adjuvant therapy

辅助治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    恶性肿瘤是复杂的全身性慢性疾病,是人类死亡的主要原因之一。靶向治疗,化疗,免疫疗法,和放射疗法是对中晚期恶性肿瘤有效的主流对抗疗法。常规对抗疗法的持续使用导致了不良反应和耐药性,这阻碍了它的功效。作为补充和替代医学的重要组成部分,已发现中药具有抗肿瘤作用,在增强主流对症药物的治疗敏感性方面发挥了重要作用,降低不良事件的发生率和改善免疫相关功能。辅助中药与主流对症药物的联合应用已开始被接受,并逐步应用于抗肿瘤治疗领域。传统天然药物及其活性成分,以及中成药,已被证明在各种恶性肿瘤的治疗中具有优异的治疗效果和良好的安全性。本文重点介绍了上述药物与主流对抗疗法药物结合提高治疗敏感性的作用机制及研究进展,缓解耐药性,减少不良反应,提高身体的免疫功能。鼓励临床开发和使用中药辅助疗法,并为创建更安全,更有效的抗癌药物组合提供思路和信息,详细描述了中草药疗法作为癌症治疗辅助疗法的重要功能。
    Malignant tumors are complex systemic chronic diseases and one of the major causes of human mortality. Targeted therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy are examples of mainstream allopathic medicine treatments that effective for intermediate and advanced malignant tumors. The ongoing use of conventional allopathic medicine has resulted in adverse responses and drug resistance, which have hampered its efficacy. As an important component of complementary and alternative medicine, Chinese medicine has been found to have antitumor effects and has played an important role in enhancing the therapeutic sensitivity of mainstream allopathic medicine, reducing the incidence of adverse events and improving immune-related functions. The combined application of adjuvant Chinese medicine and mainstream allopathic medicine has begun to gain acceptance and is gradually used in the field of antitumor therapy. Traditional natural medicines and their active ingredients, as well as Chinese patent medicines, have been proven to have excellent therapeutic efficacy and good safety in the treatment of various malignant tumors. This paper focuses on the mechanism of action and research progress of combining the above drugs with mainstream allopathic medicine to increase therapeutic sensitivity, alleviate drug resistance, reduce adverse reactions, and improve the body\'s immune function. To encourage the clinical development and use of Chinese herb adjuvant therapy as well as to provide ideas and information for creating safer and more effective anticancer medication combinations, the significant functions of Chinese herb therapies as adjuvant therapies for cancer treatment are described in detail.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)通常是一种广泛传播的肺癌,高度致命的恶性肿瘤,但偶尔表现为局部的,适合局部治疗的有限阶段癌症。我们回顾了我们使用手术或立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)的经验,以评估安全性,临床I期SCLC患者的生存率和治疗毒性。
    方法:回顾性分析了1996年至2021年间接受手术切除或SBRT的临床I期淋巴结阴性SCLC患者的电子病历。建立了多变量Cox比例风险模型。
    结果:在符合纳入标准的96名患者中,77例接受切除,19例接受SBRT。手术患者较年轻(平均68.4±9.2年手术与74.3±6.6年SBRT,P=.005)并具有更好的肺功能(预测手术的FEV1%与SBRT的44.0±20.9%相比,P<.001)。SBRT患者的合并症明显增多。对于这两个队列,59个肿瘤为纯SCLC,37个为混合SCLC/NSCLC组织学。SBRT和手术患者的中位生存期分别为21个月和31个月(P=.07)。没有治疗相关的死亡率。手术患者的平均住院时间为5.4±5.7天。淋巴结阴性手术患者的生存期更长(平均48个月淋巴结阴性与19个月淋巴结阳性,P=.04)。对于淋巴结阴性的手术患者,估计2年和5年生存率分别为60%和48%。
    结论:我们25年的单机构经验表明,临床I期SCLC的手术或SBRT局部治疗是安全有效的,生存率低于相似阶段的非小细胞癌患者。然而,我们的结果与先前的小细胞手术系列相比是有利的,并且远远优于类似阶段患者的放化疗的报告结果,从而验证目前对I期SCLC采用手术或SBRT的建议。
    OBJECTIVE: Small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is usually a wide-spread, highly-lethal malignancy but occasionally presents as localized, limited stage cancer amenable to local treatment. We reviewed our experience using surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to assess safety, survival rates and treatment toxicity in clinical stage I SCLC patients.
    METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients with clinical stage I lymph node-negative SCLC who underwent surgical resection or SBRT between 1996 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. A multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards model was constructed.
