archival data

档案数据
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    俄罗斯不断记录各种传染病的流行。亚洲霍乱在流行病中占有特殊的地位。1892年,霍乱通过黑海港口传入俄罗斯帝国,同年夏天到达库班地区的领土。1892年,俄罗斯约有30万人死于霍乱。他们仍然不知道如何治疗这种可怕的疾病,不知道它的传播机制,以及其课程的特殊性。文章,根据对新罗西斯克市市政管理局档案部和Mostovsky区市政管理局档案部的文献数据的分析编写,研究了1892年和1910年席卷库班地区领土的霍乱疫情。作者描述了导致感染迅速传播的主要因素,并评估了为抗击该疾病而采取的措施:当局组织的抗霍乱措施的实施因缺乏教育而受到极大阻碍,绝大多数人口的偏见和迷信;非居民人口的代表不仅不符合个人卫生的基本标准,但也表达了不信任,有时还有对医生的敌意。使用档案数据,作者调查了传染病对这些居住区人口指标的影响。
    Epidemics of a wide variety of infectious diseases were constantly recorded in Russia. Asian cholera occupied a special place among epidemic diseases. In 1892, cholera was imported into the Russian Empire through the Black Sea ports, which reached the territory of the Kuban region by the summer of the same year. In 1892, about 300 thousand people died of cholera in Russia. They still did not know how to treat this terrible disease, did not know its mechanism of spread, as well as the peculiarities of its course. The article, prepared on the basis of an analysis of documentary data from the Archive Department of the administration of the municipal formation of the city of Novorossiysk and the archival Department of the Administration of the municipal formation of the Mostovsky district, examines the cholera epidemic that swept the territories of the Kuban region in 1892 and 1910. The authors characterize the main factors that contributed to the rapid spread of infection and assess the measures that were taken to combat the disease: the implementation of anti-cholera measures organized by the authorities was greatly hampered by the lack of education, prejudices and superstitions of the vast majority of the population; representatives of the nonresident population not only did not comply with basic standards of personal hygiene, but also expressed distrust, and sometimes and hostility towards doctors. Using archival data, the authors investigate the impact of infectious diseases on the demographic indicators of these settlements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2021年9月,我通过普林斯顿数据空间以CreativeCommons许可证提供了一系列采访笔录供公众使用。采访包括我与AmazonFlex的零工进行的39次对话,Uber,和Lyft在2019年作为这些组织内部自动化工作研究的一部分。我之所以做出这个决定,是因为(1)我被要求为公开可用的数据集做出贡献,作为我资助的要求;(2)我认为这是参与科学技术研究中出现的协作定性科学实验的机会。本文记录了我的思维过程和设计研究的逐步设计决策,收集数据,掩盖它,并将其发布在公共档案中。重要的是,一旦我决定公布这些数据,我决定,关于如何设计和实施这项研究的每个选择都必须以非常慎重的方式评估受访者的风险。这并不意味着要全面,涵盖研究人员在产生定性数据时可能面临的每一种可能的状况。我的目标是在面试数据和收集和发布这些数据的过程中保持透明。我使用这篇文章来说明我的思维过程,因为我为这项研究做出了每个设计决策,希望它对考虑自己的数据发布过程的未来研究人员有用。
    In September 2021 I made a collection of interview transcripts available for public use under a CreativeCommons license through the Princeton DataSpace. The interviews include 39 conversations I had with gig workers at AmazonFlex, Uber, and Lyft in 2019 as part of a study on automation efforts within these organizations. I made this decision because (1) I was required to contribute to a publicly available data set as a requirement of my funding and (2) I saw it as an opportunity to engage in the collaborative qualitative science experiments emerging in Science and Technology studies. This article documents my thought process and step-by-step design decisions for designing a study, gathering data, masking it, and publishing it in a public archive. Importantly, once I decided to publish these data, I determined that each choice about how the study would be designed and implemented had to be assessed for risk to the interviewee in a very deliberate way. It is not meant to be comprehensive and cover every possible condition a researcher may face while producing qualitative data. I aimed to be transparent both in my interview data and the process it took to gather and publish these data. I use this article to illustrate my thought process as I made each design decision for this study in hopes that it could be useful to a future researcher considering their own data publishing process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文介绍了使用基于行政数据的标准措施的注意事项。我们从概念框架开始,将行政标准措施理解和评估为“客观”,而不是(基于评级的)工作绩效评估。然后,我们描述相关的优势(例如,可用性)和缺点(例如,污染)将管理数据用于与标准相关的验证目的。使用管理数据进行验证的最佳做法,包括(A)处理丢失数据的程序,(b)进行数据检查,(c)报告详细的决策规则,以便未来的研究人员可以复制分析也被描述。最后,我们讨论了“现代数据管理”方法,以改善管理数据以支持组织决策。
