We share a case of a 54-year-old Caucasian immune-competent male with a suspected long latent visceral leishmaniasis presenting primarily with parasitic colitis, splenomegaly, and pancytopenia. Due to histopathologically and endoscopically mimicking ulcerative colitis the patient was initially treated for UC, until the parasites were identified and eradicated with liposomal Amphotericin B.

UNASSIGNED: Therapeutic drug monitoring is used to optimize anti-tumour necrosis factor biologic effectiveness in inflammatory bowel disease, but its role with other biological classes is unclear. This study explores relationships between post-induction vedolizumab trough concentrations and biochemical outcomes in a real-world study of individuals with inflammatory bowel disease.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective analysis of data from a national patient support program between 2018 and 2020, included 436 individuals with Crohn\'s disease or ulcerative colitis receiving vedolizumab. Optimal vedolizumab concentration thresholds (at weeks 6 and 14) were determined based on their ability to predict biochemical normalization (week 30 faecal calprotectin [<250 µg/g], C-reactive protein [<5 mg/l]). Thresholds best associated with each outcome were evaluated in multivariate analyses.
UNASSIGNED: Among patients with Crohn\'s disease, week 6 serum vedolizumab concentrations (>41.65 µg/ml) predicted normalization defined by C-reactive protein: Spearman correlation coefficient [ρ] = -0.26, P = 0.002 and multivariate analysis (MVA)-OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.32-7.87, P = 0.01, and at week 14 (>22.25 µg/ml): ρ = -0.38, P < 0.0001, and MVA-OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.26-8.17 but not faecal calprotectin. Similarly, among patients with ulcerative colitis, week 6 vedolizumab concentrations (>39.65 g/ml) predicted normalization defined by C-reactive protein: ρ = -0.26, P = 0.005 and MVA-OR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.30-12.52, P = 0.016, and at week 14 (>17.35 µg/ml): ρ = -0.39, P = 0.0001 and MVA-OR: 6.95, 95% CI: 1.81-26.77, P = 0.005, but not faecal calprotectin.
UNASSIGNED: Induction and post-induction serum vedolizumab were not consistently associated with biochemical normalization. As such, proactive therapeutic drug monitoring for vedolizumab should not be routinely incorporated in a treat to target strategy for inflammatory bowel disease.
UNASSIGNED: NCT04567628.

UNASSIGNED: As new therapies for the treatment of Crohn\'s disease (CD) are approved, there is an increasing need for evidence that clarifies their positioning and sequencing.
UNASSIGNED: Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to inform physicians\' decisions when they choose which intervention (drug or treatment strategy) to administer to their patients. Pragmatic head-to-head trials represent the best tools for CER, but only a few have been published in the IBD field. Network meta-analyses can point toward the superiority of one drug over another, but they do not reflect everyday clinical practice. Finally, real-world evidence complements that coming from head-to-head trials and network meta-analyses, assessing the real-life effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.
UNASSIGNED: There is insufficient evidence to create a definitive therapeutic algorithm for CD, but some general considerations can be made. Anti-TNF-α agents seemingly represent the most \'sustainable\' first-line choice, considering benefit-harm ratio and costs; vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and risankizumab may be considered as first-line choice when safety issues become prominent. In the event of pharmacodynamic failure, out-of-class swap is to be preferred - possibly with anti-IL23p19 as the best option, with unclear data regarding upadacitinib positioning; a second anti-TNF-α could be considered, as a second choice, after pharmacokinetic failure.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of approved therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) during induction and maintenance, including upadacitinib (UPA), vedolizumab (VEDO), ustekinumab (UST), and tofacitinib (TOFA), is limited.
METHODS: Using data from phase 3 trials, three placebo (PBO)-anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparisons of the efficacy and safety of UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA (U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH, GEMINI-1, UNIFI, and OCTAVE induction and maintenance trials) have been conducted. Baseline characteristics from UPA trials were weighted separately to match each comparator trial. Induction responders were re-randomized to oral UPA 15 or 30 mg, VEDO 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks (Q8W), UST 90 mg SC Q8W, or oral TOFA 5 mg, or PBO in maintenance. Treat-through efficacy outcomes at weeks 44(UST)/46(VEDO)/52(UPA/TOFA) were adjusted by the likelihood of induction response and included clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to discontinuation (except UPA vs. VEDO). Benefit-risk was assessed by numbers needed to treat (NNT)/harm, calculated as the inverse of the difference in proportions of patients achieving each efficacy/safety outcome for UPA versus comparator.
RESULTS: The proportions of patients who demonstrated clinical response or endoscopic improvement was greater with UPA 15 mg versus VEDO and TOFA (p < 0.05). The proportions of patients demonstrating all treat-through efficacy outcomes were significantly greater with UPA 30 mg versus VEDO, UST, or TOFA with NNTs 3.2-8.7. No significant differences in proportions of AEs, SAEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation were observed between the two doses of UPA and comparators.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active UC, greater clinical efficacy, and similar safety after 1 year of maintenance were observed with UPA versus VEDO, UST, and TOFA, suggesting a favorable benefit-risk profile for UPA. Despite matched baseline characteristics, differences in trial design and endpoints may persist.

