airway clearance

气道清除
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:气道清除障碍对自我护理和生活质量有重大影响。确定临床数据,护理诊断,护理干预对于临床推理和加强护理至关重要。本研究旨在将现有证据映射到临床数据上,护理诊断,和护理干预措施解决了“气道清除”的护理重点。
    方法:研究是根据JoannaBriggs的范围审查方法进行的。直到2023年12月,我们搜索了四个数据库中已发表的研究。
    结果:从最初的1854项研究中确定,123人被纳入审查。调查结果强调了护理注意的两个领域:一个与体征和症状管理有关,另一个与教育和应对策略有关。导致护理诊断的数据分为认知数据和临床数据。护理诊断主要与分泌物潴留有关,过多的粘液产生,和气道阻塞。最常见的护理干预措施是将教育干预措施组装到预先设计的教育计划中,而不是为患者量身定制的计划。
    结论:研究结果可以为与“气道清除”相关的护理过程系统化增加实质性价值,提高护理决策和护理质量。这项研究于2022年12月2日在开放科学框架(OSF)进行了前瞻性注册,注册编号为wx5ze。
    BACKGROUND: Airway clearance impairment has a significant impact on self-care and quality of life. Identifying clinical data, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions is essential to clinical reasoning and enhancing nursing care. This study aims to map the existing evidence on clinical data, nursing diagnoses, and nursing interventions addressing the nursing focus on \"airway clearance\".
    METHODS: Research was conducted based on Joanna Briggs\'s Scoping Review Methodology. We searched four databases for published studies until December 2023.
    RESULTS: From the initial 1854 studies identified, 123 were included in the review. The findings highlighted two areas of nursing attention: one related to signs and symptom management, and the other related to education and coping strategies. The data that led to nursing diagnoses were divided into cognitive and clinical data. The nursing diagnoses were mostly related to secretion retention, excessive mucus production, and airway obstruction. The most commonly identified nursing interventions were educational interventions assembled into predesigned education programs rather than patient-tailored programs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings can add substantial value for systematizing the nursing process related to \"airway clearance\", improving nursing decision-making and care quality. This study was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) on 02 December 2022, with the registration number wx5ze.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:机械吹气-排气(MI-E)装置是一种常用的工具,用于清除无效咳嗽的儿童的气道。尽管该设备已被证明具有多种好处,关于父母在加拿大家庭使用经验的证据有限。这项研究的目的是探索通过IWK健康中心接受服务并在家中与孩子一起使用MI-E设备的父母的观点和经验。
    方法:本研究采用解释性描述设计。半结构化面试,与9名参与者一起进行,被录音和逐字转录。使用反思性主题过程分析了成绩单。
    结果:采访了7位母亲和2位父亲。分析后,确定了3个主题:(1)了解MI-E设备描述了参与者从意识到设备到获得有关其使用的知识和技能的旅程;(2)使用设备详细说明了MI-E设备在他们的生活中发挥的重要作用,包括围绕使用的决定,和父母的角色;(3)改变生活概述了身体,情感,和社会福利的设备提供给孩子和他们的家人。
    结论:参与者提供了他们从学习到将MI-E设备集成到孩子的日常生活和家庭生活中的旅程的详细描述。它的多重相关益处改善了孩子及其家庭的生活质量。然而,强调了对其使用进行更好的教育,因为父母和与他们一起工作的医疗保健专业人员都需要。
    BACKGROUND: A mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) device is a commonly used tool for airway clearance in children with an ineffective cough. Whereas the device has been shown to have multiple benefits, limited evidence exists regarding parents\' experiences with its home use in the Canadian context. This study\'s objective was to explore the perspectives and experiences of parents who receive service through the IWK Health Centre and use an MI-E device at home with their child.
    METHODS: The study used an interpretive description design. Semi-structured interviews, conducted with 9 participants, were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analyzed using a reflective thematic process.
    RESULTS: Seven mothers and 2 fathers were interviewed. Following analysis, 3 themes were identified: (1) Learning about the MI-E device described participants\' journey from becoming aware of the device to acquiring knowledge and skills about its use; (2) using the device detailed the integral role the MI-E device played in their lives, including decisions around use, and parental role; and (3) changing lives outlined the physical, emotional, and social benefits the device provided to the child and their family.
