UNASSIGNED: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has proven to be a clinically efficient and cost-effective method for treating patients with degenerative cervical spine conditions. New intervertebral implant products are being developed to improve fusion and stability while decreasing complications. This study assesses the effectiveness of Tritanium C (Tri-C) Anterior Cervical Cage (Stryker) in the treatment of degenerative disk disease (DDD) of the cervical spine compared with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data prospectively collected from two institutions. Patients who underwent ACDFs for DDD using either the Tri-C cage or PEEK cage were identified. The patients\' demographics, comorbidities, operative variables, and baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected. PROs included the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and numeric rating scale (NRS) for neck and arm pain. The primary outcomes included 3- and 12-month PROs as well as the rates of 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation, and perioperative complication. The radiographic outcomes included rates of subsidence, cage movement, and successful fusion within 12 months. Multivariate linear regression models were run to identify variables predictive of 12-month PROs.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 275 patients who underwent ACDF were included in this study and were divided into two groups: PEEK (n=213) and Tri-C (n=62). Both groups showed improvement in neck and arm pain and NDI postoperatively. When Tri-C and PEEK were compared, no significant differences were observed in the 3- or 12-month changes in neck or arm pain or NDI. Furthermore, there were no differences in the rates of 90-day readmission, 90-day reoperation, and perioperative complication. Regression analysis revealed that Tri-C vs. PEEK was not a significant predictor of any outcome.
UNASSIGNED: Our results indicate that the use of porous titanium Tri-C cage during ACDFs is an effective method for managing cervical DDD in terms of PROs, perioperative morbidity, and radiologic parameters. No significant difference was observed in any clinical outcome between patients undergoing ACDF using the Tri-C cage and those in whom the PEEK cage was used.
UNASSIGNED: III.

UNASSIGNED: This study investigates the outcomes of treating neglected unstable Hangman\'s fractures through a single-stage Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) procedure with tricortical iliac crest bone grafts.
UNASSIGNED: Five patients with neglected unstable Hangman\'s fractures, treated at our institution between March 2012 and March 2017, underwent C2-C3 ACDF. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Neck Disability Index (NDI), and neurological evaluation was done using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading system. The radiological assessment included serial plain radiographs and a computed tomography scan at a 12-month follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: Postoperatively, C2-C3 angulation improved significantly, decreasing from 15° to 4.4°, and sagittal translation improved from 4.2 mm to 2 mm. The VAS score improved from 6.4 to 1.4 at 24 months postsurgery. Concurrently, NDI decreased from 70.4% to 14.8%. Fusion occurred in an average of 5.6 months. Neurologically, one patient improved from ASIA grade D to grade E, while the other four retained their grade E status.
UNASSIGNED: A single-stage ACDF with autologous iliac crest bone grafts is an effective surgical option for neglected type II/IIA Hangman\'s fractures, yielding satisfactory functional and radiological outcomes. This technique significantly corrects anterior translation and angulation, even in neglected cases, with the aid of intraoperative skull traction and plate reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type(CSA).
METHODS: The clinical data of 42 patients with CSA from January 2020 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 25 males and 17 females, aged from 30 to 74 years old with an average of (53.9±11.0) years old. There were 18 cases with single-segment lesions, 17 cases with two-segment lesions, and 7 cases with three-segment lesions. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery\'s Hearing and Balance Committee score (CHE), the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the cervical curvature Cobb angle were recorded before surgery and after surgery at 6 months.
RESULTS: All 42 ACDF patients were followed up for 6 to 30 months with an average of (14.0±5.2) months. The operative time ranged from 95 to 220 min with an average of (160.38±36.77) min, the intraoperative blood loss ranged from 30 to 85 ml with an average of (53.60±18.98) ml. Tow patients had mild postoperative dysphagia, which improved with symptomatic treatment such as nebulized inhalation. CHE score decreased from (4.05±0.96) preoperatively to (2.40±0.70) at 6 months postoperatively (t=12.97, P<0.05). The number of improved vertigo at 6 months postoperatively was 38, with an improvement rate of 90.5%. NDI score was reduced from (34.43±8.04) preoperatively to (20.76±3.91) at 6 months postoperatively (t=11.83, P<0.05). The cervical curvature Cobb angle improved from (8.04±6.70)° preoperatively to (12.42±5.23)° at 6 months postoperatively (t=-15.96, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The ACDF procedure has outstanding clinical efficacy in treating CSA. The operation can rapidly relieve patients\' episodic vertigo symptoms by relieving bony compression and reconstructing cervical curvature. However, it is necessary to strictly grasp the indications for surgery and clarify the causes of vertigo in patients, and ACDF surgery is recommended for CSA patients for whom conservative treatment is ineffective.

