UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of corrective fusion for adult spinal deformity (ASD) in older people using two different sagittal correction goals: the conventional formula of \"pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch <10°\" and an undercorrection strategy based on the range of 10°≤PI-LL≤20°.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 102 consecutive patients (11 male and 91 female patients; mean age, 72.0 years) aged above 65 years with scoliosis >20° or LL<20° who had undergone long-segment fusion from the lower thoracic spine to the pelvis for ASD and had been followed-up for a minimum of two years at our institution since March 2013 were included in this retrospective study. After excluding patients with PI-LL≤-10° on postoperative standing radiographs, the remaining patients were divided into two groups: 31 patients with 10°≤PI-LL≤20° (U group) and 63 patients with -10°UNASSIGNED: The incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis and mechanical failure was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.659 and 1.000, respectively). After excluding patients who underwent reoperation due to mechanical failure, there were no differences in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and each domain of the Visual Analog Scale score, Scoliosis Research Society-22r patient questionnaire (SRS-22r), or the short form 36 health survey questionnaire at the final observation between the U (n=27) and M (n=57) groups. In addition, the non-inferiority and equivalence of the U group to the M group were demonstrated in all domains of the SRS-22r and ODI. Furthermore, the superiority of the U group was demonstrated by the functional domain of SRS-22r.
UNASSIGNED: For the sagittal correction goal in corrective fusion surgery for ASD in the elderly, strict adherence to \"PI-LL mismatch <10°\" is not necessary and \"PI-LL≤20°\" may be acceptable.

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) has not shown superior benefit overall in cost-effectiveness during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.
METHODS: Retrospective PURPOSE: Generate a risk score for pseudarthrosis to inform the utilization of rhBMP-2, balancing costs against quality of life and complications.
METHODS: ASD patients with 3-year data were included. Quality of life gained was calculated from ODI to SF-6D and translated to quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Cost was calculated using the PearlDiver database and CMS definitions for complications and comorbidities. Established weights were generated for predictive variables via logistic regression to yield a predictive risk score for pseudarthrosis that accounted for frailty, diabetes, depression, ASA grade, thoracolumbar kyphosis and three-column osteotomy use. Risk score categories, established via conditional inference tree (CIT)-derived thresholds were tested for cost-utility of rhBMP-2 usage, controlling for age, prior fusion, and baseline deformity and disability.
RESULTS: 64% of ASD patients received rhBMP-2 (308/481). There were 17 (3.5%) patients that developed pseudarthrosis. rhBMP-2 use overall did not lower pseudarthrosis rates (OR: 0.5, [0.2-1.3]). Pseudarthrosis rates for each risk category were: No Risk (NoR) 0%; Low-Risk (LowR) 1.6%; Moderate Risk (ModR) 9.3%; High-Risk (HighR) 24.3%. Patients receiving rhBMP-2 had similar QALYs overall to those that did not (0.163 vs. 0.171, p = .65). rhBMP-2 usage had worse cost-utility in the LowR cohort (p < .001). In ModR patients, rhBMP-2 usage had equivocal cost-utility ($53,398 vs. $61,581, p = .232). In the HighR cohort, the cost-utility was reduced via rhBMP-2 usage ($98,328 vs. $211,091, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows rhBMP-2 demonstrates effective cost-utility for individuals at high risk for developing pseudarthrosis. The generated score can aid spine surgeons in the assessment of risk and enhance justification for the strategic use of rhBMP-2 in the appropriate clinical contexts.
METHODS: III.

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL) is directly related to poor quality of life in adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients. The purpose of the study was to determine the most appropriate postoperative PI-LL value for patients with ADS.
METHODS: The medical records of patients with ADS in our department were retrospectively collected. The data included age, sex, body mass index, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, osteopenia, length of hospital stay, operative duration, estimated blood loss, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score, number of fusion levels, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, PI-LL, SRS-22 score, ODI score, and mechanical complications.
RESULTS: A total of 316 patients were enrolled. PI-LL, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, SRS-22 score, ODI score at the time of last follow-up were 20.7±8.5°, 23.4±14.1°, 4.0±2.1 cm, 3.7±0.9, and 18.1±5.5, respectively. In terms of mechanical complications, 88 patients (27.8%), 34 patients (10.8%), and 19 patients (6.0%) had proximal junctional kyphosis, distal junctional kyphosis, and implant-related complications, respectively. In the fully adjusted model, compared with 0 grade PI-LL group and ++ grade PI-LL group, + grade PI-LL group had the best clinical outcomes and the fewest mechanical complications. The stability of these conclusions was verified in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimal PI-LL value should be 10°-20° after corrective surgery in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis, which is associated with excellent clinical outcomes and lower complication rates. Previous criteria may be at risk of overcorrection, which may lead to proximal junctional kyphosis.

