aortic stenosis

主动脉狭窄
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据报道,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)患者中睡眠呼吸暂停的患病率很高;然而,在年轻和相对健康的外科AVR(SAVR)患者中,睡眠呼吸暂停的患病率尚不清楚.
    我们评估了SAVR患者的睡眠呼吸暂停的患病率和总体睡眠质量。50-89岁的参与者有资格招募。所有参与者在SAVR之前完成II型HST。睡眠呼吸暂停定义为呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥5次/小时。目前使用气道正压通气是排他性的。
    46名参与者(32名男性/14名女性)的平均年龄为66.6岁,体重指数为30,AHI为23.5,阻塞性AHI为22.0。只有四名参与者有睡眠呼吸暂停诊断,然而在II型睡眠测试中,除了一个人之外,所有人都有睡眠呼吸暂停。三分之二的睡眠呼吸暂停为中度或重度(AHI≥15)。四分之一的呼吸事件被定义为没有去饱和的觉醒。虽然大多数睡眠参数类似于类似年龄的社区队列,N3的平均百分比降低,仅占总睡眠时间的3.8%。
    II型家庭睡眠测试(HST)显示,该样本中睡眠呼吸暂停的患病率为97.8%,其中大部分是未确诊的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。大约三分之二的睡眠呼吸暂停是中度或重度。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停在严重主动脉瓣疾病患者中的如此高的影响值得进一步研究潜在的潜在机制和临床意义。
    UNASSIGNED: A high prevalence of sleep apnea has been reported among transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients; however, the prevalence of sleep apnea in the younger and relatively healthier population of surgical AVR (SAVR) patients is unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: We assessed the prevalence of sleep apnea and overall sleep quality in patients having SAVR. Participants aged 50-89 were eligible for recruitment. All participants completed type II HST before SAVR. Sleep apnea was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/hour. The current use of positive airway pressure was exclusionary.
    UNASSIGNED: The 46 participants (32 males/14 females) had a mean age of 66.6 years, body mass index of 30, AHI of 23.5, and obstructive AHI of 22.0. Only four participants had a prior sleep apnea diagnosis, yet all but one had sleep apnea on type II sleep testing. Two-thirds of sleep apnea was moderate or severe (AHI ≥ 15). A quarter of respiratory events were defined by arousals without desaturations. Whereas most sleep parameters resembled those of similarly aged community cohorts, mean percentage of N3 was reduced, accounting for only 3.8% of total sleep time.
    UNASSIGNED: Type II home sleep testing (HST) revealed a 97.8% prevalence of sleep apnea in this sample, most of which was undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea. Roughly two-thirds of sleep apnea was moderate or severe. Such a high impact of obstructive sleep apnea among patients with severe aortic valve disease deserves further investigation on potential underlying mechanisms and clinical implications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是高收入国家中最常见的退行性瓣膜疾病。虽然血液动力学指标通常用于评估狭窄的严重程度,它们受到负载条件和每搏容量的影响,并且通常不一致。经胸超声心动图(TTE)期间的解剖瓣膜评估,例如主动脉瓣钙化(AVC)和瓣膜运动(VM)可以提供疾病严重程度的线索。这些半定量评估的解剖成像参数的可靠性未知。
    方法:这是一项对TTE上AVC和瓣膜VM的半定量评估的回顾性研究。鉴定了代表一系列AS严重性的TTE。以标准方式评估主动脉瓣的钙化程度和受限的VM程度。AVC评分和瓣膜运动由具有不同训练水平的读者评估,这些训练水平对AS的严重程度视而不见。评估了读者之间的相关性和读者间的可靠性。
    结果:收集了35个TTE的420项评估(AVC和VM各210项)。成像学员的AVC相关性(研究员和学生,分别),VM的范围为0.49(95%CI0.18-0.70)至0.62(95%CI0.36-0.79)和0.58(95%CI0.30-0.76)至0.54(95%CI0.25-0.74)。超声心动图医师分配的AVC等级之间的解剖评估相关性为r=0.76(95%CI0.57-0.87)。超声心动图医师分配的VM评估之间的相关性为r=0.73(95%CI0.53-0.86),两者的p<0.00001。对于超声心动图医师AVC评估,加权κ为0.52(0.32-0.72),瓣膜运动加权κ为0.60(0.42-0.78)。
    结论:由董事会认证的超声心动图医师评估时,基于TTE的AVC和VM的半定量评估之间存在良好的读者间相关性。董事会认证的超声心动图医师之间对AVC和VM的半定量评估的读者间可靠性不高。成像学员之间的读者间相关性和可靠性较低。需要更可靠的方法来评估基于TTE的解剖评估,以便准确地跟踪疾病进展。
    背景:研究Y00003100.
    BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common degenerative valve disease in high income countries. While hemodynamic metrics are commonly used to assess severity of stenosis, they are impacted by loading conditions and stroke volume and are often discordant. Anatomic valve assessments such as aortic valve calcification (AVC) and valve motion (VM) during transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can offer clues to disease severity. The reliability of these semi-quantitatively assessed anatomic imaging parameters is unknown.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective study of semi-quantitative assessment of AVC and valve VM on TTE. TTEs representing a range of AS severities were identified. The degree of calcification of the aortic valve and the degree of restricted VM were assessed in standard fashion. AVC scores and valve motion were assessed by readers with varied training levels blinded to the severity of AS. Correlation and inter-reader reliability between readers were assessed.
    RESULTS: 420 assessments (210 each for AVC and VM) were collected for 35 TTEs. Correlation of AVC for imaging trainees (fellows and students, respectively), ranged from 0.49 (95% CI 0.18-0.70) to 0.62 (95% CI 0.36-0.79) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.30-0.76) to 0.54 (95% CI 0.25-0.74) for VM. Correlation of anatomic assessments between echocardiographer-assigned AVC grades was r = 0.76 (95% CI 0.57-0.87)). The correlation between echocardiographer-assigned assessment of VM was r = 0.73 (95% CI 0.53-0.86), p < 0.00001 for both. For echocardiographer AVC assessment, weighted kappa was 0.52 (0.32-0.72), valve motion weighted kappa was 0.60 (0.42-0.78).
    CONCLUSIONS: There was good inter-reader correlation between TTE-based semi-quantitative assessment of AVC and VM when assessed by board certified echocardiographers. There was modest inter-reader reliability of semi-quantitative assessments of AVC and VM between board certified echocardiographers. Inter-reader correlation and reliability between imaging trainees was lower. More reliable methods to assess TTE based anatomic assessments are needed in order to accurately track disease progression.
    BACKGROUND: STUDY00003100.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管预测的假体-患者不匹配(PPMP)对外科主动脉瓣置换术后结局的影响已得到证实,PPMP在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中的应用研究有限.这项研究调查了PPMp对TAVR后血流动力学和5年临床结局的影响。
    方法:我们分析了1733例接受TAVR的患者。使用两种不同的方法定义PPMp:1)每种瓣膜类型和大小的有效孔口面积的正常参考值(PPMp1;n=1733),2)主动脉瓣环面积或周长的参考值,使用术前计算机断层扫描评估的参考体表面积(PPMp2;n=1227)。主要终点是5年时全因死亡和/或心力衰竭再住院的复合终点。
    结果:在中度和重度病例中,PPMp1的发生率分别为11.7%和0.8%,分别。PPMp2分为中度(3.8%)或重度(0%)。根据PPMp1的严重程度,残余平均主动脉梯度≥20mmHg的比率显着增加(无PPMp1:3.1%与中等PPMp1:26.8%vs.严重PPMp1:53.9%,p<0.0001)和PPMp2(无PPMp2:4.1%与中等PPMp2:12.8%,p=0.0049)。两种PPMP方法均不与总队列中的复合结局相关;然而,在多变量分析中,在左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的患者中,PPMP1与5年的不良临床结局显着相关(HR:1.87;95%CI:1.02-3.43)。
    结论:在低LVEF患者中,PPMP对TAVR临床结局的影响不可忽视。
    OBJECTIVE: Although the impact of predicted prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPMP) on outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement is well established, studies on PPMP in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are limited. This study investigated the effects of PPMp on haemodynamic and 5-year clinical outcomes after TAVR.
