BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures (HSFs) has limitations due to malreduction and radiation exposure. To address these limitations, we integrated robotics and 3D printing by incorporating plates as reduction templates.
METHODS: The innovative technology facilitated closed reduction of HSFs in the operating theatre using 18 models with cortical marking holes. The dataset of the precontoured plate was imported into 3D planning software for virtual fixation and screw path planning. The models were divided into half to simulate transverse fractures. During the operation, the software generated drilling trajectories for robot navigation, and precise plate installation achieved automatic fracture reduction.
RESULTS: The evaluation results of reduction accuracy revealed variations in length, apposition, alignment, and rotation that meet the criteria for anatomic reduction. High interoperator reliabilities were observed for all parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technology achieved anatomic reduction in simulated bones.

Less invasive fixation techniques, such as intramedullary nailing (IMN) and minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO), are now the preferred choices for treating tibia shaft fractures (TSFs). However, malreduction and radiation exposure are the main deficiencies associated with less invasive fixation techniques, especially when assessing rotation around the shaft axis intra-operatively. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and reduction accuracy of an innovative technology that integrates robotics and 3D printing for achieving anatomical reduction of TSFs with MIPPO. The surgical workflow from a standardized CT protocol, via 3D reconstruction, 3D printing tibia model, pre-contouring plate, 3D scanning plate, 3D planning of the trajectories of the robot, and use of a commercial surgical robot, robot-assisted screw hole drilling, to automatic fracture reduction through precise installation of the plate was described. The reduction accuracy was evaluated by an optical tracking system. The mean variations of 1.95 ± 1.36mm in length, 1.63 ± 0.92 mm in apposition, 2.78 ± 1.69° in alignment, and 1.99 ± 1.81° in rotation. The interoperator reliabilities were almost perfect, with values of 0.91, 0.93, 0.92, and 0.90, respectively. The proposed technology achieved anatomic reduction on phantom bones.

UNASSIGNED: Operative treatment of displaced tibial spine fractures consists of fixation and reduction of the fragment in addition to restoring tension of the anterior cruciate ligament.
UNASSIGNED: To determine whether residual displacement of the anterior portion of a tibial spine fragment affects the range of motion (ROM) or laxity in operatively and nonoperatively treated patients.
UNASSIGNED: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
UNASSIGNED: Data were gathered from 328 patients younger than 18 years who were treated for tibial spine fractures between 2000 and 2019 at 10 institutions. ROM and anterior lip displacement (ALD) measurements were summarized and compared from pretreatment to final follow-up. ALD measurements were categorized as excellent (0 to <1 mm), good (1 to <3 mm), fair (3 to 5 mm), or poor (>5 mm). Posttreatment residual laxity and arthrofibrosis were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 88% of patients (290/328) underwent operative treatment. The median follow-up was 8.1 months (range, 3-152 months) for the operative group and 6.7 months (range, 3-72 months) for the nonoperative group. The median ALD measurement of the cohort was 6 mm pretreatment, decreasing to 0 mm after treatment (P < .001). At final follow-up, 62% of all patients (203/328) had excellent ALD measurements, compared with 5% (12/264) before treatment. Subjective laxity was seen in 11% of the nonoperative group (4/37) and 5% of the operative group (15/285; P = .25). Across the cohort, there was no association between final knee ROM and final ALD category. While there were more patients with arthrofibrosis in the operative group (7%) compared with the nonoperative group (3%) (P = .49), this was not different across the ALD displacement categories.
UNASSIGNED: Residual ALD was not associated with posttreatment subjective residual laxity, extension loss, or flexion loss. The results suggest that anatomic reduction of a tibial spine fracture may not be mandatory if knee stability and functional ROM are achieved.

In ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury, the anatomic reduction of the ankle mortise is crucial for preventing osteoarthritis. Yet, no studies have analysed the effect of surgical reduction after unstable ankle fractures on patients\' active functional outcome.
The Intraoperative 3D imaging data of patients surgically treated between 2012 and 2019 for ankle fracture with concomitant syndesmotic injury were reviewed. 58 patients were allocated to two groups depending on whether the criteria for radiologically optimal reduction were met (39 patients) or not (19 patients). Criteria for optimal reduction were composed of objectively measured and subjectively rated data. After undertaking the Olerud/Molander ankle score, a gait analysis and several active function tests using 3D motion capture were performed in order to evaluate kinetic and kinematic differences between both groups.
Patients showed deficits of range of motion and balance parameters on the injured ankle, however, there were no significant differences between both groups.
Although, the data did not show that radiological reduction criteria have a statistically significant effect on active functional outcome after a mean follow up time of 5.7 years, tendencies for a better outcome of patients that met the criteria could be seen. It also must be taken into consideration that results are limited by case number and allocation ratio, which made a sub-analysis of the separate reduction criteria unfeasible.

