背景:职业参与被认为对个人的健康和福祉至关重要。参与是一种多维结构,包含了在生命过程中转变的客观和主观维度。尽管如此,缺乏全面的措施来检查年轻人参与适合年龄的活动。因此,我们开发了青少年每日参与量表(YADAPS),并旨在探讨其心理测量特性。
方法:在研究1中,基于9位专家建立了YADAPS的内容效度。其内部一致性,判据,convergent,并在115名典型青年(21-35岁)中探索了结构效度。使用不同的样本,研究2检查了YADAPS在33名患有发育协调障碍(DCD)的年轻成年人和52名典型同龄人中的判别效度。
■这些研究中没有包括消费者和社区的参与。
结果:YADAPS项目的相关性是足够的。内部一致性在大多数尺度(.74≤α≤.89)上是可以接受的。主观参与量表与幸福感之间的相关性支持了标准效度。所有量表都有收敛效度。未观察到性别效应(p≥0.05)。然而,有和没有DCD的个体之间存在显着差异(p≤0.05)。
结论:YADAPS似乎是对年轻人参与的客观和主观维度的一种有希望的衡量标准。结果支持审查各种参与层面的重要性,包括职业经验。因此,它可以用于年轻人的临床目的以及职业科学研究,扩大我们对青年时期各种生活情况下参与维度之间相互作用的理解。然而,需要进一步研究心理测量特性,最适合的评分方法,并巩固他们在不同群体的年轻人中的稳健性。
结论:参与,或者一个人如何参与日常生活活动,极大地影响福祉。一个人的日常活动在生命周期中发生变化,按照一个人的发展阶段。现有的参与评估有局限性,比如不考虑年轻人的担忧,或者只关注参与的某些方面。通过关注参与的客观可观察和主观体验方面,青年成人每日参与量表(YADAPS)致力于成为一种全面的评估工具,专门设计用于反映与青年有关的活动。本手稿为YADAPS提供了初步的有效性和可靠性,一份新的问卷,评估参与与年轻成年个体相关的活动的客观和主观方面。此外,问卷能够区分有和没有参与困难的年轻人;因此,它适合研究和临床使用。
BACKGROUND: Participation in occupations is considered essential for individuals\' health and wellbeing. Participation is a multidimensional construct that encompasses objective and subjective dimensions that transform over the course of life. Nonetheless, there is a lack of comprehensive measures that examine young adults\' participation in age-appropriate activities. Therefore, we developed the Young Adults\' Daily Participation Scale (YADAPS) and aimed to explore its psychometric properties.
METHODS: In Study 1, the content validity of the YADAPS was established based on nine experts. Its internal consistency, criterion, convergent, and construct validity were explored among 115 typical young adults (21-35 years). Using a different sample, Study 2 examined YADAPS discriminant validity among 33 young adults with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) and 52 typical peers.
UNASSIGNED: No consumer and community involvement was included in these studies.
RESULTS: The relevance of YADAPS items was sufficient. Internal consistency was acceptable to excellent in most scales (.74 ≤ α ≤ .89). Criterion validity was supported by correlations between the subjective participation scales and a wellbeing measure. Convergent validity was found for all scales. No gender effect was observed (p ≥ .05). However, significant differences (p ≤ .05) were found between individuals with and without DCD.
CONCLUSIONS: The YADAPS appears to be a promising measure of objective and subjective dimensions of participation in young adults. The results support the importance of examining various participation dimensions, including occupational experience. Thus, it may be used for clinical purposes among young adults as well as for occupational science research, to broaden our understanding on the interplay between participation dimensions in various life situations in young adulthood. However, further research is needed on psychometric properties, the most suited scoring method, and to consolidate their robustness among diverse populations of young adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Participation, or how one engages in daily life activities, greatly affects wellbeing. The activities in one\'s routine change over the lifespan, in accordance with one\'s developmental phase. Existing assessments of participation have limitations, like not considering young adults\' concerns or only focussing on certain aspects of participation. By focussing on both the objective-observable and subjective-experiential aspects of participation, the Young Adults\' Daily Participation Scale (YADAPS) strives to be a comprehensive assessment tool designed specifically for reflecting activities relevant in young adulthood. This manuscript provides preliminary validity and reliability for the YADAPS, a new questionnaire that assesses objective and subjective aspects of participation in activities relevant for individuals in young adulthood. Furthermore, the questionnaire is able to distinguish between young adults with and without participation difficulties; therefore, it is suitable for research and clinical use.