admission avoidance

避免入学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管缺乏严格的医疗紧迫性,患有急性功能减退的老年人仍可前往急诊科(ED)寻求医疗支持。在ED引入过渡性护理团队(TCT)已显示出减少可避免的入院人数的希望。然而,TCT的最佳组成和实施仍未明确。我们评估了由老年护理医师(ECP)和转学护士与仅转学护士组成的TCT对减少住院人数的影响。以及患者和护理人员在护理质量方面的经验。
    方法:我们评估了老年人(≥65岁)在ED时出现急性功能减退,但没有入院医学指征。收集了有关类型和ED后护理的数据,在30天的随访期内评估了再访视。与利益攸关方的半结构化访谈是基于综合执行框架研究,而患者和护理人员的经验是通过开放式访谈收集的。
    结果:在TCT评估的老年人(N=821)中,ECP和转诊护士以相同的比率(81.2%)与仅转诊护士(79.5%)防止不必要的住院。ED再就诊率分别为15.6%(ECP和转诊护士)和13.5%。访谈强调了ECP的附加值,包括更好的员工意识,知识转移和与外部组织的联网。TCT干预总体上得到广泛支持,但是适应性被认为是一个重要的先决条件。
    结论:无论成分如何,TCT可以防止老年人不必要的住院,而不会增加ED再就诊率,而ECP的增加对患者和专业经验有有利的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Older adults with acute functional decline may visit emergency departments (EDs) for medical support despite a lack of strict medical urgency. The introduction of transitional care teams (TCT) at the ED has shown promise in reducing avoidable admittances. However, the optimal composition and implementation of TCTs are still poorly defined. We evaluated the effect of TCTs consisting of an elderly care physician (ECP) and transfer nurse versus a transfer nurse only on reducing hospital admissions, as well as the experience of patients and caregivers regarding quality of care.
    METHODS: We assessed older adults (≥ 65 years) at the ED with acute functional decline but no medical indication for admission. Data were collected on type and post-ED care, and re-visits were evaluated over a 30-day follow-up period. Semi-structured interviews with stakeholders were based on the Consolidated-Framework-for-Implementation-Research, while patient and caregiver experiences were collected through open-ended interviews.
    RESULTS: Among older adults (N = 821) evaluated by the TCT, ECP and transfer nurse prevented unnecessary hospitalization at the same rate (81.2%) versus a transfer nurse alone (79.5%). ED re-visits were 15.6% (ECP and transfer nurse) versus 13.5%. The interviews highlighted the added value of an ECP, which consisted of better staff awareness, knowledge transfer and networking with external organizations. The TCT intervention in general was broadly supported, but adaptability was regarded as an important prerequisite.
    CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of composition, a TCT can prevent unnecessary hospitalization of older adults without increasing ED re-visiting rates, while the addition of an ECP has a favourable impact on patient and professional experiences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:研究“在家住院”(HAH)的随机对照试验(RCTs),以避免患有急性身体疾病的成年人入院,以确定生命体征监测方法的使用及其有效性的证据。
    方法:系统评价。
    方法:这篇综述比较了对于患有急性躯体疾病的成年人在避免入院HAH中的生命体征监测策略。生命体征监测可以通过促进安全性来支持HAH急性多学科护理,确定进一步评估的要求,指导临床决策。目前有各种各样的系统可用,包括使用可穿戴设备的可靠和自动化的连续远程监控。
    方法:通过更新的数据库和试验注册检索(2016年3月2日至2023年2月15日)确定符合条件的研究,和现有的系统评价。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估偏倚风险。进行随机效应荟萃分析,并通过生命体征监测方法分层提供叙述摘要。
    结果:确定了21个符合条件的RCT(3459名参与者)。生命体征监测的两种方法的特征在于:手动和自动。在大多数分类研究中,报告不足。对于HAH与医院护理相比,6个月死亡风险比(RR)为0.94(95%CI0.78-1.12),3个月再入院RR1.02(0.77-1.35),和住院时间平均差1.91天(0.71-3.12)。自动监测亚组的再入院率降低(RR0.3095%CI0.11-0.86)。
    结论:本综述强调了在提供远程生命体征监测替代急性病入院的报告和证据基础方面的差距。尽管在临床实践中的实施范围不断扩大。尽管使用可穿戴设备进行连续生命体征监测可能会带来额外的好处,其在现有RCT中的使用是有限的。提出了在未来临床试验中实施和评估远程监测的建议。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of \"hospital at home\" (HAH) for admission avoidance in adults presenting with acute physical illness to identify the use of vital sign monitoring approaches and evidence for their effectiveness.