    METHODS: We analysed 1733 patients who underwent TAVR. PPMp was defined using two different methods: 1) normal reference values of the effective orifice area for each valve type and size indexed to body surface area (PPMp1; n = 1733) and 2) reference values for aortic annulus area or perimeter assessed with pre-procedural computed tomography indexed to body surface area (PPMp2; n = 1227). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death and/or rehospitalisation for heart failure at 5 years.
    RESULTS: The incidence of PPMp1 was 11.7 % and 0.8 % in moderate and severe cases, respectively. PPMp2 was classified as either moderate (3.8 %) or severe (0 %). Rates of residual mean aortic gradient ≥20 mmHg significantly increased depending on PPMp1 severity (no PPMp1: 3.1 % vs. moderate PPMp1: 26.8 % vs. severe PPMp1: 53.9 %, p < 0.0001) and PPMp2 (no PPMp2: 4.1 % vs. moderate PPMp2: 12.8 %, p = 0.0049). Neither of PPMP methods were associated with the composite outcome in total cohort; however, PPMP1 was significantly related to worse clinical outcomes at 5 years among patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in multivariate analysis (HR: 1.87; 95 % CI: 1.02-3.43).
    CONCLUSIONS: The impact of PPMP on TAVR clinical outcomes may not be negligible in patients with low LVEF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    右心室-肺动脉(RV-PA)耦合与严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者接受经导管瓣膜植入(TAVI)的临床结果有关。然而,预后评估的最佳时机仍不确定.我们的目的是确定RV纵向功能参数和RV-PA偶联对接受TAVI的患者死亡率的影响。回顾性,单中心,分析包括2007年至2021年接受TAVI的AS患者。之前进行了超声心动图评估,手术后不久,在后续行动中。RV-PA解偶联定义为TAPSE/PASP比值<0.55(严重RV解偶联定义为TAPSE/PASP比值<0.32。评估了RV参数对长达12个月的全因死亡率的影响。在577名患者中,术前TAPSE/PASP比值数据为205。113例患者存在RV-PA解偶联(55.1%),在31(15.1%)中观察到严重的解偶联。在TAVI之后的前12个月内,51例(9%)患者死亡。在单变量Cox回归分析中,严重的RV-PA解偶联与死亡率相关;然而,在调整为EuroSCOREII后,该协会丢失了。手术后TAPSE/PASP比值(每增加0.1个单位)与主要终点之间存在显著关联(HR:0.73;95%CI:0.56,0.97;p=0.029)。术后PASP较高(HR:1.04;95%CI:1.02,1.06;p<0.001也与全因死亡率相关。TAVI后的V-PA解偶联和PASP与患者的全因死亡率相关,可能对患者选择和计划术后护理有价值。
    Right ventricle-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling has been linked to clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter valve implantation (TAVI). However, the best timing for prognostic assessment remains uncertain. Our aim was to determine the impact of RV longitudinal function parameters and RV-PA coupling on mortality in patients undergoing TAVI.  Retrospective, single center, analysis including patients with AS who underwent TAVI between 2007 and 2021. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed before, shortly after the procedure, and during follow-up. RV-PA uncoupling was defined as a TAPSE/PASP ratio<0.55 (severe RV uncoupling was defined as TAPSE/PASP ratio<0.32. The effect of RV parameters on all-cause mortality up to 12 months was assessed.  Among the 577 patients included, pre-procedural TAPSE/PASP ratio data were available for 205. RV-PA uncoupling was present in 113 patients (55.1%), with severe uncoupling observed in 31 (15.1%). Within the first 12 months after TAVI, 51 patients (9%) died. Severe RV-PA uncoupling was associated with mortality in univariable Cox regression; however, this association was lost after adjusting for EuroSCORE II. A significant association was found between the TAPSE/PASP ratio (per 0.1-unit increase) after the procedure and the primary endpoint (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.97; p=0.029). Higher postprocedural PASP (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.06; p<0.001 was also associated with all-cause mortality.  V-PA uncoupling and PASP after TAVI are associated with all-cause mortality in patients and may be valuable for patient selection and for planning post-procedural care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    主动脉瓣狭窄的进展率在患者之间不同,复杂的临床随访和管理。
    本研究旨在确定与主动脉瓣狭窄进展率相关的预测因子。
    在这项回顾性纵向单中心队列研究中,纳入了2011年12月至2022年12月期间出现的所有中度主动脉瓣狭窄患者,并有超声心动图检查.基于主动脉瓣面积(AVA)从至少间隔6个月进行的至少2次超声心动图计算个体主动脉瓣狭窄进展率。使用线性混合效应模型确定与AVA进展率相关的基线因素,使用Cox回归评估进展率与临床结局的相关性.
