Visual analog scale

视觉模拟量表
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:偏头痛是一种偶发性疾病和常见的头痛形式。自由基产生之间的平衡受损和导致氧化损伤的抗氧化防御系统受损可能在偏头痛病因中起主要作用。我们试图调查饮食抗氧化剂质量评分(DAQS)是否与偏头痛女性的偏头痛强度和频率相关。
    方法:这项横断面研究对265名女性进行。收集了与人体测量和饮食摄入相关的数据。DAQS评分是根据FFQ(食物频率问卷)与参考日摄入量(RDI)。为了测量偏头痛的强度,采用偏头痛残疾评估问卷(MIDAS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS).头痛的频率定义为参与者在上个月头痛的天数,并使用30天的头痛日记。
    结果:研究结果表明,VAS,MIDAS,调整协变量后,头痛的频率从低DAQS(抗氧化剂质量差)到高DAQS(抗氧化剂质量高)显着降低。此外,多项回归显示,较高的DAQS与头痛频率之间存在负相关。在调整后的模型中,DAQS较高的受试者患中度偏头痛残疾的可能性降低69%,与DAQS较低的那些相比。线性回归显示,维生素C摄入量与疼痛严重程度之间呈负相关.同样在一个粗略的模型中,维生素E与头痛的发生频率呈负相关.
    结论:结论:DAQS较高的参与者的偏头痛强度和头痛频率较低。此外,维生素C的消耗可能与减轻头痛的严重程度有关。应密切监测患有偏头痛的个体的饮食抗氧化剂。
    BACKGROUND: Migraine is an episodic disorder and a frequent form of headache. An impaired balance between free radical production and an impaired antioxidant defense system leading to oxidative damage may play a major role in migraine etiology. We sought to investigate whether dietary antioxidant quality score (DAQS) is associated with migraine intensity and frequency among women suffering from migraine.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 265 women. The data related to anthropometric measures and dietary intake were collected. DAQS score was calculated based on FFQ (food frequency questionnaire) vs. the reference daily intake (RDI) quantity. To measure migraine intensity, the migraine disability assessment questionnaire (MIDAS) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used. The frequency of headaches was defined as the days the participants had headaches in the last month and a 30-day headache diary was used.
    RESULTS: The results of the study demonstrated that VAS, MIDAS, and frequency of headaches were reduced significantly from the low DAQS (poor quality of antioxidants) to high DAQS (high quality of antioxidants) after adjusting covariates. Also, multinomial regression showed there was an inverse association between higher DAQS and the frequency of headaches. In the adjusted model, subjects with the higher DAQS were 69% less likely to have moderate migraine disability, compared with those with the lower DAQS. Linear regression showed, there was an inverse association between vitamin C intake and the grades of pain severity.َAlso in a crude model, a negative association was found between vitamin E and the frequency of headaches.
    CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, Participants with higher DAQS had lower migraine intensity and headache frequency. In addition, the consumption of vitamin C may potentially associate with decreasing the severity of headaches. Dietary antioxidants should be monitored closely in individuals suffering from migraine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头戴式显示器(HMD)作为用于手术的替代显示系统出现。本研究旨在评估立体HMD在神经内镜手术中的实用性。
    要求领先的操作员和助手使用基于视觉模拟量表(VAS)的问卷评估HMD特性与监视器显示器相比的各个方面。VAS评分范围从0到10(0,HMD显著劣于监视器;5,HMD和监视器显示器相等;10,HMD显著优于监视器)。
    外科医生和助手在七项腹腔镜手术中使用并评估了HMD:三项肿瘤切除,一次动脉瘤夹闭,一次颈前路椎间盘切除术和融合术,和两次颈椎椎板切除术.领先的操作员对基于HMD的手术的评估与基于监视器的手术没有什么不同;然而,助手们评估了视野,整体图像质量,在基于MHD的手术中,辅助程序优于基于监视器的手术(分别为P=0.039、0.045和0.013)。
    可以以与基于监视器的手术相似的质量进行基于HMD的手术。手术助手可以受益于使用基于HMD的手术。
    UNASSIGNED: Head-mounted display (HMD) arises as an alternative display system for surgery. This study aimed to assess the utility of a stereoscopic HMD for exoscopic neurosurgery.