UNASSIGNED: To describe and compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) among advanced therapy-naïve and advanced therapy-experienced patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab in the United States.
UNASSIGNED: Claims data from IQVIA PharMetrics Plus de-identified database (01/01/2015-06/30/2022) were used to identify adult patients with UC initiating ustekinumab or vedolizumab (index date) after 10/21/2019. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting. All-cause and UC-related HRU (number of inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits) were described during the post-index period, and Poisson regression models were used to evaluate associations between index therapy and HRU outcomes. Analyses were performed separately among advanced therapy-naïve or advanced therapy-experienced patients.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 444 (ustekinumab) and 1,917 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-naïve patients, and 647 (ustekinumab) and 1,152 (vedolizumab) advanced therapy-experienced patients were identified. In advanced therapy-naïve patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient days (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.84 [1.15, 3.58]; p = 0.004), emergency department visits (1.39 [1.01, 2.17]; p = 0.044), and outpatient visits (1.81 [1.61, 2.04]; p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. In advanced therapy-experienced patients, higher rates of UC-related inpatient admissions (1.47 [1.06, 2.12]; p = 0.012), inpatient days (2.18 (1.44, 3.71); p < 0.001), and outpatient visits (1.50 (1.19, 1.82); p < 0.001) were observed among patients initiating vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab. Results were similar when all-cause HRU was examined.
UNASSIGNED: Among patients with UC with and without advanced therapy experience, higher rates of all-cause and UC-related HRU were observed among those treated with vedolizumab relative to ustekinumab.

UNASSIGNED: The risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been concurrently evaluated based on the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents versus non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) in the Korean population.
UNASSIGNED: We compared the risk of serious infection and active tuberculosis in Korean patients with IBD treated with non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) or anti-TNF-α agents.
UNASSIGNED: This study was a population-based cohort analysis of nationwide administrative claims data.
UNASSIGNED: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims data (representing 97% of the South Korean population) from between January 2007 and February 2021 were reviewed, and adults with IBD who initiated vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment (n = 6123) between 2017 and 2020 were enrolled. Intergroup differences in the risk of serious infection requiring hospitalization/emergency department visits or active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: In the patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents or vedolizumab/ustekinumab during a mean follow-up of 1.55 ± 1.05 and 0.84 ± 0.69 years, the incidence rates of serious infection were 9.43/100 and 6.87/100 person-years, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed no significant intergroup difference in the risk of serious infection with vedolizumab/ustekinumab or anti-TNF-α treatment; the adjusted relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.46-1.44, p = 0.478). Among patients treated with anti-TNF-α agents and vedolizumab/ustekinumab, the incidence rates of active tuberculosis were 0.87 and 0.37 per 100 person-years, respectively. The relative risk of vedolizumab/ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF-α agents was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.07-1.26, p = 0.101). In a subset analysis comparing vedolizumab and ustekinumab with anti-TNF-α agents, similar results were observed.
UNASSIGNED: In Korean patients with IBD, non-anti-TNF biologics (vedolizumab/ustekinumab) tended to be associated with a lower risk of serious infection or active tuberculosis than anti-TNF-α agents.