BACKGROUND: The extensile lateral approach (ELA) and sinus tarsi approach (STA) are commonly utilized for surgically treating calcaneal fractures. This study compared the outcomes of ELA and STA in the management of calcaneal fractures and assessed the influence of postoperative quality of reduction on functional and pain scores.
METHODS: The study included 68 adults with Sanders type-II and type-III calcaneal fractures who underwent either ELA or STA surgery. Pre- and postoperative radiographs and computed tomography scans were analyzed, and functional and pain scores were evaluated using the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, and Visual Analogue Score (VAS) during follow-up visits.
RESULTS: Out of the total patients, 50 underwent ELA surgery while 18 underwent STA surgery. The anatomic (excellent) reduction was achieved in 33 (48.5%) patients. There were no significant differences between the ELA and STA groups concerning functional scores, pain scores, the proportion of excellent reduction, and complications. Additionally, anatomic reduction, compared to near or non-anatomic (good, fair, or poor) reduction, demonstrated a decrease in MOXFQ (unstandardized β coefficient: -13.83, 95% CI: -25.47 to -2.19, p = 0.021), an increase in AOFAS (unstandardized β coefficient: 8.35, 95% CI: 0.31 to 16.38, p = 0.042), and a reduction in VAS pain (unstandardized β coefficient: -0.89, 95% CI: -1.93 to -0.16, p = 0.095) scores.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we found no significant differences regarding complications, excellent reduction, and functional scores between STA and ELA surgeries. Therefore, STA may be an effective alternative for the treatment of calcaneal fractures in Sanders type II and type III calcaneal fractures. Furthermore, the anatomic reduction of the posterior facet correlated with improved functional scores, emphasizing the importance of achieving it for restoring foot function regardless of surgery type or time between injury and surgery.

UNASSIGNED: Fractures of the talus and its associated hindfoot dislocations are uncommon. They usually result from high-energy trauma. These fractures can lead to permanent disability. Optimal treatment relies on accurate evaluation of the injury with proper imaging to identify the fracture pattern and associated injuries and to be able to make an appropriate pre-operative plan. Avoiding soft-tissue complications, avascular necrosis, and post-traumatic arthrosis are the main goal of treatment.
UNASSIGNED: We report a case of concomitant left talar neck and body fracture associated with a fracture of the medial malleolus in a 46-year-old male. We performed a closed reduction of the subtalar joint followed by an open reduction internal fixation of the talar neck/body and medial malleolus fractures.
UNASSIGNED: At 12 weeks following the treatment, the patient had good movement with minimal discomfort on dorsiflexion, he was able to ambulate with no limp. Radiographs showed appropriate healing of the fracture. The patient was able to go back to his work with no restrictions as of publication of this report. Talus fracture dislocations are not benign in nature. Meticulous attention to soft-tissue management, anatomic reduction and fixation as well as adequate post-operative follow-up is needed to obtain a satisfactory outcome and avoid the detrimental sequalae of avascular necrosis and post-traumatic arthrosis.

