Patients with solid tumor brain metastases that progress after whole-brain radiation have limited options. This prospective trial investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of bevacizumab as salvage therapy in this population. Eligible patients received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks until progression. The primary endpoint was radiologic response using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, and safety. Quality of life (QOL) was studied using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br) scale. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, with twenty-four having evaluable data for response. The majority of histologies (n = 21, 78%) were breast cancer. The remaining histologies were non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 4, 15%), neuroendocrine cancer (n = 1, 3%), and papillary fallopian serous adenocarcinoma (n = 1, 3%). Eighteen patients had radiologic response, with two patients demonstrating partial response (8.33%) and sixteen patients demonstrating stable disease (66.7%). The median duration of response was 203 days. PFS at 6 months was 46%, median PFS was 5.3 m, and median OS was 9.5 m. Treatment was well tolerated, with six patients experiencing grade 3 lymphopenia and hypertension. There was one grade 3 thromboembolism. QOL was not negatively impacted. Bevacizumab is a safe and feasible salvage treatment with durable response and favorable overall survival for patients with progressive brain metastases after whole-brain radiation.

BACKGROUND: Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is a standard and effective approach for brain metastases, but it is linked to neurocognitive complications, specifically issues related to the hippocampus. Innovative strategies are being explored to enhance outcomes. However, a consensus is yet to be reached in this field. Our aim is to investigate the efficacy and safety of WBRT combined with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), memantine, and hippocampal avoidance (HA) techniques in treatment of brain metastases.
METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we comprehensively searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane for studies reporting the efficacy and toxicity of WBRT-based combination therapies from inception to September 19, 2023. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs) for dichotomous outcomes, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic.
RESULTS: Among 2175 articles, 29 studies involving 3460 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that compared to WBRT alone, combination therapies significantly mitigated neurocognitive function decline (RD = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.18-0.01]; P = 0.03) and intracranial control failure (RR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.52-1.44]; P = 0.02), without increasing the risk of hippocampal recurrence or high-grade toxicities. Notably, HA-WBRT + SIB/memantine demonstrated improved neurocognitive outcomes and survival benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: WBRT-based combination therapies demonstrate improved efficacy and comparable safety to WBRT alone, with specific emphasis on the effectiveness of HA-WBRT + Memantine and HA-WBRT + SIB in optimizing therapeutic outcomes for brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: In patients requiring prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs), hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life. Here, we aim to estimate the incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs and the subsequent risk of local undertreatment in patients undergoing hippocampal sparing radiotherapy.
METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched with the terms \"Hippocampus\", \"Brain Neoplasms\", and related terms. Trials reporting on the incidence of hippocampal and/or perihippocampal BMs or hippocampal failure rate after PCI or WBRT were included.
RESULTS: Forty records were included, encompassing a total of 5,374 patients with over 32,570 BMs. Most trials employed a 5 mm margin to define the HA zone. In trials reporting on BM incidence, 4.4 % (range 0 - 27 %) and 9.2 % (3 - 41 %) of patients had hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs, respectively. The most common risk factor for hippocampal BMs was the total number of BMs. The reported failure rate within the HA zone after HA-PCI or HA-WBRT was 4.5 % (0 - 13 %), salvageable with radiosurgery in most cases. SCLC histology was not associated with a higher risk of hippocampal failure (OR = 2.49; p = 0.23). In trials comparing with a conventional (non-HA) PCI or WBRT group, HA did not increase the hippocampal failure rate (OR = 1.90; p = 0.17).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs is considerably low, with a subsequent low risk of local undertreatment following HA-PCI or HA-WBRT. In patients without involvement, the hippocampus should be spared to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life.

The circadian system, a vital temporal regulator influencing physiological processes, has implications for cancer development and treatment response. Our study assessed circadian timing\'s impact on whole-brain radiotherapy outcomes in brain metastases for personalized cancer therapy insights. The aim of the study was to evaluate circadian influence on radiation treatment timing and its correlation with clinical outcomes and to identify patient populations benefiting from interventions synchronizing circadian rhythms, considering subgroup differences and potential disparities. An IRB-approved retrospective analysis of 237 patients undergoing whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases (2017-2021), receiving over 80% of treatments in the morning or afternoon, was performed. Survival analyses utilized Kaplan-Meier curves. This was a single-institution study involving patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy. Demographic, disease, and socioeconomic parameters from electronic medical records were collected. Morning treatment (n = 158) showed a trend toward improved overall survival vs. afternoon (n = 79); the median survival was 158 vs. 79 days (p = 0.20, HR = 0.84, CI95% 0.84-0.91). Subgroup benefits for morning treatment in females (p = 0.04) and trends in controlled primary disease (p = 0.11) and breast cancer metastases (p = 0.08) were observed. Black patients exhibited diminished circadian influence. The present study emphasized chronobiological factors\' relevance in brain metastases radiation therapy. Morning treatment correlated with improved survival, particularly in specific subgroups. Potential circadian influence disparities were identified, laying a foundation for personalized cancer therapy and interventions synchronizing circadian rhythms for enhanced treatment efficacy.

