity and the use of certain therapies can alter fertility, and this is reflected in a prolonged time-to-pregnancy (TTP), a validated outcome measure that can evaluate the status of subfertility. The employment of glucocorticoids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs has also been linked to reduced fertility, whereas the use of biologics, especially tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), is not associated with a prolonged TTP. In all women of childbearing age with rheumatic diseases, preconception counselling is paramount, and a referral to a reproductive specialist should be considered in the presence of multiple factors that may influence fertility. A comprehensive evaluation involving a multidisciplinary team of rheumatologists, gynaecologists, and often psychologists is warranted. In this narrative review, we collected the currently available literature focusing on fertility issues in women affected by SpA, providing data on fertility outcomes, hormonal imbalance, and therapeutic concerns.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of body composition, evaluated by bioimpedance analysis (BIA), with disease activity, physical function, and mobility in patients with axSpA undergoing bDMARD treatment for one year.
METHODS: Patients with AS (radiographic axSpA) were enrolled in an extension of the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort (GESPIC). Patients were required to be candidates for bDMARD therapy at baseline presenting high disease activity despite previous treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Outcomes (disease activity, function, and mobility) and body composition parameters were assessed at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. Body composition was assessed by BIA. The association between body composition parameters and outcomes over 1 year was analyzed using longitudinal generalized estimating equations.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients with radiographic axSpA were included in current analysis with a mean age of 36.5 years, disease duration of 6.2 years and ASDAS-CRP score of 3.4 at baseline. Fat mass value and fat mass index were positively associated with disease activity (ASDAS: ß = 0.01, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.03] and ß = 0.04, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.08], respectively) and functional disability (BASFI). Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) was associated with reduced spine mobility (BASMI: ß = 0.20, 95% CI [0.07, 0.33]). Additionally, increase in VAT and fat mass parameters was linked to worse disease activity and functional disability in women, while they were strongly associated with reduced spinal mobility in men.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of body fat and VAT were positively associated with increased disease activity, functional disability, and reduced spinal mobility in patients with radiographic axSpA treated with bDMARDs.

UNASSIGNED: The persistence in therapy of rheumatoid arthritis drugs and particularly bDMARD is a limiting factor for their long-term use. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may not reflect real-world contexts due to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Baricitinib, which targets both JAK1 and JAK2, has been used in Italy for several years. The aim of this multi-center study is to assess the real world persistence on therapy of baricitinib in RA patients and to identify predictive factors of baricitinib\'s survival rate.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective, multicentric, Italian, longitudinal study. All patients were enrolled according to the following criteria: a) age ≥ 18 years old; b) diagnosed with RA according 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria; c) treated with baricitinib. In order to describe baricitinib clinical efficacy, the survival rate was evaluated by The Kaplan-Meier curve. Then, predictive factors of drug retention rate were assessed by performing the Cox analysis, identifying which risk factors influenced treatment persistence.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, we included 478 patients treated with baricitinib. Among them, 380 (79.5%) were females. Baricitinib\'s survival rate was 94.6% at 6 months, 87.9% at 12 months, 81.7% at 24 months and 53.4% at 48 months. The Cox analysis regression showed that a higher bDMARDs/tsDMARD line of therapy seems to be a negative prognostic factor for the drug retention rate (HR 1.26 CI 95% 1.07-1.49, p = 0.006.
UNASSIGNED: Real-life study confirms baricitinib effectiveness up to 4 years, but previous treatment with bDMARDs was a negative prognostic factor for its survival rate.