BACKGROUND: The system described by Matta for rating acetabular fracture quality of reduction following ORIF has been used extensively throughout the literature. However, the reliability of this system remains to be validated. We sought to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this system when used by fellowship-trained pelvic and acetabular surgeons to evaluate intraoperative fluoroscopy.
METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected acetabular fracture database at an academic level I trauma center. The quality of reduction of all acetabular fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) between May 2013 and December 2015 was assessed using three standard intraoperative fluoroscopic views (anteroposterior and two 45˚ oblique Judets). Displacement of ≤1 mm was considered to be an anatomic reduction, 2-3 mm imperfect, and >3 mm poor according to the system described by Matta. A total of 107 acetabular fractures treated with ORIF with complete intraoperative fluoroscopic images during that time period were available for review. Acetabular fracture reductions were reviewed by the operative surgeon at the time of surgery and subsequently reviewed by two fellowship-trained pelvic and acetabular surgeons. All reduction assessments were performed in a blinded fashion. The primary outcome measure was interobserver reliability for assessing reduction quality. This was evaluated using a weighted kappa (κw) statistic between each evaluator and the operative surgeon and a generalized kappa (κg) for all 3 surgeons. After a 6-week \"washout interval,\" the surgeons reviewed the images again and intraobserver agreement was calculated using a weighted kappa statistic.
RESULTS: Interobserver reliability based on the initial assessment was low (κg = 0.09); however, did slightly improve with the second assessment to fair (κg = 0.24). Intraobserver reliability ranged from slight (κw = 0.20) to moderate (κw = 0.53) among the surgeons.
CONCLUSIONS: Low interobserver and intraobserver reliability was found when quality of reduction was assessed with intraoperative fluoroscopic images by the operative and two other pelvic and acetabular surgeons using the Matta system. Given the importance of an anatomic reduction on functional and radiographic outcomes, an accurate and reliable system for assessing intraoperative quality of reduction is essential.

Various techniques are well documented to obtain anatomic reduction, such as reduction forceps, manual reduction, or a combination of these methods. However, these techniques have inherent drawbacks. We propose a new intra-operative technique for anatomic reduction using screw-wire traction for open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing posttraumatic step-offs after lateral tibial plateau fracture reduction on the intra-articular pressure.
METHODS: In eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees with intact menisci, a standardized sagittal osteotomy of the lateral tibial condyle was performed as an OTA/AO type 41-B1 fracture-model. The fragment was fixed by a customized sled including an angular stable tibia plate to evaluate step-offs from 0 mm to 8 mm in 1mm increments. In a servo-hydraulic testing machine, an axial force was applied to the tibial plateau in 0° (700N), 15° (700N), 30° (700N), 60° (350N), and 90 ° (350N) of flexion while the joint pressure was recorded by two pressure sensors.
RESULTS: A 1mm step-off did not result in an increased joint pressure. At 60° of flexion a 2mm step-off increased the lateral joint pressure by 61.84kPa (P = 0.0027). In 30° of flexion, a 3mm step raised the lateral joint pressure by 66.80kPa (p = 0.0017), whereas in 0°, 15° and 90° of flexion, a 4mm step increased the pressure by >50kPa (P < 0.05). Concomitant medial joint pressure increments were lower than those in the lateral plateau. A significant increase of 19-24kPa in the medial joint pressure was detected in 90° of flexion with a 1mm lateral step (P = 0.0075), in 15° and 60° of flexion with a 2mm step (P < 0.05), in 0° of flexion with a 4mm step (P = 0.0215) and in 30° of flexion with a 7mm step (P = 0.0487).
CONCLUSIONS: Lateral fracture step-offs of 2mm or larger should be reduced intraoperatively to avoid large increases in lateral joint pressure.

OBJECTIVE: Reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of sacroiliac joint disruptions and sacral fractures are surgical procedures for stabilizing the posterior pelvic ring. It is unknown, however, whether smaller irregularities or the inability to achieve an anatomic reduction of the joint and the posterior pelvic ring affects the functional outcome. Here, the long-term well-being of patients with and without anatomic reduction of the posterior pelvis after sacroiliac joint disruptions is described.
METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, 155 patients with pelvic injuries underwent surgical treatment. Of these, 39 patients with sacroiliac joint disruption were examined by radiological images and computer tomography (CT) diagnostics and classified according to Tile. The functional outcome of the different surgical treatments was assessed using the short form health survey-36 (SF-36) and the Majeed pelvic score.
RESULTS: Complete data sets were available for 31 patients, including 14 Tile type C and 17 type B injuries. Of those, 26 patients received an anatomic reduction, 5 patients obtained a shift up to 10 mm (range 5-10 mm). The SF-36 survey showed that the anatomic reduction was significantly better in restoring the patient\'s well being (vitality, bodily pain, general mental health and emotional well-being). Patients without this treatment reported a decrease in their general health status.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic reduction was achieved in over 80% of patients in this study. When comparing the long-term well-being of patients with and without anatomic reduction of the posterior pelvis after sacroiliac joint disruptions, the results suggest that anatomical restoration of the joint is beneficial for the patients.