OBJECTIVE: To investigate changes in postoperative mobility status in patients with ASD, and the determining factors that influence these changes and their impact on clinical outcomes, including the rate of home discharge and long-term mobility.
METHODS: A total of 299 patients with ASD who underwent multi-segment posterior spinal fusion were registered in a multi-center database were investigated. Patient mobility status was assessed using walking aids and classified into five levels (1: independent, 2: cane, 3: walker, 4: assisted, and 5: wheelchair) preoperatively, at discharge, and after 2 years. We determined improvements or declines in the patient\'s mobility based on changes in the classification levels. The analysis focused on the factors contributing to the deterioration of postoperative mobility.
RESULTS: Two years postoperatively, 87% of patients maintained or improved mobility. However, 27% showed decreased mobility status at discharge, associated with a lower rate of home discharge (49% vs. 80% in the maintained mobility group) and limited improvement in mobility status (35% vs. 5%) after 2 years. Notably, postoperative increases in thoracic kyphosis (7.0 ± 12.1 vs. 2.0 ± 12.4°, p = 0.002) and lower lumbar lordosis (4.2 ± 13.1 vs. 1.8 ± 12.6°, p = 0.050) were substantial factors in mobility decline.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative mobility often temporarily decreases but generally improves after 2 years. However, an overcorrection in sagittal alignment, evidenced by increased TK, could detrimentally affect patients\' mobility status. Transient mobility decline associated with overcorrection may require further rehabilitation or hospitalization. Further studies are required to determine the biomechanical effects of surgical correction on mobility.

METHODS: This study was a retrospective multi-center comparative cohort study.
METHODS: A retrospective institutional database of operative adult spinal deformity patients was utilized. All fusions > 5 vertebral levels and including the sacrum/pelvis were eligible for inclusion. Revisions, 3 column osteotomies, and patients with < 2-year clinical follow-up were excluded. Patients were separated into 3 groups based on surgical approach: 1) posterior spinal fusion without interbody (PSF), 2) PSF with interbody (PSF-IB), and 3) anteroposterior (AP) fusion (anterior lumbar interbody fusion or lateral lumbar interbody fusion with posterior screw fixation). Intraoperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes, as well as complications, were compared between groups with ANOVA and χ2 tests.
RESULTS: One-hundred and thirty-eight patients were included for study (PSF, n = 37; PSF-IB, n = 44; AP, n = 57). Intraoperatively, estimated blood loss was similar between groups (p = 0.171). However, the AP group had longer operative times (547.5 min) compared to PSF (385.1) and PSF-IB (370.7) (p < 0.001). Additionally, fusion length was shorter in PSF-IB (11.4) compared to AP (13.6) and PSF (12.9) (p = 0.004). There were no differences between the groups in terms of change in alignment from preoperative to 2 years postoperative. There were no differences in clinical outcomes. While postoperative complications were largely similar between groups, operative complications were higher in the AP group (31.6%) compared to the PSF (5.4%) and PSF-IB (9.1) groups (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: While there were differences in intraoperative outcomes (operative time and fusion length), there were no differences in postoperative clinical or radiographic outcomes. AP fusion was associated with a higher rate of operative complications.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to clarify the relation between global spinal alignment and the necessity of walking aid use in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and to investigate the impact of spinal fixation on mobility status after surgery.
METHODS: In total, 456 older patients with ASD who had multi-segment spinal fixation surgery and were registered in a multi-center database were investigated. Patients under 60 years of age and those unable to walk preoperatively were excluded. Patients were classified by their mobility status into the independent, cane, and walker groups. Comparison analysis was conducted using radiographic spinopelvic parameters and the previously reported global spine balance (GSB) classification. In addition, preoperative and 2 years postoperative mobility statuses were investigated.
RESULTS: Of 261 patients analyzed, 66 used walking aids (canes, 46; walkers, 20). Analysis of preoperative radiographical parameters showed increased pelvic incidence and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch in the walker group and increased sagittal vertebral axis in the cane and walker groups versus the independent group. Analysis of GSB classification showed a higher percentage of walker use in those with severe imbalance (grade 3) in the sagittal classification but not in the coronal classification. While postoperative radiographical improvements were noted, there was no significant difference in the use of walking aids before and 2 years after surgery (P = 0.085).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant correlation was found between \"sagittal\" spinal imbalance and increased reliance on walking aids, particularly walkers. However, the limitation of improvement in postoperative mobility status suggested that multiple factors influence the mobility ability of elderly patients with ASD.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association between quantitatively assessed trunk extensor strength and gait-induced back pain (GIBP) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).
METHODS: Ninety-five patients with ASD aged ≥ 50 years who were admitted to our hospital between April 2018 and March 2023 were included in the study. GIBP was evaluated through a 6-minute walking test (6MWT), with GIBP being defined as the occurrence of back pain during the evaluation and inability to complete the test. The patients were divided into three groups: difficulty completing the 6MWT (Group 1), ability to complete the 6MWT with breaks (Group 2), and ability to complete the 6MWT without taking a break (Group 3). The main independent variable was trunk extensor strength, which was measured using a hand-held dynamometer. Ordered logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between GIBP and trunk extensor strength while adjusting for basic characteristics and radiographic parameters as covariates.
RESULTS: The numbers of patients with ASD included in each group were; 27 in Group 1 (28.4%), 31 in Group 2 (32.6%), and 37 in Group 3 (39.0%). An ordered logistic regression analysis adjusted for basic characteristics and radiographic parameters, trunk extensor strength was significantly associated with GIBP (odds ratios, 1.128; 95% confidence intervals, 1.025-1.242).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study strongly indicate that trunk extensor strength is a valuable factor associated with GIBP in patients with ASD.