    CONCLUSIONS: Participants provided detailed descriptions of their journey from learning to integrating the MI-E device into their child\'s daily routine and family life. Its multiple associated benefits improved the child\'s and their family\'s quality of life. However, better education on its use was highlighted as a need for both parents and the health care professionals who work with them.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:高频辅助气道清除系统将呼气正压或振荡气道正压与集成雾化器相结合,以改善气雾剂的输送并协助气道清除。这项气雾剂研究评估了两种高频辅助气道清除/雾化器系统之间在呼气正压和振荡气道正压治疗期间的肺部输送效率。
    方法:使用BiWazeClear和Volara高频辅助气道清除/雾化器系统,在10cmH2O的呼气正压治疗和20cmH2O的振荡气道正压治疗期间评估了气溶胶输送。手机和雾化器通过烟嘴连接到解剖上呼吸道模型,并放入体积描记器中。放置气管过滤器以捕获吸入的气溶胶。真空过滤器从体积描记器中夹带了短效气溶胶。在3.0mL生理盐水溶液中雾化,使用闪烁显像扫描组件,并以初始雾化器的tech电荷为参考进行衰减校正的辐射计数。
    结果:在10cmH2O的呼气正压治疗期间,与Volara相比,BiWazeClear的气溶胶输送导致更高的肺沉积(28vs6.2%;P<.001;95%CI16.5-27.7),Volara的逃逸损失(23.7vs2.8%;P=.004)和雾化器损失(55vs3.3%;P<.001)高于BiWaze。在20cmH2O的振荡气道正压期间,气溶胶输送导致BiWazeClear相对于Volara的肺沉积较高(16.3vs7.3%;P=.005;95%CI3.3-15),而Volara的挥发性较高(22.3vs3.8%;P=.02)和雾化器(58.8vs7.2%;P=.004)。在测试期间在其他位置没有差异。
    结论:在呼气正压和振荡气道正压期间,BiWazeClear系统的输送效率高于Volara系统。高残留雾化器剂量和通过手机泄漏阀的逃逸性气溶胶损失导致Volara观察到的较低输送效率。雾化器类型,电路设计,当通过高频辅助气道清除疗法将有效的气雾剂递送到肺部时,和手持疗法是重要的因素。
    BACKGROUND: High-frequency assisted airway clearance systems combine positive expiratory pressure or oscillatory positive airway pressure with integrated nebulizers to improve the delivery of aerosols and assist with airway clearance. This aerosol study evaluated lung delivery efficiency during positive expiratory pressure and oscillatory positive airway pressure therapy of 2 high-frequency assisted airway clearance/nebulizer systems.
    METHODS: Aerosol delivery was evaluated during positive expiratory pressure therapy of 10 cm H2O and oscillatory positive airway pressure therapy of 20 cm H2O with the BiWaze Clear and the Volara high-frequency assisted airway clearance/nebulizer systems. The handset and nebulizer were attached to an anatomic upper-airway model via a mouthpiece and placed into a plethysmograph. A tracheal filter was placed to capture the inhaled aerosol. A vacuum filter entrained fugitive aerosols from the plethysmograph. After nebulization of technetium in 3.0 mL normal saline solution, the components were scanned by using scintigraphy and the decay-corrected radiation counts were referenced to the initial nebulizer technetium charges.
    RESULTS: Aerosol delivery during positive expiratory pressure therapy of 10 cm H2O resulted in higher lung deposition with the BiWaze Clear versus the Volara (28 vs 6.2%; P < .001; 95% CI 16.5-27.7), and higher fugitive losses (23.7 vs 2.8%; P = .004) and nebulizer losses (55 vs 3.3%; P < .001) with the Volara than with the BiWaze Clear. Aerosol delivery during oscillatory positive airway pressure of 20 cm H2O resulted in a higher lung deposition with the BiWaze Clear versus the Volara (16.3 vs 7.3%; P = .005; 95% CI 3.3-15) and higher fugitive (22.3 vs 3.8%; P = .02) and nebulizer (58.8 vs 7.2%; P = .004) losses with the Volara. There were no differences at the other locations during testing.