UNASSIGNED: Long-term vedolizumab (VDZ) outcomes in real-world cohorts have been largely limited to 1-year follow-up, with few bio-naïve patients or objective markers of inflammation assessed.
UNASSIGNED: We aimed to assess factors affecting VDZ persistence including clinical, biochemical and faecal biomarker remission at 1, 3 and 5 years.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective, observational, cohort study.
UNASSIGNED: All adult inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who had received VDZ induction for ulcerative colitis (UC)/IBD-unclassified (IBDU) were included. Baseline phenotype and follow-up data were collected via a review of electronic medical records.
UNASSIGNED: We included 290 patients [UC n = 271 (93.4%), IBDU n = 19 (6.6%)] with a median time on VDZ of 27.6 months (interquartile range: 14.4-43.2). At the end of follow-up, a total of 157/290 (54.1%) patients remained on VDZ. The median time to discontinuation was 14.1 months (7.0-23.3). Previous exposure to ⩾1 advanced therapy, steroid use at baseline and disease extension (E3 and E2 versus E1) were independent predictors for worse VDZ persistence. Clinical remission (partial Mayo < 2) was 75.7% (171/226), 72.4% (157/217) and 70.2% (127/181) at years 1, 3 and 5, respectively. Steroid use during maintenance VDZ therapy occurred in 31.7% (92/290), hospitalization in 15.5% (45/290) and surgery in 3.4% (10/291). The rate of serious adverse events was 1.2 per 100 patient-years of follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: VDZ effectiveness appears enduring with favourable long-term safety profile. VDZ persistence was influenced by previous exposure to biologics/small molecules, disease distribution and steroid use at baseline in our study.
Vedolizumab long-term use in ulcerative colitis What was this study done? • Vedolizumab efficacy and safety in ulcerative colitis have been firmly established by existing evidence. • Long-term data from the GEMINI trial further corroborate the favourable safety profile over an extended duration but there is little data on long-term vedolizumab use over 1 year. What did the researches do? • We performed a retrospective, observational, cohort study. All adult IBD patients who ever received vedolizumab induction from November 2014 to December 2021 for ulcerative colitis/IBDU were included. What did the researchers find? • This real-world study demonstrates that vedolizumab persistence exceeds 80% at 1 year and remains nearly 50% at 5 years with no new safety signals. • Worse vedolizumab persistence is associated with prior exposure to biologics/small molecules, more extensive disease involvement and steroid use at vedolizumab initiation. What do the findings mean? • These findings have important implications for drug positioning and sequencing, as well as for optimizing outcomes when vedolizumab is utilized as first-line therapy. Furthermore, it also emphasizes the long-term safety profile.

Outcomes in intestinal transplantation remain hampered by higher rates of rejection than any other solid organs. However, maintenance immunosuppression regimens have largely remained unchanged despite advances in therapies for induction and treatment of rejection and graft-versus-host disease. Recently, there have been a small number of new maintenance therapies attempted, and older agents have been used in new ways to achieve better outcomes. The authors herein review the traditional maintenance therapies and their mechanisms and then consider updates in new therapies and new ways of using old therapies for maintenance immunosuppression after intestinal transplantation.

Despite advancements in short-term outcomes since the inception of intestinal transplant, significant long-term graft failure persists. Early successes are attributed to the utilization of tacrolimus for maintenance therapy, coupled with T-cell modulating induction regimens, which effectively reduce the incidence of acute cellular rejection. However, the challenge of chronic allograft injury remains unresolved. There is increasing evidence indicating a correlation between donor-specific antibodies and the survival of visceral allografts. Strategies aimed at reducing the presence or load of these antibodies may potentially enhance long-term outcomes. Consequently, our focus is now turning toward B-cell induction therapies as a possible solution.

Growing evidence suggests that impaired gut permeability and gut microbiota alterations are involved in the pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBDs), which include Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn\'s Disease (CD). Vedolizumab is an anti-α4β7 antibody approved for IBD treatment, used as the first treatment or second-line therapy when the first line results in inadequate effectiveness. The aim of this study is to develop a mathematical model capable of describing the pathophysiological mechanisms of Vedolizumab treatment in IBD patients. In particular, the relationship between drug concentration in the blood, colonic mucosal permeability and fecal microbiota composition was investigated and modeled to detect and predict trends in order to support and tailor Vedolizumab therapies. To pursue this aim, clinical data from a pilot study on a cluster of 11 IBD patients were analyzed. Enrolled patients underwent colonoscopy in three phases (before (t0), after 24 weeks of (t1) and after 52 weeks of (t2 ) Vedolizumab treatment) to collect mucosal biopsies for transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) evaluation (permeability to ions), intestinal permeability measurement and histological analysis. Moreover, fecal samples were collected for the intestinal microbiota analysis at the three time points. The collected data were compared to those of 11 healthy subjects at t0, who underwent colonoscopy for screening surveillance, and used to implement a three-compartmental mathematical model (comprising central blood, peripheral blood and the intestine). The latter extends previous evidence from the literature, based on the regression of experimental data, to link drug concentration in the peripheral blood compartment with Roseburia abundance and intestinal permeability. The clinical data showed that Vedolizumab treatment leads to an increase in TEER and a reduction in intestinal permeability to a paracellular probe, improving tissue inflammation status. Microbiota analysis showed increasing values of Roseburia, albeit not statistically significant. This trend was adequately reproduced by the mathematical model, which offers a useful tool to describe the pathophysiological effects of Vedolizumab therapy on colonic mucosal permeability and fecal microbiota composition. The model\'s satisfactory predictive capabilities and simplicity shed light on the relationship between the drug, the microbiota and permeability and allow for its straightforward extension to diverse therapeutic conditions.