UNASSIGNED: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) techniques have been extensively used in adult spinal deformity surgery. Preoperative knowledge of the optimal position of the patient on the surgical table is essential for a safe procedure. Therefore, this study aims to determine the optimal angle for positioning the patient on the surgical table during LLIF using three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT).
UNASSIGNED: Data from 59 patients (2 males, 57 females, mean age 66.3±8.6 years) with adult spinal deformities treated by performing corrective spinal surgery were included in this observational retrospective study. Simulated fluoroscopic images were obtained using 3DCT images rotated from the reference position with the spinous process of S1 as the midline to the position with the spinous process in the center of the bilateral pedicle of T12-L5. The rotation angle of each vertebra was measured and defined as the optimal rotation angle (ORA). The angle that bisected the angle between the maximum and minimum ORA was defined as the optimal mean angle of the maximum and minimum ORA (OMA) and considered the optimal angle for the patient\'s position on the surgical table, as this position could minimize the rotation angle of the surgical table during surgery. A multiple regression analysis was performed to predict OMA.
UNASSIGNED: Multiple regression analysis revealed the following equation: OMA=1.959+(0.238×lumbar coronal Cobb angle)+(-0.208×sagittal vertical axis).
UNASSIGNED: When the patient is placed on the surgical table by rotating them at the OMA, the rotation of the surgical table can be reduced, ensuring a safe and efficient surgical procedure.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) significantly impacts the quality of life due to three-dimensional spinal abnormalities. Patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29), play a crucial role in assessing postoperative outcomes. This study aims to investigate trends in PROMIS-29 scores over 36 months in patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion for ASD and provide insights into its long-term utility.
A retrospective study including 163 ASD patients undergoing long-segment thoracolumbar fusion was conducted. PROMIS-29 scores were collected at baseline and at postoperative (0-), 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, 30-, and 36-month follow-ups. Statistical analyses was performed to assess significant score changes from baseline and in consecutive recordings.
Significant improvements in all PROMIS-29 categories were observed at 36 months, with the greatest changes in pain intensity (-35.19%, P < 0.001), physical function (+29.13%, P < 0.001), and pain interference (-28.8%, P < 0.001). Between the 0 and 3 month mark, the greatest significant changes were recorded in pain intensity (-26.5%, P < 0.001), physical function (+24.3%, P < 0.001), and anxiety (-16.9%, P < 0.018). However, scores plateaued after the 3-month mark, with zero categories showing significant changes with subsequent consecutive recordings.
PROMIS-29 scores demonstrated notable improvements in ASD patients particularly in pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function. However, scores plateaued beyond the 3-month mark, suggesting PROMIS-29\'s limited sensitivity to nuanced changes in long-term patient recovery. Future investigations exploring optimal combinations of patient reported outcome measures for comprehensive short- and long-term outcome assessments in ASD surgery would be beneficial.

METHODS: A prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the PI change in different postures and before and after S2‑alar‑iliac (S2AI) screw fixation, and to investigate whether pre-op supine PI could predict post-op standing PI. Previous studies have reported PI may change with various positions. Some authors postulated that the unexpected PI change in ASD patients could be due to sacroiliac joint laxity, S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw placement, or aggressive sagittal cantilever technique. However, there was a lack of investigation on how to predict post-op standing PI when making surgical strategy.
METHODS: A prospective case series of ASD patients undergoing surgical correction with S2AI screw placement was conducted. Full-spine X-ray films were obtained at pre-op standing, pre-op supine, pre-op prone, as well as post-op standing postures. Pelvic parameters were measured. Spearman correlation analysis was used to determine relationships between each parameter.
RESULTS: A total of 83 patients (22 males, 61females) with a mean age of 58.4 ± 9.5 years were included in this study. Pre-op standing PI was significantly lower than post-op standing PI (p = 0.004). Pre-op prone PI was significantly lower than post-op standing PI (p = 0.001). By contrast, no significant difference was observed between pre-op supine and post-op standing PI (p = 0.359) with a mean absolute difference of 2.2° ± 1.9°. Correlation analysis showed supine PI was significantly correlated with post-op standing PI (r = 0.951, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the PI changed after S2AI screw fixation. The pre-op supine PI can predict post-op standing PI precisely, which facilitates to provide correction surgery strategy with a good reference for ideal sagittal alignment postoperatively.