    RESULTS: Of 96 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 77 underwent resection and 19 underwent SBRT. Surgical patients were younger (mean 68.4 ± 9.2 years surgery versus 74.3 ± 6.6 years SBRT, P = .005) and had better pulmonary function (81.5 ± 19.6 FEV1% of predicted surgery versus 44.0 ± 20.9% SBRT, P < .001). SBRT patients had significantly more comorbidities. For both cohorts, 59 tumors were pure SCLC and 37 were mixed SCLC/NSCLC histology. Median survivals were 21 months versus 31 months for SBRT and surgery patients respectively (P = .07). There were no treatment-related mortalities. Mean length of hospital stay for surgical patients was 5.4 ± 5.7 days. Survival was longer in lymph node-negative surgery patients (median 48 months node-negative versus 19 months node-positive, P = .04). For node-negative-surgery patients, the estimated 2- and 5-year survival rates are 60% and 48%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our single-institutional experience over 25 years demonstrates that local treatment with surgery or SBRT for clinical stage I SCLC is safe and effective, with survivals lower than similar stage non-small-cell carcinoma patients. However, our results compare favorably with prior small-cell surgical series and far better than reported results of chemoradiotherapy for similar stage patients, thereby validating current recommendations for employing surgery or SBRT for stage I SCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:卡培他滨和奥沙利铂(CAPOX)辅助治疗是有复发风险的结直肠癌的标准治疗策略。CAPOX治疗的早期剂量减少(EDR)通常用于现实世界的实践。然而,关于CAPOX对EDR患者的有效性的证据有限.因此,本研究旨在阐明EDR的风险及其对长期结局和身体组成因素的影响.
    方法:纳入2013年6月至2021年12月间结直肠癌根治术后接受CAPOX治疗的患者。EDR定义为CAPOX治疗四个疗程内的剂量减少。在手术后1年内测量身体成分因子以确定EDR效应。
    结果:包括84例患者;其中35例(42%)患有EDR。多变量分析显示,体重不足[优势比(OR)=4.95,95%置信区间(CI)=1.13-21.7,p=0.03]是EDR的危险因素。无复发生存率(RFS)在非EDR组明显优于对照组(p=0.01)。非EDR和EDR组的5年RFS率分别为88.7%和65.4%,分别。多变量分析显示,年龄>65岁[风险比(HR)=3.97;95%CI=1.16-13.62,p=0.03]和EDR(HR=7.62;95%CI=1.71-33.91,p=0.005)与较差的RFS相关。1年的身体成分分析显示EDR组的所有因素都减少。
    结论:术前体重不足与EDR相关,与非EDR组相比,RFS和身体成分因子降低。因此,避免EDR和EDR后的早期营养干预可能会改善结局.
    OBJECTIVE: Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) therapy is standard strategy for colorectal cancer with risk of recurrence. Early dose reduction (EDR) of CAPOX therapy is commonly used in real-world practice. However, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of CAPOX for patients who had EDR. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the risks of EDR and its effect on long-term outcomes and body composition factors.
    METHODS: Patients who received CAPOX therapy after radical surgery for colorectal cancer between June 2013 and December 2021 were included. EDR was defined as dose reduction within four courses of CAPOX therapy. Body composition factors were measured for 1 year following surgery to determine the EDR effects.
    RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were included; 35 (42%) of them had EDR. The multivariate analysis revealed that underweight [odds ratio (OR)=4.95, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.13-21.7, p=0.03] was a risk factor for EDR. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly better in the non-EDR group (p=0.01). The 5-year RFS rates for the non-EDR and EDR groups were 88.7% and 65.4%, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that age >65 years [hazard ratio (HR)=3.97; 95% CI=1.16-13.62, p=0.03] and EDR (HR=7.62; 95% CI=1.71-33.91, p=0.005) were associated with poorer RFS. The 1-year body composition analysis revealed decreases in all factors in the EDR group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative underweight status was associated with EDR, which resulted in decreased RFS and body composition factors when compared with the non-EDR group. Therefore, avoiding EDR and early nutritional intervention after EDR may improve outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:接受伊马替尼辅助治疗的高危切除胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)患者无复发生存期(RFS)改善,然而,是否存在完全的杀细胞作用是未知的。我们使用从肿瘤治疗结束(EOOT)测量的归一化复发时间表进行了调查,定义为切除较晚或辅助治疗结束。
    方法:我们回顾了2003年至2018年在我们癌症中心切除的高危GIST患者。RFS(从切除和EOOT测量),总生存期(OS),使用Kaplan-Meier分析和多变量Cox比例风险模型分析伊马替尼耐药时间(TTIR).评估了纪念斯隆·凯特琳(MSK)GIST列线图的性能。
    结果:我们确定了86例高危GIST患者,中位术后随访时间为106个月。三分之一(n=29;34%)没有接受伊马替尼佐剂,而57(66%)的中位数为3年。接受伊马替尼辅助治疗的患者的MSK列线图预测的5年RFS与未接受的患者相似(29%与31%,p=0.64)。当从EOOT测量RFS时,MSK预测的RFS与EOOTRFS独立相关(风险比0.22,p=0.02),而伊马替尼佐剂的服用和持续时间没有。伊马替尼佐剂的接受和持续时间均与TTIR或OS无关(均p>0.05)。
    结论:伊马替尼延迟辅助治疗,但并不明显影响最终复发,TTIR,或操作系统,提示许多高危GIST患者可能不必要地接受伊马替尼辅助治疗.需要进一步的研究来确定辅助治疗与首次影像学复发时开始治疗的益处。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with high-risk resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) receiving adjuvant imatinib have improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), however whether a complete cytocidal effect exists is unknown. We investigated this using a normalized recurrence timeline measured from end of oncologic treatment (EOOT), defined as the later of resection or end of adjuvant therapy.
    METHODS: We reviewed patients with resected high-risk GIST at our cancer center from 2003 to 2018. RFS (measured from resection and EOOT), overall survival (OS), and time to imatinib resistance (TTIR) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. The performance of the Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) GIST nomogram was assessed.
    RESULTS: We identified 86 patients with high-risk GIST with a median 106 months of postsurgical follow-up. One-third (n = 29; 34%) did not receive adjuvant imatinib, while 57 (66%) did for a median of 3 years. The MSK nomogram-predicted 5-year RFS for patients receiving adjuvant imatinib was similar to those who did not (29% vs. 31%, p = 0.64). When RFS was measured from EOOT, the MSK-predicted RFS was independently associated with EOOT RFS (hazard ratio 0.22, p = 0.02), while adjuvant imatinib receipt and duration were not. Neither receipt nor duration of adjuvant imatinib were associated with TTIR or OS (all p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with adjuvant imatinib delays, but does not clearly impact ultimate recurrence, TTIR, or OS, suggesting many patients with high-risk GIST may receive adjuvant imatinib unnecessarily. Additional studies are needed to establish the benefit of adjuvant therapy versus initiating therapy at first radiographic recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝细胞癌(HCC)是一种预后较差的疾病,经常在晚期被诊断。近年来,治疗方案有了很大的发展,特别是经动脉治疗。系统治疗也有了显著的发展,随着免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)作为晚期HCC一线治疗的兴起。局部区域治疗和ICI的结合正在开辟新的前景,并且是许多临床试验的主题。最近,两项研究基于ICI的辅助联合治疗的3期全球试验表明,在接受切除治疗的患者中,无复发生存期或无进展生存期得到改善,消融,或经动脉化疗栓塞。然而,成熟的数据和总体生存结果仍在等待中,但将难以解释.我们正处于局部区域治疗和免疫疗法组合的新时代的开始。确定最佳治疗策略和预测性生物标志物是临床实践中未来标准的关键问题。
