Vascular surgical procedure

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估股骨膝下动脉旁路手术患者手术时间与术后住院时间和计划外返回手术室的关系,通过自体静脉移植或聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)分层。
    方法:血管质量倡议数据库(2003-2021)的回顾性分析。将所选择的患者分组为以下:静脉搭桥(I组)和PTFE(II组)患者。每组按手术时间的中位数进一步分层(即,自体静脉210分钟,PTFE155分钟)研究结果。通过单变量和多变量方法评估结果。
    结果:在研究的10902名患者中,自体静脉组3570例(32.7%),PTFE组7332(67.3%)。单变量分析显示,手术时间增加的自体静脉和PTFE移植受体与术后平均住院时间更长和全因返回手术室的发生率更高相关。在PTFE组中,手术时间延长的患者也被发现与较高的严重截肢发生率有关。手术部位感染,和心血管事件,以及一年内失去初级通畅。
    结论:对于使用自体静脉或PTFE进行股骨至膝下动脉旁路的患者,较长的手术时间与较差的结局相关.未发现死亡率与手术时间延长有关。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the association of operative time with the postoperative length of stay and unplanned return to the operating room in patients undergoing femoral to below knee popliteal bypasses, stratified by autologous vein graft or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of vascular quality initiative database (2003-2021). The selected patients were grouped into the following: vein bypass (group I) and PTFE (group II) patients. Each group was further stratified by a median split of operative time (i.e., 210 min for autologous vein and 155 min for PTFE) to study the outcomes. The outcomes were assessed by univariate and multivariate approach.
    RESULTS: Of the 10,902 patients studied, 3570 (32.7%) were in the autologous vein group, while 7332 (67.3%) were in the PTFE group. Univariate analysis revealed autologous vein and PTFE graft recipients that had increased operative times were associated with a longer mean postoperative length of stay and a higher incidence of all-cause return to the operating room. In PTFE group, patients with prolonged operative times were also found to be associated with higher incidence of major amputation, surgical site infection, and cardiovascular events, along with loss of primary patency within a year.
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing femoral to below knee popliteal bypasses using an autologous vein or PTFE, longer operative times were associated with inferior outcomes. Mortality was not found to be associated with prolonged operative time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:认知障碍影响了近一半的血管手术患者,但其与术后结局的关系仍知之甚少.这项研究探讨了术前认知表现与术后并发症之间的联系,包括术后谵妄,血管手术患者。
    方法:对年龄≥65岁的血管外科患者进行前瞻性队列研究。使用蒙特利尔认知评估评估术前认知表现,术后并发症采用综合并发症指数进行评估。通过多变量logistic回归分析其相关性。
    结果:在110名患者中(18.2%为女性,平均年龄73.8​±5.7岁),48.2%的认知障碍明显。在参与者中,29人(26.3%)经历了术后并发症,其中11人(10%)出现术后谵妄。认知能力与术后并发症之间的校正比值比为1.19(95%CI1.02-1.38;p=0.02)。
    结论:血管外科患者术前认知表现较差与术后并发症和术后谵妄发生率增加相关。
    BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment affects nearly half of vascular surgery patients, but its association with postoperative outcomes remains poorly understood. This study explores the link between preoperative cognitive performance and postoperative complications, including postoperative delirium, in vascular surgery patients.
    METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on vascular surgery patients aged ≥65. Preoperative cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and postoperative complications were evaluated using the Comprehensive Complication Index. The association was analyzed through multivariable logistic regression.
    RESULTS: Among 110 patients (18.2 ​% female, mean age 73.8 ​± ​5.7 years), cognitive impairment was evident in 48.2 ​%. Of the participants, 29 (26.3 ​%) experienced postoperative complications, among which 11 (10 ​%) experienced postoperative delirium. The adjusted odds ratio for the association between cognitive performance and postoperative complications was 1.19 (95 ​% CI 1.02-1.38; p ​= ​0.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: Worse preoperative cognitive performance correlated with increased odds of postoperative complications and postoperative delirium in vascular surgery patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于诊断和治疗干预引起的医源性血管损伤(IVIs)是已知的,但很少见或报道不足。我们介绍了在资源有限的情况下进行血管外科修复的导管插入或手术后IVIs患者的四年发现。
    纳入了2018年6月至2022年9月之间的回顾性病例系列研究,其中35例确诊为IVIs并在我院接受手术治疗的患者。包括患者特征在内的IVIs数据,伤害的原因和类型,治疗,并对结局进行收集和分析.
