acute cholecystitis

急性胆囊炎
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性胆囊炎患者经皮经肝胆囊引流(PTGBD)需要腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。然而,目前尚不清楚如何区分这些患者的手术难度。
    收集2016年至2022年PTGBD后接受LC的患者数据。根据手术时间将患者分为困难手术和非困难手术,失血,和手术转换。通过ROC评估预测模型的性能,校准,和决策曲线。
    共分析了127例患者,其中非困难手术组91例,困难手术组36例。CRP升高(P=0.011),胆囊周围积液(P<0.001),与胃或十二指肠接触(P=0.015)是PTGBD后困难LC的独立危险因素。根据这些风险因素绘制了列线图,并且校准良好,擅长区分PTGBD后的困难LC。
    术前全身和局部炎症指标升高是PTGBD后困难LC的预测因子。
    UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is required for acute cholecystitis patient with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD). However, it\'s unknown how to distinguishing the surgical difficulty for these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Data of patients who underwent LC after PTGBD between 2016 and 2022 were collected. Patients were categorized into difficult and non-difficult operations based on operative time, blood loss, and surgical conversion. Performance of prediction model was evaluated by ROC, calibration, and decision curves.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 127 patients were analyzed, including 91 in non-difficult operation group and 36 in difficult operation group. Elevated CRP (P = 0.011), pericholecystic effusion (P < 0.001), and contact with stomach or duodenal (P = 0.015) were independent risk factors for difficult LC after PTGBD. A nomogram was developed according to these risk factors, and was well-calibrated and good at distinguishing difficult LC after PTGBD.
    UNASSIGNED: Preoperative elevated systemic and local inflammation indictors are predictors for difficult LC after PTGBD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    此病例介绍涉及一名31岁的孕妇(gravida2,para1),在她怀孕的第33周,他被送到特里卡拉总医院急诊科,在希腊,抱怨24小时腹痛,呕吐,和腹泻大便。初步诊断为急性胃肠炎,决定接纳孕妇进入妇产科。腹部超声显示胆囊壁增厚,而不存在胆结石或肝内和肝外胆管扩张。手术团队的临床检查,结合超声和实验室检查结果,建立急性胆囊炎的诊断。在成功的保守抗生素治疗后,病人在住院第五天出院。她在产褥期接受了腹腔镜胆囊切除术。在本文中,在描述了一个怀孕的急性胆囊炎病例后,我们强调了关于这些患者管理的重大诊断困难和治疗困境,包括他们不愿使用侵入性诊断方法,以及他们对给药药物的致畸性的担忧。
    This case presentation involves a 31-year-old pregnant woman (gravida 2, para 1) in her 33rd week of pregnancy, who presented to the Emergency Department of General Hospital of Trikala, in Greece, complaining of 24-hour abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrheal stools. With a possible initial diagnosis of acute gastroenteritis, it was decided to admit the pregnant woman to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department. Abdominal ultrasound revealed thickening of the gallbladder wall without the presence of gallstones or distension of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. Clinical examination by a surgical team, combined with ultrasound and laboratory findings, established the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. After successful conservative antibiotic treatment, the patient was discharged from the department on the fifth day of hospitalization. She underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the puerperal period. In this paper, after describing a case of acute cholecystitis in pregnancy, we highlight the significant diagnostic difficulties and therapeutic dilemmas regarding the management of these patients, including their reluctance to use invasive diagnostic methods and their concerns about the teratogenicity of administered drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在被认为腹腔镜胆囊切除术高风险的患者中,传统上,经皮胆囊引流被认为是一线治疗选择。最近的证据支持内镜胆囊引流是一种安全可行的替代选择。我们描述了一例Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术患者,因手术困难而导致急性胆囊炎和胆总管结石,腹腔镜胆囊切除术失败,在我们机构成功进行了一次内镜超声引导下经胃内镜逆行胰胆管造影术和内镜超声引导下经胆囊壁引流.