Vascular complications succeeding anterior cervical spine surgery are rare, but their consequences represent a major burden for the patient. Cerebral infarction following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is uncommon. However, screening for risk factors before surgery should become mandatory. We present the case of a patient with no significant medical history who underwent ACDF for a C5/C6 herniated disc with myelopathy. Although the surgery was uneventful, after the surgery, partial right palpebral ptosis and miosis were noted, suggestive of Horner syndrome. On the fifth postoperative day, the patient experienced left hemiplegia and drowsiness. An emergency CT scan and cerebral MRI revealed ischemia in the right middle cerebral artery territory. The patient was transferred to a neurology center for mechanical thrombectomy, which revealed a complete occlusion of the right internal carotid artery. The procedure had to be halted due to blood extravasation at the internal carotid artery bifurcation to prevent further complications. An angio-CT examination of the cervical arteries exposed a soft atheromatous plaque on the right internal carotid artery, immediately after the bifurcation. Despite the patient having no significant medical history, blood tests indicated dyslipidemia. At the two-month follow-up, the patient remained hemiplegic, with mild dysphasia. Performing carotid and vertebral Doppler ultrasound before cervical spine surgery might be useful, whenever possible, to assess high-risk factors for ischemic events and avoid such debilitating complications.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to compare rates of dysphagia and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following long-segment (≥ 3 levels) anterior cervical spinal fusion (ACF) and posterior cervical spinal fusion (PCF) at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. PROs were also compared for patients with dysphagia versus those without dysphagia.
METHODS: A prospectively collected quality improvement database was used to identify patients who had a long-segment cervical spinal fusion. Cohorts were divided into ACF and PCF groups. Eating Assessment Tool-10 scores and PROs were obtained for all patients preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively to compare. Multivariate analysis was also performed to evaluate risk factors for dysphagia.
RESULTS: A total of 132 patients met the inclusion criteria, 77 of whom had undergone ACF and 55 of whom had undergone PCF. Dysphagia rates between ACF and PCF cohorts were similar at baseline (13.0% vs 18.2%, p = 0.4). New-onset dysphagia rates were also comparable at 3-month follow-up (39.7% vs 23.1%, p = 0.08) and 12-month follow-up (32.6% vs 32.4%, p > 0.99). Patients who underwent PCF had worse Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores at 3 months than did patients with ACF (13.67 ± 9.49 vs 10.55 ± 6.24, respectively; p = 0.03). There were significantly higher NDI scores for patients with dysphagia at 3 months in both the ACF and PCF groups and at 12 months for those in the PCF group. Analogously, EuroQol-5 Dimensions scores were worse for patients with dysphagia; however, this was only significant for patients in the ACF group at 3 months. There were no significant risk factors for the development of dysphagia found on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar rates and severity of dysphagia were seen following ACF and PCF at 3- and 12-month follow-up. This suggests that long-term dysphagia following cervical fusion surgery may be due to structural changes from the fusion rather than the surgical approach. However, the ACF cohort was significantly younger, and this may have partially accounted for the findings. PROs were also compared for patients with and without dysphagia, demonstrating worsened outcomes in some domains for patients who presented with dysphagia at 3- and 12-month follow-up. This suggests that dysphagia may be associated with a decreased quality of life after cervical fusion.

METHODS: Systematic Review.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate which cervical deformity correction technique between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) produces better clinical, radiographic, and operative outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis comparing studies involving ACDF and ACCF. Adult patients with either original or previously treated cervical spine deformities were included. Two independent reviewers categorized extracted data into clinical, radiographic, and operative outcomes, including complications. Clinical assessments included patient-reported outcomes; radiographic evaluations examined C2-C7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, T1-CL, C2-7 SVA, and graft stability. Surgical measures included surgery duration, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications.
RESULTS: 26 studies (25727 patients) met inclusion criteria and were extracted. Of these, 14 studies (19077 patients) with low risk of bias were included in meta-analysis. ACDF and ACCF similarly improve clinical outcomes in terms of JOA and NDI, but ACDF is significantly better at achieving lower VAS neck scores. ACDF is also more advantageous for improving cervical lordosis and minimizing the incidence of graft complications. While there is no significant difference between approaches for most surgical complications, ACDF is favorable for reducing operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: While both techniques benefit cervical deformity patients, when both techniques are feasible, ACDF may be superior with respect to VAS neck scores, cervical lordosis, graft complications and certain perioperative outcomes. Further studies are recommended to address outcome variability and refine surgical approach selection.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of applying CT Hounsfield Units (HUs) for the assessment of preoperative paraspinal muscle fat infiltration (FI) in different segments in patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). To compare the consistency of preoperative paraspinal muscle FI evaluations using MRI and those via CT HUs in patients who underwent ACDF surgery.
METHODS: Ninety-five patients (45 males and 50 females, aged 37‒71 years) who received CT and MRI examinations and underwent ACDF surgery were retrospectively analyzed. In the axial T2-weighted MR images at the median level of the C3/4, C4/5, and C5/6 segments, regions of interests (ROIs) were delineated along the boundaries of the cervical multifidus (MF) and semispinalis cervicis (Scer) muscles. Using the threshold tool in ImageJ software, areas of fat tissue and intermuscular septa within the ROI were quantified. The effective cross-sectional area (ECSA) for each side was obtained by subtracting the areas of fat tissue and intermuscular septa from the total ROI area. The ratio of the fat tissue area to the CSA was then calculated to determine the initial FI value. The depth of subcutaneous fat from the midline spinous process to the epidermis at the median plane of the C4/5 intervertebral disc was measured. The initial FI values were then divided by the depth of fat to determine the post-correction FI value. Using the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS), at identical segments and planes, ROIs were delineated using the same method as in MRI under a standard soft tissue window (width of 500 HU, level of 60 HU). The CT HU values were measured within these defined areas. The CT HU values from both sides are summed to obtain the total HU value for the segment. According to whether the measurement results of two sets of data follow a normal distribution, Pearson\'s test or Sperman\'s test was used to analyze the correlation.
RESULTS: On MRI, a statistically significant difference was observed in the post-correction FI only at the C3/4 segment compared to the other two segments (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the post-correction FI between the C4/5 and C5/6 segments was noted (P > 0.05). The CT HU results showed a substantial discrepancy between C3/4 and C4/5 segments and between C3/4 and C5/6 segments (P < 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was found in the CT HU value between the C4/5 and C5/6 segments (P > 0.05). The consistency analysis revealed a relatively strong correlation between the post-correction FI and CT HU values of the C3/4 and C4/5 segments. Furthermore, a strong correlation was detected in the variations in the measurement outcomes at the C5/6 segment.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring surgical treatment for the cervical spine exhibit varying degrees of FI in paraspinal muscles across different locations and segments. Evaluating the degree of FI in the paraspinal muscles of the cervical spine through CT HU values is feasible. There is considerable consistency between the post-correction FI assessed under MRI and the measurements of CT HU values in evaluating the FI of paraspinal muscles in the cervical spine.