    该研究包括540例患者(中位年龄69岁,38%为女性)和2,937例超声心动图(每位患者中位数5)。患者呈线性进展,平均AVA降低0.09cm2/y,平均峰值喷射速度增加0.17m/s/y。快速进展与全因死亡率(HR:1.77,95%CI:1.26-2.48)和主动脉瓣置换术(HR:3.44,95%CI:2.55-4.64)独立相关。年纪大了,左心室质量指数较大,心房颤动,慢性肾脏病与AVA下降较快有关。
    AVA在个别患者中线性下降,且较快的进展与较高的死亡率独立相关。常规临床和超声心动图变量可准确预测个体进展率,并可帮助临床医生确定主动脉瓣狭窄患者的最佳随访间隔。
    UNASSIGNED: The progression rate of aortic stenosis differs between patients, complicating clinical follow-up and management.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to identify predictors associated with the progression rate of aortic stenosis.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective longitudinal single-center cohort study, all patients with moderate aortic stenosis who presented between December 2011 and December 2022 and had echocardiograms available were included. The individual aortic stenosis progression rate was calculated based on aortic valve area (AVA) from at least 2 echocardiograms performed at least 6 months apart. Baseline factors associated with the progression rate of AVA were determined using linear mixed-effects models, and the association of progression rate with clinical outcomes was evaluated using Cox regression.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 540 patients (median age 69 years and 38% female) with 2,937 echocardiograms (median 5 per patient). Patients had a linear progression with a median AVA decrease of 0.09 cm2/y and a median peak jet velocity increase of 0.17 m/s/y. Rapid progression was independently associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.26-2.48) and aortic valve replacement (HR: 3.44, 95% CI: 2.55-4.64). Older age, greater left ventricular mass index, atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease were associated with a faster decline of AVA.
    UNASSIGNED: AVA decreases linearly in individual patients, and faster progression is independently associated with higher mortality. Routine clinical and echocardiographic variables accurately predict the individual progression rate and may aid clinicians in determining the optimal follow-up interval for patients with aortic stenosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着微创结构性心脏介入的出现,严重主动脉瓣狭窄(SAS)的治疗迅速发展。与瓣膜手术相比,经导管主动脉瓣置换术使患者能够接受明确的SAS治疗,从而实现更快的恢复率。不经常,患者在与髋部骨折(HFx)相关的跌倒后入院/诊断为SAS.虽然紧急骨科手术是降低残疾和死亡率的关键,未经治疗的SAS会增加围手术期风险并妨碍身体恢复。关于最佳策略是在血流动力学监测下进行髋关节矫正,然后进行瓣膜置换,或术前球囊主动脉瓣成形术以允许HFx手术,然后进行瓣膜置换,尚无共识。然而,术前极简主义经导管主动脉瓣置换术可能是对选定患者有吸引力的策略.我们提供了一种管理途径,强调早期多学科方法来优化髋关节手术时间,以改善HFx-SAS患者的骨科和心血管预后。
    The treatment of severe aortic stenosis (SAS) has evolved rapidly with the advent of minimally invasive structural heart interventions. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has allowed patients to undergo definitive SAS treatment achieving faster recovery rates compared to valve surgery. Not infrequently, patients are admitted/diagnosed with SAS after a fall associated with a hip fracture (HFx). While urgent orthopedic surgery is key to reduce disability and mortality, untreated SAS increases the perioperative risk and precludes physical recovery. There is no consensus on what the best strategy is either hip correction under hemodynamic monitoring followed by valve replacement or preoperative balloon aortic valvuloplasty to allow HFx surgery followed by valve replacement. However, preoperative minimalist transcatheter aortic valve replacement may represent an attractive strategy for selected patients. We provide a management pathway that emphasizes an early multidisciplinary approach to optimize time for hip surgery to improve orthopedic and cardiovascular outcomes in patients presenting with HFx-SAS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在中度/重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)中,已经提出了基于瓣膜外损伤程度的心脏损伤分期分类的预后价值。