Spinal deformities, including adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and adult spinal deformity (ASD), affect many patients. The measurement of the Cobb angle on coronal radiographs is essential for their diagnosis and treatment planning. To enhance the precision of Cobb angle measurements for both AIS and ASD, we developed three distinct artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms: AIS/ASD-trained AI (trained with both AIS and ASD cases); AIS-trained AI (trained solely on AIS cases); ASD-trained AI (trained solely on ASD cases). We used 1612 whole-spine radiographs, including 1029 AIS and 583 ASD cases with variable postures, as teaching data. We measured the major and two minor curves. To assess the accuracy, we used 285 radiographs (159 AIS and 126 ASD) as a test set and calculated the mean absolute error (MAE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between each AI algorithm and the average of manual measurements by four spine experts. The AIS/ASD-trained AI showed the highest accuracy among the three AI algorithms. This result suggested that learning across multiple diseases rather than disease-specific training may be an efficient AI learning method. The presented AI algorithm has the potential to reduce errors in Cobb angle measurements and improve the quality of clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with sagittal plane deformity (N) or structural lumbar/thoraco-lumbar (TL) curves can be treated with fusions stopping at the TL junction or extending to the upper thoracic (UT) spine. This study evaluates the impact on cost/cumulative quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in patients treated with TL vs UT fusion.
METHODS: ASD patients with > 4-level fusion and 2-year follow-up were included. Index and total episode-of-care costs were estimated using average itemized direct costs obtained from hospital records. Cumulative QALY gained were calculated from preoperative to 2-year postoperative change in Short Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) scores. The TL and UT groups comprised patients with upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) at T9-T12 and T2-T5, respectively.
RESULTS: Of 566 patients with type N or L curves, mean age was 63.2 ± 12.1 years, 72% were female and 93% Caucasians. Patients in the TL group had better sagittal vertical axis (7.3 ± 6.9 vs. 9.2 ± 8.1 cm, p = 0.01), lower surgical invasiveness (- 30; p < 0.001), and shorter OR time (- 35 min; p = 0.01). Index and total costs were 20% lower in the TL than in the UT group (p < 0.001). Cost/QALY was 65% lower (492,174.6 vs. 963,391.4), and 2-year QALY gain was 40% higher, in the TL than UT group (0.15 vs. 0.10; p = 0.02). Multivariate model showed TL fusions had lower total cost (p = 0.001) and higher QALY gain (p = 0.03) than UT fusions.
CONCLUSIONS: In Schwab type N or L curves, TL fusions showed lower 2-year cost and improved QALY gain without increased reoperation rates or length of stay than UT fusions.
METHODS: III.

OBJECTIVE: Previous work comparing ASD to a normative population demonstrated that a large proportion of lumbar lordosis is lost proximally (L1-L4). The current study expands on these findings by collectively investigating regional angles and spinal contours.
METHODS: 119 asymptomatic volunteers with full-body free-standing radiographs were used to identify age-and-PI models of each Vertebra Pelvic Angle (VPA) from L5 to T10. These formulas were then applied to a cohort of primary surgical ASD patients without coronal malalignment. Loss of lumbar lordosis (LL) was defined as the offset between age-and-PI normative value and pre-operative alignment. Spine shapes defined by VPAs were compared and analyzed using paired t-tests.
RESULTS: 362 ASD patients were identified (age = 64.4 ± 13, 57.1% females). Compared to their age-and-PI normative values, patients demonstrated a significant loss in LL of 17 ± 19° in the following distribution: 14.1% had \"No loss\" (mean = 0.1 ± 2.3), 22.9% with 10°-loss (mean = 9.9 ± 2.9), 22.1% with 20°-loss (mean = 20.0 ± 2.8), and 29.3% with 30°-loss (mean = 33.8 ± 6.0). \"No loss\" patients\' spine was slightly posterior to the normative shape from L4 to T10 (VPA difference of 2°), while superimposed on the normative one from S1 to L2 and became anterior at L1 in the \"10°-loss\" group. As LL loss increased, ASD and normative shapes offset extended caudally to L3 for the \"20°-loss\" group and L4 for the \"30°-loss\" group.
CONCLUSIONS: As LL loss increases, the difference between ASD and normative shapes first occurs proximally and then progresses incrementally caudally. Understanding spinal contour and LL loss location may be key to achieving sustainable correction by identifying optimal and personalized postoperative shapes.