    This paper covers considerations in using criterion measures based on administrative data. We begin with a conceptual framework for understanding and evaluating administrative criterion measures as \"objective\" rather than (ratings-based) assessments of job performance. We then describe the associated advantages (e.g., availability) and disadvantages (e.g., contamination) of using administrative data for criterion-related validation purposes. Best practices in the use of administrative data for validation purposes, including procedures for (a) handling missing data, (b) performing data checks, and (c) reporting detailed decision rules so future researchers can replicate the analyses are also described. Finally, we discuss \"modern data management\" approaches for improving administrative data for supporting organizational decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对著名行为分析期刊的国际和合作出版趋势的分析一直是行为研究人员感兴趣的话题。本文重点介绍了1997年至2020年在三个著名期刊上的出版趋势:行为实验分析杂志(JEAB),应用行为分析杂志(JABA),和行为科学观点(PBS)。感兴趣的变量是每个地理类别的文章发表的百分比-澳大利亚/东亚,欧洲,拉丁美洲,中东,北美,和非洲。结果显示,JEAB发表的文章中有79%、96%和87%,JABA,PBS,分别,是由与北美有联系的研究人员进行的。此外,JEAB中12、4和4%的文章,JABA,PBS,分别,由至少两名来自不同地理类别的研究人员合着。
    The analysis of international and collaborative publication trends in prominent behavior-analytic journals has been a topic of interest for behavioral researchers. This paper focuses on publication trends from 1997 through 2020 in three prominent journals: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JEAB), Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA), and Perspectives on Behavior Science (PBS). The variable of interest was the percentage of articles published per geographical category-Australasia/East Asia, Europe, Latin America, Middle East, North America, and Africa. The results showed that 79, 96, and 87% of the published articles in JEAB, JABA, and PBS, respectively, were conducted by researchers with a North American affiliation. Furthermore, 12, 4, and 4% of the articles in JEAB, JABA, and PBS, respectively, were coauthored by at least two researchers from different geographical categories.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在调查韩国老年人主观健康的决定因素。2018年的次要数据来自韩国就业信息服务收集的老年人研究小组数据。共分析了3822个有效观察值。因变量是主观健康,独立变量是宗教参与,参加社会聚会,经济活动,食品支出,休闲支出,旅行频率,艺术观看频率描述性分析,相关矩阵,并进行独立t检验进行数据分析。使用资产进行多元线性回归分析,年龄,和性别作为控制变量来检验研究假设。结果表明,所有提出的属性对韩国老年人的主观健康都有显著的正向影响,对政策制定有影响。
    This study aimed to investigate the determinants of subjective health among South Korean senior citizens. Secondary data for the year 2018 was used from the Senior Citizen Research Panel data collected by the Korea Employment Information Service. A total of 3822 valid observations were analyzed. The dependent variable was subjective health, and the independent variables were religion participation, social gathering participation, economic activity, food expenditure, leisure expenditure, travel frequency, and art watching frequency. Descriptive analysis, correlation matrix, and independent t-test were carried out for data analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was employed using assets, age, and gender as control variables to test the research hypotheses. The results indicate that all the proposed attributes have a significant positive impact on the subjective health of Korean senior citizens, with implications for policy making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该计划系统地研究了大量档案研究成果在各种情况下的推广程度。我们在相同的背景下(直接复制)以及52个新的时间段和地理位置中重复了29个原始战略管理效果的关键分析;45%的复制品返回了与原始报告相匹配的结果,以及55%的不同年份的测试和40%的新地理位置的测试。一些原始发现与多个新测试相关。重现性是泛化性的最佳预测指标——因为这些发现被证明是可直接重现的,84%出现在其他可用时间段,57%出现在其他地区。总的来说,对于上下文敏感性,只有有限的经验证据出现。在预测调查中,独立科学家能够预测在新样本的测试中哪些效果会得到支持。