    平均年龄为37.12±17.0岁,大多数患者(65.7%)为男性。在35个IVIs中,21是由经皮手术引起的,14例发生在术中并影响各种动脉和静脉。主要损伤血管是股动脉(20%),透析插管期间由不合格专家直接穿刺血管(42.9%)是主要原因。术中IVI累及下腔静脉3例,两个病人的主动脉,四髂外动脉,胫骨和pop动脉有四个,和颈内动脉合二为一。记录了以下类型的修复:有或没有动脉内膜切除术的血管直接缝合(71.4%),合成贴片放置(25.7%),结扎(8.6%),旁路或间置术(14.3%),和血栓栓塞切除术(5.7%)。32例(91.4%)患者血管修复成功,3例(8.6%)患者过期。7例(20%)患者出现并发症,其中浅表伤口感染是常见的并发症(11.6%),并采用适当的抗生素治疗。
    快速识别IVIs,以及未来治疗的适当分诊,可以提高患者的治疗效果。我们的数据显示,不合格的专家似乎对大多数IVIs负责。为此,我们强调由经过适当培训的合格专家进行血管手术的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED: Iatrogenic vascular injuries (IVIs) due to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions are known but rare or probably under-reported. We present our four-year findings on patients with IVIs after catheterization or surgery who underwent vascular surgical repairs in a resource-limited setting.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective case series study between Jun 2018 and Sep 2022 of 35 patients diagnosed with IVIs and treated surgically at our hospital was included. The data on IVIs including patient characteristics, causes and type of injury, treatment, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age was 37.12± 17.0 years, and most patients (65.7%) were male. Of the 35 IVIs, 21 were caused by percutaneous procedures, while 14 occurred intraoperatively and affected various arteries and veins. The main injured vessels were the femoral artery (20%) and direct blood vessel puncture made by non-qualified specialists (42.9%) during dialysis cannulation was the main cause. The intraoperative IVI affected the inferior vena cava in three patients, the aorta in two patients, the external iliac artery in four, the tibial and popliteal arteries in four, and the internal carotid artery in one. The following types of repairs were recorded: direct suture of the vessel with or without endarterectomy (71.4%), synthetic patch placement (25.7%), ligation (8.6%), bypass or interposition graft (14.3%), and thromboembolectomy (5.7%). Vascular repair was successful in 32 (91.4%) patients while three patients (8.6%) were expired. Complications occurred in 7 (20%) patients, of which superficial wound infections were the common complication (11.6%) and were treated with proper antibiotic therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Prompt identification of IVIs, as well as proper triage for future treatment, can enhance patient outcomes. Our data showed that non-qualified specialists seem to be responsible for the majority of IVIs. For that, we emphasize the importance of performing vascular procedures by a qualified specialist with adequate training.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们介绍了一例75岁的男性,其症状性穿透性主动脉溃疡位于左锁骨下动脉和左颈动脉之间的弓内曲线2区,使用单分支胸主动脉腔内修复术结合原位激光开窗术治疗。患者进行了一次成功的手术,没有神经系统损害,并在术后第二天出院。术后随访显示排除良好的穿透性主动脉溃疡。
    We present the case of a 75-year-old man with a symptomatic penetrating aortic ulcer located in zone 2 on the arch inner curve between the left subclavian artery and left carotid artery treated using a single branch thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with in situ laser fenestration. The patient underwent a successful procedure with no neurologic impairment and was discharged on the second postoperative day. The postoperative follow-up showed a well-excluded penetrating aortic ulcer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下肢丧失的人,尤其是血管异常的病因,同侧和对侧截肢都有很大的风险。此外,虽然没有很好的记录,人们认识到截肢发生率不仅受性别等社会人口统计学因素的影响,种族,社会经济地位,还受服务接入等系统因素影响。在肢体丧失康复领域解决这种差异的系统策略是使肢体丧失康复计划(LRP)与医学专家合作,心理健康专业人士,和肢体保存计划(LPP),以提供全面的肢体护理。虽然LPP存在于全国各地,此类计划的设计原则及其与LRP的伙伴关系作用尚未确立。使用社会生态模型纳入肢体护理多学科领域固有的分层利益相关者观点,这篇综述综合了最新的证据,专注于LPP的设计和实施原则,这些原则可以帮助决策者,医疗保健组织和失肢康复和肢体保护专业人员的发展,工具,并与LRP合作维持强大的LPP计划。
