antibiotic stewardship

抗生素管理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估马来西亚三级教学医院择期神经外科手术抗生素预防(SAP)指南的依从性,并评估对手术部位感染率(SSI)的影响。
    方法:对2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日在拥有1600张床位的三级教学医院接受择期神经外科手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。该研究评估了国家和医院SAP指南的依从性,专注于抗生素的选择,剂量,定时,和持续时间。此外,在神经外科医生中进行了一项调查,以评估他们的知识,关于SAP的态度和实践(KAP)。
    结果:在202名患者中,对抗生素选择的依从率为99%,对抗生素持续时间的依从率为69.8%.SSI率为6.4%。KAP调查强调了外科医生对SAP指南的强烈认识,尽管在实践中有所不同,特别是在抗生素的持续时间和抗生素的选择。
    结论:虽然在择期神经外科手术中对SAP抗生素的正确选择有很高的依从性,在遵守抗生素使用的推荐持续时间方面存在差距.该研究强调需要有针对性的干预措施,以提高对SAP指南的依从性。这可能会降低神经外科手术中SSI的发生率。持续的教育和审核对于优化SAP实践和提高神经外科患者的预后至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the adherence to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines in elective neurosurgery and assess the impact on surgical site infection (SSI) rates in a tertiary teaching hospital in Malaysia.
    METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent elective neurosurgical procedures from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, in a 1600-bed tertiary teaching hospital. The study assessed adherence to national and hospital SAP guidelines, focusing on the choice of antibiotic, dosage, timing, and duration. Additionally, a survey was conducted among neurosurgeons to evaluate their knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) regarding SAP.
    RESULTS: Out of 202 patients included, there was a 99% compliance rate with antibiotic choice and 69.8% with the antibiotic duration. The SSI rate was identified at 6.4%. The KAP survey highlighted a strong awareness of SAP guidelines among surgeons, albeit with variations in practice, particularly in antibiotic duration and choice of antibiotics.
    CONCLUSIONS: While there is high adherence to the correct choice of antibiotic for SAP in elective neurosurgery, there are gaps in compliance with the recommended duration of antibiotic use. The study highlights the need for targeted interventions to improve adherence to SAP guidelines, which could potentially reduce the incidence of SSI in neurosurgery. Ongoing education and auditing are essential to optimize SAP practices and enhance patient outcomes in neurosurgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:发展中国家的糖尿病足溃疡经常被感染。医疗保健系统通常不具备进行针对糖尿病足感染(DFI)的针对性抗生素治疗所需的培养和敏感性测试。
    方法:我们评估了DFIs的抗生素管理计划,在各级医疗保健中,强调资源匮乏的环境,如非洲。
    结果:DFI的管理通常适应资源贫乏地区的财务和实际现实。深层组织样本的即时革兰氏染色的应用是有效的,快速,低成本和无处不在。在确定革兰氏染色中的主要病原体后,根据世界卫生组织意识,可以开始半定量的先发制人的抗生素治疗,观察和限制基本药物清单。这个列表迎合了每个国家,是一个强大的工具。然而,当地微生物流行病学的一些基本知识是选择最合适的药物所必需的。我们报告了我们使用快速可用的革兰氏染色来缩小上市抗生素的优先选择的经验,作为DFI中抗生素管理的经济工具。
    结论:在DFI的实际和资源节约管理中,在资源丰富的国家,革兰氏染色剂的“治疗性”使用并不常见,但应添加到抗生素管理的一般努力中。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcers in developing countries often become infected. The healthcare systems are often not equipped to conduct the culture and the sensitivity tests required for prescribing a targeted antibiotic treatment for diabetic foot infection (DFI).
    METHODS: We evaluate antibiotic stewardship programmes for DFIs, at every level of health care, with an emphasis on resource-poor settings such as in Africa.