    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a disease with a poor prognosis, often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therapeutic options have developed considerably in recent years, particularly with trans-arterial treatments. Systemic treatments have also evolved significantly, with the rise of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. The combination of loco-regional treatments and ICI is opening up new prospects and is the subject of numerous clinical trials. Recently, two global phase 3 trials investigating ICI-based adjuvant combinations have demonstrated improvements in recurrence-free survival or progression-free survival in patients treated with resection, ablation, or trans-arterial chemoembolization. However, mature data and overall survival results are still awaited but will be difficult to interpret. We are at the start of a new era of combinations of loco-regional treatments and immunotherapy. The identification of the best therapeutic strategies and predictive biomarkers is a crucial issue for future standards in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了评估可行性,安全,以及全面区域计划的有效性,包括微创康复和授权护理(MIREC)途径,可以显着减少腹腔镜胃切除术后的住院时间,而不会增加不良事件。
    成本效益和改善患者预后对于在全球范围内提供高质量的胃癌护理至关重要。
    比较2012年2月至2023年3月在综合医疗保健系统内使用2种不同护理模式进行胃癌手术的结果。主要终点是住院时间。次要终点是需要重症监护病房,急诊室(ER)访问,重新接纳,再操作,手术后30天内死亡。
    有553名患者,前(2012年2月至2016年4月)为167,后MIREC时期(2016年5月至2023年3月)为386。围手术期化疗利用率从31.7%上升至76.4%(P<0.0001)。腹腔镜胃切除术从17.4%增加到97.7%(P<0.0001)。住院时间从7天减少到2天(P<0.0001),分别有32.1%和88%的患者在术后第1天和术后第2天出院回家。当比较之前和之后的MIREC时,重症监护病房利用率(10.8%与2.9%,P<0.0001),急诊室就诊(34.7%与19.7%,P=0.0002),和再入院(18.6%与11.1%,P=0.019)在30天也相当低。此外,更多患者接受术后辅助化疗(31.4%至63.5%,P<0.0001),胃切除术和开始辅助化疗之间的时间也更短(49-41天;P=0.002)。
    这个全面的区域计划,其中包括区域化护理,腹腔镜入路,现代肿瘤治疗,外科亚专业化,和MIREC通路,可以潜在地改善胃癌手术的结果。这些益处包括减少住院时间和降低并发症发生率。因此,这个项目可以彻底改变胃癌手术的实施方式,导致更高质量的护理和增加对患者的价值。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a comprehensive regional program, including the Minimally Invasive Recovery and Empowerment Care (MIREC) pathway, that can significantly reduce hospital stays after laparoscopic gastrectomy without increasing adverse events.
    UNASSIGNED: Cost-effectiveness and improving patient outcomes are crucial in providing quality gastric cancer care worldwide.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the outcomes of gastric cancer surgery using 2 different models of care within an integrated healthcare system from February 2012 to March 2023. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. The secondary endpoints were the need for intensive care unit care, emergency room (ER) visits, readmission, reoperation, and death within 30 days after surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 553 patients, 167 in the pre-(February 2012-April 2016) and 386 in the post-MIREC period (May 2016-March 2023). Perioperative chemotherapy utilization increased from 31.7% to 76.4% (P < 0.0001). Laparoscopic gastrectomy increased from 17.4% to 97.7% (P < 0.0001). Length of hospitalization decreased from 7 to 2 days (P < 0.0001), with 32.1% and 88% of patients discharged home on postoperative day 1 and postoperative day 2, respectively. When comparing pre- and post-MIREC, intensive care unit utilization (10.8% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.0001), ER visits (34.7% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.0002), and readmission (18.6% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.019) at 30 days were also considerably lower. In addition, more patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (31.4% to 63.5%, P < 0.0001), and the time between gastrectomy and starting adjuvant chemotherapy was also less (49-41 days; P = 0.002).
    UNASSIGNED: This comprehensive regional program, which encompasses regionalization care, laparoscopic approach, modern oncologic care, surgical subspecialization, and the MIREC pathway, can potentially improve gastric cancer surgery outcomes. These benefits include reduced hospital stays and lower complication rates. As such, this program can revolutionize how gastric cancer surgery is delivered, leading to a higher quality of care and increased value to patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的治疗在各种癌症类型中取得了令人印象深刻的成功。近十年来,几种ICI被空前批准为晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗方案。同时,正在进行许多临床试验,以利用更多的ICIs进入最初不可切除的HCC和术后HCC,以预期诱导足够的肿瘤降级以进一步切除或实施辅助治疗以实现无复发生存。分别。在这次审查中,我们的目的是总结一些语用的组织形态学,免疫组织化学,和分子病理参数有望表明新辅助/转化ICI相关治疗的反应,并预测辅助/治疗性ICI相关治疗对HCC的疗效。
    我们使用术语肝细胞癌搜索PubMed,免疫疗法,免疫检查点抑制剂,免疫检查点封锁,转换疗法,新辅助治疗,辅助治疗,生物标志物,病理评估,病理评估至2023年2月。
    尽管对相关HCC标本的病理评估尚无共识,令人鼓舞的是,一些研究集中在这个领域,而且,其他类型癌症的方法和参数也值得参考。对于接受免疫治疗的HCC标本的病理评估,一个合适的抽样方案,识别免疫疗法相关的病理反应,应强调病理反应率的量化。对于计划接受免疫治疗的HCC患者,肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞,肿瘤内三级淋巴结构,程序性细胞死亡配体1,Wnt/β-catenin,微卫星不稳定性和错配修复,肿瘤突变负荷和肿瘤新抗原,以及其他一些信号通路是ICI治疗反应的潜在预测生物标志物。