    CONCLUSIONS: The BiWaze Clear system showed greater delivery efficiency than did the Volara during positive expiratory pressure and oscillatory positive airway pressure. The high residual nebulizer dose and fugitive aerosol losses through the handset leak valve contributed to the lower delivery efficiency observed with the Volara. The nebulizer type, circuit design, and handset are important factors when targeting effective aerosol delivery to the lungs with high-frequency assisted airway clearance therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    呼吸道后遗症是NMD儿童发病和死亡的常见原因。咳嗽强度受损和导致的气道清除以及睡眠呼吸紊乱是呼吸后遗症的两个主要类别。肺科医师的常规临床评估和诊断测试是NMD儿童所需的多学科护理的重要支柱。定期监测呼吸道疾病和及时实施治疗,包括肺清除技术以及通气,可以预防与呼吸道相关的发病率,包括住院和提高生存率。此外,针对某些NMD的新型疾病修饰疗法现已推出,这显著改善了患者的临床轨迹,导致临床护理的范式转变.肺科医师正在“学习”这些疾病的新自然史,并相应地调整临床管理。
    Respiratory sequelae are a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in children with NMD. Impaired cough strength and resulting airway clearance as well as sleep disordered breathing are the two main categories of respiratory sequelae. Routine clinical evaluation and diagnostic testing by pulmonologists is an important pillar of the multidisciplinary care required for children with NMD. Regular surveillance for respiratory disease and timely implementation of treatment including pulmonary clearance techniques as well as ventilation can prevent respiratory related morbidity including hospital admissions and improve survival. Additionally, novel disease modifying therapies for some NMDs are now available which has significantly improved the clinical trajectories of patients resulting in a paradigm shift in clinical care. Pulmonologists are \'learning\' the new natural history for these diseases and adjusting clinical management accordingly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在评估知识水平,护士对气道清除的态度和做法,并探讨影响其知识的因素,态度和实践。
    方法:以问卷调查为基础的横断面研究。
    背景:气道清除是消除多余分泌物的重要方法。在神经科学护理中,护士是气道管理的重要执行者,和他们的知识,态度和实践可以影响气道清除的有效性。
    方法:本研究于2023年7月至9月在江苏省四家医院进行,中国。设计并使用有关气道清除的结构化问卷来收集数据。护士使用此问卷进行自我评分。遵循横断面研究的STROBE检查表。
    结果:年龄,工作经验,护士的最高学历和技术职称可以显著影响他们的知识。年龄,护士的最高学历和技术职称可以显着影响他们的态度。练习成绩受年龄影响显著,工作经验,技术职称,护士是否接受过气道清除技术的培训,以及部门是否制定了实施气道清除技术的程序。护士的态度与知识和实践显著相关,知识与实践之间没有显著的相关性。
    结论:这项研究表明,年龄,工作经验,最高的教育程度和培训与知识有关,态度和实践。这些发现表明,护理管理者可以根据年龄组进行气道清除训练,护士的工作经验和教育水平。
    没有患者或公众捐款。
    结论:研究结果表明,知识水平,护士在神经科学护理中与气道清除相关的态度和做法是可以接受的,这意味着护士可以更好地对患者进行气道管理。这些发现对于设计护士气道清除教育具有重要的参考意义,满足护士在临床护理实践中的需求。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the level of knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding airway clearance among nurses and explore the factors affecting the knowledge, attitudes and practices.
    METHODS: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study.
    BACKGROUND: Airway clearance is an important method of eliminating excess secretions. In neuroscience nursing, nurses are important executors of airway management, and their knowledge, attitudes and practices can influence the effectiveness of airway clearance.
    METHODS: This study was conducted from July to September 2023 in four hospitals in Jiangsu Province, China. A structured questionnaire about airway clearance was designed and used to collect the data. The nurses used this questionnaire to self-rate. The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was followed.
    RESULTS: The age, work experience, highest educational attainment and technical title of the nurses can significantly influence their knowledge. The age, highest educational attainment and technical title of the nurses can significantly impact their attitudes. Practice scores were significantly influenced by age, work experience, technical title, whether the nurses had received any training on airway clearance techniques, and whether the department developed procedures for implementing the airway clearance technology. Nurses\' attitudes were significantly associated with knowledge and practice, and there was no significant correlation between knowledge and practice.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that age, work experience, highest educational attainment and training were related to knowledge, attitudes and practices. These findings suggest that nursing managers can conduct airway clearance training according to age group, working experience and education level of the nurses.