    RESULTS: The management of DFI very often is adapted to the financial and practical realities of the resource-poor regions. The application of the point-of-care Gram stain of deep tissue samples is efficient, rapid, low cost and ubiquitously available. Upon the identification of the predominant pathogen in the Gram stain, a semi-quantitative preemptive antibiotic treatment can be started in accordance with the World Health Organization Aware, Watch and Restrict Essential Medicine List. This list is catered to every country and is a powerful tool. However, some basic knowledge of the local microbiological epidemiology is necessary to choose the most appropriate agent. We report our experience on using the rapidly available Gram stain for narrowing the preemptive choice of listed antibiotic agents, as an economic tool for antibiotic stewardship in DFIs.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the practical and resource-saving management of DFI, the \'therapeutic\' use of Gram stains is not common in resource-rich countries but should be added to the arsenal of the general efforts for antibiotic stewardship.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    滥用抗生素会导致抗生素耐药性(AMR)并导致死亡,发病率,和财政负担。带有教育的抗生素管理计划(ASP)可以解决成功实施ASP的许多障碍。这项研究的目的是评估2022年卫生专业人员对医院ASP的看法和状况。
    从2022年9月1日至2022年10月30日进行了横断面研究。共包括181名卫生专业人员,并使用自我管理问卷收集数据.使用检查表评估医院的状况。使用SPSS版本23对数据进行分析,并使用描述性统计和卡方检验(X2),P值<0.05。
    在181名受访者中,163(90.1%),161人(89.0%)认为AMR在埃塞俄比亚和全球都是一个重大问题,分别。容易获得抗生素155(85.6%),不适当使用137(75.7%)被认为是AMR的主要贡献者。抗生素被认为是处方/分配没有实验室结果86(47.5%),和抗生素敏感性模式不被认为是指导经验性治疗81(44.8%).ASP被认为可以减少住院时间和相关费用137(75.7%),并提高患者护理质量133(73.5%),而151(83.4%),143(79%),142(78.5%)建议接受教育,机构指南,以及带有反馈干预措施的前瞻性审计,以打击他们医院的AMR,分别。根据专业类别和医院实施ASP的尝试,专业人员之间的认知存在显着差异。虽然ASP没有按照标准运行,已经尝试在三家医院实施。ASP的问题在综合医院中从未听说过。目前,在四家医院实施ASP是可行的。
    ASP在医院中的地位很差。尽管缺乏对ASP的先验知识,大多数受访者确实对AMR和ASP的实施有积极的看法。药剂师领导的前瞻性审核和反馈以及经验性抗生素使用的教育和机构指南可以在医院中更好地实施。感染预防和控制代表的参与,医院之间在ASP实施方面的合作将有助于在该领域建立强大的ASP。
    UNASSIGNED: Indiscriminate use of antibiotics leads to antibiotic resistance (AMR) and results in mortality, morbidity, and financial burden. Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) with education can resolve a number of barriers recognized in the implementation of successful ASPs. The aim of this study was to assess health professionals\' perceptions and status of ASPs in hospitals in 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional study was conducted from September 1, 2022 to October 30, 2022. A total of 181 health professionals were included, and a self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. The status of hospitals was assessed using a checklist. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, and descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests (X2) at a P-value of <0.05 were used.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 181 respondents, 163 (90.1 %), and 161 (89.0 %) believed that AMR is a significant problem in Ethiopia and globally, respectively. Easy access to antibiotics 155 (85.6 %), and inappropriate use 137 (75.7 %) were perceived as key contributors to AMR. Antibiotics were believed to be prescribed/dispensed without laboratory results 86 (47.5 %), and antibiotic susceptibility patterns were not considered to guide empiric therapy 81 (44.8 %). ASP was believed to reduce the duration of hospital stays and associated costs 137 (75.7 %), and improve the quality of patient care 133 (73.5 %), whereas 151 (83.4 %), 143 (79 %), and 142 (78.5 %) suggested education, institutional guidelines, and prospective audits with feedback interventions to combat AMR in their hospitals, respectively. There were significant differences in perception among professionals based on professional category and attempts by hospitals to implement ASPs. Although ASPs were not functioning according to standard, there have been attempts to implement it in three hospitals. The issue of ASP had never been heard in general hospitals. Currently, it is feasible to implement ASPs in four hospitals.
