Managing a thin endometrium is a common challenge in assisted reproductive treatments. The thickness of the endometrium is crucial for embryo implantation, with younger patients generally having higher success rates even with a thinner lining. A frozen embryo transfer cycle often allows for a more thorough assessment of the endometrium compared to a fresh transfer. We present a case of a 36-year-old woman who presented to our fertility center with primary infertility for six years. Despite having regular menstrual cycles, her endometrial thickness consistently measured between 5 and 6.0 mm on ultrasonography. She underwent ovarian stimulation using an antagonist protocol, resulting in the retrieval of oocytes and the freezing of three embryos. However, three frozen embryo transfer cycles were cancelled due to inadequate endometrial thickness (ranging from 4.3 to 5.2 mm). In the fourth cycle, she was treated with gonadotropins with the goal of achieving two to three follicles and improved endometrial thickness. Triggering was performed on day 15, followed by the transfer of one frozen embryo at an endometrial thickness of 5.7 mm. Her beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level was positive, with an initial value of 136.9 mIU/mL, and she subsequently delivered a healthy baby. This case highlights the challenges of managing a thin endometrium in assisted reproductive techniques. Through persistent efforts and tailored treatment protocols, a successful live birth was achieved despite recurrent thin endometrium. This case underscores the importance of individualized treatment strategies in overcoming endometrial challenges in infertility treatments.

This article examines the interplay of queer reproduction and private assisted reproductive technologies (ART) companies in urban China. While same-sex marriage has not gained legal recognition in mainland China and childbirth outside heterosexual marriage has been restricted, queer parents who have children through ART have gradually become visible. ART has emerged as an ideal way for Chinese queer citizens to have children, though they are not legally permitted to use ART services in domestic hospitals. Consequently, an increasing number of queer intended parents turned to underground ART businesses, with some of them becoming salespeople or business owners themselves. My ethnographic analysis comes from fieldworks conducted in Guangdong province, China, from 2018 to 2021. This paper shows that the legal and moral debates brought by queer people\'s use of ART are perceived differently among diverse gender and sexual groups in Chinese society. It founds that queer parents\' participation in the ART industry has demonstrated the potential for queer forms of parenthood and family, while reinforcing stratified reproduction and gender inequalities. The tendency to reduce IVF/surrogacy to \"womb-for-rent\" business among Chinese ART businesses continues to impact queer people\'s reproductive and parenting rights. This paper hopes to offer insights into queer reproductive justice and reproductive technologies across the globe.

Rates of infertility are rising, and informed decision making is an essential part of reproductive life planning with the knowledge that ART success decreases dramatically while a woman\'s age increases and that high costs can often be incurred during fertility treatment. We aimed to determine the current knowledge of infertility and its treatments in the general public through an online survey. We received 360 complete responses. The average age of respondents was 35 years with most respondents being female (90%), heterosexual (88%), white (85%) and university educated (79%). Of the total, 49% had children and 23% had a condition that affects their fertility; 41% had concerns about future fertility and 78% knew someone who had had fertility treatment. Participants\' understanding of basic reproductive biology and causes of infertility varied with correct responses to questions ranging from 44% to 93%. Understanding of IVF outcomes was poorer with only 32% to 55% of responses being correct, and 76% of respondents felt that their education in fertility was inadequate. This survey highlights the inconsistencies in the general public\'s understanding of infertility in this relatively educated population. With increasing demands on fertility services and limited public funds, better education is essential to ensure patients are fully informed with regard to their reproductive life planning.

All over the world, many companies are including oocyte cryopreservation for nonmedical reasons, also popularly known as nonmedical egg freezing (NMEF), within their employee benefits packages. However, it is important to ask whether companies are ethically justified in offering NMEF as a benefit for their employees. The inclusion of NMEF within companies\' employee benefits packages could be ethically justified in two ways. On the one hand, company-sponsored NMEF can serve as a strategy to mitigate or eliminate gender inequalities in the workplace, such as female underrepresentation in positions of authority and leadership and the so-called work/motherhood conflict. On the other hand, company-sponsored NMEF can be a means to expand women\'s reproductive autonomy by making egg freezing accessible to those women who are not able to afford it otherwise. This article calls into question these ethical justifications. We argue that by offering NMEF as an employee benefit, companies maintain current workplace inequalities and impose an option for women with multiple risks and externalities. Therefore, companies\' offering of NMEF benefits cannot be ethically justified. Furthermore, we argue that companies that offer NMEF benefits incur fiduciary responsibilities related to the physiological, emotional, psychological, and financial costs of the use of company-sponsored NMEF.

