Antiviral therapy is constantly challenged by the emergence of resistant pathogens. At the same time, experimental approaches to understand and predict resistance are limited by long periods required for evolutionary processes. Here, we present a herpes simplex virus 1 mutant with impaired proofreading capacity and consequently elevated mutation rates. Comparing this hypermutator to parental wild type virus, we study the evolution of antiviral drug resistance in vitro. We model resistance development and elucidate underlying genetic changes against three antiviral substances. Our analyzes reveal no principle difference in the evolutionary behavior of both viruses, adaptive processes are overall similar, however significantly accelerated for the hypermutator. We conclude that hypermutator viruses are useful for modeling adaptation to antiviral therapy. They offer the benefit of expedited adaptation without introducing apparent bias and can therefore serve as an accelerator to predict natural evolution.

BACKGROUND: Post-contrast T1-Sampling Perfection with Application-optimized Contrasts using different flip angle Evolutions (SPACE) is the preferred 3D T1 spin-echo sequence for evaluating brain metastases, regardless of the prolonged scan time.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the application of accelerated post-contrast T1-SPACE with iterative denoising (ID) for intracranial enhancing lesions in oncologic patients.
METHODS: For evaluation of intracranial lesions, 108 patients underwent standard and accelerated T1-SPACE during the same imaging session. Two neuroradiologists evaluated the overall image quality, artifacts, degree of enhancement, mean contrast-to-noise ratiolesion/parenchyma, and number of enhancing lesions for standard and accelerated T1-SPACE without ID.
RESULTS: Although there was a significant difference in the overall image quality and mean contrast-to-noise ratiolesion/parenchyma between standard and accelerated T1-SPACE without ID and accelerated SPACE with and without ID, there was no significant difference between standard and accelerated T1-SPACE with ID. Accelerated T1-SPACE showed more artifacts than standard T1-SPACE; however, accelerated T1-SPACE with ID showed significantly fewer artifacts than accelerated T1-SPACE without ID. Accelerated T1-SPACE without ID showed a significantly lower number of enhancing lesions than standard- and accelerated T1-SPACE with ID; however, there was no significant difference between standard and accelerated T1-SPACE with ID, regardless of lesion size.
CONCLUSIONS: Although accelerated T1-SPACE markedly decreased the scan time, it showed lower overall image quality and lesion detectability than the standard T1-SPACE. Application of ID to accelerated T1-SPACE resulted in comparable overall image quality and detection of enhancing lesions in brain parenchyma as standard T1-SPACE. Accelerated T1-SPACE with ID may be a promising replacement for standard T1-SPACE.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited clinical data for recommendations on how to deliver thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) concurrently with chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer. We reviewed radiation therapy treatment plans in a randomized phase 2 trial comparing high-dose with standard-dose twice-daily TRT to assess treatment planning techniques, dose-volume data for target volumes and organs at risk (OARs), evaluate compliance with the protocol, associations with radiation-induced toxicity, and whether an imbalance in treatment planning parameters might be a reason for the large survival benefit of the higher dose (median overall survival 43.6 vs 22.6 months).
METHODS: In the study, 170 patients were to receive 4 courses of platinum/etoposide and were randomized to receive twice-daily TRT of 60 Gy/40 fractions (fx) or 45 Gy/30 fx. TRT treatment plans for those who received 1 or more fx of TRT (n = 166) were analyzed.
RESULTS: The most common treatment planning technique was 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (67%). The 75th percentile of the reported dose-volume parameters for the OARs were within the protocol-recommended limits for both groups. Mean doses to the esophagus of 25.5 Gy (IQR, 20.2-31.3; 60 Gy/40 fx) and 24.3 Gy (IQR, 20.3-27.5; 45 Gy/30 fx) were associated with 21% and 18% ≥ grade 3 acute esophagitis, respectively. In the 60 Gy/40 fx group, a mean dose to the lungs of 16.5 Gy (IQR, 15.8-16.9), V20 Gy of 29.5% (IQR, 28.8-30.4), and V5 Gy of 65.6% (IQR, 61.5-68.7) led to ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in 4% of the patients. There was no ≥ grade 3 pneumonitis in the 45 Gy/30 fx group. The treatment planning techniques, the percentage change in volumes between original and redelineated OARs, planning target volumes, relative doses, and laterality were well balanced between the randomly assigned groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the incidences of severe radiation-induced toxicities were within the range of other recent trials, the reported doses to the OARs appear to be safe. Treatment planning parameters were well balanced between the randomly assigned groups, supporting that the survival benefit of the twice-daily 60 Gy/40 fx TRT schedule was due to the higher dose.