    This initiative examined systematically the extent to which a large set of archival research findings generalizes across contexts. We repeated the key analyses for 29 original strategic management effects in the same context (direct reproduction) as well as in 52 novel time periods and geographies; 45% of the reproductions returned results matching the original reports together with 55% of tests in different spans of years and 40% of tests in novel geographies. Some original findings were associated with multiple new tests. Reproducibility was the best predictor of generalizability-for the findings that proved directly reproducible, 84% emerged in other available time periods and 57% emerged in other geographies. Overall, only limited empirical evidence emerged for context sensitivity. In a forecasting survey, independent scientists were able to anticipate which effects would find support in tests in new samples.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    宗教信仰的性别差异在跨文化上很普遍,而且很强烈,然而,尚不清楚为什么某些文化中的性别差异比其他文化中的性别差异更大。尽管在大多数国家,女性比男性更虔诚,宗教经常以牺牲女性为代价为男性提供不对称的福利。两项全球分析(51个国家和74个国家)发现,国家一级的性别平等始终与宗教(即,报告了上帝的重要性和祈祷的频率)对男人来说,比女人多,导致性别更平等的国家在宗教方面存在更大的性别差异。宗教出席的结果尤其强劲,并持有国家一级的财富,以及个人的宗教信仰,性的道德化,年龄和教育水平。我们通过理性的选择镜头来解释结果,它假设人们在宗教与他们的生殖目标一致时更容易被宗教吸引。
    Sex differences in religiosity are cross-culturally common and robust, yet it is unclear why sex differences in some cultures are larger than in others. Although women are more religious than men in most countries, religions frequently provide asymmetrical benefits to men at the expense of women. Two global analyses (51 countries and 74 countries) found that country-level gender equality was consistently and negatively associated with religiousness (i.e. religious attendance, reported importance of God and frequency of prayer) for men, more than for women, leading to a larger sex difference in religiousness in more gender-equal countries. Results were especially robust for religious attendance, and hold accounting for country-level wealth, as well as individuals\' religious affiliation, the moralization of sexuality, age and education level. We interpret results through a rational choice lens, which assumes that people are more drawn to religion when it is consistent with their reproductive goals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    An essential component of sustainable forest management is accurate monitoring of forest activities. Although monitoring efforts have generally increased for many forests throughout the world, in practice, effective monitoring is complex. Determining the magnitude and location of progress towards sustainability targets can be challenging due to diverse forest operations across multiple jurisdictions, the lack of data standardization, and discrepancies between field inspections and remotely-sensed records. In this work, we used California as a multijurisdictional case study to explore these problems and develop an approach that broadly informs forest monitoring strategies. The State of California recently entered into a shared stewardship agreement with the US Forest Service (USFS) and set a goal to jointly treat one million acres of forest and rangeland annually by 2025. Currently, however, federal and state forest management datasets are disjoint. This work addresses three barriers stymying the use of federal and state archival records to assess management goals. These barriers are: 1) current databases from different jurisdictions have not been combined due to their distinct data collection processes and internal structures; 2) datasets have not been comprehensively analyzed, despite the need to understand the extent of previous treatments as well as the rate of current activity; and 3) the spatial accuracy of archival datasets has not been evaluated against remotely-sensed data. To reduce these barriers, we first aggregated existing archival forest management records between 1984 and 2019 from the USFS\' Forest Activity Tracking System (FACTS) and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) using a qualitative scalar of treatment intensity. Combined FACTS and CAL FIRE completed footprint