Embryo transfer is just one of a range of assisted reproductive technologies - often the last one in a sequence of others - that has revolutionised the cattle breeding industry. The number of in vitro-produced embryos transferred annually now surpasses the number derived by traditional superovulation by a factor of four. Although issues with cryotolerance of IVP embryos, embryo loss, and, in some cases, calf birth weight remain to be fully resolved, IVP embryos are likely here to stay as a tool for genetic improvement in dairy herds, offering increased flexibility in sire usage allowing multiple pregnancies from elite dam-bull combinations to be generated and the ability to produce more embryos per unit time than traditional superovulation. What follows is a short personal look back at the last 30 years; if you are looking for deep insights into the underlying biology regulating embryo development, this is not the place to look! Please refer to some of the excellent recent reviews and research papers cited herein.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate first, the association between endometriosis and preterm birth; second, the associations between endometriosis and preeclampsia, placenta previa, postpartum hemorrhage, stillbirth, and small-for-gestational-age infants (assessed by birthweight); and third, the risk of these adverse pregnancy outcomes with and without the use of medically assisted reproduction.
METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: A total of 103 French maternity units.
METHODS: Deliveries by 368,935 women (377,338 infants) from 1999 through 2016.
METHODS: Endometriosis, defined as a single disease entity (endometriosis and/or ademyosis) MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The main outcome was the preterm birth rate (both <37 and <33 weeks). The secondary outcomes were rates of preeclampsia, placenta previa, postpartum hemorrhage, stillbirth, and small-for-gestational-age neonates.
RESULTS: Women in the endometriosis group had more frequent histories of infertility before the included pregnancy (34.7 vs. 5.0%), more hospitalizations during the pregnancy (27.4 vs. 19.8%), and more planned cesarean sections (14.0 vs. 8.7); they more often were nulliparous (51.7 vs. 43.4%). The prevalence of preterm birth at <37 weeks was 11.1% in the endometriosis group and 7.7% in the unexposed group, and for <33 weeks, it was 3.1% and 2.2%, respectively. The adjusted relative risk for confounding factors was higher in the endometriosis than the unexposed group for preterm delivery <37 weeks (1.40, 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.67) or <33 weeks (1.53, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.16). For the secondary outcomes, the adjusted risk ratios for preeclampsia, placenta previa, postpartum hemorrhage, and small-for-gestational-age status of <10th and <5th percentiles were higher in the endometriosis group. The adjusted risk ratios for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age status of <3rd percentile did not differ between the two groups, and those after stratification by medically assisted reproduction for preterm birth at <37 and <33 weeks did not differ statistically significantly between them, for the secondary outcomes, only the risk of placenta previa was higher in the medically assisted reproduction and non-medically assisted reproduction subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with endometriosis had higher risks of preterm birth and other poor pregnancy outcomes than women without endometriosis.

Perspectives of IVF users on their spare embryos is a less explored subject in the Indian context despite the country\'s population and abundance of IVF clinics. We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews in a selected district of the Indian state of Karnataka. Seven individuals were recruited independently of any assistance from an IVF clinic. The interviews explored participants\' knowledge and perception of the spare embryos using a set of guiding questions exploring the theme of the informed consent process, views on research, preferences for embryo donation, the role of family and the dynamics of decision-making, amongst other things. The interviews were qualitatively analysed using Corbin and Strauss\'s grounded theory approach. Our findings reveal that the participants do not learn about the prospects of spare embryos from the very start of their IVF journeys, and they may not be informed about the various options available to decide the fate of the spare embryos. Irrespective of their views on research and moral perceptions of embryos, participants expressed a sense of responsibility and ownership towards their embryos and a general reluctance to donate them. Our findings have implications for guiding future inquiries on this subject, which can better the informed consent process and unravel the role of ownership in the ethics of spare embryos in the Indian context.

