aortic rim

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    房间隔封堵器侵蚀的风险,特别是Amplatzer中隔封堵器,已被描述为在短主动脉边缘的患者中更高。卵圆孔未闭(PFO)闭合装置也有类似的担忧,但只有罕见的侵蚀案例。当这不一定是问题时,可能由于担心PFO患者中的装置侵蚀而选择较小的装置。
    作者旨在评估使用AmplatzerPFO装置在短(<9mm)主动脉边缘患者中关闭PFO后的结果。
    我们对任何适应症的PFO闭合进行了回顾性分析,2006年至2017年之间在第四纪中心。术前重新测量经食管超声心动图参数,包括主动脉边缘。通过与省级行政数据库的链接获得了长期结果。
    在研究期间,324例患者使用AmplatzerPFO装置进行PFO封堵,平均年龄49.8岁;61%的患者主动脉边缘短(<9mm)。最常见的指征是隐源性卒中(72%);主动脉距离较长的患者更有可能出现非卒中的闭合指征。糖尿病(15%对6.5%,P=0.04),和心力衰竭(15.7%vs4%,P<0.001)。在平均7年的随访中,没有需要心脏手术的器械侵蚀或栓塞病例.
    在长期行政随访的大型队列中(1,394患者-年),即使在主动脉边缘较短的患者中,也可以安全地植入AmplatzerPFO装置.
    UNASSIGNED: The risk of erosion of an atrial septal closure device, in particular the Amplatzer Septal Occluder, has been described as higher in patients with a short aortic rim. Similar concern has been applied to patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure devices, but there are only rare reported cases of erosion. It may be that smaller devices are chosen due to fear of device erosion in PFO patients when this is not necessarily an issue.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors aimed to assess outcomes after PFO closure with the Amplatzer PFO device in patients with a short (<9 mm) aortic rim.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective analysis of PFO closure for any indication, between 2006 and 2017 at a quaternary center. Preprocedural transesophageal echocardiographic parameters including the aortic rim were remeasured. Long-term outcomes were obtained by linkage to provincial administrative databases.
    UNASSIGNED: Over the study period, 324 patients underwent PFO closure with the Amplatzer PFO device, with a mean age of 49.8 years; 61% had a short aortic rim (<9 mm). The most common indication was cryptogenic stroke (72%); those with longer aortic distance were more likely to have a non-stroke indication for closure, diabetes (15% vs 6.5%, P = 0.04), and heart failure (15.7% vs 4%, P < 0.001). Over a median 7 years of follow-up, there were no cases of device erosion or embolization requiring cardiac surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: In a large cohort with long-term administrative follow-up (1,394 patient-years), implantation of an Amplatzer PFO device was performed safely even in patients with a short aortic rim.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This study aimed to assess the feasibility of transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) closure in patients with absent aortic rim.
    The indication of transcatheter closure for ASD with absent aortic rim is controversial.
    We enrolled 547 patients with ASD who were scheduled for transcatheter closure. Morphologies of aortic rim were evaluated using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
    Aortic rim of <5 mm was observed in 396 (72%) patients; 128 (23%) had absent aortic rim of 0 mm, and 268 (49%) had deficient aortic rim of >0 to <5 mm. Patients with absent aortic rim frequently had aortic rim absence at an angle of 0° on TEE and septal malalignment. Of the 128 patients with absent aortic rim, 126 (98%) successfully underwent transcatheter closure, while 2 (2%) failed transcatheter closure due to a large defect with severe septal malalignment. The success rate of transcatheter closure was similar between patients with absent aortic rim and those with deficient aortic rim (98% vs. 99%, p = .45). After the procedure, no patients had erosion or device embolization during a median follow-up of 24 months.
    Transcatheter closure was successfully performed without adverse events in patients with absent aortic rim, as well as in those with deficient aortic rim. Our findings can be valuable to determine the indication of transcatheter closure in patients with ASD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    BACKGROUND: Aortic erosion is a serious complication that usually occurs shortly after Amplazter Septal Occluder (ASO) implantation for atrial septal defect (ASD).
    METHODS: A seven-year-old girl was diagnosed with secundum ASD without symptoms. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed a defect of 20 mm in diameter in the fossa ovalis without aortic rim. An ASO device of 24 mm in diameter was selected and electively implanted. The \"A-shape\" of the device was confirmed by intraoperative TEE, a landmark finding indicating the proper implantation of ASO in patients without aortic rim. After an uneventful postoperative course of 5 years and 10 months, she was transferred to our unit due to cardiogenic shock. Her echocardiogram in emergency room showed pericardial effusion with collapsed right ventricle. Given her history of ASO and the observation of the sequentially increasing pericardial effusion, we diagnosed her with acute cardiac tamponade due to aortic erosion. Emergency pericardiotomy was then performed to improve the hemodynamic condition. Fresh clots were found, so we immediately prepared the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and explored the damage to the aorta, in which the clots had accumulated. Bleeding suddenly started when the clots were removed. We then inserted the cannulae for perfusion and venous drainage. The clots were removed, and tears were found in both the lateral side of the ascending aorta and the right atrial wall. Intraoperative TEE showed that an edge of the ASO device was directly touching the aortic wall and the Doppler color-flow imaging showed blood flow through this lesion. The erosive lacerations of both the ascending aorta and right atrium were detected from the inside after achieving cardioplegic cardiac arrest. The ascending aorta was obliquely incised, and the laceration was closed from inside the aortic root. The postoperative course was uneventful. She has been doing well for 5 years since the surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: We experienced and successfully treated a rare case of acute cardiac tamponade caused by aortic erosion 5 years and 10 months after ASO implantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure carries a not negligible burden of complications, such as the erosion of cardiac structures surrounding the device. Complications related to erosion are rare and often occur during the first 6 months after implantation.
    METHODS: A 40-year-old female patient underwent percutaneous ASD closure in 2006. After 12 years of uneventful follow-up, in March 2018, a device dislodgement causing atrial shunting was incidentally discovered and was attributed to device-induced atrial septal erosion. The patient successfully underwent surgical removal of the device and correction of the interatrial defect.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our purpose is to underline the importance of staged long-term imaging follow-up, even many years after a successful procedure and to highlight the possible risk factors leading to this worrisome condition. In addition, we sought to underline the possible risks associated with deficient aortic rim and explain pros and cons of different approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号