The creation of scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering has faced significant challenges in developing constructs that can provide sufficient biomechanical support and offer suitable degradation characteristics. Ideally, such tissue-engineering techniques necessitate the fabrication of scaffolds that mirror the mechanical characteristics of the articular cartilage while degrading safely without damaging the regenerating tissues. The aim of this study was to create porous, biomechanically comparable 3D-printed scaffolds made from Poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) 85:15 and to assess their degradation at physiological conditions 37 °C in pH 7.4 phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for up to 56 days. Furthermore, the effect of scaffold degradation on the cell viability and proliferation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (HBMSC) was evaluated in vitro. To assess the long-term degradation of the scaffolds, accelerated degradation tests were performed at an elevated temperature of 47 °C for 28 days. The results show that the fabricated scaffolds were porous with an interconnected architecture and had comparable biomechanical properties to native cartilage. The degradative changes indicated stable degradation at physiological conditions with no significant effect on the properties of the scaffold and biocompatibility of the scaffold to HBMSC. Furthermore, the accelerated degradation tests showed consistent degradation of the scaffolds even in the long term without the notable release of acidic byproducts. It is hoped that the fabrication and degradation characteristics of this scaffold will, in the future, translate into a potential medical device for cartilage tissue regeneration.

Mortality in rheumatoid arthritis is increased, about twice vs controls, and cardiovascular diseases are a major cause. The pathogenesis is primarily accelerated atherosclerosis of the coronary, cervical, and cerebral arteries, which is premature, pervasive, and progressive, but often occult, under-recognized, and under-treated. It is mostly driven by the chronic, systemic autoimmune inflammation, but increased prevalence of traditional risk factors and adverse effects of treatments are also very important. Inflammatory markers, disease severity, and duration are major determinants of the cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis, which is underestimated by usual methods. Cardiovascular protection is best achieved by suppressing inflammation and disease activity as early as possible (\"treat-to-target\"), and striving to achieve and maintain remission or lowest disease activity. Secondly, identifying and addressing the whole spectrum of traditional risk factors, currently often neglected, is necessary. Because long-term glucocorticoid exposure ≥5 mg/d may be associated with cardiovascular events and other harm, more intensive treatment, especially useful for bridging with methotrexate at the outset of treatment, needs to be limited in time and dosage. A multipronged approach may improve cardiovascular outcomes of RA patients in future studies.

There is growing interest in accelerated rTMS dosing regimens, wherein multiple sessions of rTMS are applied per day. This Phase IV study evaluated the safety, efficacy, and durability of various accelerated Deep TMS protocols used in clinical practice. Data were aggregated from 111 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) at 4 sites. Patients received one of several accelerated Deep TMS protocols (2x/day, 3x/day, 5x/day, 10x/day). Self-assessment questionnaires (PHQ-9, BDI-II) and clinician-based rating scales (HDRS-21, MADRS) were collected. On average, accelerated TMS led to an 80.2% response and 50.5% remission rate in the first month based on the most rated scale for each patient. There was no significant difference between protocols (Response: 2x/day:89.6%; 3x/day:75%; 5x/day:81%; 10x/day:67.6%). Response occurred after 10 (3x/day), 20 (5x/day), and 31 sessions (10x/day) on average- all of which occur on day 3-4 of treatment. Of patients with longer term follow up, durability was found in 86.7% (n = 30; 60 days) and 92.9% (n = 14; 180 days). The protocols were well-tolerated with no reported serious adverse events. Accelerated Deep TMS protocols are found to be safe, effective therapeutic options for MDD. They offer treatment resistant patients a treatment option with a rapid onset of action and with long durability.

To evaluate corneal stiffening of porcine corneas induced by corneal crosslinking (CXL) with constant irradiance as a function of total fluence.
Ninety corneas from freshly enucleated porcine eyes were divided into five groups of 18 eyes. Groups 1-4 underwent epi-off CXL using a dextran-based riboflavin solution and an irradiance of 18 mW/cm2, group 5 served as the control group. Groups 1 to 4 were treated with a total fluence of 20, 15, 10.8, and 5.4 J/cm2, respectively. Thereafter, biomechanical measurements were performed on 5 mm wide and 6 mm long strips using an uniaxial material tester. Pachymetry measurements were performed on each cornea.
At 10% strain, the stress was 76, 56, 52, and 31% higher in groups 1-4, respectively compared to the control group. The Young\'s modulus was 2.85 MPa for group 1, 2.53 MPa for group 2, 2.46 MPa for group 3, 2.12 MPa for group 4, and 1.62 MPa for the control group. The difference between groups 1 to 4 and the control group 5 were statistically significant (p = <0.001; p = <0.001; p = <0.001; p = 0.021). In addition, group 1 showed significantly more stiffening than group 4 (p = <0.001), no other significant differences were found. Pachymetry measurements revealed no statistically significant differences among the five groups.
Additional mechanical stiffening can be achieved by increasing the fluence of the CXL. There was no threshold detected up to 20 J/cm2. A higher fluence could compensate the weaker effect of accelerated or epi-on CXL procedures.