    UNASSIGNED: The leading operator and assistants were asked to assess the various aspects of the HMD characteristics compared to the monitor display using a visual analog scale (VAS)-based questionnaire. The VAS score ranged from 0 to 10 (0, HMD was significantly inferior to the monitor; 5, HMD and monitor display were equal; and 10, HMD was significantly superior to the monitor).
    UNASSIGNED: The surgeons and assistants used and evaluated HMD in seven exoscopic surgeries: three tumor removal, one aneurysm clipping, one anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and two cervical laminectomy surgeries. The leading operators\' assessment of HMD-based surgery was not different from monitor-based surgery; however, the assistants evaluated the field of view, overall image quality, and the assisting procedure as better in MHD-based surgery than monitor-based surgery (P = 0.039, 0.045, and 0.013, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: HMD-based exoscopic neurosurgery can be performed at a similar quality as monitor-based surgery. Surgical assistants may benefit from using HMD-based surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:复杂区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)表现为持续性区域疼痛,自发和触发。对患者可以忍受最小副作用的创新治疗方法的需求仍然存在。高压氧治疗(HBOT)在这方面成为可能的干预措施。方法:这项工作的主要目的是回顾性分析在高压医学中心治疗的一系列CRPS患者超过两年(2018-2019年)。每天一次在2.0-2.4绝对大气(ATA)下施用HBOT。结果:83例CRPS患者均接受HBOT治疗。98%的病例报告疼痛,92%报告患肢运动受限,87%有肢体肿胀,41%的人有尸斑,70%的人有感觉问题。HBOT暴露的平均次数为22.0±7.1。在HBOT治疗结束时,86%的病例症状缓解。HBOT开始前休息时疼痛的平均VAS值为3.2±3.0,治疗后为1.6±1.9(p<0.001)。在活动疼痛中,它是6.1±2.4和3.7±2.4(p<0.001),分别,在HBOT的结尾。肢体功能评估值分别为7.0±2.0和4.3±2.4(p<0.001),分别,在治疗结束时。79例纳入治疗结束评估。23例(29%)被评估为大的临床显着反应,48例(61%)被评估为部分反应,具有最小的重要差异。结果表明,在疾病持续时间长达3和6个月的情况下,临床HBOT效应更大(p=0.029)。结论:大多数患者改善了患肢的疼痛和功能状态。我们的数据还表明,在CRPS诊断后,HBOT越早开始,治疗具有较大的临床效果。无严重的HBOT相关并发症或损伤。
    Background: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) presents as persistent regional pain, both spontaneous and triggered. The demand persists for innovative treatments that patients can endure with minimal adverse effects. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) emerges as a possible intervention in this regard. Methods: The main objective of this work is to retrospectively analyse a case series of patients diagnosed with CRPS treated in the Centre of Hyperbaric Medicine Ostrava over two years (period 2018-2019). The HBOT was applied at 2.0-2.4 absolute atmosphere (ATA) once a day. Results: A total of 83 patients with CRPS were treated with HBOT. 98% of cases reported pain, 92% reported limitation of movement of the affected limb, 87% had swelling of the limb, 41% had lividity and 70% had sensory problems. The mean number of HBOT exposures was 22.0 ± 7.1. At the end of HBOT treatment, 86% of cases had symptoms relief. The mean VAS value of pain at rest before the start of HBOT was 3.2±3.0, after treatment it was 1.6±1.9 (p<0.001). In a pain at activity it was 6.1±2.4 and 3.7±2.4 (p<0.001), respectively, at the end of HBOT. The value of the functional assessment of the limb was 7.0±2.0 and 4.3±2.4 (p<0.001), respectively, at the end of treatment. 79 cases were included in the end-of-treatment assessment. 23 cases (29%) were evaluated as large clinically significant response, 48 cases (61%) were evaluated as partial response with minimally important difference. The results showed larger clinical HBOT effect in cases of disease duration up to 3 and 6 months (p=0.029). Conclusions: The majority of patients improved pain and functional state of the affected limb. Our data also suggests the sooner after diagnosis of CRPS is HBOT started, the treatment has larger clinical effect. There was no serious HBOT-related complication or injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鼻包是鼻部手术的核心。首先,这些包通过控制出血来发挥作用,调节疼痛和减少术后粘连。然而,目前使用的传统鼻包的主要挫折是患者在移除这些鼻包时经历的难以忍受的疼痛。为了克服这个缺点,已经出现了各种可生物降解的包装。这项研究旨在评估安全性,VELNEZ鼻包的疗效和耐受性。VELNEZ,获得专利的DattMediproductsPvt.有限公司鼻包,是一种可生物降解的复合材料,可在应用后几天内破碎。
    80名患者被纳入开放标签,介入,使用临床终点进行单臂临床研究,以研究鼻包VELNEZ的安全性和有效性。从出院日至术后第28天(9次随访)定期使用视觉模拟量表询问患者。标准化的出血控制问卷,缓解术后疼痛,中度梗阻,和疼痛被使用。
    共76名患者纳入研究,74名患者完成研究。VELNEZ鼻包在控制出血和减轻术后疼痛方面发挥了重要作用。平均出血控制时间为7.49±3.90分钟,只有34.24%的人群在手术的第六天抱怨疼痛(随访4)。术后四天,只有10.95%的受试者抱怨术后疼痛。这种可生物降解的复合材料在鼻腔中的平均碎裂时间为4.7天。此外,本研究未观察到任何术后不良事件或严重不良事件.