Because of improved survival of cancer patients, more patients irradiated for brain metastases develop intracerebral recurrences requiring subsequent courses of radiotherapy. Five studies focused on reirradiation with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) after initial WBRT for brain metastases. Following the second WBRT course, improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 31-68% of patients. Rates of neurotoxicity, such as encephalopathy or cognitive decline, were reported in two studies (1.4% and 32%). In another study, severe or unexpected adverse events were not observed. Survival following the second WBRT course was generally poor, with median survival times of 2.9-4.1 months. The survival prognosis of patients receiving two courses of WBRT can be estimated by a scoring tool considering five prognostic factors. Three studies investigated reirradiation with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) following primary WBRT. One-year local control rates were 74-91%, and median survival times ranged between 7.8 and 14 months. Rates of radiation necrosis (RN) after reirradiation were 0-6%. Seven studies were considered that investigated re-treatment with SF-SRS or fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) following initial SF-SRS or FSRT. One-year local control rates were 60-88%, and the median survival times ranged between 8.3 and 25 months. During follow-up after reirradiation, rates of overall (asymptomatic or symptomatic) RN ranged between 12.5% and 30.4%. Symptomatic RN occurred in 4.3% to 23.9% of cases (patients or lesions). The risk of RN associated with symptoms and/or requiring surgery or corticosteroids appears lower after reirradiation with FSRT when compared to SF-SRS. Other potential risk factors of RN include the volume of overlap of normal tissue receiving 12 Gy at the first course and 18 Gy at the second course of SF-SRS, maximum doses ≥40 Gy of the first or the second SF-SRS courses, V12 Gy >9 cm3 of the second course, initial treatment with SF-SRS, volume of normal brain receiving 5 Gy during reirradiation with FSRT, and systemic treatment. Cumulative EQD2 ≤100-120 Gy2 to brain, <100 Gy2 to brainstem, and <75 Gy2 to chiasm and optic nerves may be considered safe. Since most studies were retrospective in nature, prospective trials are required to better define safety and efficacy of reirradiation for recurrent or progressive brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to evaluate the existing evidence for radiotherapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients and provide recommendations for the use of radiotherapy for brain metastases and leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.
METHODS: For the current review, a PubMed search was conducted including articles from 01/1985 to 05/2023. The search was performed using the following terms: (brain metastases OR leptomeningeal carcinomatosis) AND (breast cancer OR breast) AND (radiotherapy OR ablative radiotherapy OR radiosurgery OR stereotactic OR radiation).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the fact that the biological subtype of breast cancer influences both the occurrence and relapse patterns of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), for most scenarios, no specific recommendations regarding radiotherapy can be made based on the existing evidence. For a limited number of BCBM (1-4), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is generally recommended irrespective of molecular subtype and concurrent/planned systemic therapy. In patients with 5-10 oligo-brain metastases, these techniques can also be conditionally recommended. For multiple, especially symptomatic BCBM, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), if possible with hippocampal sparing, is recommended. In cases of multiple asymptomatic BCBM (≥ 5), if SRS/SRT is not feasible or in disseminated brain metastases (> 10), postponing WBRT with early reassessment and reevaluation of local treatment options (8-12 weeks) may be discussed if a HER2/Neu-targeting systemic therapy with significant response rates in the central nervous system (CNS) is being used. In symptomatic leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, local radiotherapy (WBRT or local spinal irradiation) should be performed in addition to systemic therapy. In patients with disseminated leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in good clinical condition and with only limited or stable extra-CNS disease, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) may be considered. Data regarding the toxicity of combining systemic therapies with cranial and spinal radiotherapy are sparse. Therefore, no clear recommendations can be given, and each case should be discussed individually in an interdisciplinary setting.

General radiotherapeutic management for >10 brain metastases (BMs) totaling >100 cm3, including multiple large lesions (>10-30 cm3) in close proximity, demonstrated limited efficacy and/or safety. We describe a case of 12 BMs, summating 122.2 cm3, including a 39.6 cm3 maximum lesion and adjacent ones. The patient had an 8.1-year treatment history for recurrent/metastatic breast cancer refractory to endocrine and chemotherapy. BMs were treated with conventional whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with 30 Gy/10 fractions (fr), followed by an immediate stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) boost with 27 Gy/5 fr (52-64% isodoses) which covers the gross tumor boundaries of selected eight lesions (total 118.4 cm3). The SRS dose was defined to ensure the cumulative biologically effective dose (BED10) of just ≥80 Gy while minimizing the risk of radiation injury. The SRS was performed using a CyberKnife (CK) robotic system (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, California, United States) with a variable-sized collimator (10-40 mm), for which en bloc consecutive irradiation, using 215 beams based on a comprehensively optimized single plan (path), was adopted. The treatment time per fraction was ≤45 min (mean 5.6 min per lesion). Afterward, BMs demonstrated remarkable regression over six months, causing the total residual visible lesions of 12.6 cm3 (10.3%) at 11.4 months, despite the absence of obvious lesion shrinkage during the radiotherapy. WBRT, followed by an immediate 5-fr SRS boost with a total BED10 of 80 Gy to large and/or culprit lesions, can be an efficacious and safe treatment option for multiple BMs, totaling >120 cm3. En bloc consecutive irradiation with a single path provides overwhelmingly more efficient delivery for treating multiple lesions using CK in terms of irradiation time and comprehensive reduction of normal brain dose compared to individual planning. Volumetric-modulated arc-based >10-fr SRS with simultaneously integrated reduced-dose WBRT may be an alternative to further enhance efficacy and safety.