The standard method of Hymenoptera venom intradermal skin test is performed at a starting concentration of 0.001 to 0.01 μg/mL and increased by 10-fold concentrations until positive or a maximum concentration of 1 μg/mL. Accelerated methods that start at higher concentrations have been reported as safe; however, many institutions have not adopted this approach.
To compare the outcome and safety of standard and accelerated venom skin test protocols.
This was a retrospective chart review of patients with suspected venom allergy who underwent skin testing at 4 allergy clinics within a single health care system from 2012 to 2022. Demographic data, test protocol (standard vs accelerated), test results, and adverse reactions were reviewed.
Of 134 patients who underwent standard venom skin test, 2 (1.5%) experienced an adverse reaction, whereas none of the 77 patients who underwent accelerated venom skin test experienced an adverse reaction. One patient, with a history of chronic urticaria, experienced urticaria. The other experienced anaphylaxis requiring an epinephrine although had tested negative to all venom concentrations. Within the standard testing protocol, more than 75% of the positive results occurred at concentrations of 0.1 or 1 μg/mL. Within the accelerated testing protocol, more than 60% of the positive results occurred at 1 μg/mL.
The study underscores the overall safety of venom intradermal skin test. Most of the positive results occurred at 0.1 or 1 μg/mL. Adopting an accelerated approach would reduce time and cost associated with testing.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this exploratory study was to evaluate different accelerated tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine schedules for last-minute travellers.
METHODS: In a single-centre, open-label pilot study, 77 TBE-naïve Belgian soldiers were randomized to one of the following five schedules with FSME-Immun®: group 1 (\'classical accelerated\' schedule) received one intramuscular (IM) dose at day 0 and day 14, group 2 two IM doses at day 0, group 3 two intradermal (ID) doses at day 0, group 4 two ID doses at day 0 and day 7, group 5 two ID doses at day 0 and day 14. The last dose(s) of the primary vaccination scheme were given after one year: IM (1 dose) or ID (2 doses). TBE virus neutralizing antibodies were measured in a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT90 and 50) at day 0, 14, 21, 28, month 3, 6, 12, and 12 + 21 days. Seropositivity was defined as neutralizing antibody titres ≥10.
RESULTS: The median age was 19-19.5 years in each group. Median time-to-seropositivity up to day 28 was shortest for PRNT90 in ID-group 4 and for PRNT50 in all ID groups. Seroconversion until day 28 peaked highest for PRNT90 in ID-group 4 (79%) and for PRNT50 in ID-groups 4 and 5 (both 100%). Seropositivity after the last vaccination after 12 months was high in all groups. Previous yellow fever vaccination was reported in 16% and associated with lower GMTs of TBE-specific antibodies at all time points. The vaccine was generally well tolerated. However, mild to moderate local reactions occurred in 73-100% of ID compared to 0-38% of IM vaccinations, persistent discolouration was observed in nine ID vaccinated individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: The accelerated two-visit ID schedules might offer a better immunological alternative to the recommended classical accelerated IM schedule but an aluminium-free vaccine would preferable.

Project Orbis was initiated in May 2019 by the Oncology Center of Excellence to facilitate faster patient access to innovative cancer therapies by providing a framework for concurrent submissions and review of oncology products among international partners. Since its inception, Australia\'s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), Canada\'s Health Canada (HC), Singapore\'s Health Sciences Authority (HSA), Switzerland\'s Swissmedic (SMC), Brazil\'s National Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), United Kingdom\'s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and most recently Israel\'s Ministry of Health (IMoH) Medical Technologies, Health Information, Innovation and Research (MTIIR) Directorate, have joined Project Orbis. While each country has its own expedited review pathways to bring promising therapies to patients, there are some similarities and differences in pathways and timelines. FDA\'s fast-track designation and MHRA\'s marketing authorization under exceptional circumstances (MAEC) allow non-clinical and limited clinical evidence to support approval under these programs. HC\'s Extraordinary Use New Drug (EUND) pathway allows granting exceptional use authorization with limited clinical evidence. ANVISA, HSA, MTIIR, and TGA do not have standard pathways that allow non-clinical evidence and limited clinical evidence. While there is no definite regulatory pathway for HSA, the current framework for approval does allow flexibility in the type of data (non-clinical or clinical) required to demonstrate the benefit-risk profile of a product. HSA may register a product if the agency is satisfied that the overall benefit outweighs the risk. All Project Orbis Partner (POP) countries have similar programs to the FDA accelerated approval program except ANVISA. Although HSA and MTIIR do not have defined pathways for accelerated approval programs, there are opportunities to request accelerated approval per these agencies. All POP countries have pathways like the FDA priority review except MHRA. Priority review timelines for new drugs range from 120 to 264 calendar days (cd). Standard review timelines for new drugs range from 180 to 365 cd.