    本研究的目的是评估主动脉手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)后AS患者的心脏损伤分期与死亡率之间的关系。
    我们对截至2023年2月发表的研究中的Kaplan-Meier衍生的重建事件时间数据进行了汇总荟萃分析。
    总共,16项研究(n=14,499)符合我们的资格标准,包括12,282例有症状的重度AS患者和2,217例无症状的重度/中度AS患者。对于有症状的重度AS患者,全因死亡率为24.0%,27.7%,38.0%,56.3%,心脏损害0、1、2、3和4期患者的5年分别为57.3%(以0期为参考;1期HR:1.30[95%CI:1.03-1.64];P=0.029;2期:1.74[95%CI:1.41-2.16];P<0.001;3期:2.92[95%CI:2.35-3.64];P<0.001,95%CI<0.001,和对于无症状中度/重度AS患者,全因死亡率为19.3%,36.9%,51.7%,在第0、1、2和3~4期的患者中,第8年分别为67.8%(第1阶段的HR:1.70[95%CI:1.21~2.38];P=0.002;第2阶段:2.20[95%CI:1.60~3.02];P<0.001;第3~4阶段:3.90[95%CI:2.79~5.47];P<0.001)。
    在AS的症状和严重程度范围内接受AVR的患者中,心脏损害基线分期对预后有重要意义.在接受AVR的患者中进行的汇总荟萃分析提示,对于中度或重度AS患者的治疗时机和选择,可以考虑对基线心脏损伤进行分期,以确定是否需要早期AVR或辅助药物治疗以预防不可逆的心脏损伤并改善长期预后。
    UNASSIGNED: The prognostic value of cardiac damage staging classification based on the extent of extravalvular damage has been proposed in moderate/severe aortic stenosis (AS).
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to assess the association of cardiac damage staging with mortality across the spectrum of patients with AS following aortic surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR).
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived reconstructed time-to-event data from studies published through February 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 16 studies (n = 14,499) met our eligibility criteria and included 12,282 patients with symptomatic severe AS and 2,217 patients with asymptomatic severe/moderate AS. For patients with symptomatic severe AS, all-cause mortality was 24.0%, 27.7%, 38.0%, 56.3%, and 57.3% at 5 years in patients with cardiac damage stage 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (stage 0 as reference; HR in stage 1: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.03-1.64]; P = 0.029; stage 2: 1.74 [95% CI: 1.41-2.16]; P < 0.001; stage 3: 2.92 [95% CI: 2.35-3.64]; P < 0.001, and stage 4: 3.51 [95% CI: 2.79-4.41]; P < 0.001). For patients with asymptomatic moderate/severe AS, all-cause mortality was 19.3%, 36.9%, 51.7%, and 67.8% at 8 years in patients with cardiac damage stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 to 4, respectively (HR in stage 1: 1.70 [95% CI: 1.21-2.38]; P = 0.002; stage 2: 2.20 [95% CI: 1.60-3.02]; P < 0.001; and stage 3 to 4: 3.90 [95% CI: 2.79-5.47]; P < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: In patients undergoing AVR across the symptomatic and severity spectrum of AS, cardiac damage staging at baseline has important prognostic implications. This pooled meta-analysis in patients undergoing AVR suggests that staging of baseline cardiac damage could be considered for timing and selection of therapy in patients with moderate or severe AS to determine the need for earlier AVR or adjunctive pharmacotherapy to prevent irreversible cardiac damage and improve the long-term prognosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号