    UNASSIGNED: No patient or public contribution.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that the level of knowledge, attitudes and practices related to airway clearance in neuroscience nursing among nurses were acceptable, which means that nurses can better perform airway management on patients. These findings serve as a significant reference for designing an airway clearance education for nurses and meet the needs of nurses in clinical nursing practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:气道清除(ACT)和肺容量募集(LVR)技术用于管理支气管分泌物,增加咳嗽效率和肺/胸壁募集,预防和治疗呼吸道感染。该研究的目的是回顾法国儿童家庭使用的ACT/LVR技术的处方。
    方法:邀请国家儿科无创通气(NIV)网络的所有中心为每个年龄≤20岁的儿童填写匿名问卷,这些儿童在2022年至2023年之间开始使用ACT/LVR设备进行治疗。这些装置包括机械排气(MI-E),间歇性正压呼吸(IPPB),肺内冲击通气(IPV),和/或用于ACT/LVR的有创机械通气(IMV)/NIV。
    结果:13个中心纳入了139名患者。83例(60%)患者开始IPPB,MI-E为43(31%),IPV为30(22%)。没有患者使用IMV/NIV进行ACT/LVR。这些设备主要由儿科肺科医师(103,74%)处方。开始时的平均年龄为8.9±5.6(0.4-18.5)岁。ACT/LVR设备主要用于神经肌肉疾病(n=66,47%)和神经残疾(n=37,27%)的患者。MI-E的主要起始标准是咳嗽辅助(81%)和气道清除(60%),IPPB的胸腔动员(63%)和肺活量(47%),和气道清除率(73%)和反复呼吸加重(57%)的IPV。父母是在家进行治疗的主要照顾者。
    结论:IPPB是最常用的技术。疾病和启动标准是不同的,强调需要研究验证这些技术的适应症和设置。
    BACKGROUND: Airway clearance (ACT) and lung volume recruitment (LVR) techniques are used to manage bronchial secretions, increase cough efficiency and lung/chest wall recruitment, to prevent and treat respiratory tract infections. The aim of the study was to review the prescription of ACT/LVR techniques for home use in children in France.
    METHODS: All the centers of the national pediatric noninvasive ventilation (NIV) network were invited to fill in an anonymous questionnaire for every child aged ≤20 years who started a treatment with an ACT/LVR device between 2022 and 2023. The devices comprised mechanical in-exsufflation (MI-E), intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB), intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV), and/or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)/NIV for ACT/LVR.
    RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients were included by 13 centers. IPPB was started in 83 (60 %) patients, MI-E in 43 (31 %) and IPV in 30 (22 %). No patient used IMV/NIV for ACT/LVR. The devices were prescribed mainly by pediatric pulmonologists (103, 74 %). Mean age at initiation was 8.9 ± 5.6 (0.4-18.5) years old. The ACT/LVR devices were prescribed mainly in patients with neuromuscular disorders (n = 66, 47 %) and neurodisability (n = 37, 27 %). The main initiation criteria were cough assistance (81 %) and airway clearance (60 %) for MI-E, thoracic mobilization (63 %) and vital capacity (47 %) for IPPB, and airway clearance (73 %) and repeated respiratory exacerbations (57 %) for IPV. The parents were the main carers performing the treatment at home.
    CONCLUSIONS: IPPB was the most prescribed technique. Diseases and initiation criteria are heterogeneous, underlining the need for studies validating the indications and settings of these techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:雾化高渗盐水(HS)和呼气正压装置(PEP)通常用于支气管扩张患者。我们试图描述使用HS和PEP的患者的临床特征,利用大型国家数据库注册表。
    方法:本研究使用美国支气管扩张和NTM研究注册的数据。包括诊断为支气管扩张的患者。符合条件的患者被分配到四个相互排斥的组之一:仅HS,仅限PEP,HS&PEP,或没有气道清除或粘液活性剂。对整个研究人群进行描述性统计,并按四组进行分层。使用单因素方差分析和卡方检验来测试四组中连续变量的均值差异和分类变量之间的关联(分别)。
    结果:共纳入2195例患者。患有支气管扩张和咳嗽的人中,仅使用HS的患者数量多于仅使用PEP的患者数量(17.5%vs9.1%,p<0.001)。在铜绿假单胞菌中发现了类似的关联(仅22.3%HSvs仅6.5%PEP,p<0.001)。使用HS和PEP联合治疗的患者数量高于单独使用PEP治疗的患者(25.0%vs9.1%,p=0.002),那些有生产性咳嗽的人。
    结论:在支气管扩张伴咳嗽或铜绿假单胞菌的患者中,HS比单独使用PEP更常用。需要进一步分析,以比较这两种模式,并探讨影响其利用的因素。
    BACKGROUND: Nebulized Hypertonic saline (HS) and positive expiratory pressure device (PEP) are often used in patients with bronchiectasis. We sought to describe the clinical characteristics in patients using HS and PEP, utilizing a large national database registry.