acres - defined as unique areas of land where a treatment was completed at any time since 1984 - have decreased since a peak in 2008. At most, 300,000 footprint acres are completed each year, 30% of the million-acre goal. Prescribed fires - defined as direct burning operations - have risen over time, according to the FACTS hazardous fuels dataset but prescribed fire records in CAL FIRE\'s dataset have rapidly increased since 2016. We also refined the spatial and temporal detail of the aggregated management record using the Continuous Change Detection and Classification algorithm on satellite remote sensing data to produce a state-wide time series map of harvest disturbances. A comparison of the algorithm\'s refined data to the archival record potentially suggests over-reporting in both FACTS and CAL FIRE\'s archival datasets. Our integrated dataset provides a better assessment of current treatments and the path towards the 1-million-acre a year goal. The refined dataset leverages the strengths of complementary, albeit imperfect, monitoring strategies from archives and remotely-sensed detection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一项研究假设的预先登记,方法,数据分析步骤正在成为一种流行的心理学研究实践。迄今为止,大多数关于研究预注册的讨论都集中在研究的预注册上,包括收集原始数据。然而,心理学的许多研究依赖于对先前存在的数据的(重新)分析。重要的是,这种类型的研究与原始研究不同,因为研究人员不能改变研究的主要方面(例如,实验操作,样本量)。这里,我们提供了参数,说明为什么对预先存在的数据进行预注册分析是有用的,讨论实际考虑,考虑潜在的担忧,并介绍为专注于分析现有数据的研究量身定制的预注册模板。我们认为,预先注册假设和数据分析以分析先前存在的数据是迈向更透明的心理学研究的重要一步。
    The preregistration of a study\'s hypotheses, methods, and data-analyses steps is becoming a popular psychological research practice. To date, most of the discussion on study preregistration has focused on the preregistration of studies that include the collection of original data. However, much of the research in psychology relies on the (re-)analysis of preexisting data. Importantly, this type of studies is different from original studies as researchers cannot change major aspects of the study (e.g., experimental manipulations, sample size). Here, we provide arguments as to why it is useful to preregister analyses of preexisting data, discuss practical considerations, consider potential concerns, and introduce a preregistration template tailored for studies focused on the analyses of preexisting data. We argue that the preregistration of hypotheses and data-analyses for analyses of preexisting data is an important step towards more transparent psychological research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Airborne radar sounding can measure conditions within and beneath polar ice sheets. In Antarctica, most digital radar-sounding data have been collected in the last 2 decades, limiting our ability to understand processes that govern longer-term ice-sheet behavior. Here, we demonstrate how analog radar data collected over 40 y ago in Antarctica can be combined with modern records to quantify multidecadal changes. Specifically, we digitize over 400,000 line kilometers of exploratory Antarctic radar data originally recorded on 35-mm optical film between 1971 and 1979. We leverage the increased geometric and radiometric resolution of our digitization process to show how these data can be used to identify and investigate hydrologic, geologic, and topographic features beneath and within the ice sheet. To highlight their scientific potential, we compare the digitized data with contemporary radar measurements to reveal that the remnant eastern ice shelf of Thwaites Glacier in West Antarctica had thinned between 10 and 33% between 1978 and 2009. We also release the collection of scanned radargrams in their entirety in a persistent public archive along with updated geolocation data for a subset of the data that reduces the mean positioning error from 5 to 2.5 km. Together, these data represent a unique and renewed extensive, multidecadal historical baseline, critical for observing and modeling ice-sheet change on societally relevant timescales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号