A deep-seated, locally infiltrative 5.8-cm brain metastasis (BM) involving the ventricular wall and optic radiation is deemed unamenable for a safe total resection, while preventing tumor seeding. Meanwhile, radiotherapeutic management alone for such a BM close to the brainstem is also challenging. We describe such a BM (gross tumor volume [GTV] 40.3 cm3) from lung adenocarcinoma (LAC), located in the left temporo-occipital lobes, with extensive invasion to the tentorium cerebelli and a high potential for dissemination. The BM was treated with 15-fraction(s) (fr) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) followed by whole-brain irradiation (WBI) at 27 Gy/15 fr with a 19-day interval. During the SRS, the solid component away from the tentorium showed obvious shrinkage. The cumulative biologically effective doses (BEDs) of the minimum and D99% of the GTV were ≥92.3 Gy and ≥102.6 Gy, respectively, where the BED was based on the linear-quadratic formula at an alpha/beta ratio of 10 (BED10). Despite a maximum response with nearly complete regression at 7.5 months, local tumor regrowth near the tentorial incisura became gradually apparent from 11.2 to 19.3 months. Salvage re-SRS with 53 Gy/10 fr specific to these lesions resulted in obvious regression at 5.8 months. However, radiation injury concomitant with triventriculomegaly progressed from 7.9 to 13.9 months, eventually leading to meningeal dissemination and patient mortality at 34.6 months. This case demonstrates that a BED10 ≥90-100 Gy in 30 fr to the GTV boundary with a more than two-week interval without combined systemic therapy is insufficient for achieving complete local tumor eradication of a 40-cc LAC-BM. Shorter treatment duration with a steeper dose gradient outside and inside the GTV in the SRS or a volumetric modulated arc-based SRS combined with simultaneously integrated WBI may improve efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) are a common complication in advanced cancer patients, and extremely challenging to treat. Consequently, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) remains the standard palliative intervention for patients with BM. The present study set to evaluate the clinical benefits of WBRT by assessing the quality of life (QoL) in WBRT-treated patients with BM, in Nigeria.
METHODS: This was a prospective, longitudinal, hospital-based single-centre study. Consecutive sampling methodology was used to recruit 52 patients with BM undergoing WBRT. Patients were followed up on days 7, 30, 90 and 180 after WBRT. The EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL and EORTC QLQ-BN20 were employed to report patients\' responses. The likert scale responses were linearly converted into 0 - 100 scores, and the descriptive analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0, at 95% confidence interval, using the two-tailed t-test for continuous variables or the chi-square test for categorical values. The overall survival was calculated with the Kaplan Maier method and the difference tested with Log-rank method, considering the interval from the baseline until death or end of the study.
RESULTS: The study cohort was predominantly females (82.7%), and accordingly, 65.4% of the respondents had a breast primary tumor. A goodness-of-fit test yielded non-significant Chi square Pearson (p = 0.325) and Deviance (p = 1.000) residuals, indicating the best fit. The median overall survival was 180 days (~ 6 months). A total of 20 patients (38%) that survived up to 180 days reported alleviated symptoms and better functioning. A significant improvement in physical functioning (p < 0.001) and emotional functioning (p = 0.031) was reported at 180 days post WBRT, compared to baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: WBRT is an effective palliative intervention in patients with BM, resulting in improved QoL. More than 50% of patients that survived ~ 3 months reported alleviation of pain, and 38% of patients that survived for ~ 6 months reported a significantly improved functioning. This demonstrated the clinical benefits of WBRT in palliative care and will add to the body of data on the use of WBRT, from Africa.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for limited disease small cell lung cancer is the standard of care for curative treatment of this disease. However, neurocognitive dysfunction is one of the late adverse events of PCI and is often problematic. Recently, hippocampal avoidance prophylactic cranial irradiation (HA-PCI) is sometimes performed to prevent neurocognitive dysfunction after PCI. In HA-PCI, the question is whether or not metastases appear around the hippocampus that were not irradiated. We have experienced a case of perihippocampal meningeal carcinomatosis after HA-PCI. We also draw attention to the potential risks of performing HA-PCI based on this experience.