anti-microbial stewardship

抗微生物管理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据卫生部抗菌素耐药性监测计划的2017-2020年度报告,已经观察到常见致病病原体的显著耐药模式。在医院环境中,已经实施了抗菌药物管理计划,以优化抗菌药物的使用。药物利用审查研究提供了必要的反馈,以改善药物的处方和使用。
    本研究旨在回顾2019年1月至12月收治的患者中监测的肠胃外抗菌药物的药物利用情况。
    这项研究采用了回顾性研究,横截面,描述性研究设计。对给予患者的药物进行回顾性图表审查。
    共有821例患者符合纳入标准。患者年龄在18至98岁之间,52%为女性。普通内科医师(28%)是主要用于中等风险社区获得性肺炎管理的监测肠胃外抗菌药物的主要处方(39%)。他们主要用于经验性治疗感染(94%),平均给予5.73天。在所有病例中,只有58%的病例有培养和敏感性测试的订单。其中,主要有47%的人有殖民地文化。血液(29%)和痰(27%)是最常见的标本,用于培养和敏感性测试。经常分离的微生物是大肠杆菌(19%),肺炎克雷伯菌(18%),和金黄色葡萄球菌(9%)。此外,还分离了产超广谱β内酰胺酶的革兰氏阴性病原体(4%)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(1%).所有分离出的微生物对氨苄青霉素的耐药性最高(81%),对粘菌素的敏感性最高(100%)。遇到了与药物治疗相关的问题。有1例药物不良反应(0.1%)和2例禁忌症(0.2%)。在5%的病例中也观察到治疗重复。此外,39%有药物-药物相互作用。在监测的肠胃外抗菌药物中,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的消费量最高(79.50定义的每日剂量/1,000名患者天)。一些处方在评估时被认为是不合适的。根据正当性指标,12%的案件是不适当的。至于关键指标,治疗持续时间(78%)是主要原因。只有DUE标准指标的四个组成部分达到或超过了既定的阈值水平。成本分析表明,使用监测的肠胃外抗菌药物治疗的实际总费用为17,645,601.73比索。考虑到卫生部国家抗生素指南的建议,理想的治疗总费用为14,917,214.29。去年2019年收治的患者可能实现了2,728,387.44的潜在累计成本节省。
    哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的消耗量与本研究涵盖的其他监测的肠胃外抗菌药物相比相对较高。研究地点的医生很少按照国家抗生素指南的建议开出监测的肠胃外抗菌药物。这在不适当的治疗方案的发生率上得到了证明,以不恰当的治疗持续时间为主要解释。从病人的角度来看,主要的经济影响是直接医疗费用,特别是用于管理各种感染的实际抗菌疗法的成本增加。医生坚持既定的指南和选择最具成本效益的治疗方法可能会节省大量的成本。
    UNASSIGNED: Based on the 2017-2020 annual report of the Department of Health-Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Program, significant resistance patterns have been observed for common disease-causing pathogens. In the hospital setting, antimicrobial stewardship programs have been implemented to optimize the use of antimicrobials. Drug utilization review studies provide essential feedback to improve prescribing and use of medications.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to review drug utilization of monitored parenteral antimicrobials among patients admitted from January to December 2019.
    UNASSIGNED: The study employed a retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive research design. A retrospective chart review of drugs administered to patients was conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 821 patients charts met the inclusion criteria. The patients\' ages ranged from 18 to 98 years old and 52% were females. General Internal Medicine practitioners (28%) were the top prescribers of monitored parenteral antimicrobials primarily for the management of moderate-risk community-acquired pneumonia (39%). They were mostly indicated for empirical treatment of infections (94%) and were given for an average of 5.73 days.Only 58% of the total cases had orders for culture and sensitivity testing. Of which, principally 47% had colony cultures. Blood (29%) and sputum (27%) were the most common specimens taken for culture and sensitivity testing. The microorganisms often isolated were Escherichia coli (19%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (18%), and Staphylococcus aureus (9%). In addition, extended-spectrum beta lactamase-producing gram-negative pathogens (4%) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (1%) were also isolated. All the microorganisms isolated showed most resistance to ampicillin (81%) and most susceptibility to colistin (100%). There were drug therapy-related problems encountered. There was one case of an adverse drug reaction (0.1%) and two cases of contraindications (0.2%). Therapeutic duplication was also observed in 5% of the cases. Moreover, 39% had instances of drug-drug interactions.Piperacillin-tazobactam had the highest consumption (79.50 defined daily doses/1,000-patient days) among the monitored parenteral antimicrobials.Some prescriptions were deemed inappropriate upon evaluation. 12% of cases were inappropriate based on the justification indicator. As for the critical indicators, duration of therapy (78%) was the main reason. Only four components of the DUE criteria indicators have met or exceeded the established threshold level.The cost analysis indicated that the total actual cost of therapy with the monitored parenteral antimicrobials amounted to ₱17,645,601.73. Considering Department of Health National Antibiotic Guidelines recommendations, ideal total cost of treatment was ₱14,917,214.29. Potential cumulative cost savings of ₱2,728,387.44 could have been achieved for patients admitted last 2019.
