Vascular surgical procedure

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究揭示了起源的变化,number,和旋股外侧动脉(LCFA)的分支模式。本研究旨在记录这些变化及其潜在的临床适用性。解剖了16具经过防腐处理的成年人尸体的32个股骨三角形,以研究起源的变化,number,和LCFA的分枝模式。独立跟踪LCFA的主要分支,以了解分支模式的数值变化。在每种情况下还测量了LCFA的起点与腹股沟中点(MIP)之间的距离。LCFA最常见于股骨深部(PF),其次是股动脉(FA)和股动脉共同干(CFA)。在15(46.87%)肢体中观察到复制LCFA,在5例(31.25%)中,重复仅在右侧,在4例(25%)中,重复仅在左侧,在3例(18.75%)中,重复是双边的。LCFA重复的案件,显示出数值变化,下降模式是最常见的。LCFA1和LCFA2距腹股沟中点的平均距离分别为5.77±1.35cm和6.14±2.05cm。关于重复发生的详细信息对于外科医生来说非常重要,介入放射科医生,和其他医疗专业人员在股骨区域执行手术。了解LCFA分支模式的变化至关重要,因为外科医生在旁路移植术和血管重建手术中使用LCFA的下降分支。
    Studies reveal variations in the in the origin, number, and branching patterns of the lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA). The present study aimed to document such variations and their potential clinical applicability. Thirty-two femoral triangles of 16 embalmed adult human cadavers were dissected to investigate the variation in the origin, number, and branching patterns of LCFA. The main branches of the LCFA were tracked independently for numerical variations in branching pattern. The distance between the origin of LCFA and mid inguinal point (MIP) was also measured in each case. LCFA was most commonly arising from profunda femoris (PF), followed by femoral artery (FA) and common trunk of the femoral artery (CFA). Duplication LCFA was observed in 15 (46.87%) limbs, in 5 (31.25%) cases duplication was only on right side, in 4 (25%) cases duplication was only on left side and in 3 (18.75%), duplication was bilateral. Cases with duplication of LCFA, showed numerical variations with descending pattern being the most common. The average distance of LCFA1 and LCFA2 from mid-inguinal point was 5.77±1.35 cm and 6.14±2.05 cm respectively. Detailed information regarding the occurrence of duplication will be great importance for surgeons, interventional radiologists, and other medical professionals performing procedures in the femoral region. Knowledge of variation of branching pattern of LCFA is utmost important as surgeons use the descending branch of the LCFA in bypass grafting and vascular reconstruction surgeries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:认知障碍影响了近一半的血管手术患者,但其与术后结局的关系仍知之甚少.这项研究探讨了术前认知表现与术后并发症之间的联系,包括术后谵妄,血管手术患者。
    方法:对年龄≥65岁的血管外科患者进行前瞻性队列研究。使用蒙特利尔认知评估评估术前认知表现,术后并发症采用综合并发症指数进行评估。通过多变量logistic回归分析其相关性。
    结果:在110名患者中(18.2%为女性,平均年龄73.8​±5.7岁),48.2%的认知障碍明显。在参与者中,29人(26.3%)经历了术后并发症,其中11人(10%)出现术后谵妄。认知能力与术后并发症之间的校正比值比为1.19(95%CI1.02-1.38;p=0.02)。
    结论:血管外科患者术前认知表现较差与术后并发症和术后谵妄发生率增加相关。
    BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment affects nearly half of vascular surgery patients, but its association with postoperative outcomes remains poorly understood. This study explores the link between preoperative cognitive performance and postoperative complications, including postoperative delirium, in vascular surgery patients.
    METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on vascular surgery patients aged ≥65. Preoperative cognitive performance was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and postoperative complications were evaluated using the Comprehensive Complication Index. The association was analyzed through multivariable logistic regression.
    RESULTS: Among 110 patients (18.2 ​% female, mean age 73.8 ​± ​5.7 years), cognitive impairment was evident in 48.2 ​%. Of the participants, 29 (26.3 ​%) experienced postoperative complications, among which 11 (10 ​%) experienced postoperative delirium. The adjusted odds ratio for the association between cognitive performance and postoperative complications was 1.19 (95 ​% CI 1.02-1.38; p ​= ​0.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: Worse preoperative cognitive performance correlated with increased odds of postoperative complications and postoperative delirium in vascular surgery patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    由于诊断和治疗干预引起的医源性血管损伤(IVIs)是已知的,但很少见或报道不足。我们介绍了在资源有限的情况下进行血管外科修复的导管插入或手术后IVIs患者的四年发现。
    纳入了2018年6月至2022年9月之间的回顾性病例系列研究,其中35例确诊为IVIs并在我院接受手术治疗的患者。包括患者特征在内的IVIs数据,伤害的原因和类型,治疗,并对结局进行收集和分析.