    UNASSIGNED: The status of ASP in hospitals was very poor. Despite a lack of prior knowledge on ASPs, most respondents do have a positive perception of AMR and the implementation of ASPs. Pharmacist-led prospective audits and feedback with education and institutional guidelines for empiric antibiotic use can be better implemented in hospitals. Involvement of representatives from infection prevention and control, and collaboration among hospitals in ASP implementation will help establish a strong ASP in the area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    The beta-lactam antibiotics are some of the safest and best-tolerated antibiotic agents; however, many patients have reported allergies against penicillin. All beta-lactam antibiotics are only restrictively prescribed for these patients and alternative antibiotics are increasingly given, which carries the risk of negative clinical results and socioeconomic sequelae; however, over 95% of patients who reported an allergy to penicillin show a negative result in the allergy tests for penicillin and this antibiotic can safely be prescribed. The use of sensitive and specific instruments for identification of false penicillin allergies should be an important topic within the framework of antibiotic stewardship. Anesthesists can play a central role in the reduction of the enormous individual and public health burden associated with the classification of penicillin allergy by taking an appropriate medical history and a risk stratification for the identification of patients with a penicillin allergy. This overview article presents a possible delabelling algorithm within the framework of the clarification of a beta-lactam antibiotic allergy. The focus is on a structured allergy anamnesis using the penicillin allergy, five or fewer years ago, anaphylaxis/angioedema, severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) and treatment required for allergy episode (PEN-FAST) score.
    UNASSIGNED: Die β‑Lactam-Antibiotika gehören zu den sichersten und am besten verträglichen Antibiotika. Viele Patienten berichten allerdings von Allergien gegen Penicillin. Diesen Patienten werden sämtliche β‑Lactam-Antibiotika nur eingeschränkt verordnet und vermehrt Alternativantibiotika gegeben, was die Risiken negativer klinischer und sozioökonomischer Folgen birgt. Jedoch weisen über 95 % der Patienten, die von einer Penicillinallergie berichten, einen negativen Befund im Penicillin-Allergietest auf und können dieses Antibiotikum sicher erhalten. Die Verwendung sensibler und spezifischer Instrumente zur Identifizierung von „falschen“ Penicillinallergien sollte ein wichtiges Thema im Rahmen der Antibiotic Stewardship sein. Durch eine angemessene Anamnese und Risikostratifizierung zur Identifizierung von Patienten mit einer Penicillinallergie können Anästhesistinnen und Anästhesisten eine zentrale Rolle bei der Reduktion der enormen individuellen und öffentlichen Gesundheitsbelastung im Zusammenhang mit der Bezeichnung Penicillinallergie einnehmen. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit wird ein möglicher Delabeling-Algorithmus im Rahmen der Abklärung einer β‑Lactam-Antibiotika-Allergie präsentiert. Der Fokus liegt auf einer strukturierten Allergieanamnese mithilfe des Scores „Penicillin allergy, within last five years, anaphylaxis/angioedema, severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) and treatment required for allergy episode“ (PEN-FAST).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:10%的人口被标记为对青霉素过敏,事实上,这些标签中有90%是不合适的。最近的研究表明,在低风险患者中,通过直接药物攻击(dDC)进行住院患者去标记是安全的。然而,有必要对门诊和非过敏症患者进行标签去除。
    目的:评估在初级保健中通过dDC对低风险成人进行去标签的安全性。
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE和Conchrane图书馆数据库,从开始到2022年3月15日(2023年6月5日更新),用于在初级保健或其他门诊的成人中进行dDC的研究.两名研究人员独立筛选研究的资格。数据提取和批判性评估由一名审阅者进行,我们将结果汇总在荟萃分析中。
    结果:在2,138个结果中,12项研究(1070名参与者)符合纳入条件。三项研究评估了初级保健中的去标签,9项研究在门诊医院环境中进行了评估。dDC期间无严重不良事件。1070例患者中97.13%无反应发生,以前被标记为青霉素过敏的人,并被安全地取消了标签。10名患者(<1%)出现了立即反应:3名患者有自限性反应,七个人需要抗组胺药,类固醇,肾上腺素和/或沙丁胺醇。
    结论:在成人门诊患者中,在阿莫西林直接激发过程中未观察到严重的过敏反应。然而,除了最近的一份报告外,这些研究质量低到中等。非专科医生去标签是有希望的,但在评估初级保健dDC的大型队列研究中,需要进一步研究正确的风险分层和安全性评估。
    BACKGROUND: Ten % of the population is labeled as allergic to penicillin(s), when in fact 90% of these labels are inappropriate. Recent studies have shown that inpatient de-labelling by a direct drug challenge (dDC) is safe in low-risk patients. However, there is a need for outpatient and non-allergist de-labelling.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of de-labelling low-risk adults by means of dDC in primary care.
    METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Conchrane Library databases, from inception to March 15, 2022 (updated June 5, 2023) for studies performing dDC in adults in primary care or other outpatient settings. Two researchers independently screened studies for eligibility. The data extraction and critical appraisal was performed by one reviewer and we pooled the results in a meta-analysis.
    RESULTS: Out of 2,138 results, 12 studies (1070 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Three studies evaluated de-labelling in primary care and 9 studies in an outpatient hospital setting. There were no critical adverse events during dDC. No reaction occurred in 97.13% of the 1070 patients, who previously labeled as penicillin-allergic, and were safely de-labelled. Ten patients (<1%) developed an immediate reaction: three had self-limiting reactions, and seven needed antihistaminics, steroids, epinephrine and/or salbutamol.
    CONCLUSIONS: No serious allergic reactions are observed during direct amoxicillin challenge in adults in an outpatient setting. However, with the exception of one recent report, these studies are of low to moderate quality. Non-specialist de-labelling is promising but further research is required on correct risk stratification and safety assessment in large cohort studies evaluating dDC in primary care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估非住院儿童社区获得性肺炎两阶段干预是否与抗生素处方改善相关。
    方法:在大型医疗保健组织中,针对2个月至17岁肺炎儿童的抗生素选择和持续时间,于2020年9月实施了第一阶段干预.活动包括临床医生教育和在电子健康记录(EHR)中实施针对肺炎的特定订单集。2021年10月,第二阶段包括额外的教育和订单调整。一种窄谱抗生素(如,在大多数情况下建议使用阿莫西林)。EHR数据用于识别肺炎病例和订购抗生素。使用中断的时间序列分析,将第一阶段(2020年9月至2021年9月)和第二阶段(2021年10月至2022年10月)后的抗生素选择和持续时间与大流行前干预期(2016年1月至2020年3月初)进行比较.
    结果:总体而言,确定了3570例社区获得性肺炎:3246例干预前,98第一阶段后,第二阶段后226。接受窄谱单一疗法的比例从干预前的40.6%增加到第一阶段后的68.4%,再到第二阶段后的69.0%(p<0.001)。对于最初使用窄谱抗生素的儿童,持续时间比干预前减少(平均持续时间9.9天,标准偏差[SD]0.5天)至第一阶段后(平均8.2,SD1.9)至第二阶段后(平均6.8,SD2.3)期(p<0.001)。
    结论:在社区获得性肺炎儿童中,两阶段干预与临床决策支持相结合,与抗生素选择和持续时间的持续改善有关。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a two-phase intervention was associated with improvements in antibiotic prescribing among non-hospitalized children with community-acquired pneumonia.
    METHODS: In a large health care organization, a phase one intervention was implemented in September 2020 directed at antibiotic choice and duration for children 2 months through 17 years of age with pneumonia. Activities included clinician education and implementation of a pneumonia-specific order set in the electronic health record (EHR). In October 2021, a second phase comprised additional education and order set revisions. A narrow spectrum antibiotic (eg, amoxicillin) was recommended in most circumstances. EHR data were used to identify pneumonia cases and antibiotics ordered. Using interrupted time series analyses, antibiotic choice and duration after phase one (September 2020 to September 2021) and after phase two (October 2021 to October 2022) were compared with a pre-intervention pre-pandemic period (January 2016 to early March 2020).