    UNASSIGNED: Consumption of piperacillin-tazobactam was relatively high as compared to the other monitored parenteral antimicrobials covered in this study. Physicians at the study site seldom prescribe monitored parenteral antimicrobials as recommended by the National Antibiotic Guidelines. This is evidenced in the incidence of inappropriate therapy regimens, with inapt duration of therapy as the leading explanation.From the patient\'s perspective, the main economic implication was on the direct medical costs, particularly the increased cost of the actual antimicrobial therapy prescribed to manage various infections. Adherence of physicians to the established guidelines and selection of the most cost-effective therapy could have resulted in considerable cost savings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:在巴基斯坦,医院特别是广谱的抗生素处方不当以及随后对抗生素耐药率的影响令人担忧。减少不适当处方的一种公认方法是根据培养敏感性报告的结果调整经验性治疗。目的:使用文化敏感性报告优化巴基斯坦一家教学医院的抗生素处方。方法:在GhurkiTrust教学医院进行回顾性观察性研究。在研究期间(2018年5月和2018年12月),总共从患者中采集了465个阳性培养物。评估了患者感染部位的病原体鉴定和敏感性测试的结果。从患者的医疗档案中收集其他数据。这包括人口统计数据,样品类型,致病微生物,抗菌治疗,以及经验性或确定性治疗以及药物成本。抗菌数据使用世界卫生组织定义的每日剂量方法进行评估。结果:从465个患者样本中检测到497个分离株,因为32个患者存在微生物,其中包括309克阴性杆菌和188克阳性球菌。在497个分离株中,最常见的革兰氏阳性病原菌是金黄色葡萄球菌(甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌)(125)(25.1%),最常见的革兰氏阴性病原菌是大肠杆菌(140)(28.1%).发现大多数革兰氏阴性分离株对氨苄青霉素和co-amoxiclav具有抗性。大多数鲍曼不动杆菌对碳青霉烯类抗生素耐药。革兰阳性菌对利奈唑胺和万古霉素的敏感性最高。经验性治疗最广泛使用的抗生素是头孢哌酮加舒巴坦,头孢曲松,阿米卡星,万古霉素,和甲硝唑,而利奈唑胺的使用率高,克林霉素,美罗培南,哌拉西林+他唑巴坦在确定性治疗中可见。在220例(71.1%)革兰氏阴性感染和134例(71.2%)革兰氏阳性感染中调整了经验性治疗。与经验性治疗相比,在确定性治疗中,抗生素的使用数量减少了13.8%.确定性治疗中抗生素的平均费用低于经验性治疗(8.2%),住院时间也减少了。结论:培养敏感性报告有助于降低抗生素利用率和成本,并有助于选择最合适的治疗方法。我们还发现迫切需要在医院实施抗菌药物管理计划,并制定医院抗生素指南,以减少不必要的广谱抗生素处方。
    Background: There are concerns with inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics in hospitals especially broad spectrum in Pakistan and the subsequent impact on antimicrobial resistance rates. One recognized way to reduce inappropriate prescribing is for empiric therapy to be adjusted according to the result of culture sensitivity reports. Objective: Using culture sensitivity reports to optimize antibiotic prescribing in a teaching hospital in Pakistan. Methods: A retrospective observational study was undertaken in Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital. A total of 465 positive cultures were taken from patients during the study period (May 2018 and December 2018). The results of pathogen identification and susceptibility testing from patient-infected sites were assessed. Additional data was collected from the patient\'s medical file. This included demographic data, sample type, causative microbe, antimicrobial treatment, and whether empiric or definitive treatment as well as medicine costs. Antimicrobial data was assessed using World Health Organization\'s Defined Daily Dose methodology. Results: A total of 497 isolates were detected from the 465 patient samples as 32 patients had polymicrobes, which included 309 g-negative rods and 188 g-positive cocci. Out of 497 isolates, the most common Gram-positive pathogen isolated was Staphylococcus aureus (Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus) (125) (25.1%) and