    平均年龄为37.12±17.0岁,大多数患者(65.7%)为男性。在35个IVIs中,21是由经皮手术引起的,14例发生在术中并影响各种动脉和静脉。主要损伤血管是股动脉(20%),透析插管期间由不合格专家直接穿刺血管(42.9%)是主要原因。术中IVI累及下腔静脉3例,两个病人的主动脉,四髂外动脉,胫骨和pop动脉有四个,和颈内动脉合二为一。记录了以下类型的修复:有或没有动脉内膜切除术的血管直接缝合(71.4%),合成贴片放置(25.7%),结扎(8.6%),旁路或间置术(14.3%),和血栓栓塞切除术(5.7%)。32例(91.4%)患者血管修复成功,3例(8.6%)患者过期。7例(20%)患者出现并发症,其中浅表伤口感染是常见的并发症(11.6%),并采用适当的抗生素治疗。
    快速识别IVIs,以及未来治疗的适当分诊,可以提高患者的治疗效果。我们的数据显示,不合格的专家似乎对大多数IVIs负责。为此,我们强调由经过适当培训的合格专家进行血管手术的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED: Iatrogenic vascular injuries (IVIs) due to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions are known but rare or probably under-reported. We present our four-year findings on patients with IVIs after catheterization or surgery who underwent vascular surgical repairs in a resource-limited setting.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective case series study between Jun 2018 and Sep 2022 of 35 patients diagnosed with IVIs and treated surgically at our hospital was included. The data on IVIs including patient characteristics, causes and type of injury, treatment, and outcomes were collected and analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age was 37.12± 17.0 years, and most patients (65.7%) were male. Of the 35 IVIs, 21 were caused by percutaneous procedures, while 14 occurred intraoperatively and affected various arteries and veins. The main injured vessels were the femoral artery (20%) and direct blood vessel puncture made by non-qualified specialists (42.9%) during dialysis cannulation was the main cause. The intraoperative IVI affected the inferior vena cava in three patients, the aorta in two patients, the external iliac artery in four, the tibial and popliteal arteries in four, and the internal carotid artery in one. The following types of repairs were recorded: direct suture of the vessel with or without endarterectomy (71.4%), synthetic patch placement (25.7%), ligation (8.6%), bypass or interposition graft (14.3%), and thromboembolectomy (5.7%). Vascular repair was successful in 32 (91.4%) patients while three patients (8.6%) were expired. Complications occurred in 7 (20%) patients, of which superficial wound infections were the common complication (11.6%) and were treated with proper antibiotic therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Prompt identification of IVIs, as well as proper triage for future treatment, can enhance patient outcomes. Our data showed that non-qualified specialists seem to be responsible for the majority of IVIs. For that, we emphasize the importance of performing vascular procedures by a qualified specialist with adequate training.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    严重肢体缺血(CLI)的管理存在显着的变异性和均势。重症肢体缺血患者的最佳血管内治疗与最佳手术治疗(BEST-CLI)试验,由国家心脏资助,肺,血液研究所,是一个潜在的,开放标签,多中心,旨在比较治疗效果的多专业随机对照试验,功能结果,成本效益,2100名患有CLI的患者的生活质量。BEST-CLI正在招募那些被确定为开放性手术或血管内血运重建的候选人的患者,并且旨在全面,务实,和平衡。在全球超过130个站点进行注册,BEST-CLI正在接近终点线。虽然审判遇到了一些障碍,他们正在成功导航。该试验有望在该脆弱患者人群的管理中建立基于证据的护理标准。
    There is significant variability and equipoise in the management of critical limb ischemia (CLI). The Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) trial, funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, is a prospective, open label, multicenter, multispecialty randomized controlled trial designed to compare treatment efficacy, functional outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life for 2100 patients suffering from CLI. BEST-CLI is enrolling those patients who are determined to be candidates for open surgical or endovascular revascularization and is designed to be comprehensive, pragmatic, and balanced. Enrollment is occurring at >130 sites across the world, and BEST-CLI is nearing the finish line. Although the trial has encountered a number of obstacles, they are being successfully navigated. This trial promises to establish an evidence-based standard of care in the management of this population of vulnerable patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号