OBJECTIVE: Nonunion and significant subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are associated with poor clinical outcomes, which occasionally lead to revision surgery. Allograft and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages are the two most commonly used interbody spacer devices for ACDF. Although studies have been conducted to compare the efficacies of these two interbody materials, the question remains regarding the superiority of one over the other. Therefore, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare nonunion, subsidence, and reoperation rates after ACDF using allograft and PEEK cages as interbody devices.
METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors systematically searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies published prior to November 2023 that compared the efficacy and safety of allograft and PEEK cages for ACDF. A pooled analysis was designed to identify differences in nonunion, subsidence, and reoperation rates between the two interbody devices.
RESULTS: Ten studies involving 1462 patients (allograft, 852 patients; PEEK cage, 610 patients) were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that allograft had a significantly lower rate of nonunion compared to that of PEEK cages (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.79; p = 0.01). Furthermore, the reoperation rate due to nonunion was significantly higher with PEEK cages compared to that with allograft (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.71; p < 0.01), whereas the reoperation rate due to overall causes did not display significant results (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.11-1.29; p = 0.12). The incidence of significant subsidence (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.28-1.55; p = 0.34) and the mean amount of subsidence (standard mean difference 0.03, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.47; p = 0.90) did not demonstrate significant differences between allograft and PEEK cages.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the current meta-analysis suggests the advantages of allograft over PEEK cages used for ACDF, due to an enhanced fusion rate and minimized revision risk, with no increase in the risk of subsidence.

The aim of this study was to quantitatively study the effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) on the risk of spinal injury under frontal impact. A head-neck finite element model incorporating active neck muscles and soft tissues was developed and validated. Based on the intact head-neck model, three ACDF models (single-level, two-level and three-level) were used to analyze the frontal impact responses of the head-neck. The results revealed that various surgical approaches led to distinct patterns of vertebral damage under frontal impact. For single-level and three-level ACDFs, vertebral destruction was mainly concentrated at the lower end of the fused segment, while the other vertebrae were not significantly damaged. For two-level ACDF, the lowest vertebra was the first to suffer destruction, followed by severe damage to both the upper and lower vertebrae, while the middle vertebra of the cervical spine exhibited only partial damage around the screws. Fusion surgery for cervical spine injuries predominantly influences the vertebral integrity of the directly fused segments when subjected to frontal impact, while exerting a comparatively lesser impact on the cross-sectional properties of adjacent, non-fused segments.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, clinical outcomes, and radiological results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with zero-profile anchored spacer (ZPAS) versus plate and cage (PC) for 3-level contiguous cervical degenerative disease.
METHODS: The study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024512706). The Web of Science core collection, PubMed, and Embase were searched up to February 12, 2024. Review Manager 5.3 was used. The relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval were evaluated for dichotomous data. Continuous data were assessed using the mean difference and 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS: Nine studies comparing ACDF with ZPAS versus PC for 3-level contiguous cervical degenerative disease were included. The intraoperative blood loss and operation time in ZPAS were significantly less than those in PC. The subsidence rate, loss of cervical alignment, fusion segmental height, and intervertebral disc height were significantly greater in ZPAS than in PC. The cervical alignment and dysphagia rate within 6 months were significantly lower in ZPAS than in PC. The ASD of ZPAS was significantly lower than that of PC according to the sensitivity analysis when 1 study was excluded. No significant differences were identified in the other aspects.
CONCLUSIONS: Both ACDF with ZPAS and PC were safe and effective procedures. PC was associated with increased surgical trauma. The ZPAS could better decrease the incidence of ASD and dysphagia. ZPAS was also accompanied by high subsidence rate and poor cervical alignment.