the most common Gram-negative pathogen was Escherichia coli (140) (28.1%). Most of the gram-negative isolates were found to be resistant to ampicillin and co-amoxiclav. Most of the Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were resistant to carbapenems. Gram-positive bacteria showed the maximum sensitivity to linezolid and vancomycin. The most widely used antibiotics for empiric therapy were cefoperazone plus sulbactam, ceftriaxone, amikacin, vancomycin, and metronidazole whereas high use of linezolid, clindamycin, meropenem, and piperacillin + tazobactam was seen in definitive treatment. Empiric therapy was adjusted in 220 (71.1%) cases of Gram-negative infections and 134 (71.2%) cases of Gram-positive infections. Compared with empiric therapy, there was a 13.8% reduction in the number of antibiotics in definitive treatment. The average cost of antibiotics in definitive treatment was less than seen with empiric treatment (8.2%) and the length of hospitalization also decreased. Conclusions: Culture sensitivity reports helped reduced antibiotic utilization and costs as well as helped select the most appropriate treatment. We also found an urgent need for implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospitals and the development of hospital antibiotic guidelines to reduce unnecessary prescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是验证一种临床辅助手段,以指导在澳大利亚农村地区使用的患者所列β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏的评估和管理。
    方法:农村通才,药剂师和初级医生使用该工具完成了对8个患者案例研究的在线评估。
    方法:这项研究是在南部唐斯进行的,QLD。
    方法:27名农村通才,九名药剂师和八名初级医生。
    方法:按专业和总体计算每个病例研究的选定过敏表型和管理选项的敏感性。危险反应按管理类别和专业报告。
    结果:表型选择的总体敏感性为82.4%(95%CI,78.0-86.2),管理的总体敏感性为88.1%(95%CI,84.2-91.2)。初级医生对表型选择的敏感性低于其他职业73.4%(95%CI,60.9-83.7),但未达到统计学意义(p=0.08)。总共有10/308对管理层的回应建议了限制性最小的选择,即直接去标签或口头质询,正确的答案是皮肤点刺测试或转诊给过敏专科医生。
    结论:随着进一步的教育,该工具可能成为澳大利亚农村地区增加抗菌药物管理的关键组成部分。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to validate a clinical aid to guide the assessment and management of a patient\'s listed beta-lactam antibiotic allergy for use in rural areas of Australia.
    METHODS: Rural generalists, pharmacists and junior doctors completed an online assessment of eight patient case studies using the tool.
    METHODS: The study was conducted in the Southern Downs, QLD.
    METHODS: Twenty-seven rural generalists, nine pharmacists and eight junior doctors.
    METHODS: The sensitivity of the selected allergy phenotype and management option for each case study was calculated by profession and overall. Hazardous responses were reported by management category and profession.
    RESULTS: The sensitivity overall for phenotype selection was 82.4% (95% CI, 78.0-86.2) and for management 88.1% (95% CI, 84.2-91.2). The sensitivity for phenotype selection was lower for junior doctors than other professions 73.4% (95% CI, 60.9-83.7), but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). A total of 10/308 responses for management recommended the least restrictive option of direct delabelling or oral challenge, where the correct answer was skin prick testing or referral to an allergist.