    In patients considered high risk of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, percutaneous gallbladder drainage is traditionally considered first-line treatment option. Recent evidence supports endoscopic gallbladder drainage as a safe and feasible alternate option. We describe a case of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery patient with acute cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis with unsuccessful laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of difficult operative field, underwent successful single-session endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage at our institution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:严格的安全性(CVS)对于确保安全的腹腔镜胆囊切除术很重要。当CVS是不可能的,进行胆囊次全切除术.在考虑胆囊次全切除术时,外科医生通常关心的是防止胆囊管的胆漏。急性胆囊炎的胆囊次全切除术的两种主要类型是开窗和重建。以前,这两个没有选择标准;因此,进行开放转换。这项研究旨在评估我们以目标为导向的方法,以选择开窗或重建急性胆囊炎的胆囊次全切除术。
    方法:我们在2019年4月推出了面向目标的方法。在介绍这种方法之前,急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术无胆囊次全切除术标准。我们的方法引入后,根据大部胆囊切除术标准对急性胆囊炎进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。我们回顾性回顾了2015年至2021年间因急性胆囊炎而接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者的病历。腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎由外科医生进行,无论他们是新手还是退伍军人。
    结果:从2015年4月到2019年3月的时期是在我们的方法引入(BI)之前,从2019年4月到2021年12月的时期是在我们的方法引入(AI)之后。在BI和AI期间有177和186例急性胆囊炎患者,分别。两组在术前特征方面无显著差异,手术时间,和失血。组间腹腔镜胆囊次全切除率无差异(10.2%[BI]vs.[AI]13.9%;p=0.266)。BI期间的开放转化率明显高于AI期间(7.4%vs.1.6%;p=0.015)。
    结论:我们的目标导向方法是可行的,安全,许多外科医生容易理解。
    BACKGROUND: A critical view of safety (CVS) is important to ensure safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. When the CVS is not possible, subtotal cholecystectomy is performed. While considering subtotal cholecystectomy, surgeons are often concerned about preventing bile leakage from the cystic ducts. The two main types of subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis are fenestrating and reconstituting. Previously, there were no selection criteria for these two; therefore, open conversion was performed. This study aimed to evaluate our goal-oriented approach to choose fenestrating or reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
    METHODS: We introduced our goal-oriented approach in April 2019. Before introducing this approach, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed without criteria for subtotal cholecystectomy. After our approach was introduced, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed according to the subtotal cholecystectomy criteria. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between 2015 and 2021. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed by surgeons regardless of whether they were novices or veterans.
    RESULTS: The period from April 2015 to March 2019 was before the introduction (BI) of our approach, the period from April 2019 to December 2021 was after the introduction (AI) of our approach. There were 177 and 186 patients with acute cholecystitis during the BI and AI periods, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of preoperative characteristics, operative time, and blood loss. No difference in the laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy rate between groups (10.2% [BI] vs. 13.9% [AI]; p = 0.266) was obserbed. The open conversion rate during the BI period was significantly higher than that during the AI period (7.4% vs. 1.6%; p = 0.015).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our goal-oriented approach is feasible, safe, and easy for many surgeons to understand.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急性胆囊炎(AC)患者表现为不利的全身或局部条件,通常采用经皮胆囊造口术(PC)作为临时措施。PC后间歇胆囊切除术的临床结果尚不清楚。该研究的目的是确定AC的PC后胆囊切除术的时机与间歇胆囊切除术的围手术期并发症发生率之间的关系。我们假设胆囊切除术的特定时间间隔与不良事件的风险较低相关。
    方法:这是一项回顾性(2018-2020年)多中心研究,在8家参与医院系统的成年AC患者中进行,用PC和间歇胆囊切除术管理。人口统计,合并症,治疗细节,并对结果进行了检查。根据PC后手术时机的四分位数对患者进行分组(<7、7-9、10-13、>13周)。主要结果是胆管损伤的复合终点,再操作,重新接纳,图像引导干预,内镜干预,转换为开放手术,或死亡。
    结果:188例患者的年龄中位数为66岁,AC为轻度(41%),中等(47%),严重(12%)。从PC到手术的中位天数为65天(Q1=48,Q3=91)。腹腔镜胆囊切除术(89.9%)是最常见的计划方法(机器人6.4%,3.7%开放)和28(14.9%)转化为开放。51例患者报告了复合终点(27.1%)。7例(3.7%)患者发生胆道损伤。手术时间和术中引流管放置与复合结局独立相关。PC后7周内的胆囊切除术与复合终点的风险降低相关(OR=0.36,95%CI0.13-0.97),与PC后>13周接受手术的患者相比。
    结论:PC后手术时机与手术结果相关。在7周之前接受手术的患者的发病率明显低于延迟胆囊切除术的患者。在PC后的患者选择和管理中应考虑这些结果。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) presenting with unfavorable systemic or local conditions are often managed with percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) as a temporary measure. The clinical outcomes of interval cholecystectomy following PC remain unclear. The aim of the study was to identify the association between the timing of cholecystectomy following PC for AC and perioperative complication rates at interval cholecystectomy. We hypothesized that there would be a specific time interval to cholecystectomy associated with lower risk for adverse events.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective (2018-2020) multicenter study at 8 participating hospital systems of adult patients with AC, managed with PC and interval cholecystectomy. Demographics, comorbidities, treatment details, and outcomes were examined. Patients were grouped based on quartiles for timing of surgery after PC (< 7, 7-9, 10-13, > 13 weeks). The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of bile duct injury, reoperation, readmission, image-guided intervention, endoscopic intervention, conversion to open surgery, or death.