    METHODS: Systematic review.
    METHODS: This review compared strategies for vital sign monitoring in admission avoidance HAH for adults presenting with acute physical illness. Vital sign monitoring can support HAH acute multidisciplinary care by contributing to safety, determining requirement of further assessment, and guiding clinical decisions. There are a wide range of systems currently available, including reliable and automated continuous remote monitoring using wearable devices.
    METHODS: Eligible studies were identified through updated database and trial registries searches (March 2, 2016, to February 15, 2023), and existing systematic reviews. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Random effects meta-analyses were performed, and narrative summaries provided stratified by vital sign monitoring approach.
    RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible RCTs (3459 participants) were identified. Two approaches to vital sign monitoring were characterized: manual and automated. Reporting was insufficient in the majority of studies for classification. For HAH compared to hospital care, 6-monthly mortality risk ratio (RR) was 0.94 (95% CI 0.78-1.12), 3-monthly readmission to hospital RR 1.02 (0.77-1.35), and length of stay mean difference 1.91 days (0.71-3.12). Readmission to hospital was reduced in the automated monitoring subgroup (RR 0.30 95% CI 0.11-0.86).
    CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights gaps in the reporting and evidence base informing remote vital sign monitoring in alternatives to admission for acute illness, despite expanding implementation in clinical practice. Although continuous vital sign monitoring using wearable devices may offer added benefit, its use in existing RCTs is limited. Recommendations for the implementation and evaluation of remote monitoring in future clinical trials are proposed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于紧缩政策而在2010年实施的地方政府资金减少与死亡率的社会经济不平等恶化有关。人们对这些减少与医疗保健不平等的关系知之甚少;因此,我们调查了地方政府资金减少较多的地区在急诊入院时的社会经济不平等是否有更大的增加.
    方法:我们使用固定效应线性回归来估计LAD支出减少之间的关联,研究了英国地方当局地区(LAD)之间的不平等。使用多重剥夺指数(IMD)和2010-2017年(所有和可避免的)紧急入院的平均比率,他们的剥夺水平。我们还使用绝对梯度指数(AGI)检查了急诊入院不平等的变化,这是一个地区最贫困和最贫困社区之间的模型差距。
    结果:最贫困的IMD五分之一人口中的LAD人均支出减少了更多的英镑,所有和可避免的紧急入院率更高,以及入学时更大的邻里间不平等。然而,在英格兰三个最不贫困的IMD五分之一人口中,支出减少仅与所有和可避免的紧急入院的平均比率增加以及地方当局社区之间的不平等有关。对于处于最不贫困的IMD五分之一的LAD来说,人均总支出每年减少100英镑,可避免的入院每年增加47英镑(95%CI22至73),142(95%CI70至213)全因急诊入院,并且可以避免的48(95%CI14至81)和140(95%CI60至220)的社区之间的不平等每年增加。2017年,LAD的平均人口约为170,000。
    结论:2010年实施的紧缩政策影响了较少贫困的地方当局,在紧急入院和邻里之间的不平等增加的地方,而在最贫困的地区,紧急入院没有改变,保持高和持久。
    BACKGROUND: Reductions in local government funding implemented in 2010 due to austerity policies have been associated with worsening socioeconomic inequalities in mortality. Less is known about the relationship of these reductions with healthcare inequalities; therefore, we investigated whether areas with greater reductions in local government funding had greater increases in socioeconomic inequalities in emergency admissions.
    METHODS: We examined inequalities between English local authority districts (LADs) using a fixed-effects linear regression to estimate the association between LAD expenditure reductions, their level of deprivation using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) and average rates of (all and avoidable) emergency admissions for the years 2010-2017. We also examined changes in inequalities in emergency admissions using the Absolute Gradient Index (AGI), which is the modelled gap between the most and least deprived neighbourhoods in an area.