    CONCLUSIONS: With further education the tool could be a key component of increased antimicrobial stewardship in rural areas in Australia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the clinical value of serial MRSA surveillance cultures to rule out a MRSA diagnosis on subsequent cultures during a patient\'s surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admission.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate patients who received a MRSA surveillance culture at admission to the SICU (n = 6,915) and collected and assessed all patient cultures for MRSA positivity during their admission. The primary objective was to evaluate the transition from a MRSA negative surveillance on admission to MRSA positive on any subsequent culture during a patient\'s SICU stay. Percent of MRSA positive cultures by type following MRSA negative surveillance cultures was further analyzed.
    RESULTS: 6,303 patients received MRSA nasal surveillance cultures at admission with 21,597 clinical cultures and 7,269 MRSA surveillance cultures. Of the 6,163 patients with an initial negative, 53 patients (0.87%) transitioned to MRSA positive. Of the 139 patients with an initial positive, 30 (21.6%) had subsequent MRSA positive cultures. Individuals who had an initial MRSA surveillance positive status on admission predicted MRSA positivity rates for cultures in qualitative lower respiratory cultures (64.3% versus. 3.1%), superficial wound (60.0% versus 1.6%), deep wound (39.0% versus 0.8%), tissue culture (26.3% versus 0.6%), and body fluid (20.8% versus 0.7%) cultures when compared to MRSA negative patients on admission.
    CONCLUSIONS: Following MRSA negative nasal surveillance cultures patients showed low likelihood of MRSA infection suggesting empiric anti-MRSA treatment is unnecessary for specific patient populations. SICU patient\'s MRSA status at admission should guide empiric anti-MRSA therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究碳青霉烯酶基因的分布,即新德里金属β-内酰胺酶(blaNDM),Oxacillinase-48(blaOXA48),维罗纳整合子编码的金属β-内酰胺酶(blaVIM)和亚胺酶(blaIMP)在耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)中,从临床样本中分离出来。
    方法:这项横断面研究是在西部马哈拉施特拉邦的一家三级保健医院进行的,为期六个月。通过常规的圆盘扩散和改良的碳青霉烯灭活法(mCIM)鉴定CRE。对来自临床样品的总共50个连续的CRE分离物进行家庭酿造的聚合酶链反应(PCR),以检测碳青霉烯酶。
    结果:在50个CRE分离物中,在49个(98%)分离株中检测到四种碳青霉烯酶基因中的至少一种。这些基因的分布频率为90%(n=45),OXA4860%(n=30)和VIM12%(n=6)。blaNDM和blaOXA48的双重组合(50%)是观察到的最常见的模式,常与肺炎克雷伯菌相关。
    结论:研究表明,NDM的高患病率需要严格的抗微生物管理实践。对CRE和抗性机制的监测对于监测趋势并做出适当的抗微生物治疗的明智决定至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: To study distribution of carbapenemase genes namely; New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (blaNDM), Oxacillinase-48 (blaOXA48), Verona Integron-Encoded Metallo-beta-lactamase (blaVIM) and Imipenemase (blaIMP) in carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), isolated from clinical samples.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital of western Maharashtra over six months period. CREs were identified by conventional disc diffusion and modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM). A total of 50 consecutive CRE isolates from clinical samples were subjected to home brewed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of carbapenemases.