BACKGROUND: In assisted reproductive technology (ART), the choice between intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional in vitro insemination (IVF) remains a pivotal decision for couples with female or unexplained infertility. The hypothesis that ICSI may not confer significant improvements in live birth rates in the absence of a male infertility factor was explored in this study.
METHODS: This was a retrospective collection of data recorded by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in the UK from 2005 to 2018 and analysed through regression analysis models on both the entire dataset and a matched-pair subset. First fresh ART cycles were analysed according to the insemination technique in order to compare live birth as the main outcome. Cycles were included if complete information regarding infertility cause, female age, number of oocytes retrieved, allocation to ICSI or IVF, and treatment outcome in terms of live birth was available. Matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio between IVF and ICSI cycles according to the cause of infertility, female age, number of oocytes, and year of treatment.
RESULTS: This study, based on 275,825 first cycles, revealed that, compared with IVF, ICSI was associated with higher fertilization rates and lower cycle cancellations rates. However, ICSI was associated with a lower chance of implantation and live birth than IVF in cycles with female-only infertility: in the entire dataset, the adjusted odds of having a live birth decreased by a factor of 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.99, p = 0.011), while in the matched-pair analyses it decreased by a factor of 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.96, p = 0.003) using ICSI compared to IVF. For unexplained infertility cycles, the adjusted odds ratios for live birth in ICSI compared to IVF cycles were 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-1.01) in the entire dataset and 0.97 (95% CI 0.93-1.01) in the matched-pair analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IVF, ICSI was associated with a reduction in live births when ART was indicated due to female-only factors. Additionally, no significant improvements were associated with the use of ICSI in cycles with unexplained infertility. Our findings impose a critical reevaluation regarding the use of ICSI over IVF for cases with female-only factors and unexplained infertility.

In Australia and the UK, commercialization and corporatization of assisted reproductive technologies have created a marketplace of clinics, products, and services. While this has arguably increased choice for patients, \'choice\', shaped by commercial imperatives may not mean better-quality care. At present, regulation of clinics (including clinic-corporations) and clinicians focuses on the doctor-patient dyad and the clinic-consumer dyad. Scant attention has been paid to the conflicts between the clinic-corporation\'s duty to its shareholders and investors, the medical profession\'s duty to the corporations within which they practice, and the obligations of both clinicians and corporations to patients and to health systems. Frameworks of regulation based in corporate governance and business ethics, such as stakeholder models and \'corporate social responsibility\', have well-recognized limits and may not translate well into healthcare settings. This means that existing governance frameworks may not meet the needs of patients or health systems. We argue for the development of novel regulatory approaches that more explicitly characterize the obligations that both corporations and clinicians in corporate environments have to patients and to society, and that promote fulfilment of these obligations. We consider mechanisms for application in the multi-jurisdictional setting of Australia, and the single jurisdictional settings of the UK.

The treatment of women aged 35 years and older with infertility applies assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in every third case. The purpose of the study is to analyze impact of maternal health on health of children who were delivered by women aged 35 years and older after application of ART. The analytical, direct observation, sociological (questioning), and statistical methods were applied. To study health status of children born after application of ART methods in women aged 35-45 years, representative main group of 648 preschool children (4-6 years old) was selected. The second control group included 649 preschool children (4-6 years old), who were as identical as possible to children from the main group, selected according to following characteristics: mother\'s age at birth of child (35-45 years), age (from 4 to 6 years), all were observed in same medical organization, birth from a singleton, full-term (37 weeks or more) pregnancy. The main and control groups differed from each other only in presence or absence of ART methods. The children born preterm, from egg donor programs and multiple pregnancies were excluded from study. The children health was studied according to medical examinations, medical records, child development history, and mothers questionnaire data on children health. The course of pregnancy and childbirth, morbidity and lifestyle characteristics of mothers were studied according to their questionnaires and copies of data from their outpatient medical records. It was established that there is direct correlation between health of child and health of mother (r = 0.571; p < 0.01, t = 3). At that, it was revealed that differences in level of general morbidity of children after ART and children from spontaneous pregnancy are achieved within account of significant differences in subgroup of children of mothers aged 38-45 years (3353.7‰ and 2341.8‰ control group).