    RESULTS: There were 188 patients with a median age of 66 years with AC classified as mild (41%), moderate (47%), and severe (12%). Median days from PC to surgery were 65 (Q1 = 48, Q3 = 91). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (89.9%) was the most commonly planned approach (robotic 6.4%, 3.7% open) and 28 (14.9%) were converted to open. The composite endpoint was reported in 51 patients (27.1%). A biliary injury occurred in 7 (3.7%) patients. Time to surgery and intraoperative drain placement were independently associated with the composite outcome. Cholecystectomy within 7 weeks of PC was associated with decreased risk (OR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.13-0.97) of the composite endpoint, compared to patients undergoing surgery > 13 weeks after PC.
    CONCLUSIONS: Timing of surgery following PC was associated with procedural outcomes. Patients undergoing surgery before 7 weeks experienced significantly less morbidity than patients having delayed cholecystectomy. These results should be considered in patient selection and management after PC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:紧急胆囊切除术是治疗急性胆囊炎(AC)的主要手段。在实际的实践中,围手术期预防性抗生素用于预防术后感染并发症(PIC),但其有效性缺乏证据.我们的目的是探讨预防性抗生素在急诊胆囊切除术中的疗效。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,科克伦中部,WebofScience(WOS),和Scopus至2023年6月14日。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),该试验涉及根据东京指南诊断为轻度至中度AC的患者,这些患者正在接受紧急胆囊切除术,并在术前和/或术后给予抗生素作为干预组,并与安慰剂组进行比较。对于二分数据,我们应用了风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI),而对于连续数据,我们使用均差(MD)和95%CI。
    结果:我们纳入了7个RCTs,包含1747例患者的总体样本量。我们的分析显示总PIC没有显著差异(RR=0.84,95%CI(0.63,1.12),P=0.23),手术部位感染(RR=0.79,95%CI(0.56,1.12),P=0.19),远处感染(RR=1.01,95%CI(0.55,1.88),P=0.97),非感染性并发症(RR=0.84,95%CI(0.64,1.11),P=0.22),死亡率(RR=0.34,95%CI(0.04,3.23),P=0.35),和再入院(RR=0.69,95%CI(0.43,1.11),P=0.13)。
    结论:轻中度急性胆囊炎患者围手术期使用抗生素对急诊胆囊切除术后术后感染并发症没有明显的减少。(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023438755)。
    BACKGROUND: Emergency cholecystectomy is the mainstay in treating acute cholecystitis (AC). In actual practice, perioperative prophylactic antibiotics are used to prevent postoperative infectious complications (PIC), but their effectiveness lacks evidence. We aim to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in emergency cholecystectomy.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (WOS), and Scopus up to June 14, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved patients diagnosed with mild to moderate AC according to Tokyo guidelines who were undergoing emergency cholecystectomy and were administered preoperative and/or postoperative antibiotics as an intervention group and compared to a placebo group. For dichotomous data, we applied the risk ratio (RR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI), while for continuous data, we used the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI.
    RESULTS: We included seven RCTs encompassing a collective sample size of 1747 patients. Our analysis showed no significant differences regarding total PIC (RR = 0.84 with 95% CI (0.63, 1.12), P = 0.23), surgical site infection (RR = 0.79 with 95% CI (0.56, 1.12), P = 0.19), distant infections (RR = 1.01 with 95% CI (0.55, 1.88), P = 0.97), non-infectious complications (RR = 0.84 with 95% CI (0.64, 1.11), P = 0.22), mortality (RR = 0.34 with 95% CI (0.04, 3.23), P = 0.35), and readmission (RR = 0.69 with 95% CI (0.43, 1.11), P = 0.13).
    CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative antibiotics in patients with mild to moderate acute cholecystitis did not show a significant reduction of postoperative infectious complications after emergency cholecystectomy. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023438755).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:胆道错构瘤是罕见的先天性胆管发育异常,是偶然发现的。它们通常表现为肝脏表面的多个病变,类似于转移性病变。我们报告了一例急性结石性胆囊炎,最终被诊断为无症状的多发性胆道错构瘤。
    方法:一名42岁男性,无合并症,表现为发热和呕吐相关的上腹部疼痛。腹部对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)显示急性结石性胆囊炎,肝肿大伴肝脏脂肪变化。在腹腔镜检查中,发现肝脏在两个叶的表面上散布着直径约0.5cm的灰白色结节状病变。其中一个病变与胆囊切除术一起进行了活检。
    结论:通常称为“vonMeyenburg复合物”的胆道错构瘤是在肝脏中发现的罕见病变,通常无症状。在这种情况下,患者表现出急性胆囊炎的症状,但肝脏病变的活检报告被证明是良性胆道错构瘤,在最初的印象中看起来像是多个肝脏次级。
    结论:我们描述了一个成人多发性胆道错构瘤的病例,这是一个偶然发现。胆道错构瘤是一种罕见的实体,有时可以模仿肝脏中的转移。因此,在计划任何进一步治疗之前,组织病理学确认至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Biliary hamartomas are rare congenital development anomaly of bile ducts, which are detected incidentally. They often present as multiple lesions on liver surface which resembles metastatic lesions. We report a case of acute calculous cholecystitis ultimately diagnosed to have asymptomatic multiple biliary hamartomas.