    RESULTS: LADs within the most deprived IMD quintile had larger pounds per capita expenditure reductions, higher rates of all and avoidable emergency admissions, and greater between-neighbourhood inequalities in admissions. However, expenditure reductions were only associated with increasing average rates of all and avoidable emergency admissions and inequalities between neighbourhoods in local authorities in England\'s three least deprived IMD quintiles. For a LAD in the least deprived IMD quintile, a yearly reduction of £100 per capita in total expenditure was associated with a yearly increase of 47 (95% CI 22 to 73) avoidable admissions, 142 (95% CI 70 to 213) all-cause emergency admissions and a yearly increase in inequalities between neighbourhoods of 48 (95% CI 14 to 81) avoidable and 140 (95% CI 60 to 220) all-cause emergency admissions. In 2017, a LAD average population was ~170 000.
    CONCLUSIONS: Austerity policies implemented in 2010 impacted less deprived local authorities, where emergency admissions and inequalities between neighbourhoods increased, while in the most deprived areas, emergency admissions were unchanged, remaining high and persistent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:永久性起搏器(PPM)植入是一种针对症状性窦房结功能障碍(SND)的完善治疗方法。这种干预的最佳时机尚不清楚,由于死亡率问题,房室传导阻滞通常在资源紧张的等待名单中优先考虑。
    方法:比较接受选择性门诊(OP)PPM植入的患者的死亡率数据,以及那些因症状SND而到医院接受紧急住院(IP)管理的人。使用Kaplan-Meier图进行生存分析,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。单变量和多变量Cox回归,我们进行了倾向评分匹配分析,以评估对住院患者植入物30日和1年全因死亡率的预后影响.
    结果:在1269名患有孤立性SND的患者中,740例(58%)的PPM在OP上植入,529例(42%)的PPM在IP基础上植入。在多变量分析中,患者的死亡率明显更差,患者的管理由紧急入院驱动(Log-Rankχ2=21.6,p<0.001),并且仍然是1年全因死亡率的独立预测因子(HR3.40,95%CI1.97-5.86,p<0.001)。
    结论:SND主要是一种与老龄化和共病人群相关的疾病,在避免取消管制的地方,住院获得性感染,和复方是有利的。因此,避免录取是可取的策略。
    Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a well-established treatment for symptomatic sinus node dysfunction (SND). The optimal timing of this intervention is unclear, with atrioventricular blocks often prioritized in resource stressed waiting lists due to mortality concerns.
    Mortality data was compared between patients receiving elective outpatient (OP) PPM implantation, and those presenting to hospital for urgent inpatient (IP) management for symptomatic SND. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier plots and compared using the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression, as well as propensity score matching analyses were performed to assess the prognostic effect on 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality of inpatient implant.
    Of the 1269 patients identified with isolated SND, 740 (58%) had PPMs implanted on an OP and 529 (42%) on an IP basis. Mortality was significantly worse in patients where management was driven by hospital admission on an urgent basis (Log-Rank χ2 = 21.6, p < 0.001) and remained an independent predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 3.40, 95% CI 1.97-5.86, p < 0.001) on multivariable analysis.
    SND is predominantly a disease associated with ageing and comorbid populations, where avoidance of deconditioning, hospitalization acquired infections, and polypharmacy is advantageous. Admission avoidance is therefore the preferable strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景随着时间的推移,寻求在患者家中提供急性护理的医院在家(H@H)计划变得越来越普遍。然而,现有文献在程序结构上表现出异质性,评估设计,和目标人口规模,这使得很难得出可概括的结论来为未来的H@H程序设计提供信息。目标这项工作的目的是为H@H计划开发质量改进评估策略-北加州的KaiserPermanente高级家庭护理(KPACAH)计划-利用电子健康记录数据,图表审查,和患者调查,以比较KPACAH患者与传统医院环境中的住院患者。方法作者开发了一个3步招募工作流程,该工作流程使用电子健康记录过滤工具生成潜在比较者的每日列表,对潜在合格的比较患者进行手动图表审查,以评估个人临床和社会标准,以及与患者的电话访谈,以确认潜在比较患者的资格和兴趣。结果此工作流程成功识别并招募了5个月内表现出相似人口统计学特征的446名比较患者。住院的原因,合并症负担,以及对KPACAH计划中登记的患者的利用措施。结论这些初步发现为工作流程提供了希望,该工作流程可以促进识别在传统砖混设施住院的类似住院患者,以增强H@H计划的结果评估。以及随着程序的扩展,确定潜在的注册人数。
    Hospital at Home (H@H) programs-which seek to deliver acute care within a patient\'s home-have become more prevalent over time. However, existing literature exhibits heterogeneity in program structure, evaluation design, and target population size, making it difficult to draw generalizable conclusions to inform future H@H program design.