    METHODS: Data from the US Bronchiectasis and NTM Research Registry were used in this study. Patients with a diagnosis of bronchiectasis were included. Eligible patients were assigned to one of four mutually exclusive groups: HS only, PEP only, HS & PEP, or no airway clearance or mucoactive agent. Descriptive statistics were computed for the overall study population and stratified by the four groups. One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to test the difference in the means in continuous variables and the association between categorical variables (respectively) across the four groups.
    RESULTS: A total of 2195 patients were included. Of those with bronchiectasis and a productive cough, a greater number of patients utilized HS only vs PEP only (17.5 % vs 9.1 %, p < 0.001). Similar association was found in those with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.3 % HS only vs 6.5 % PEP only, p < 0.001). There was a higher number of patients who used HS and PEP therapy in combination vs PEP therapy alone (25.0 % vs 9.1 %, p = 0.002), in those with a productive cough.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bronchiectasis and a productive cough or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, HS is used more often than PEP alone. There is a need for further analysis to compare these two modalities and explore the factors influencing their utilization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性或慢性呼吸系统疾病继发的呼吸功能受损造成了重大的临床和医疗保健负担。肺内冲击通气(IPV)在各种临床环境中用于治疗过多的气道分泌物,肺不张,气体交换受损。尽管IPV的广泛使用,缺乏IPV应用的临床指导,这可能导致临床实践的不一致。本综述旨在总结IPV的临床应用方法和剂量,为临床医生和研究人员提供指导。进行了两阶段的系统搜索,以检索在住院和门诊环境中使用IPV的研究。MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,Scopus,谷歌学者从1979年1月到2022年被搜索。包括年龄≥16岁并以任何语言发表的患者的研究。两名审稿人独立筛选标题和摘要,查看全文文章,并提取数据。搜索产生514项研究。删除重复项和不相关的研究后,有905名参与者的25项研究符合纳入标准。这是第一次范围审查,以总结重症监护病房(ICU)现有研究中的IPV应用方法和剂量,急性住院患者(非ICU),和门诊设置。注意到IPV的临床应用和规定剂量的一些变化。尽管有变化,我们观察并总结了临床应用和IPV剂量处方的共同趋势,以协助临床医生进行IPV干预.尽管无法提供基于证据的临床指南,这篇综述提供了有关IPV应用和剂量的详细信息,以便提供临床指导,并为将来制定临床实践指南奠定基础.
    Impaired respiratory function secondary to acute or chronic respiratory disease poses a significant clinical and healthcare burden. Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) is used in various clinical settings to treat excessive airway secretions, pulmonary atelectasis, and impaired gas exchange. Despite IPV\'s wide use, there is a lack of clinical guidance on IPV application which may lead to inconsistency in clinical practice. This scoping review aimed to summarise the clinical application methods and dosage of IPV used by clinicians and researchers to provide guidance. A two-staged systematic search was conducted to retrieve studies that used IPV in inpatient and outpatient settings. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google scholar were searched from January 1979 till 2022. Studies with patients aged ≥16 years and published in any language were included. Two reviewers independently screened the title and abstract, reviewed full text articles, and extracted data. Search yielded 514 studies. After removing duplicates and irrelevant studies, 25 studies with 905 participants met the inclusion criteria. This is the first scoping review to summarise IPV application methods and dosages from the available studies in intensive care unit (ICU), acute inpatient (non-ICU), and outpatient settings. Some variations in clinical applications and prescribed dosages of IPV were noted. Despite variations, common trends in clinical application and prescription of IPV dosages were observed and summarised to assist clinicians with IPV intervention. Although an evidence-based clinical guideline could not be provided, this review provides detailed information on IPV application and dosages in order to provide clinical guidance and lays a foundation towards developing a clinical practice guideline in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    为了限制疾病的进展,囊性纤维化(pwCF)患者每天进行呼吸理疗,这被认为是管理他们病情的最繁重的常规。elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor(ETI)组合改变了呼吸管理。
    调查在ETI治疗1年中感知的治疗负担如何变化。
    前瞻性观察性研究。
    在开始ETI治疗之前,然后在6-12个月时,对pwCF和pwCF<18年的护理人员进行临时问卷调查。实施囊性纤维化问卷修订(CFQ-R)和鼻窦结果测试(SNOT-22)以探索疾病相关症状和社会限制。国际身体活动问卷用于确定身体活动水平。对混合效应模型进行了拟合,以探索在1年内进行呼吸理疗的时间是否发生变化。
    该研究包括47/184pwCF,年龄为21.4(5.7)年,完成ETI治疗1年。6个月时,气雾剂治疗时间减少2.5(95%CI-32.9至27.8)分钟/天,气道清除治疗时间(ACTs)减少8.8(95%CI-25.9至8.3)分钟/天,呼吸设备的清洁和消毒时间减少了10.6(95%CI-26.5至5.3)分钟/天。在1年,平均节省了近15分钟/天的时间。在1年,5/47(10.6%)pwCF报告他们已停用呼气正压面罩。
    ETI上的PwCF可能会注意到参与日常呼吸理疗的时间减少。尽管如此,气溶胶疗法,ACTs和维护呼吸设备仍然被认为是耗时的日常活动。
    了解使用三联疗法在囊性纤维化患者中进行呼吸理疗的挑战:一项为期一年的研究。为了减缓他们疾病的进展,囊性纤维化患者通常每天进行呼吸理疗,他们发现这是管理病情最具挑战性的部分。elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor组合改变了他们管理呼吸健康的方式。我们想看看在使用elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor的一年中,治疗的感知难度如何变化。在开始三联疗法之前,我们向囊性纤维化患者及其护理人员进行了问卷调查,并在6-12个月再次进行了问卷调查。我们还使用了两份国际问卷来了解与该疾病相关的症状和社会限制。国际身体活动问卷帮助我们了解他们的身体活动水平。我们使用统计模型来查看一年来呼吸理疗所花费的时间是否发生变化。我们的研究涉及47例囊性纤维化患者,平均年龄21岁,他完成了一年的elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor治疗。六个月后,每天使用气雾剂治疗的时间减少2.5分钟,气道清除治疗的时间每天减少8.8分钟,清洁呼吸设备的时间每天减少10.6分钟。到今年年底,他们平均每天节省近15分钟。一年,47人中有5人说他们已经停止使用呼气正压面罩。使用elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor的囊性纤维化患者可能会发现他们在日常呼吸理疗程序上花费的时间更少。然而,像气溶胶疗法这样的活动,气道清除疗法,维持呼吸设备仍然被认为是耗时的。
    UNASSIGNED: To limit the progression of disease, people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) perform daily respiratory physiotherapy, which is perceived as the most burdensome routine in managing their condition. The elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) combination has changed respiratory management.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate how the perceived treatment burden changed in 1 year of treatment with ETI.
    UNASSIGNED: Prospective observational study.
    UNASSIGNED: Ad hoc questionnaires for the pwCF and for the caregivers of pwCF < 18 years were administered before the initiation of ETI therapy and then at 6-12 months. The Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) and the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) were administered to explore disease-related symptoms and social limitations. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to determine levels of physical activity. Mixed-effect models were fitted to explore whether the time engaged in respiratory physiotherapy changed during 1 year.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 47/184 pwCF aged 21.4 (5.7) years, who completed 1 year of ETI therapy. At 6 months, time on aerosol therapy was decreased by 2.5 (95% CI -32.9 to 27.8) min/day, time on airway clearance therapies (ACTs) was decreased by 8.8 (95% CI -25.9 to 8.3) min/day, and time for cleaning and disinfecting respiratory equipment was decreased by 10.6 (95% CI -26.5 to 5.3) min/day. At 1 year, gains in time saved were nearly 15 min/day on average. At 1 year, 5/47 (10.6%) pwCF reported that they had discontinued positive expiratory pressure mask.