    VELNEZ,一个破碎的鼻包,很舒服,安全,对术后出血和疼痛有效。
    UNASSIGNED: Nasal packs are central to nasal surgeries. Primarily, these packs function by controlling bleeding, modulating pain and reducing adhesions postsurgery. However, the major setback of the currently used conventional nasal packs is the unbearable pain the patient undergoes upon removal of these packs. To overcome this shortcoming a variety of biodegradable packs have emerged. This study was aimed at evaluating the safety, efficacy and tolerability of VELNEZ nasal packs. VELNEZ, a patented Datt Mediproducts Pvt. Ltd. nasal pack, is one of its kind biodegradable composite that fragments within a few days of application.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighty patients were included in an open label, interventional, single arm clinical study using clinical endpoints to investigate the safety and efficacy of nasal pack VELNEZ. The patients were questioned using a visual analog scale from discharge day to 28th postoperative day (9 follow-up visits) at regular intervals. The standardized questionnaires for hemorrhage control, relief from postoperative pain, moderate obstruction, and pain were used.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in the study and 74 patients completed the study. VELNEZ nasal pack played a significant role in controlling hemorrhage and reducing postoperative pain. The average hemorrhage control time was 7.49 ± 3.90 min with only 34.24% of population complaining of pain on the sixth day of surgery (follow-up 4). Forteen days postsurgery only 10.95% of subject population complained of postoperative pain. This biodegradable composite has an average fragmentation time of 4.7 days in the nasal cavity. In addition, this study did not observe any postoperative adverse events or serious adverse events.
    UNASSIGNED: VELNEZ, a fragmentable nasal pack, is comfortable, safe, and effective against postsurgery bleeding and pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景子宫内膜异位症是一种常见的妇科疾病,其特征是子宫外子宫内膜样组织,导致大量的发病率,包括慢性盆腔疼痛和不孕症。关于子宫内膜异位症的影像学表现与疼痛严重程度之间的相关性知之甚少。方法我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,招募150名诊断为子宫内膜异位症的妇女。临床,成像(MRI和经阴道超声(TVUS)),和组织病理学标准用于诊断。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛严重程度。统计分析包括多元回归以确定疼痛严重程度的预测因子。结果影像学显示子宫内膜异位症受累的常见部位,主要是卵巢(73.3%)和直肠阴道隔(40%)。深度浸润性子宫内膜异位症(DIE)存在于30%的患者中,主要影响子宫骶韧带(占DIE病例的66.7%)。卵巢子宫内膜瘤和DIE患者的VAS评分(分别为7.6±1.5和8.0±1.2)明显高于无(分别为6.5±1.9和6.9±1.8)。手术干预导致VAS评分显着降低(从7.4±1.6降至3.2±1.7,p<0.001),与随访成像中观察到的病变大小和程度的减少相关。结论先进的成像技术,尤其是MRI和TVUS,在评估子宫内膜异位症疼痛严重程度方面发挥关键作用。卵巢子宫内膜瘤和DIE是疼痛严重程度增加的独立预测因子。指导个性化治疗策略。手术切除病灶,特别是在死亡的情况下,提供实质性的疼痛缓解和提高生活质量,强调影像学在临床决策中的整合,以优化子宫内膜异位症管理。
    Background Endometriosis is a prevalent gynecological disorder characterized by extra-uterine endometrial-like tissue, causing substantial morbidity, including chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Little is known about the correlation between imaging findings and pain severity in endometriosis. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study, enrolling 150 women diagnosed with endometriosis. Clinical, imaging (MRI and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)), and histopathological criteria were used for diagnosis. Pain severity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Statistical analysis included multivariate regression to identify predictors of pain severity. Results Imaging revealed common sites of endometriosis involvement, predominantly ovaries (73.3%) and rectovaginal septum (40%). Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) was present in 30% of patients, predominantly affecting uterosacral ligaments (66.7% of DIE cases). Patients with ovarian endometriomas and DIE exhibited significantly higher VAS scores (7.6 ± 1.5 and 8.0 ± 1.2, respectively) compared to those without (6.5 ± 1.9 and 6.9 ± 1.8, respectively). Surgical intervention led to a significant reduction in VAS scores (from 7.4 ± 1.6 to 3.2 ± 1.7, p < 0.001), correlating with reductions in lesion size and extent observed in follow-up imaging. Conclusion Advanced imaging techniques, particularly MRI and TVUS, play a critical role in assessing pain severity in endometriosis. Ovarian endometriomas and DIE are independent predictors of increased pain severity, guiding personalized treatment strategies. Surgical excision of lesions, particularly in cases of DIE, offers substantial pain relief and improves quality of life, emphasizing the integration of imaging in clinical decision-making for optimal endometriosis management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景本研究旨在探讨激光治疗与传统脱敏治疗在牙本质过敏症治疗中的潜在疗效和安全性。方法对138名18-65岁被诊断患有牙本质过敏的成年人进行了全面的观察研究。参与者被分配到激光治疗组或传统治疗组。激光治疗组接受使用FotonaLightWalker®铒激光在2,940nm的治疗。使用连续和接触模式将能量密度设置为20J/cm²,激光尖端垂直于照射部位。每次会议持续五分钟,每两周进行三个月。传统的治疗方法包括在办公室内每15天一次使用5%的氟化钠清漆,持续三个月,并使用脱敏牙膏作为常规口腔卫生程序的一部分。治疗后6个月和12个月进行随访评估,以评估治疗效果的寿命和稳定性。通过使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和触觉敏感性评估测量的牙本质过敏减少来评估主要结果。结果激光治疗在降低牙本质过敏症方面持续超越传统治疗,明显较低的VAS分数反映了这一点。值得注意的是,在3、6和12个月时,激光治疗显示平均VAS评分为2.5(±1.5),1.2(±0.9),和0.6(±0.5),分别,而传统治疗组的得分更高(分别为3.8±1.2、4.5±1.0和4.0±0.7)。统计分析显示这些差异是非常显著的(p<0.001)。触觉超敏反应评估与这些发现相呼应,激光治疗持续保持较低的分数(0.8±0.7在6个月,12个月时0.4±0.3)与传统治疗(6个月时3.5±1.0,12个月时4.0±0.7),在所有时间点具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。结论虽然本研究缺乏随机对照设计,观察到的VAS评分和触觉敏感性评估的大幅降低,以及激光治疗的良好安全性,建议其作为治疗牙本质过敏的有效替代方法的潜力。
    Background This study aimed to explore the potential efficacy and safety of laser therapy compared with traditional desensitizing treatments in the management of dentin hypersensitivity. Methodology A comprehensive observational study was conducted on 138 adult individuals aged 18-65 diagnosed with dentin hypersensitivity. Participants were allocated to either the laser therapy or traditional treatment group. The laser therapy group received treatment using the Fotona LightWalker® Erbium laser at 2,940 nm. The energy density was set at 20 J/cm² using continuous and contact modes, with the laser tip held perpendicularly to the irradiated site. Each session lasted five minutes, conducted bi-weekly for three months. Traditional treatment included the in-office application of 5% sodium fluoride varnish application once every 15 days for three months and the use of desensitizing toothpaste as part of regular oral hygiene routines. Follow-up assessments were conducted 6 and 12 months post-treatment to evaluate the longevity and stability of the treatment effects. Primary outcomes were assessed by dentin hypersensitivity reduction measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and tactile hypersensitivity assessments. Results Laser therapy consistently surpassed traditional treatment in reducing dentin hypersensitivity, as reflected by the significantly lower VAS scores. Notably, at 3, 6, and 12 months, laser therapy demonstrated mean VAS scores of 2.5 (±1.5), 1.2 (±0.9), and 0.6 (±0.5), respectively, while the traditional treatment group exhibited higher scores (3.8 ± 1.2, 4.5 ± 1.0, and 4.0 ± 0.7, respectively). Statistical analysis revealed that these differences were highly significant (p < 0.001). Tactile