    RESULTS: Out of the 50 CRE isolates, at least one of the four carbapenemase genes was detected in 49 (98%) isolates. The frequency of distribution of these genes were NDM 90% (n = 45), OXA48 60% (n = 30) and VIM 12% (n = 6). Dual combination of blaNDM and blaOXA48 (50%) was the commonest pattern observed, which was frequently associated with Klebsiella pneumoniae.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study indicate high prevalence of NDM warranting strict anti-microbial stewardship practices. Surveillance of CRE and resistance mechanism is essential to monitor the trend and take informed decision for appropriate anti-microbial therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:世界卫生组织建议在临床环境中实施抗菌药物管理(AMS),以最大程度地减少抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)的发展和传播。当前的研究旨在评估AMS的全球研究活动,以此作为致力于遏制AMR的努力的一项措施。
    方法:采用Scopus的文献计量法。实现了经过验证的搜索查询。生成了文献计量指标和映射。研究期为1990年至2019年。搜索查询在标题或摘要中使用关键字“抗菌管理”或“抗生素管理”。此外,检索带有“限制”或“限制”(如果与“抗菌药物”或“抗生素”一起使用)的文档。
    结果:搜索查询返回了4402个文档。关键字“抗生素管理”返回2849个文档,而关键字“抗生素管理”返回1718个文档。条款限制/限制和抗菌/抗生素返回209个文件。在过去十年中,出版物和累计引用数量急剧增加。美洲地区返回最多,而东地中海地区返回最少。美国(n=1834,41.7%)排名第一。检索到的文献中的主要研究主题是(1)AMS对住院时间的影响,(2)药师的作用,(3)各种病原菌耐药性的发展。艰难梭菌(n=94)和金黄色葡萄球菌(n=76)是最常见的作者关键词。感染控制和医院流行病学杂志排名第一(n=245,5.6%,h-index=134),而在《临床传染病》杂志上发表的文件(h-index=321)获得的引用次数最高(70.7)。在机构层面,美国疾病预防和控制中心(n=93,2.1%)排名第一,其次是伦敦帝国理工学院(n=86,2.0%)。主要资助机构是国家卫生研究所。辉瑞,默克,拜耳制药公司在资助AMS研究方面发挥了关键作用。发达国家(n=3693,83.9%)和发展中国家(n=759,17.2%)之间的国际研究合作。
    结论:对抗AMR是全球责任,AMS的实施需要在全球范围内进行。应鼓励发展中国家和发达国家之间的国际研究合作。
    The World Health Organization recommended the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the clinical settings to minimize the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The current study aimed to assess global research activity on AMS as one measure for efforts dedicated to contain AMR.
    A bibliometric method was applied using Scopus. A validated search query was implemented. Bibliometric indicators and mapping were generated. The study period was from 1990 to 2019. The search query utilized the keywords \"antimicrobial stewardship\" or \"antibiotic stewardship\" in the titles or abstracts. In addition, documents with the term \"restrict\" or \"restriction\" if used with the terms \"antimicrobial\" or \"antibiotic\" were retrieved.
    The search query returned 4402 documents. The keyword \"antimicrobial stewardship\" returned 2849 documents while the keyword \"antibiotic stewardship\" returned 1718 documents. The terms restrict/restriction and antimicrobial/antibiotics returned 209 documents. The number of publications and cumulative citations showed a steep and parallel increase in the last decade. The region of the Americas returned the most while the Eastern Mediterranean region returned the least. The United States (n = 1834, 41.7%) ranked first. Main research themes in the retrieved literature were the (1) impact of AMS on hospital length stay, (2) role of pharmacists, and (3) development of resistance of various pathogens. Clostridium difficile (n = 94) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 76) were among the most frequently encountered author keywords. The Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology journal ranked first (n = 245, 5.6%, h-index = 134) while documents published in the Clinical Infectious Diseases journal (h-index = 321) received the highest number of citations per document (70.7). At the institutional level, the US Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (n = 93, 2.1%) ranked first followed by the Imperial College London (n = 86, 2.0%). The main funding sponsors were the National Institute of Health. Pfizer, Merck, and Bayer pharmaceutical companies played a key role in funding AMS research. International research collaboration between developed (n = 3693, 83.9%) and developing countries (n = 759, 17.2%).
    The fight against AMR is a global responsibility and implementation of AMS need to be carried out across the globe. International research collaboration between developing and developed countries should be encouraged.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Antibiotic resistance is a public health emergency fueled by inappropriate antibiotic use. Public education campaigns often focus on global antibiotic resistance or societal harm of antibiotic misuse. There has been little research into what messages have the greatest impact on patient preferences for nonindicated antibiotics in ambulatory clinics.
    We administered a survey at a primary care clinic in Baltimore, MD. A total of 250 participants rated 18 statements about potential harm from antibiotics on how each statement changed their likelihood to request antibiotics for an upper respiratory tract infection. Statements focused on potential harm either to the individual, to contacts of the individual, to society, and related or not to antibiotic resistance. Initial and final likelihood of requesting antibiotics was measured, and the impact of the statements in each category were compared using general linear models and Wilcoxon rank sum or Kruskal-Wallis tests.