    METHODS: A 42-year-old male with no co-morbidities presented with pain in upper abdomen associated with fever and vomiting. Contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of abdomen showed acute calculous cholecystitis, hepatomegaly with fatty changes in liver. On laparoscopy the liver was found to have grey-white nodular lesions of about 0.5 cm in diameter scattered on the surface of both the lobes. One of the lesion was biopsied along with cholecystectomy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Biliary hamartoma commonly referred to as \"von Meyenburg complexes\" are uncommon lesions found in the liver which are usually asymptomatic. In this case the patient presented with symptoms of acute cholecystitis but the biopsy report from liver lesions proved to be benign biliary hamartoma which on initial impression looked like multiple liver secondaries.
    CONCLUSIONS: We have described a case of an adult with multiple biliary hamartoma which was an incidental finding. Biliary hamartoma is a rare entity which can sometime mimic metastasis in the liver. Thus, histopathological confirmation is essential before planning any further treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于急性胆囊炎和消化性溃疡等并发症的临床特征重叠,大量饮酒和吸烟史患者的腹痛提出了诊断挑战。对醉酒患者进行不可靠的身体检查通常会使准确的诊断复杂化。我们介绍了一个56岁的男性,有酗酒和吸烟史,出现非特异性腹痛的患者到急诊科就诊。初始成像提示胆囊炎,但由于病人中毒,他的身体检查不可靠。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,意外发现了一个穿孔的幽门前溃疡,由胆囊密封。这种情况突出了仅依靠影像学来诊断醉酒患者的腹部状况的局限性。术中发现穿孔性溃疡需要改变手术方法,强调有重大生活方式风险的患者需要灵活的手术计划,并高度怀疑其他腹部病变。通过自适应的手术技术和全面的术后护理,成功地管理了该患者,包括根除幽门螺杆菌的治疗,强调了保持广泛的鉴别诊断和准备适应手术计划的重要性.这种方法对于有效管理复杂案件至关重要,确保解决直接的手术问题和根本原因,以优化恢复并防止复发。
    Abdominal pain in patients with significant alcohol use and smoking history presents diagnostic challenges due to overlapping clinical features of complications like acute cholecystitis and peptic ulcers. The unreliable physical examinations of intoxicated patients often complicate accurate diagnosis. We present a case of a 56-year-old male with a history of alcoholism and smoking, who presented to the emergency department with nonspecific abdominal pain. Initial imaging suggested cholecystitis, but due to the patient\'s intoxication, his physical examination was unreliable. During a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a perforated prepyloric ulcer was unexpectedly discovered, sealed by the gallbladder. This case highlights the limitations of relying solely on imaging for diagnosing abdominal conditions in intoxicated patients. The intraoperative discovery of the perforated ulcer necessitated a shift in the surgical approach, emphasizing the need for flexibility in surgical planning and a high index of suspicion for other abdominal pathologies in patients with significant lifestyle risks. The successful management of this patient through adaptive surgical techniques and comprehensive postoperative care, including Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, underscores the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis and readiness to adapt surgical plans. This approach is essential for managing complex cases effectively, ensuring that both the immediate surgical issues and underlying causes are addressed to optimize recovery and prevent recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    小肠憩室病不是常见的疾病实体;然而,它越来越多地被诊断出来,并与各种胃肠道疾病有关。虽然罕见,可能发生并发症,有时可能需要手术或内窥镜介入治疗.此外,由于各种体征和症状,怀疑和诊断十二指肠憩室病(DD)可能具有挑战性。我们目前的大部分知识来自病例报告和系列报告。本报告旨在记录一例DD,表现为严重的右上腹疼痛,模仿急性胆囊炎的体征和症状。它还回顾和总结了有关DD临床表现的现有文献,它的诊断方法,治疗方式,以及ED中可能遇到的并发症。
    Small bowel diverticulosis is not a common disease entity; however, it is increasingly diagnosed and linked to various gastrointestinal complaints. Although rare, complications can occur and may sometimes require surgical or endoscopic intervention. Furthermore, suspecting and diagnosing duodenal diverticulosis (DD) can be challenging due to the variety of presenting signs and symptoms. Much of our current knowledge comes from case reports and series. This report aims to document a case of DD presenting with severe right upper quadrant pain mimicking the signs and symptoms of acute cholecystitis. It also reviews and summarizes the available literature on the clinical manifestations of DD, its diagnostic approach, treatment modalities, and possible complications encountered in the ED.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号