hypersensitivity assessments echoed these findings, with laser therapy consistently maintaining lower scores (0.8 ± 0.7 at 6 months, 0.4 ± 0.3 at 12 months) compared to traditional treatment (3.5 ± 1.0 at 6 months, 4.0 ± 0.7 at 12 months) with statistical significance at all time points (p < 0.001). Conclusions Although this study lacks a randomized controlled design, the observed substantial reduction in VAS scores and tactile hypersensitivity assessments, along with the favorable safety profile of laser therapy, suggest its potential as an effective alternative for managing dentin hypersensitivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    期望可能会改变结果。然而,研究往往无法衡量预期。这就需要一个简短有效和可靠的预期措施。
    为了研究进入针灸或休息的个体的治疗期望,在类别量表上分级的单项目期望测量的有效性和测试重新测试信度,数字评分量表(NRS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS),并确定量表之间的心理测量差异。
    在本方法论研究中,在363名参与者接受针灸治疗之前,他们对治疗预期进行了测量(真正的传统穿透性或非穿透性伸缩假针灸,n=239,98%,回应)或只涉及休息的对照治疗(n=120,100%,回应),旨在提高放松水平。治疗预期指标,按五级类别评分,八级NRS和100毫米VAS,进行了测试重测可靠性测试。在基线测量期望和松弛水平,治疗前后(n=729个预期测量值)。
    安排针灸或休息的参与者认为适度(四分位数间,IQR,适度多)和多(适度多)的治疗是有效的。类别量表的测试和重新测试之间的类别内相关系数与Kappa系数为.868/.868,NRS的.820/.820,VAS和.856/.854。中间步骤“适度相信治疗是有效的”相当于中位数4(IQR,3-4)在NRS上,在VAS上的中位数为52mm(IQR42-52)。在类别量表上,应答率为708(97%),707(97%)在NRS上,和703(96%)在VAS上。所有三个量表都区分出治疗前期望在报告放松水平改善的个体中更积极(P<.001-.003)。VAS对检测预期随时间的变化具有更高的响应性(预期增加了71%),与NRS(增加52%)和类别量表(增加12%)相比,P<.001。
    个人进入针灸,或者控制干预,提出了积极的治疗期望,预期指标提供了令人满意的可靠性,有效性,高反应率,敏感性,和响应性。想要在临床试验中控制预期相关偏倚的综合癌症治疗研究人员应该考虑使用单一项目预期测量来测量预期。
    UNASSIGNED: Expectations may modify outcomes. However, studies often fail to measure expectations. This raises the need for a brief valid and reliable expectancy measure.
    UNASSIGNED: To study treatment expectations in individuals entering acupuncture or rest, validity and test re-test reliability of a single-item expectancy measure graded on a category scale, a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and to identify psychometric differences between the scales.
    UNASSIGNED: In this methodology study, treatment expectations were measured in 363 participants before they received acupuncture (genuine traditional penetrating or non-penetrating telescopic sham acupuncture, n = 239, 98%, responded) or a control treatment involving just rest (n = 120, 100%, responded), aimed to improve level of relaxation. A treatment expectancy measure, graded on a five-grade category scale, an eight-grade NRS and a 100 mm VAS, was tested for test re-test reliability. Level of expectation and relaxation was measured at baseline, pre- and post-therapy (n = 729 expectancy measurements).
    UNASSIGNED: The participants scheduled for acupuncture or rest believed moderately (Inter Quartile Range, IQR, moderately-much) and much (IQR moderately-much) the treatment to be effective. The Intra-Class Correlation coefficient versus Kappa coefficient between test and re-test was .868/.868 for the category scale, .820/.820 for the NRS, and .856/.854 for the VAS. The middle step \"Believe moderately the treatment to be effective\" was equivalent with median 4 (IQR, 3-4) on NRS and median 52 mm (IQR 42-52) on VAS. The response rates were 708 (97%) on the category scale, 707 (97%) on the NRS, and 703 (96%) on the VAS. All three scales discriminated that pre-therapy expectations were more positive in the individuals who reported an improvement in relaxation level (P < .001-.003). The VAS presented higher responsiveness to detect expectancy changes over time (71% increased expectation), compared to the NRS (52% increased) and the category scale (12% increased), P < .001.