    RESULTS: Overall, 3570 cases of community-acquired pneumonia were identified: 3246 cases pre-intervention, 98 post-phase-one, and 226 post-phase-two. The proportion receiving narrow spectrum monotherapy increased from 40.6% pre-intervention to 68.4% post-phase-one to 69.0% post-phase-two (p<0.001). For children with an initial narrow spectrum antibiotic, duration decreased from pre-intervention (mean duration 9.9 days, standard deviation [SD] 0.5 days) to post-phase-one (mean 8.2, SD 1.9) to post-phase-two (mean 6.8, SD 2.3) periods (p<0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: A two-phase intervention with educational sessions combined with clinical decision support was associated with sustained improvements in antibiotic choice and duration among children with community-acquired pneumonia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定兽医首选的抗菌药物,以解决美国金毛猎犬的传染病。
    方法:3,044只金毛犬参加了金毛犬寿命研究。
    方法:人口统计学和兽医访问数据从莫里斯动物基金会金毛终身研究中检索,在2012年至2020年期间,通过问卷调查收集了3044只金毛猎犬。RStudio程序用于清理和分析数据,其中评估了最常见的诊断以及按美国地理区域分层的最常用的抗菌药物。
    结果:据报道和使用抗菌药物治疗的最常见诊断是外耳道炎,腹泻/胃炎,热点,和膀胱感染。外耳炎是最常报告的医学诊断以及抗生素处方。南部地区报告了最多的抗菌药物使用,其次是中西部和东北部。在报告的用于传染病的抗生素总数中,氨基糖苷是最常见的(370/1,874[19.74%]),其次是第一代头孢菌素,硝基咪唑,还有青霉素.
    结论:在金毛猎犬中预防外耳炎的更多努力可能会减少总体抗菌药物的使用,并促进有效的抗菌药物管理,以进一步对抗抗菌药物耐药性。
    OBJECTIVE: To identify the preferred choices of antimicrobials by veterinarians for addressing infectious diseases in Golden Retrievers across the US.
    METHODS: 3,044 Golden Retrievers enrolled in the Golden Retriever Lifetime Study.
    METHODS: Demographic and veterinary visit data were retrieved from the Morris Animal Foundation Golden Retriever Lifetime Study, following 3,044 Golden Retrievers spanning from 2012 to 2020 collected through questionnaires. The R Studio program was used to clean and analyze the data in which the most common diagnoses were evaluated along with the most frequently used antimicrobials stratified by geographical region within the US.
    RESULTS: The most common diagnoses reported and treated with antimicrobials were otitis externa, diarrhea/gastritis, hot spots, and bladder infections. Otitis externa was the most frequently reported medical diagnosis as well as prescribed with antibiotics. The Southern region reported the most antimicrobial use, followed by the Midwest and Northeast. Of the total reported antibiotics prescribed for infectious disease, aminoglycosides were the most frequent (370/1,874 [19.74%]) followed by first-generation cephalosporins, nitroimidazoles, and penicillins.
    CONCLUSIONS: More effort in the prevention of otitis externa in Golden Retrievers may reduce overall antimicrobial usage and promote effective antimicrobial stewardship to combat further antimicrobial resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗生素耐药性的巨大增加和新抗生素的有限范围,有效的抗生素是我们应该思考合理的抗感染治疗方法的原因。在临床实践中,经常发现在治疗危重病人的同时过度使用抗生素。抗生素治疗通常是经验性的,或者它只是基于治疗上的犹豫不决,不仅仅是ICU患者。在取样进行微生物分析之前施用抗生素,或者没有基于实验室发现的治疗调整。解决方案在于抗生素管理,这是确保抗生素在未来几年内足够有效的方法。
    The enormous increase in antibiotic resistance and the limited spectrum of new, effective antibiotics are the reasons why we should think about a rational approach to anti-infective therapy. The excessive and non-indicated use of antibiotics while treating critically ill patients can be found quite often in clinical practice. Antibiotic therapy is usually indicated empirically, or it is only based on therapeutic indecision, not just in ICU patients. The antibiotics are administered before taking a sample for microbiological analysis or there is no therapy adjustment based on the laboratory findings. The solution lies in antibiotic stewardship, which is the way to ensure that antibiotics will be sufficiently effective in years to come.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号