    UNASSIGNED: PwCF on ETI may note less time engaged in their daily respiratory physiotherapy routine. Nonetheless, aerosol therapy, ACTs and maintaining respiratory equipment were still perceived as time-consuming daily activities.
    Understanding the challenges of respiratory physiotherapy in individuals with cystic fibrosis using triple therapy: a one-year study.In order to slow down the progression of their disease, people with cystic fibrosis typically do daily respiratory physiotherapy, which they find to be the most challenging part of managing their condition. The elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor combination has changed how they manage their respiratory health. We wanted to see how the perceived difficulty of the treatment changed over one year of using elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. We gave questionnaires to people with cystic fibrosis and to their caregivers before they started the triple therapy and again at 6-12 months. We also used two international questionnaires to learn about symptoms and social limitations related to the disease. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire helped us understand their physical activity levels. We used statistical models to see if the time spent on respiratory physiotherapy changed over the year. Our study involved 47 individuals with cystic fibrosis, with an average age of 21 years, who completed one year of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor therapy. After 6 months, time spent on aerosol therapy decreased by 2.5 minutes per day, time on airway clearance therapies decreased by 8.8 minutes per day, and time for cleaning respiratory equipment decreased by 10.6 minutes per day. By the end of the year, they were saving almost 15 minutes per day on average. At one year, 5 out of 47 said they had stopped using the positive expiratory pressure mask. People with cystic fibrosis using elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor may find that they spend less time on their daily respiratory physiotherapy routine. However, activities like aerosol therapy, airway clearance therapies, and maintaining respiratory equipment were still seen as time-consuming.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:建议对患有慢性肺部疾病和粘液分泌过多的人进行气道清除干预,但是很少有公开的护理模式或气道清除服务提供的描述。此评估描述了一个专门的,理疗主导,大城市本地卫生网络中基于社区的气道清除服务。
    方法:使用现有气道清除服务管理数据库进行回顾性评估。
    方法:在5年内(2017年1月1日至2021年12月31日)所有首次转诊气道清除服务。
    方法:可用的服务数据分为四个领域:参与者人口统计、推荐人口统计,服务提供和结果。
    结果:在1335名有资格纳入的首次转介中,1157人(87%)参加。支气管扩张是最常见的疾病(n=649/1135,49%)。共服务2996次(面对面诊所n=2108,70%,电话n=736,25%,远程医疗n=99,3%,家访n=53,2%)。经常规定的气道间隙装置是Aerobika(525/1157,45%),气泡呼气正压(263/1157,23%)和Acapella(127/1157,11%)。平均而言,首次预约呼吸道清除服务是在转诊后的36天内进行的,人们三次参加了这项服务。个人自愿填写服务前/后问卷大约三分之一的时间。至少一半的反应者报告了与最小临床重要差异一致的呼吸道症状结果测量值的改善。
    结论:此评估描述了存在的气道清除服务,提供可以计划气道清除服务的示例,实施和改进。
    OBJECTIVE: Airway clearance interventions are recommended for people with chronic lung conditions and mucus hypersecretion, but there are few published models of care or descriptions of airway clearance service provision. This evaluation describes a dedicated, physiotherapy-led, community-based airway clearance service in a metropolitan local health network.
    METHODS: Retrospective evaluation using existing airway clearance service administrative database.
    METHODS: All first referrals to the airway clearance service in a 5-year period (1/1/2017 to 31/12/2021).
    METHODS: Available service data grouped into four domains: participant demographics, referral demographics, service provision and outcomes.
    RESULTS: Of the 1335 first referrals eligible for inclusion, 1157 (87%) people attended. Bronchiectasis was the commonest condition (n = 649/1135, 49%). A total of 2996 occasions of service (face to face clinic n = 2108, 70%, phone n = 736, 25%, telehealth n = 99, 3%, home visit n = 53, 2%) were delivered. Airway clearance devices frequently prescribed were the Aerobika (525/1157, 45%), bubble-positive expiratory pressure (263/1157, 23%) and the Acapella (127/1157, 11%). On average, initial appointment with the airway clearance service occurred within 36 days of referral and people attended the service three times. Individuals voluntarily completed both pre/post service questionnaires around a third of the time. At least half of responders reported an improvement in respiratory symptom outcome measures consistent with the minimum clinically important difference.
    CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation describes an airway clearance service as it exists, providing an example from which airway clearance services can be planned, implemented and improved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号