Machine learning models can support an individualized approach in the choice of bDMARDs. We developed prediction models for 5 different bDMARDs using machine learning methods based on patient data derived from the Austrian Biologics Registry (BioReg).
Data from 1397 patients and 19 variables with at least 100 treat-to-target (t2t) courses per drug were derived from the BioReg biologics registry. Different machine learning algorithms were trained to predict the risk of ineffectiveness for each bDMARD within the first 26 weeks. Cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization were applied to generate the best models. Model quality was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Using explainable AI (XAI), risk-reducing and risk-increasing factors were extracted.
The best models per drug achieved an AUROC score of the following: abatacept, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54-0.78); adalimumab, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.68-0.74); certolizumab, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89); etanercept, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.87); tocilizumab, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77). The most risk-increasing variables were visual analytic scores (VAS) for abatacept and etanercept and co-therapy with glucocorticoids for adalimumab. Dosage was the most important variable for certolizumab and associated with a lower risk of non-response. Some variables, such as gender and rheumatoid factor (RF), showed opposite impacts depending on the bDMARD.
Ineffectiveness of biological drugs could be predicted with promising accuracy. Interestingly, individual parameters were found to be associated with drug responses in different directions, indicating highly complex interactions. Machine learning can be of help in the decision-process by disentangling these relations.

BACKGROUND: Ankylosing spondylitis(AS) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease primarily affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints. While biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs(bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs(tsDMARDs) are popular treatments for AS, there is limited research on their combined use. This study examined a cohort of AS patients who demonstrated inadequate response to bDMARDs and subsequently initiated combination therapy with tofacitinib in conjunction with bDMARDs, assessing both the efficacy and safety profile of this therapeutic approach.
METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively collected the electronic medical records (EMR) of 15 adult patients with AS who were admitted to the Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January 2018 and June 2022. All patients had received at least one bDMARD treatment for more than three months and still exhibited moderate to high disease activity. Tofacitinib 5 mg bid was added to their original biological treatment. Treatment was continued for a minimum of 12 weeks following the initiation of combination therapy. Changes in ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI scores at week 12 were collected and analyzed from baseline, while changes in C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at weeks 4, 8, and 12 were also collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, the overall ASDAS-CRP score decreased significantly from a baseline of 3.82 ± 1.47 (2.83 ~ 4.99) to 1.47 ± 0.48 (0.75 ~ 2.44), with remission achieved by 7 patients (46.7%) and low disease activity achieved by 5 patients (33.3%). The overall BASDAI score also showed significant improvement, decreasing from a baseline of 5.11 ± 1.42 (3.25 ~ 7 0.75) to 1.28 ± 0.70(0.20 ~ 2.55). Additionally, both ESR and CRP levels decreased significantly during the course of treatment without any reported adverse events leading to discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONS: To a certain extent, our findings provide some evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of the combination of bDMARD and JAK inhibitor tofacitinib in AS patients with inadequate response to bDMARD monotherapy. It effectively controls disease activity while maintaining a relatively low and manageable incidence of adverse events. Further prospective randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes are anticipated to provide evidence-based medical support.

OBJECTIVE: To assess current evidence for effectiveness of sequential lines of biologic and targeted small-molecule disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) when used beyond first-line for psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
METHODS: A systematic search of the literature (Medline, Embase, bibliographic searches) was undertaken (October and December 2022) to find studies meeting the criteria of assessing effectiveness of b/tsDMARDs beyond first-line in adults with PsA (PROSPERO CRD42022365298). Risk of bias assessment was undertaken (ROBINS-I/Cochrane RoB2).
RESULTS: Of 2666 abstracts identified and following a full text review of 177 psoriatic disease studies, 12 manuscripts and two abstracts were eligible. Of the 12 manuscripts, 11 were observational and one was a sub-analysis of a RCT (n = 16 081: average age 49.5 years, female 53.3%). Two abstracts (n = 7186) were included. All studies comparing first- and second-line (three studies) found a reduced response in second-line. On average, DAPSA remission (most reported outcome, eight studies) was achieved in 26%, 19% and 10% first-, second- and third-line TNFi, and 22%, 13% and 11% first-, second- and third-line other bDMARDs, respectively. Responses varied to third-line bDMARDs; four studies found comparable second- and third-line responses, five studies found diminishing responses in sequential lines.
CONCLUSIONS: Predominantly observational studies, inherently at high risk of bias, indicate bDMARDs can be effective to third-line in PsA, but that response is reduced after first line. There is very limited data for more advanced lines of b/tsDMARD. Prospective studies are required to better understand clinical response to advanced lines of treatment in PsA.