OBJECTIVE: Primary rod fracture after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a leading cause of revision, with recent prospective multicenter fracture rates reported at 11%-14% by 2 years. Consequently, the addition of supplemental rods has been explored to reduce fractures. Here the authors describe their experience with a novel iliac accessory rod technique in which each accessory rod anchors to an independent iliac bolt caudally via lateral connector, and attaches to the primary rod rostrally via side-to-side connector.
METHODS: This retrospective, single-center case series included patients who underwent thoracolumbar/lumbar fusion for ASD between March 2019 and August 2023. Data on baseline demographics, radiographic parameters, surgical characteristics, complications, rod fracture, and revision rates were collected. Paired, 2-tailed t-tests were used to compare pre- and postoperative radiographic outcomes. Rod fracture rates were compared to prior investigations via chi-square goodness of fit testing. The technique for iliac accessory rod placement is described.
RESULTS: The study consisted of 82 patients (mean age 66 years, 51% female, 26% with prior fusion) with a median follow-up of 2 years (IQR 28-104 weeks). A total of 50 patients (61%) had ≥ 2-year follow-up. Each surgery involved an average of 4 posterior column osteotomies and 8 segments. Iliac accessory rods were cobalt chromium and were placed bilaterally in 87% of constructs. Postoperative alignment improved significantly in the following parameters: maximum coronal Cobb angle, fractional curve, sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Of 50 patients with ≥ 2-year follow-up, rod fracture occurred in 1 (2.0%), which was incidentally found and required no intervention. The present rod fracture rate was significantly lower than the authors\' historically reported institutional rate of 21% for traditional dual-rod constructs, and the 11%-14% reported in recent prospective multicenter studies that used traditional and supplemental rod constructs (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Reoperation occurred in 12 patients (14.6%); 7 (8.5%) for proximal junctional kyphosis and 5 (6.1%) for wound complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Here the authors describe their experience with a novel iliac accessory rod technique to prevent rod fracture in patients undergoing surgery for ASD. The 2-year rod fracture rate (2.0%) in this study is significantly lower than the authors\' historical dual-rod fracture rate, and other prospective multicenter investigations. Future studies with longer follow-up are needed to determine the durability of this technique.

Despite less invasive surgical procedures in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, some older patients have complications and long recovery time. We investigated patients\' willingness to undergo the same surgery again and sought to elucidate the factors related to their perception of surgical outcomes. Enrolled were 60 of our patients (≥65 years old) that underwent long corrective fusion using lateral interbody fusion and who had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Patients were asked whether they would theoretically undergo the same surgery again: 28 answered yes (46.7 %; Group-Y), and 32 answered no (53.3 %; Group-N). There was no difference between the groups in age, sex, body mass index, frailty, preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs; Oswestry disability index [ODI] and Scoliosis Research Society 22r [SRS-22r]), surgical time, estimated blood loss, or pre-operative and 2-year post-operative radiographic parameters. Major complications had occurred more frequently in Group-N (P = 0.048). Although at 2-year follow-up there was significant improvement of spinal deformity and PROs (P < 0.001) in both groups, PROs in Group-N were inferior (Visual analogue scale [VAS] for low back pain, P = 0.043; VAS for satisfaction, P = 0.001; ODI: P = 0.005; SRS-22r: pain, P = 0.032; self-image, P = 0.014; subtotal, P = 0.005; satisfaction, P < 0.001). After multivariate logistic regression analysis with the willingness to undergo the same surgery again as an objective factor, incidence of major complication was found to be an independently-associated factor in unwillingness to undergo the same surgery again for older patients with ASD if they had the same condition in the future. Avoiding major perioperative complications is important in obtaining satisfactory perception of outcomes in ASD surgery.

Anterior column realignment via anterior, oblique, or lateral lumbar interbody fusion is increasingly recognized as a powerful mechanism for indirect decompression and sagittal realignment in flexible deformity. Single-position lateral surgery is a popular variation that places patients in the lateral decubitus position, allowing concomitant placement of lateral interbodies and posterior segmental instrumentation without the need for repositioning the patient. The addition of robotics to this technique can help to overcome ergonomic limitations of the placement of pedicle screws in the lateral decubitus position; however, its description in the literature is relatively lacking. In this review we aim to discuss the indications, advantages, and pitfalls of this approach.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in postoperative mobility status in patients with ASD, and the determining factors that influence these changes and their impact on clinical outcomes, including the rate of home discharge and long-term mobility.
METHODS: A total of 299 patients with ASD who underwent multi-segment posterior spinal fusion were registered in a multi-center database were investigated. Patient mobility status was assessed using walking aids and classified into five levels (1: independent, 2: cane, 3: walker, 4: assisted, and 5: wheelchair) preoperatively, at discharge, and after 2 years. We determined improvements or declines in the patient\'s mobility based on changes in the classification levels. The analysis focused on the factors contributing to the deterioration of postoperative mobility.
RESULTS: Two years postoperatively, 87% of patients maintained or improved mobility. However, 27% showed decreased mobility status at discharge, associated with a lower rate of home discharge (49% vs. 80% in the maintained mobility group) and limited improvement in mobility status (35% vs. 5%) after 2 years. Notably, postoperative increases in thoracic kyphosis (7.0 ± 12.1 vs. 2.0 ± 12.4°, p = 0.002) and lower lumbar lordosis (4.2 ± 13.1 vs. 1.8 ± 12.6°, p = 0.050) were substantial factors in mobility decline.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative mobility often temporarily decreases but generally improves after 2 years. However, an overcorrection in sagittal alignment, evidenced by increased TK, could detrimentally affect patients\' mobility status. Transient mobility decline associated with overcorrection may require further rehabilitation or hospitalization. Further studies are required to determine the biomechanical effects of surgical correction on mobility.