    UNASSIGNED: Individuals entering acupuncture, or a control intervention, presented positive treatment expectations, and the expectancy measure presented satisfactory reliability, validity, high response rates, sensitiveness, and responsiveness. Integrative cancer therapy researchers who want to control for expectancy-related bias in clinical trials should consider measuring expectation using the single-item expectancy measure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    确定隐形眼镜(CL)相关主观反应的最小临床重要差异(MCID),并探讨主观反应和研究设计之间的MCID值是否不同。
    这是对来自7项为期一周的双侧交叉研究和14项为期一天的对侧CL研究的数据的回顾性分析。为了舒适,干燥度,愿景,或易于插入,参与者以0-100视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评分,并以五点李克特量表表示镜头偏好,轻微的,没有偏好。对于每个标准,计算了四个MCID估计值并取平均值:“轻微偏好”的平均VAS得分差异,“轻微偏好的95%置信区间VAS评分差异的下限,“轻微”和“无偏好”之间的平均VAS评分差异和VAS评分的0.5标准差。
    四种计算方法生成了较小范围的MCID值。对于双边研究,舒适度的平均MCID为7.2(范围5.4-8.8),8.1(5.2-10.6)干燥,7.1(5.5-9.3)用于视觉,7.6(6.0-10.5)用于易于插入。对于对侧研究,插入时舒适度的平均MCID为6.9(6.1~7.6),日终舒适度的平均MCID为7.5(6.8~8.2).
    这项工作表明,在主观反应和研究设计中,MCID值非常相似,在一群习惯性的软CL穿着者中。在所有情况下,MCID值在0至100VAS上平均为7个单位。
    这项工作提供了MCID值,这对于解释眼部主观反应和计划临床研究很重要。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for contact lens (CL)-related subjective responses and explore whether MCID values differ between subjective responses and study designs.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective analysis of data from seven one-week bilateral crossover studies and 14 one-day contralateral CL studies. For comfort, dryness, vision, or ease of insertion, participants rated on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS) and indicated lens preference on a five-point Likert scale featuring strong, slight, and no preferences. For each criterion, four MCID estimates were calculated and averaged: mean VAS score difference for \"slight preference,\" lower limit of 95% confidence interval VAS score difference for \"slight preference,\" difference in mean VAS score difference between \"slight\" and \"no preference\" and 0.5 standard deviation of VAS scores.
    UNASSIGNED: The four calculation methods generated a small range of MCID values. For bilateral studies, the averaged MCID was 7.2 (range 5.4-8.8) for comfort, 8.1 (5.2-10.6) for dryness, 7.1 (5.5-9.3) for vision and 7.6 (6.0-10.5) for ease of insertion. For contralateral studies, the averaged MCID was 6.9 (6.1-7.6) for comfort at insertion and 7.5 (6.8-8.2) for end-of-day comfort.
    UNASSIGNED: This work demonstrated very similar MCID values across subjective responses and study designs, in a population of habitual soft CL wearers. In all cases, MCID values were on average seven units on a 0 to 100 VAS.
    UNASSIGNED: This work provides MCID values which are important for interpreting ocular subjective responses and planning clinical studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:一种常见的膝关节疾病是前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤,这通常需要手术。手术后适当的疼痛控制有助于快速恢复并防止慢性疼痛。为膝关节手术提供镇痛,阿片类药物的使用,非甾体抗炎药,通常采用区域技术。本研究旨在评估收肌管阻滞(ACB)和股神经阻滞(FNB)对前交叉韧带重建(ACLRs)术后疼痛管理的疗效。方法这项前瞻性介入研究包括30名计划接受髌骨移植物ACLR的参与者。他们被分成小组,即,ACB和FNB,每个15名患者。评估发生在手术前一天,所有外科手术均使用脊髓麻醉进行。在术后期间,采用10点视觉模拟量表(VAS)量化手术结束时和手术后不同时间间隔的疼痛强度.VAS评分大于4的患者使用0.125%布比卡因接受FNB或ACB。镇痛时间的持续时间,股四头肌的力量,并记录神经系统并发症。结果ACB患者(348.33分钟)和FNB患者(363.06分钟)的平均镇痛时间无统计学意义。在接受ACB的12例患者中未观察到运动阻滞,而在接受FNB的患者中,只有4名患者具有运动保护作用。在研究参与者中未观察到神经系统不良反应。结论ACB提供了与FNB相似的相同持续时间的镇痛。与FNB相比,ACB显着节省了运动强度并保持了更高的股四头肌功率。
    Background A common knee joint disorder is injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), which often requires surgery. Proper pain control after the surgery facilitates fast recovery and prevents chronic pain. To provide analgesia for knee procedures, the use of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and regional techniques are commonly employed. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of adductor canal block (ACB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) for postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs). Methodology This prospective interventional study included 30 participants scheduled for patellar graft ACLR. They were assigned into groups, i.e., ACB and FNB, with 15 patients each. The evaluation occurred one day before the operation, and all surgical procedures were performed using spinal anesthesia. During the postoperative period, a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was utilized to quantify pain intensity at the end of the surgery and at various intervals after the surgery. Patients with a VAS score greater than 4 received either FNB or ACB using bupivacaine 0.125%. Duration of analgesia time, power of quadriceps muscle, and neurologic complications were documented. Results No statistically significant value was observed in the mean duration of analgesia between the patients in ACB (348.33 minutes) and the patients in FNB (363.06 minutes). No motor block was observed in 12 patients who received ACB, while only four patients had a motor-sparing effect among those who received FNB. No neurological adverse effects were observed in the study participants. Conclusions ACB provides an equal duration of analgesia similar to FNB, and ACB significantly spares motor strength and maintains higher quadriceps power than FNB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肌管阻滞(ACB)广泛用于全膝关节置换术(TKA)的术后镇痛。这项研究的目的是比较外科医生辅助和麻醉师辅助(超声引导)内收肌阻滞在术后镇痛效果方面。
    方法:本研究设计为双盲,前瞻性和随机试验。共有240名参与者被随机分为三组:一组由外科医生进行内收肌管阻滞(ACB),另一个是由麻醉师用超声引导(ACBa)进行的,和没有内收肌阻滞的第三组。全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的随访管理发生在第一次,第三,第十天,以及第十二周。结果测量包括使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行疼痛评估和监测阿片类镇痛药的消耗。
    结果:两组人口统计学特征无显著差异。与对照组相比,ACBa和ACB组在手术后3小时和12小时均表现出明显较低的VAS评分。ACBa组的VAS评分最低。然而,在1天,3天,手术后10天和12周,ACBa组和ACBs组的VAS评分无显著差异。前三天,ACBa组的阿片类药物消费量最低,总阿片类药物消费量最低.两组之间的VAS评分差异在手术后的第一天开始减少。
    结论:内收肌管阻滞(ACB)已被证明是减轻全膝关节置换术(TKR)患者术后疼痛的有效方法。然而,尽管麻醉师在超声引导下进行的ACB对外科医生术中ACB的VAS评分有明显影响,其对临床结局的影响尚未得到证实.
    背景:本研究于2024年7月31日在临床试验注册平台进行了回顾性注册(NCT06533085)。
    OBJECTIVE: Adductor canal block (ACB) is widely performed for postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to compare surgeon-assisted and anesthesiologist-assisted (ultrasound-guided) adductor blocks in terms of postoperative analgesic efficacy.
    METHODS: This study was designed as a double-blind, prospective and randomized trial. A total of 240 participants were randomly allocated to three groups: one where the surgeon performed the adductor canal block (ACBs), another where it was conducted by an anesthetist with ultrasound guidance (ACBa), and a third group without the adductor block. The follow-up management after the Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) procedure occurred on the first, third, and tenth days, as well as the twelfth week. Outcome measures comprised pain assessment using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and monitoring opioid analgesic consumption.
    RESULTS: No significant differences in demographic profiles were observed between the groups. Groups ACBa and ACBs exhibited significantly lower VAS scores compared to the control group at both 3 and 12 h after surgery, with group ACBa showing the lowest VAS scores among all groups. However, at 1 day, 3 days, 10 days and 12 weeks after surgery, there was no significant difference in VAS scores between the ACBa and ACBs groups. On the first three days, the ACBa group had the lowest opioid consumption and the lowest total opioid consumption. The differences in VAS scores between the groups began to decrease on the first day after surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: The adductor canal block (ACB) has been demonstrated to be an effective method of reducing pain in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) in the postoperative period. Nevertheless, despite the pronounced impact that ACB performed by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance has on VAS scores according to intraoperative ACB by surgeons, its effect on clinical outcomes has not been demonstrated.
    BACKGROUND: This study was retrospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry Platform on July 31, 2024 (NCT06533085).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号