    People with lower limb loss, especially of dysvascular etiology, are at substantial risk for both ipsilateral and contralateral reamputation. Additionally, while not as well documented for reamputation, there is recognition that amputation incidence is influenced by not only sociodemographic factors such as sex, race, socioeconomic status, but also by system factors such as service access. A systems strategy to address this disparity within the field of limb-loss rehabilitation is for Limb-loss Rehabilitation Programs (LRP) to partner with medical specialists, mental health professionals, and Limb Preservation Programs (LPP) to provide comprehensive limb care. While LPPs exist around the nation, design principles for such programs and their partnership role with LRPs are not well established. Using a socioecological model to incorporate hierarchical stakeholder perspectives inherent in the multidisciplinary field of limb care, this review synthesizes the latest evidence to focus on LPP design and implementation principles that can help policymakers, healthcare organizations and limb-loss rehabilitation and limb-preservation professionals to develop, implement, and sustain robust LPP programs in partnership with LRPs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名66岁的男子在4年前在另一个机构进行了血管内主动脉置换手术后,主动脉瘤囊扩大;它没有任何内漏,但由于左肢闭塞而变得复杂,需要交叉股动脉旁路术.目前的计算机断层扫描显示近端颈部和右髂总动脉扩张。从内移植物右肢的远端发现了Ib型内漏,可能是继发于其周围动脉扩张;然后加压并引起近端着陆区附近主动脉扩张,并引起伴随的Ia型内漏。由于有破裂的风险,患者接受了手术。盆腔缺血是决策过程中的一个问题。患者接受了腔内移植物的切除和分叉的主动脉和股骨移植物的置换,效果良好。中线剖腹手术和腹腔夹闭方法可通过肾上固定和血管内动脉重建术切除内移植物。当血管内选择可能有风险且无效时,开放式修复为复杂的内漏提供了明确的解决方案。
    A 66-year-old man had an enlarging aortic aneurysm sac after an endovascular aortic replacement procedure that had been performed at another institution 4 years previously; it was without any endoleak but was complicated by the occlusion of the left limb, requiring cross-femoral bypass. Current computed tomography revealed dilatation of the proximal neck and the right common iliac artery. A type Ib endoleak was found from the distal end of the right limb of the endograft, possibly secondary to the dilatation of the artery around it; it then pressurized and caused the dilatation of the juxtarenal aorta around the proximal landing zone and induced a concomitant type Ia endoleak. The patient was operated on owing to the risk of rupture. Pelvic ischemia was a concern during decision-making. The patient underwent removal of the endograft and replacement of a bifurcated aortoiliac and femoral graft with good outcome. Midline laparotomy and a supraceliac clamping approach enable the removal of endografts with suprarenal fixation and revascularization of internal iliac arteries. Open repair offers a definitive solution for complicated endoleaks when endovascular options could be risky and ineffective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:表现出不良颈部解剖结构(HNA)的腹主动脉瘤(AAAs)与围手术期风险和死亡率增加相关。这些患者中的许多人不适合进行标准的血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR),并且是开放手术的高风险。我们介绍了在苏格兰首次植入新型适形主动脉支架的经验,该支架旨在克服HNA的一些挑战。
    方法:从2018年5月至2022年3月,连续24例未破裂的AAA表现为HNA(颈部长度<15mm,或角度>60°)用GORE排除器适形AAA内置假体(CLEVAR)(CEXC装置,W.L.GoreandAssociates,弗拉格斯塔夫,AZ,美国)在苏格兰血管中心。我们评估了CLEVAR在部署期间的临床结果和技术成功,主要入院和术后3个月和12个月临床随访以及CT血管造影。
    结果:24名患者(20名男性,平均年龄75.6)包括在内。近端密封区和CLEVAR展开的主要技术成功(无1/3型内漏,没有转换为开放式修复,在100%的患者中,AAA被排除在外,并且患者活着离开手术室)。在3个月和12个月的随访中,所有患者均存活且临床稳定。有5名患者需要再次干预;在3个月的随访中,一名患者(4.2%)出现需要移植肢体伸展的1b型内漏,1例患者发生右侧股动脉夹层,需要进行开放性修复,1例患者由于有发生1b型内漏的风险,需要延长右侧髂肢.在12个月的随访中,2例患者需要栓塞2型内漏,无1型或3型内漏.结论:院内和术后3个月和12个月的临床和血管造影结果证明了CLEVAR治疗HNA未破裂的AAA的安全性和有效性。需要进一步研究涉及更大的异质性样本量,以确定长期临床结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) demonstrating hostile neck anatomy (HNA) are associated with increased perioperative risk and mortality. A number of these patients are not suitable for standard endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and are high risk for open surgery. We present our experience with the first implantations in Scotland of a novel conformable aortic stent-graft designed to overcome some of the challenges of HNAs.