    免疫治疗时代的HCC管理出现了一个全新的病理学挑战,即提供与免疫治疗相关的诊断报告。尽管许多相关研究是临床前或不足的,它们可能在未来极大地改变HCC的免疫治疗策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy has achieved impressive success in various cancer types. Several ICIs have been unprecedentedly approved as the treatment regimens for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent decade. Meanwhile, numerous clinical trials are being performed to exploit more ICIs into initially unresectable HCC and postoperative HCC to expectantly induce adequate tumor downstaging for further resection or implement adjuvant treatment for relapse-free survival, respectively. In this review, we aim to summarize some pragmatic histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular pathologic parameters which promisingly indicate the response of neoadjuvant/conversion ICI-related therapy and predict the efficacy of adjuvant/therapeutic ICI-related therapy for HCC.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed using the terms hepatocellular carcinoma, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor, immune checkpoint blockade, conversion therapy, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, biomarker, pathologic evaluation, pathologic assessment till February 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: Although there is no consensus regarding the pathologic evaluation of relevant HCC specimens, it is encouraging that a few of studies have concentrated on this field, and moreover, the methods and parameters noted on other cancer types are also worthy of reference. For the pathologic assessment of HCC specimens underwent immunotherapy, a suitable sampling scheme, identifying immunotherapy-related pathologic response, and quantification of pathologic response rate should be emphasized. For the patients of HCC who are scheduled to receive immunotherapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte, intratumoral tertiary lymphoid structure, programmed cell death ligand 1, Wnt/β-catenin, microsatellite instability and mismatch repair, tumor mutational burden and tumor neoantigen, as well as some other signaling pathways are the potential predictive biomarkers of treatment response of ICI.
    UNASSIGNED: The management of HCC in the era of immunotherapy arises a brand-new pathological challenge that is to provide an immunotherapy-related diagnostic report. Albeit many related researches are preclinical or insufficient, they may tremendously alter the immunotherapy strategy of HCC in future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在切除的非转移性黑色素瘤患者中,通过循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)评估分子残留病(MRD)的液体活检是一种有前途的工具,可以对风险进行分层并监测肿瘤演变。然而,它的验证需要分析有效性的证明,临床有效性和实用性。的确,敏感和特异性检测的发展可以优化预后,并最终帮助临床医生调节辅助治疗,以改善临床结果。关于ctDNA指导预后分层的数据正在出现,但评估ctDNA指导治疗决策的临床试验仍在进行中.这篇综述旨在描述基于ctDNA的MRD评估在非转移性黑色素瘤患者中的作用,并提供路线图以应对将其引入临床实践的挑战。
    In patients with resected non-metastatic melanoma, the liquid biopsy for the assessment of molecular residual disease (MRD) by circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) represents a promising tool to stratify the risk and to monitor tumour evolution. However, its validation requires the demonstration of analytical validity, clinical validity and utility. Indeed, the development of sensitive and specific assays can optimize prognostication and eventually help clinicians to modulate adjuvant treatments, in order to improve clinical outcomes. Data about ctDNA-guided prognosis stratification is emerging, but clinical trials assessing ctDNA-guided therapeutic decisions are still ongoing. This review aims to depict the role of ctDNA-based MRD assessment in patients with non-metastatic melanoma and to provide a roadmap to face challenges for its introduction into clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是使用全国多机构数据库阐明切除的肺腺鳞癌(ASC)的临床病理特征和预后因素。
    方法:我们回顾了15,542例接受完全R0切除的ASC患者的记录(n=326),腺癌(AC,n=11,820),或鳞状细胞癌(SC,n=3396)来自2010年日本肺癌注册。为了减少选择偏差,采用倾向评分的治疗概率加权逆(IPTW)方法.
    结果:ASC组的无复发生存率和总生存率(RFS和OS)均比AC组和SC组差(5年OS:ASC为57.5%,交流中83.9%[<0.001],SC为62.3%[P=.086])。在多变量分析中,影响ASCOS的预后因素包括男性,p阶段II-III,和30天内的术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo分类中≥3级)。在130例筛选的ASC患者中,有28例(21.5%)检测到致敏EGFR突变,但这并不影响RFS,操作系统,或复发后生存。尽管与AC和SC组相比,ASC组接受辅助化疗的患者更多,多因素分析和IPTW校正分析均未显示辅助化疗对ASC中的RFS和OS有积极影响.