METHODS: Cross-sectional cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: To classify spinal morphology using the \"current\" and \"theoretical\" Roussouly systems and assess sagittal alignment in an asymptomatic cohort.
METHODS: 467 asymptomatic volunteers were recruited from 5 countries. Radiographic parameters were measured via the EOS imaging system. \"Current\" and \"theoretical\" Roussouly classification was assigned with sagittal whole spine imaging using sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), and the lumbar apex. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare subject characteristics across Roussouly types, followed by post hoc Bonferroni correction.
RESULTS: Volunteers were categorized into 4 groups (Types 1-4) and 1 subgroup (Type 3 AP) using the \"current\" and \"theoretical\" Roussouly systems. The mean PI in \"current\" Roussouly groups was 40.8° (Type 1), 43.6° (Type 2), 52.4° (Type 3), 62.4° (Type 4), and 43.7° (Type 3AP). The mean PI in \"theoretical\" Roussouly groups was 36.5° (Type 1), 39.1°(Type 2), 52.5° (Type 3), 67.3° (Type 4), and 51.0° (Type 3AP). The difference in PI between \"current\" and \"theoretical\" Roussouly types was significant for Type 1 (P = .02), Type 2 (P < .001), Type 4 (P < .001), and Type 3AP (P < .001). 34.7% of subjects had a \"current\" Roussouly type different from the \"theoretical\" type. Type 3 theoretical shape had the most frequent mismatch, constituting 61.1% of the mismatched subjects. 51.5% of mismatched Type 3 become \"current\" Type 4.
CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of Roussouly types differs depending on whether the \"current\" or \"theoretical\" classification are employed. A sizeable proportion of volunteers exhibited current and theoretical type mismatch, highlighting the need to interpret sagittal alignment cautiously when utilizing the Roussouly system.

OBJECTIVE: A tether pedicle screw (TPS) enables individual stepless pretensioning and is placed at one or two levels above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV+1 and UIV+2, respectively). This study aimed to evaluate a novel customized TPS for the prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and to investigate the potential to generate a smoother force transition from cranial to long fusion during trunk flexion, instead of an abrupt change at the UIV, following adult spinal deformity surgery.
METHODS: A finite element model was designed based on an adult patient with spinal deformity instrumented from T10 to S1. Five different sagittal balance types and implant configurations were tested. The proximal range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral stress were examined, with a special focus on their respective discontinuities.
RESULTS: Tension shielding at UIV/UIV+1 by the TPS was consistent irrespective of sagittal profiles. The use of TPSs at UIV+1 and UIV+2 increased the efficacy in reducing spinal ROM discontinuity at UIV/UIV+1, as compared with the use of TPSs at UIV+1 only. Through the use of two pairs of TPSs cranial to the UIV, the optimal tension configuration could be defined to avoid a reduction effect at UIV+1. Neither the addition of transition rods to the TPSs nor the use of transition rods in combination with standard pedicle screws improved the junctional mechanics when compared with TPSs at UIV+1/UIV+2.
CONCLUSIONS: A smoother motion discontinuity at the UIV can be achieved via implementation of a TPS strategy. This new technology shows favorable in silico mechanics for reducing the risk of PJK.

BACKGROUND: Spinal measurements play an integral role in surgical planning for a variety of spine procedures. Full-length imaging eliminates distortions that can occur with stitched images. However, these images take radiologists significantly longer to read than conventional radiographs. Artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis software that can make such measurements quickly and reliably would be advantageous to surgeons, radiologists, and the entire health system.
METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study. Preoperative full-length standing anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs of patients that were previously measured by fellowship-trained spine surgeons at our institution were obtained. The measurements included lumbar lordosis (LL), greatest coronal Cobb angle (GCC), pelvic incidence (PI), coronal balance (CB), and T1-pelvic angle (T1PA). Inter-rater intra-class correlation (ICC) values were calculated based on an overlapping sample of 10 patients measured by surgeons. Full-length standing radiographs of an additional 100 patients were provided for AI software training. The AI algorithm then measured the radiographs and ICC values were calculated.
RESULTS: ICC values for inter-rater reliability between surgeons were excellent and calculated to 0.97 for LL (95% CI 0.88-0.99), 0.78 (0.33-0.94) for GCC, 0.86 (0.55-0.96) for PI, 0.99 for CB (0.93-0.99), and 0.95 for T1PA (0.82-0.99). The algorithm computed the five selected parameters with ICC values between 0.70 and 0.94, indicating excellent reliability. Exemplary for the comparison of AI and surgeons, the ICC for LL was 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.92) and 0.93 for CB (0.90-0.95). GCC, PI, and T1PA could be determined with ICC values of 0.81 (0.69-0.87), 0.70 (0.60-0.78), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The AI algorithm presented here demonstrates excellent reliability for most of the parameters and good reliability for PI, with ICC values corresponding to measurements conducted by experienced surgeons. In future, it may facilitate the analysis of large data sets and aid physicians in diagnostics, pre-operative planning, and post-operative quality control.