    METHODS: From May 2018 to March 2022, 24 consecutive patients with non-ruptured AAAs demonstrating HNAs (neck length < 15 mm, or angulation > 60°) were treated with GORE Excluder Conformable AAA endoprosthesis (CLEVAR) (CEXC Device, W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) at a Scottish vascular centre. We assessed clinical outcomes and technical success of CLEVAR during deployment, primary admission and the post-operative period at 3- and 12-month clinical follow-up alongside CT angiography.
    RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (20 males, mean age 75.6) were included. Primary technical success of proximal seal zones and CLEVAR deployment (no type 1/3 endoleaks, no conversion to open repair, AAA excluded and patient leaving theatre alive) was achieved in 100% of patients. All patients were alive and clinically stable at 3- and 12-month follow-up. There were five patients requiring re-intervention; at the 3-month follow-up, one patient (4.2%) developed a type 1b endoleak requiring graft limb extension, one patient developed a right common femoral artery dissection requiring open repair and one patient required a limb extension of the right iliac limb due to risk of developing a type 1b endoleak. At the 12-month follow-up, two patients required embolization of type 2 endoleaks and no patients demonstrated type 1 or type 3 endoleaks.Conclusions: In-hospital and post-operative 3- and 12-month clinical and angiographic outcomes demonstrate safety and efficacy with CLEVARs in treating unruptured AAAs with HNA. Further research involving larger heterogenous sample sizes is warranted to determine long-term clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    未经证实:穿透性主动脉溃疡(PAUs)是急性主动脉综合征中最罕见的亚组,胸腹(TA)位置并不常见。血管内手术被认为是一线治疗。定制的分支/有孔的内移植物已成功应用于这种疾病,但在紧急情况下无法使用。高风险患者可能需要现成的解决方案。描述了有症状的快速扩张的TA-PAU,没有远端密封区,并进行了紧急血管内修复。
    未经证实:一名81岁男性出现急性剧烈胸痛。检查显示了一个大的TA-PAU。由于疼痛难治,计算机断层扫描血管造影证实快速扩张,建议紧急修理。由于多种合并症和没有足够的远端密封区,提出了一种标签外血管内治疗。患者接受了两个主动脉支架(GOREcTAG)成功的腔内修复术,其中30%过大,模块之间重叠50-55mm,结合烟囱自扩张支架移植物(GOREVIABAHN),以夹层结构将腹腔干和肠系膜上动脉。术后过程顺利。在18个月的随访中发现没有内漏和专利桥接支架移植物,没有内脏损害。
    UNASSIGNED:胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)被认为是紧急PAU的第一治疗选择。然而,解剖要求限制了其在胸腹主动脉中的使用。已经描述了并行移植技术来克服TA动脉瘤中的这些解剖约束。描述了使用“三明治技术”成功排除标准TEVAR没有远端密封区的PAU。与分支装置或“章鱼”技术相比,优势是主动脉覆盖范围有限。当患者不能等待定制的装置并且与开放式或混合修复相关的发病率高得不可接受时,该解决方案在紧急情况下特别有用。现成的三明治技术是紧急治疗TA-PAU的潜在安全且持久的治疗选择。
    UNASSIGNED: Penetrating aortic ulcers (PAUs) are the rarest subset of acute aortic syndromes, and a thoraco-abdominal (TA) location is uncommon. Endovascular surgery is considered first line treatment. Custom made branched/fenestrated endografts have been successfully applied in this disease but are unavailable in the urgent setting. Off the shelf solutions may be required in high risk patients. The case of a symptomatic rapidly expanding TA-PAU without a distal seal zone that underwent urgent endovascular repair is described.
    UNASSIGNED: An 81 year old male presented with acute intense thoracic pain. Workup revealed a large TA-PAU. As pain was refractory and computed tomography angiography confirmed rapid expansion, urgent repair was proposed. Due to multiple comorbidities and absence of adequate distal seal zone, an off label endovascular treatment was proposed. The patient underwent successful endovascular repair with two aortic stent grafts (GORE cTAG) with 30% oversize and 50-55 mm overlap between modules, combined with chimney self expanding stent grafts (GORE VIABAHN) to the coeliac trunk and superior mesenteric artery in a sandwich configuration. The post-operative course was uneventful. Follow up at 18 months revealed no endoleaks and patent bridging stent grafts without visceral compromise.