    All statements decreased patient likelihood to request antibiotics. Statements about harm to the individual or contacts of the individual decreased participant likelihood to request antibiotics significantly more than statements about societal harm of antibiotic misuse. Statements not discussing antibiotic resistance decreased participant likelihood of requesting antibiotics significantly more than statements discussing antibiotic resistance. Overall likelihood to request antibiotics decreased after the survey by 2.2 points on an 11-point Likert scale (P < .001).
    When dissuading patients from requesting nonindicated antibiotics, providers and public health campaigns should focus on potential harm of nonindicated antibiotics to the individual rather than societal harm or antibiotic resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在没有处方的情况下从零售药店获得抗生素已被描述为全球抗微生物耐药性(AMR)的主要贡献者。在AMR率高的背景下,中国政府最近出台了关于医院抗生素使用的严格政策,但是现有的禁止在零售药店无处方销售抗生素的禁令并没有得到强有力的执行。2016年,宣布了到2020年仅处方抗生素的目标。该研究的目的是确定实现2020年目标的进展,通过估算在中国大陆三个地区无处方销售抗生素的零售药店比例。
    使用模拟患者方法,我们对东部13个省的城乡零售药店进行了针对性抽样的横断面调查,中国中部和西部。医学生介绍了轻度上呼吸道感染的情况,遵循严格的三步协议。他们记录了药房的特点,以及他们经历的细节,包括提供抗生素的步骤。
    从1106家药房获得完整数据。在没有处方的情况下,在925(83.6,95%CI:81.5,85.8%)药房获得了抗生素,279(25.2%)在第1阶段(症状仅描述),576(52.1%)在阶段2(要求抗生素),在第3阶段(要求青霉素或头孢菌素)和70(6.3%)。各省之间存在显著差异,在浙江(81/82)和贵州(98.8%)之间的抗生素使用(在任何阶段)范围为57.0%(57/100)。然而,不同城市在获得抗生素方面没有显著差异,县,乡镇或村庄(P=0.25),药房是连锁的一部分还是独立的(P=0.23),是否有执业药剂师参加(P=0.82)或是否有迹象表明需要抗生素处方(P=0.19)。
    在中国的零售药店中,无需处方即可轻松获得抗生素,尽管这是违法的.这必须作为更广泛的抗微生物管理工作的一部分来解决,其中可能包括严格执行现有法律,在公共教育运动的支持下。
    Access to antibiotics without a prescription from retail pharmacies has been described as a major contributor to anti-microbial resistance (AMR) globally. In the context of high rates of AMR, the Chinese government has recently introduced strict policies regarding hospital antibiotic use, but the existing ban on antibiotic sales without prescription in retail pharmacies has not been strongly enforced. In 2016, a goal of prescription-only antibiotics by 2020 was announced. The objective of the study was to determine progress towards the 2020 goal, through estimating the proportion of retail pharmacies selling antibiotics without prescription across the three regions of mainland China.
    Using the Simulated Patient method, we conducted a cross-sectional survey across purposively-sampled retail pharmacies in urban and rural areas of 13 provinces in eastern, central and western China. Medical students presented a scenario of a mild upper respiratory tract infection, following a strict three-step protocol. They recorded the pharmacy characteristics, and details of their experience, including at which step antibiotics were offered.
    Complete data were obtained from 1106 pharmacies. Antibiotics were obtained in 925 (83.6, 95% CI: 81.5, 85.8%) pharmacies without a prescription, 279 (25.2%) at Stage 1 (symptoms only described), 576 (52.1%) at stage 2 (asked for antibiotics), and 70 (6.3%) at Stage 3 (asked for penicillin or cephalosporins). There were significant differences between provinces, with antibiotic access (at any stage) ranging from 57.0% (57/100) in Zhejiang (81/82) to 98.8% in Guizhou. However, there were no significant differences in access to antibiotics by level of city, county, township or village (P = 0.25), whether the pharmacy was part of a chain or independent (P = 0.23), whether a licensed pharmacist was attending (P = 0.82) or whether there was a sign saying that prescriptions were required for antibiotics (P = 0.19).
    It is easy to obtain antibiotics without a prescription in retail pharmacies in China, despite the fact it is against the law. This must be addressed as part of the wider anti-microbial stewardship effort which could include intense enforcement of the existing law, supported by a public education campaign.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号