    The objective of this work was to develop a quality improvement evaluation strategy for a H@H program-the Kaiser Permanente Advanced Care at Home (KPACAH) program in Northern California-leveraging electronic health record data, chart review, and patient surveys to compare KPACAH patients with inpatients in traditional hospital settings.
    The authors developed a 3-step recruitment workflow that used electronic health record filtering tools to generate a daily list of potential comparators, a manual chart review of potentially eligible comparator patients to assess individual clinical and social criteria, and a phone interview with patients to affirm eligibility and interest from potential comparator patients.
    This workflow successfully identified and enrolled a population of 446 comparator patients in a 5-month period who exhibited similar demographics, reasons for hospitalization, comorbidity burden, and utilization measures to patients enrolled in the KPACAH program.
    These initial findings provide promise for a workflow that can facilitate the identification of similar inpatients hospitalized at traditional brick and mortar facilities to enhance outcomes evaluations for the H@H programs, as well as to identify the potential volume of enrollees as the program expands.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定急性入院的替代方案是许多国家的优先事项。挪威建立了200多个分散的市政急性单位(MAU),以将低视力患者从医院转移出去。MAU因平均入住率低而没有减轻医院的压力而受到批评。我们开发了MAU入学和出院的离散时间模拟模型,以测试增加绝对平均入住率的方案。我们还使用该模型来估计由于历史数据不可用而被拒绝的患者数量。我们的实验表明,由于未满足的需求通常很低,因此仅合并就不太可能大大增加MAU的绝对平均入住率。然而,合并MAU提供最多可减少20%的床容量,不影响服务提供。我们的工作与其他入学回避单位有关,并提供了一种在没有历史数据的情况下估算不受限制的床位需求的方法。
    Identifying alternatives to acute hospital admission is a priority for many countries. Over 200 decentralised municipal acute units (MAUs) were established in Norway to divert low-acuity patients away from hospitals. MAUs have faced criticism for low mean occupancy and not relieving pressures on hospitals. We developed a discrete time simulation model of admissions and discharges to MAUs to test scenarios for increasing absolute mean occupancy. We also used the model to estimate the number of patients turned away as historical data was unavailable. Our experiments suggest that mergers alone are unlikely to substantially increase MAU absolute mean occupancy as unmet demand is generally low. However, merging MAUs offers scope for up to 20% reduction in bed capacity, without affecting service provision. Our work has relevance for other admissions avoidance units and provides a method for estimating unconstrained demand for beds in the absence of historical data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多的老年患者在创伤后出现ED。这些患者需要传统创伤模型无法提供的多学科护理。与老年ED和多学科服务相结合,开发了银色创伤审查诊所(STRC),以改善非手术创伤患者的出院后护理。我们旨在通过回顾参加诊所的患者的旅程和结果来评估STRC。
    方法:对所有在最初1年期间就诊的患者进行电子图表数据的回顾性分析。收集了患者人口统计学数据,病史,药物,时间线,创伤评估和进一步调查,骨折类型,隐匿性损伤,老年评估(老年综合评估,临床虚弱量表,骨骼健康,falls,体位性低血压(OH),认知筛查,移动性),评论数量和出院目的地。
    结果:137例患者的中位年龄为80岁(IQR74-86),69%为女性。临床衰弱量表的中位数为3,从患者初次ED到门诊的中位数时间为15天(IQR9.75-21),从初次检查到出院的中位数时间为20天(IQR1-35)。71%的介绍是由于跌落在2m以下。STRC的三级调查确定了24名患者(18%)的先前未发现的伤害。总的来说,56例患者复查椎体骨折。这些患者中的87%(n=49)接受了CT或MRI进一步检查,95%的患者(n=53)接受了物理治疗。参加STRC的患者进行了全面的老年评估,发现29%的Mini-Cog评估异常,新诊断为43%的骨质疏松症和13%的患者诊断为直立性低血压。61%的人出院到初级保健,19%的人与老年专科诊所联系。
    结论:STRC是一种新颖的方法,可以及时,以病人为中心,对非手术损伤后的老年患者进行全面和协作的创伤护理。
    BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of older patients are presenting to the ED following trauma. These patients require multidisciplinary care that the traditional trauma model fails to provide. A Silver Trauma Review Clinic (STRC) was developed in conjunction with the geriatric ED and multidisciplinary services to improve the post-discharge care of patients with non-operative traumatic injuries.We aimed to assess the STRC by reviewing the journey and outcomes of patients who attended the clinic.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic chart data was performed on all patients who attended the clinic over the initial 1-year period. Data were collected on patient demographics, medical history, medications, timelines, trauma assessments and further investigations, fracture types, occult injuries, geriatric assessments (Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Clinical Frailty Scale, bone health, falls, Orthostatic Hypotension (OH), cognitive screening, mobility), number of reviews and discharge destination.