    UNASSIGNED: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is considered the first treatment option for urgent PAU. However, anatomic requirements limit its use in the thoraco-abdominal aorta. Parallel graft techniques have been described to overcome these anatomic constraints in TA aneurysms. The use of a \"sandwich technique\" to successfully exclude a PAU without a distal sealing zone for standard TEVAR is described. The advantage was limited aortic coverage compared with a branched device or an \"octopus\" technique. This solution is particularly useful in urgent situations when patients cannot wait for a custom made device and the morbidity associated with open or hybrid repair is unacceptably high. An off the shelf sandwich technique is a potential safe and long lasting therapeutic option for the urgent treatment of TA-PAU.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管女性的年龄标准化心血管疾病发病率较低,患病率,死亡率高于男性,也有报告表明,患有心血管疾病的女性得到的护理较少,调查较少,并且在冠状动脉事件发生后预后较差。这项研究的目的是比较因外周动脉疾病(PAD)住院的男性和女性的特征,他们的心血管和肢体结果,和他们一年的死亡率。这项研究是一项前瞻性登记研究,收集了三级中心乔治-蓬皮杜欧洲医院(巴黎,法国)。患者需要有三个纳入标准之一:先前的下肢血运重建或由于动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病或PAD的血液动力学证据引起的任何下肢动脉闭塞。排除标准是由于其他原因导致下肢动脉闭塞的患者。所有患者在初次住院后随访至少12个月。在纳入的235名患者中,有61名女性(26%),年龄大于男性,中位年龄为75.6岁和68.3岁,分别。男性和女性的主要心血管危险因素和合并症相似,除了更多以前或现在的吸烟者[145(83.4%)与33(54.1%)]和更多的冠心病病史[42(24.1%)与7(11.5%)]男性。大多数患者[138例(58.8%)]有严重肢体缺血,97例(41.3%)有跛行,对性别没有区别。放电后,218例患者接受抗血栓治疗(93.2%),195个降脂药物(83.3%),185血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(78.9%),同样的性别之间。在1年,总死亡率,主要不良心血管事件,主要肢体不良事件与23例(13.2%)无差异,男性11人(6.3%)和32人(18.4%),和8(13.1%),3(4.9%),15(24.6%)女性,分别,尽管年龄不同。总死亡率,心血管结果,肢体血运重建或截肢在男性和女性之间没有差异,PAD住院后1年,尽管后者年龄较大,吸烟者较少,冠状动脉疾病较少。由于这个群体的规模很小,需要更大的研究和未来的研究来更好地了解PAD病理生理学和自然史中的性别特异性机制.
    Although women have lower age-standardized cardiovascular disease incidence, prevalence, and death-related rates than men, there are also reports indicating that women with cardiovascular disease receive less care, fewer investigations, and have poorer outcomes after a coronary event. The aims of this study were to compare the characteristics of men and women hospitalized for peripheral artery disease (PAD), their cardiovascular and limb outcomes, and their 1-year mortality. The study is a prospective registry collecting data about all consecutive patients hospitalized for PAD within the vascular department of the tertiary center Georges-Pompidou European Hospital (Paris, France). Patients were required to have one of three inclusion criteria: previous revascularization of the lower limb or any lower limb artery occlusion due to an atherosclerotic vascular disease or hemodynamic evidence of PAD. Exclusion criteria were patients with lower extremity arterial occlusion due to another cause. All patients were followed-up for at least 12 months after the initial hospitalization. Among the 235 patients included, there were 61 women (26%), older than men with a median age of 75.6 and 68.3 years, respectively. Main cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities were similar for men and women except more former or current smokers [145 (83.4%) vs. 33 (54.1%)] and more history of coronary heart disease [42 (24.1%) vs. 7 (11.5%)] in men. Most patients [138 (58.8%)] had critical limb ischemia and 97 (41.3%) had claudication, with no difference for sex. After discharge, 218 patients received an antithrombotic therapy (93.2%), 195 a lipid-lowering drug (83.3%), 185 an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker (78.9%), similarly between sex. At 1-year, overall mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, major adverse limb events did not differ with 23 (13.2%), 11 (6.3%) and 32 (18.4%) in men, and 8 (13.1%), 3 (4.9%), 15 (24.6%) in women, respectively, despite the difference in age. Overall mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, limb revascularization or amputation did not differ between men and women, 1-year after hospitalization for PAD although the latter were older, less smoker and had less coronary artery disease. Due to the small size of this cohort, larger studies and future research are needed to better understand sex-specific mechanisms in the pathophysiology and natural history of PAD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号