    结论:在这项全国性的注册研究中,肺ASC比AC和SC更具侵袭性。常规辅助化疗对生存无明显影响,促使我们研究新的辅助治疗策略以优化生存结果。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to clarify the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of resected lung adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) using a nationwide multi-institutional database.
    METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 15,542 patients who underwent complete R0 resection for ASC (n = 326), adenocarcinoma (AC, n = 11,820), or squamous cell carcinoma (SC, n = 3396) from a Japanese lung cancer registry in 2010. To reduce the selection bias, an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method using a propensity score was implemented.
    RESULTS: The ASC group showed worse recurrence-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) than both the AC and SC groups (5-year OS: 57.5% in ASC, 83.9% in AC [< 0.001], and 62.3% in SC [P = .086]). In multivariate analyses, prognostic factors that affected OS for ASC included male, p-stage II-III, and postoperative complications within 30 days (grade ≥ 3 in the Clavien-Dindo classification). The sensitizing EGFR mutation was detected in 28 (21.5%) of 130 screened patients with ASC, but it did not affect either RFS, OS, or postrecurrence survival. Although more patients in the ASC group received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to the AC and SC groups, both multivariate and IPTW-adjusted analyses did not show positive impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on RFS and OS in ASC.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide registry study, lung ASC was more aggressive than both AC and SC. No apparent survival impact of conventional adjuvant chemotherapy prompted us to investigate novel adjuvant strategies to optimize survival outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:骨髓抑制是癌症患者放疗和化疗的严重且常见的并发症,其特征是外周血细胞减少。这种情况不仅损害了治疗的功效,而且增加了患者死亡的风险。天然产物由于其抗氧化特性而成为有前途的辅助疗法,调节免疫反应的能力,和刺激造血干细胞增殖的能力。这些疗法显示出改善骨髓抑制的显著潜力。
    方法:使用搜索词“天然产物,\"\"中药,在著名的数据库中,“和”骨髓抑制“,包括谷歌学者,PubMed,和WebofScience。对所有相关文献进行了细致的分析和总结。这项研究的目的是进行相关分析,以阐明骨髓抑制的潜在机制,并对用于治疗骨髓抑制的天然产物和中药进行分类和综合信息。
    结果:药物和辐射暴露导致的骨髓抑制,病毒感染,外泌体的特点是涉及免疫因子的多种潜在机制,靶基因,以及不同信号通路的激活,包括(TGF-β)/Smad途径。最近,中药单体和化合物,包括二十多种天然产品,比如黄芪和当归,已显示出作为改善骨髓抑制的疗法的有希望的潜力。这些天然产物通过调节造血干细胞发挥其作用,免疫因子,和关键信号通路。
    结论:了解骨髓抑制的各种机制有助于探索天然产物疗法和生物学靶标鉴定,以评估草药疗效。本研究旨在为天然产物的临床应用奠定基础,并为探索骨髓抑制的其他治疗方法提供方法和技术支持。
    BACKGROUND: Myelosuppression is a serious and common complication of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in cancer patients and is characterized by a reduction of peripheral blood cells. This condition not only compromises the efficacy of treatment but also increases the risk of patient death. Natural products are emerging as promising adjuvant therapies due to their antioxidant properties, ability to modulate immune responses, and capacity to stimulate haematopoietic stem cell proliferation. These therapies demonstrate significant potential in ameliorating myelosuppression.
    METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed utilizing the search terms \"natural products,\" \"traditional Chinese medicine,\" and \"myelosuppression\" across prominent databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science. All pertinent literature was meticulously analysed and summarized. The objective of this study was to perform a pertinent analysis to elucidate the mechanisms underlying myelosuppression and to categorize and synthesize information on natural products and traditional Chinese medicines employed for the therapeutic management of myelosuppression.
    RESULTS: Myelosuppression resulting from drug and radiation exposure, viral infections, and exosomes is characterized by multiple underlying mechanisms involving immune factors, target genes, and the activation of diverse signalling pathways, including the (TGF-β)/Smad pathway. Recently, traditional Chinese medicine monomers and compounds, including more than twenty natural products, such as Astragalus and Angelica, have shown promising potential as therapeutics for ameliorating myelosuppression. These natural products exert their effects by modulating haematopoietic stem cells, immune factors, and critical signalling pathways.
    CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the various mechanisms of myelosuppression facilitates the exploration of natural product therapies and biological target identification for evaluating herbal medicine efficacy. This study aimed to establish a foundation for the clinical application of natural products and provide methodologies and technical support for exploring additional treatments for myelosuppression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号