    RESULTS: 137 patients were reviewed with a median age of 80 years (IQR 74-86) and 69% were female. The median Clinical Frailty Scale was 3 with a median time from the patient\'s initial ED presentation to clinic of 15 days (IQR 9.75-21) and median time from initial review to discharge 20 days (IQR 1-35). 71% of presentations were as a result of falls under 2 m. Tertiary survey in the STRC identified previously unrecognised injuries in 24 patients (18%). In total, 56 patients were reviewed with vertebral fractures. 87% of these patients (n=49) were further investigated with a CT or MRI and 95% of patients (n=53) were referred for physiotherapy. Patients attending the STRC had a comprehensive geriatric assessment with abnormal Mini-Cog assessments found in 29%, a new diagnosis of osteoporosis in 43% and orthostatic hypotension diagnosed in 13% of patients. 61% were discharged to primary care and 19% linked into a specialist geriatric clinic.
    CONCLUSIONS: The STRC is a novel approach allowing timely, patient-focused, comprehensive and collaborative trauma care of older patients following non-operative injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:老年人在非紧急情况下使用高级急诊科(ED)是全球关注的问题。事实证明,避免ED的举措在解决这一问题方面是有效的。为特别迎合65岁及以上人士,南阿德莱德当地卫生网络引入了创新的ED避免服务。这项研究评估了该服务在其用户中的可接受性。
    方法:复杂和恢复(CARE)中心是一个由多学科老年团队组成的六张床位单位。患者在呼叫救护车并由护理人员分类后直接被运送到CARE。评估发生在2021年9月至2022年9月之间。对使用该服务的患者和亲属进行了半结构化访谈。使用六步主题分析进行数据分析。
    结果:采访了17名患者和15名亲属,他描述了他们之间32次出席紧急护理中心的经历。患者出于多种原因获得该服务,但超过一半与跌倒有关。出于几个原因,有人犹豫要打电话给紧急服务,主要是ED等待时间长和/或住院过夜的前景。有些人试图联系他们的全科医生(GP)提出的问题,但无法及时预约。大多数参与者以前参加过当地的ED,并有负面的经历。所有个人都报告说,由于许多原因,包括更安静,更安全的环境以及受过专门培训的老年工作人员,他们比ED工作人员少。几位与会者希望出院后有一个标准化的后续程序。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,对于需要紧急护理的老年人来说,避免ED入院方案可能是一种可接受的替代疗法。可能有利于公共卫生系统和用户体验。
    BACKGROUND: High emergency department (ED) usage by older individuals for non-emergencies is a global concern. ED avoidance initiatives have proven effective in addressing this issue. To specifically cater to individuals aged 65 and above, the Southern Adelaide Local Health Network introduced an innovative ED avoidance service. This study assessed the acceptability of the service among its users.
    METHODS: The Complex And RestorativE (CARE) Centre is a six-bed unit staffed by a multidisciplinary geriatric team. Patients are transported directly to CARE after calling for an ambulance and being triaged by a paramedic. The evaluation took place between September 2021 and September 2022. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients and relatives who had accessed the service. Data analysis was performed using a six-step thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Seventeen patients and 15 relatives were interviewed, who described the experience of 32 attendances to the urgent CARE centre between them. Patients accessed the service for several reasons but over half were associated with falls. There was a hesitation to call emergency services for several reasons, the primary being long wait times in ED and/or the prospect of an overnight stay in hospital. Some individuals attempted to contact their General Practitioner (GP) for the presenting problem but were unable to get a timely appointment. Most participants had previously attended a local ED and had a negative experience. All individuals reported favouring the CARE centre over the traditional ED for numerous reasons including a quieter and safer environment and specially trained geriatric staff who were less rushed than ED staff. Several participants would have appreciated a standardised follow-up process after discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ED admission avoidance programmes may be an acceptable alternative treatment for older people requiring urgent care, potentially benefiting both public health systems and user experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号